UCC-1 Filing for Security and Debt Collection Agreement Template - Debtor Name Issues
I'm working with a security and debt collection agreement template that my company uses for equipment financing deals. We've been having problems with UCC-1 filings getting rejected because the debtor names don't match exactly between our security agreement and what we're putting on the UCC-1 form. The template we use has spaces for multiple entity names and DBAs, but I'm not sure which version to use for the actual filing. Last week we had three filings rejected by the SOS office - one because we used 'ABC Corp' instead of 'ABC Corporation' and another because we included the DBA when apparently we shouldn't have. The third one got kicked back for some collateral description issue but that's a separate headache. Has anyone dealt with this kind of template standardization issue? I'm wondering if there's a way to cross-check our security agreement names against what we're actually filing before we submit to avoid these rejections. Our loan officers are getting frustrated having to redo paperwork and explain delays to borrowers.
39 comments
Join the conversation
Zainab Abdulrahman
This is super common with template-based security agreements. The key is making sure your UCC-1 debtor name matches EXACTLY what's on the debtor's organizational documents, not necessarily what's in your loan docs. DBAs should generally only be included if that's how the debtor actually operates and holds the collateral. What state are you filing in? Some have stricter name-matching requirements than others.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•We're filing in multiple states but most of our problems are with Texas and Florida filings. The borrowers always sign the security agreements with their 'common' business names but then the corporate records show something slightly different.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Texas SOS is particularly picky about exact name matches. They'll reject for missing commas, wrong abbreviations, all sorts of stuff. Florida's gotten better with their online system but still pretty strict.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
•Yeah Texas will reject for 'Corp' vs 'Corporation' every time. You really need to pull the Secretary of State records for each debtor before filing to get the exact legal name format.
0 coins
Yara Elias
Been there! We used to have the same issue with our security agreement templates creating filing problems. What helped us was creating a separate 'UCC Filing Checklist' that requires pulling the debtor's current SOS records before any UCC-1 gets submitted. Takes an extra 10 minutes but saves weeks of rejection headaches.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•That's smart. Do you have your loan officers do the SOS lookups or does someone else handle that part?
0 coins
Yara Elias
•We have our paralegal do all the name verification stuff. Loan officers were making too many mistakes trying to interpret the SOS records themselves.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
I actually found a tool recently that helps with this exact problem - Certana.ai has a document verification system where you can upload your security agreement and your draft UCC-1 as PDFs and it will flag any name mismatches or other inconsistencies between the documents. Saved me from filing three bad UCC-1s last month alone. You just upload both docs and it cross-checks everything automatically.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•That sounds useful. Does it work with different document formats or just specific templates?
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Works with any PDFs. I've used it with our standard security agreement template, borrower-provided corporate docs, even handwritten amendments that we scanned. Pretty flexible system.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
•How accurate is it with catching the subtle name differences? Like missing periods or abbreviated vs spelled out entity types?
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•It's been really good at catching those exact issues. Flagged when I had 'Inc.' in one doc and 'Incorporated' in another, stuff like that.
0 coins
Amina Diop
Your collateral description problems might be related too. If your security agreement template uses broad language like 'all equipment' but your UCC-1 tries to be more specific, that can create issues. Better to keep the UCC-1 collateral description consistent with what's actually in the security agreement.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Yeah we've been inconsistent with that. Security agreement says 'all equipment, inventory and accounts' but UCC-1 sometimes lists specific equipment types.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
•Stick with the broader language from your security agreement. Specific equipment descriptions on UCC-1s can cause problems if the equipment gets replaced or modified.
0 coins
Natasha Romanova
Question about your template - does it include language about continuation statements? With equipment financing deals you definitely want to make sure your security agreement addresses UCC continuation requirements since those loans often run longer than the 5-year UCC effectiveness period.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Good point. I think our template mentions it but I should double-check that language. We've had a couple deals where the UCC lapsed before loan payoff.
0 coins
Natasha Romanova
•Definitely check that. Template should specify who's responsible for filing continuations and include appropriate notices to the debtor about filing requirements.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•Also make sure your template covers amendment procedures in case the debtor changes names or adds collateral during the loan term.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
We standardized all our security agreement templates last year specifically because of UCC filing issues. Had our legal department create forms that use the exact same debtor name fields and collateral descriptions that work best for UCC-1 filings. Took some upfront work but eliminated most of our rejection problems.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•That's the way to do it. Prevention is way better than dealing with rejections after the fact.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•How did you handle existing deals that were using the old templates? Did you have to amend all those security agreements?
0 coins
Javier Gomez
•We only updated new deals going forward. For existing deals with problems we handled amendments on a case-by-case basis when issues came up.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
UGHHH the name matching thing is so frustrating! I spent 3 hours last week trying to figure out why our UCC-1 got rejected only to find out the debtor had 'LLC' in their articles but we filed with 'L.L.C.' with periods. Such a waste of time for something so stupid!!!
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
•I feel your pain. Had one rejected because we used '&' instead of 'and' in a partnership name. Ridiculous.
0 coins
Zainab Abdulrahman
•The good news is once you get in the habit of checking SOS records first, these problems mostly go away. Just becomes part of your routine.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
For debt collection agreements specifically, make sure your UCC-1 collateral description covers any assets that might be involved in collection activities. Sometimes the security agreement language is focused on the original loan collateral but doesn't adequately cover collection scenarios.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•Interesting point. Our template does have collection provisions but I'm not sure if the UCC collateral description aligns with those sections.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•Worth reviewing. Collection situations can get complicated if your UCC doesn't properly cover all the assets you might need to reach.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•Also consider whether you need separate UCC filings for guarantors if your debt collection agreement includes personal guarantees.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
I've been using Certana.ai's verification tool for a few months now and it's definitely helped catch document inconsistencies before filing. The name-checking feature is particularly useful for template-based agreements where you're plugging in different debtor information each time.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•Does it integrate with any particular document management systems or is it standalone?
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•It's standalone - you just upload PDFs directly to their system. Pretty straightforward to use.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
Make sure your security agreement template includes proper UCC search requirements too. You want language requiring the debtor to provide UCC search results showing no conflicting liens before you extend credit. Can save headaches down the road.
0 coins
Miguel Castro
•We do require searches but I'm not sure our template language is specific enough about what constitutes acceptable search results.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•Template should specify certified searches from the appropriate filing offices and give you clear grounds to reject the deal if there are conflicting liens.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•Also good to include language about ongoing search requirements if it's a line of credit or revolving facility.
0 coins
Malia Ponder
This is exactly why we moved to a two-step verification process for all our UCC filings. First, we pull the debtor's current Secretary of State records to get the exact legal name format. Then we run the security agreement and draft UCC-1 through a document comparison tool (we use Certana.ai like a few others mentioned) to catch any mismatches before filing. It's added maybe 20 minutes to our process but eliminated about 90% of our rejections. The key is making this verification step mandatory - can't skip it even when you're rushing to close a deal. Also worth noting that some states have started accepting minor variations better than others, but Texas and Florida are still super strict about exact matches.
0 coins
Ava Garcia
•That two-step process sounds really solid! Quick question - when you pull the SOS records, do you save copies in your loan files for documentation purposes, or just use them for the name verification? I'm wondering if auditors or examiners expect to see that backup documentation showing you verified the legal names before filing.
0 coins