< Back to UCC Document Community

Malik Johnson

UCC 1207 filing number lookup issues - debtor name verification problems

Having a nightmare with UCC 1207 related filing verification. We're trying to confirm debtor name consistency across multiple related filings and the state portal keeps giving us partial matches that don't align. Our lender is requesting complete documentation showing all UCC-1 and UCC-3 filings match exactly with the debtor entity name, but we're finding discrepancies in how the business name appears across different filing numbers. The continuation deadline is approaching fast and we need to make sure everything is properly cross-referenced before we submit the UCC-3. Has anyone dealt with similar debtor name verification issues when trying to trace filing histories? The inconsistencies are making it impossible to confirm which filings actually relate to our collateral schedule.

This is exactly why I always triple-check debtor names before any filing. Even tiny variations like 'LLC' vs 'L.L.C.' can create these lookup nightmares. What state are you filing in? Some portals are worse than others for name matching.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

We're dealing with multiple states actually, which makes it even more complicated. The same entity shows up differently in different state systems.

0 coins

Ravi Sharma

•

Multi-state filings are the worst. I've seen entities with 4 different name variations across different SOS systems.

0 coins

Freya Thomsen

•

ugh this happened to me last month!!! spent HOURS trying to figure out if our UCC-1 matched the continuation we needed to file. turns out there was a period missing in the business name that threw everything off

0 coins

Omar Zaki

•

Punctuation is a killer in these systems. I've learned to always check with and without periods, commas, and even spaces.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

That's probably part of our issue too. The original charter documents have slightly different formatting than what shows up in the UCC portal.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

You need to get all your documents in one place and compare them systematically. I recently discovered Certana.ai has a UCC document verification tool where you can upload your Charter and UCC-1 PDFs and it automatically cross-checks debtor names and filing numbers for consistency. Saved me from a major headache when I was trying to verify document alignment before a critical continuation deadline.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

That sounds like exactly what we need. How accurate is it with catching name variations?

0 coins

AstroAce

•

It caught discrepancies I completely missed manually. The tool flagged that our entity name had an extra comma in one document that would've caused filing problems.

0 coins

Chloe Martin

•

Does it work with UCC-3 amendments too? We have a complex chain of filings that need verification.

0 coins

Diego Rojas

•

The SOS portals are absolutely terrible for this kind of verification. Half the time the search function doesn't even find filings that definitely exist. I've had to call the filing office directly just to confirm basic information.

0 coins

YES! The phone calls are the worst part. Sitting on hold for an hour just to verify a filing number.

0 coins

Some states have better systems than others. But you're right that manual verification is often the only reliable way.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

We're trying to avoid the phone call route if possible, but it might come to that if we can't get the documents to align properly.

0 coins

Wait, are you sure you're looking at the right filing type? UCC 1207 isn't a standard form number I recognize. Are you referring to a specific state's numbering system or maybe a filing reference number?

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

It's the filing number assigned by the state when we submitted the original UCC-1. Each filing gets a unique number for tracking.

0 coins

Ah got it, the filing reference number. I was thinking you meant a form type. Those reference numbers can be tricky to track across amendments.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

For continuation filings, the debtor name has to match EXACTLY what's on the original UCC-1. Even if the business has changed its name legally, the UCC-3 continuation must reference the original debtor name from the initial filing. This is where a lot of people get tripped up.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

That's our concern exactly. We need to make sure we're using the exact name from the original filing, not what might be in current business records.

0 coins

StarStrider

•

This rule has caught me before. The business updated their legal name but I had to use the old name for the continuation to be valid.

0 coins

Zara Ahmed

•

Exactly. If there's been a name change, you typically need to file an amendment first to update the debtor name, then file the continuation.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

I had a similar mess with multiple filings that weren't lining up. Used Certana.ai's document checker and uploaded all my UCC docs at once. It created a report showing exactly which names didn't match and what needed to be corrected. Much faster than trying to compare everything manually.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

How long did the verification take? We're under a tight deadline here.

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

The upload and analysis was almost instant. The hard part was fixing the actual filing discrepancies it found, but at least I knew exactly what needed to be corrected.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

make sure you're not mixing up filing numbers with form numbers. UCC-1 is the form, but each state assigns its own filing number when you submit. sounds like you might be dealing with a state-specific reference number

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

Right, 1207 is definitely the filing number assigned by the state, not a form number. We're trying to trace all related filings under that same debtor entity.

0 coins

Nia Thompson

•

ok that makes more sense. those filing numbers can be a pain to track especially if there have been amendments or continuations filed

0 coins

Check if your state has an online verification system where you can pull up the original filing by number. Some states let you download the actual filed documents as PDFs which makes name comparison much easier.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

We've tried that but the portal only shows summary information, not the full filed documents. Very frustrating.

0 coins

That's unfortunately common. Some states charge fees for document copies too which adds to the hassle.

0 coins

I've found that calling the filing office directly sometimes gets you access to more detailed information than the online portal shows.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

The continuation deadline pressure is real. I've been there trying to verify everything last minute. One thing that helped me was creating a simple spreadsheet with all the entity names as they appear in each document, then highlighting any variations. Sometimes seeing it laid out visually makes the discrepancies more obvious.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

That's a good idea. We've been trying to keep track mentally but a spreadsheet would be much clearer.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Definitely recommend it. I caught several small differences that would've caused problems if I hadn't documented them properly.

0 coins

NeonNova

•

spreadsheets are lifesavers for this stuff. I always export everything to Excel before making any filings

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai to verify all my UCC documents aligned properly. The tool caught a debtor name mismatch between my UCC-1 and the amendment I was about to file. Would have been a disaster if that went through with the wrong name.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

These tools seem to be getting more popular. Glad we found out about them before making any costly mistakes.

0 coins

Yuki Tanaka

•

Yeah, manual verification is just too error-prone when you're dealing with multiple documents and tight deadlines. The automated checking gives you confidence everything is consistent.

0 coins

Carmen Diaz

•

Update: We ended up getting this sorted out. The verification tools helped us identify that the original UCC-1 had a slightly different business name format than what we were using for the continuation. Once we matched the exact formatting from the original filing, everything went through smoothly.

0 coins

Glad you got it resolved! Name formatting is such a common issue but it's often the last thing people check.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

Thanks for sharing the resolution. It's always helpful to know how these situations get resolved.

0 coins

AstroAce

•

This is exactly why document verification tools are so valuable. They catch these formatting issues that are easy to miss manually.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today