National UCC filing strategy - multi-state equipment collateral confusion
Our equipment leasing company just acquired a portfolio with assets scattered across 12 states and I'm drowning in the UCC filing requirements. The previous servicer apparently filed everything in Delaware (where they were incorporated) but our legal team is saying we need state-by-state filings since these are tangible assets. Some of the UCC-1s are coming up for continuation in the next 8 months and I'm not even sure which state laws apply to each piece of equipment. Has anyone dealt with a national UCC filing situation like this? The collateral includes everything from manufacturing equipment in Ohio to food service equipment in Texas. I'm getting conflicting advice about whether we can do a blanket national approach or if we truly need individual state filings for each asset location.
35 comments
Join the conversation
Carter Holmes
Oh wow, this is exactly the kind of mess that keeps me up at night. You're right to be concerned - the location of tangible personal property generally determines the filing jurisdiction for UCC-1 purposes. Delaware incorporation doesn't override the physical location rules for equipment. You'll likely need state-specific filings in each jurisdiction where the collateral is located.
0 coins
Sophia Long
•This is correct. Section 9-301 of the UCC governs filing location and for goods/equipment it's typically where the collateral is physically located, not where the debtor is incorporated.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•That's what I was afraid of. So basically I need to research the filing requirements for all 12 states? This is going to be a nightmare with the continuation deadlines coming up.
0 coins
Angelica Smith
Been there with a similar multi-state portfolio acquisition. The key is getting organized fast. Create a spreadsheet tracking: 1) Asset location by state, 2) Current UCC filing status, 3) Continuation deadlines, 4) State-specific requirements. Some states have quirky rules about equipment descriptions that could trip you up.
0 coins
Logan Greenburg
•YES on the state-specific quirks! California has different collateral description requirements than most states. And don't get me started on Louisiana's civil law system...
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•I'm starting to realize this is way more complex than just filing continuations. Some of these original UCC-1s might be completely invalid if they were filed in the wrong jurisdiction.
0 coins
Carter Holmes
•Exactly - you might need to file new UCC-1s in the correct states rather than just continuations. Better to be safe than find out your security interest was never properly perfected.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
I dealt with something similar last year when we took over a defaulted equipment portfolio. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document verification tool - you can upload your existing UCC filings and it cross-checks everything for consistency issues, debtor name mismatches, and filing requirements. It caught several critical problems in our Delaware filings that would have voided our security interests.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Interesting, I hadn't heard of that tool. How does it work exactly? I'm dealing with probably 200+ individual pieces of equipment across these states.
0 coins
Charlotte Jones
•Super easy - just upload PDFs of your current UCC documents and it automatically flags inconsistencies. For your situation, it would help identify which filings might be problematic before you spend time and money on continuations that might not be valid anyway.
0 coins
Lucas Bey
•That actually sounds really helpful for this kind of due diligence mess. Better to know now if there are problems rather than discover them during a workout situation.
0 coins
Harper Thompson
ugh why does every state have to have different rules?? I'm dealing with something similar but only 3 states and it's still making me crazy. The forms are different, the fees are different, some states want original signatures vs electronic...
0 coins
Caleb Stark
•I feel your pain! And some states still don't have decent online filing systems. Looking at you, Montana.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•At least you only have 3 states! I'm looking at 12 different fee structures, filing procedures, and continuation requirements. This is going to cost a fortune.
0 coins
Sophia Long
For a portfolio this size, you really need to audit the entire filing structure before doing anything. Start with determining the correct filing jurisdiction for each asset, then check if existing UCC-1s are valid in those jurisdictions. Many multi-state acquisitions have filing gaps that create perfection problems.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•That's exactly what I'm worried about. How do I even begin to audit 200+ assets across 12 states efficiently?
0 coins
Jade O'Malley
•You need a systematic approach. Group by state first, then by asset type within each state. Some states allow broader collateral descriptions that might cover multiple assets in one filing.
0 coins
Hunter Edmunds
•Be careful with broad descriptions though - some states are picky about specificity for equipment filings. Better to be over-detailed than have a filing rejected.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
This reminds me of the nightmare we had with a food service equipment portfolio in 2023. Turned out half the UCC filings were in the wrong states and we had to do emergency re-filings. Cost us about $15k in rush fees plus attorney time. Learn from our mistake - get this sorted out before any continuation deadline pressure.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Oh no, that's exactly what I'm trying to avoid. What was your approach to fixing it? Did you file new UCC-1s or were you able to salvage some of the existing filings?
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•We had to start over with new UCC-1s in the correct states. The Delaware filings were basically worthless for tangible property located elsewhere. Expensive lesson.
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
Have you considered whether any of this equipment might qualify as fixtures? That adds another layer of complexity since fixture filings have different requirements and might need to be filed in real estate records rather than UCC records.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Oh great, another complication I hadn't thought of. Some of the manufacturing equipment is probably bolted down permanently. How do I determine fixture status?
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•It depends on state law but generally if equipment is permanently attached to real property and integral to its use, it might be a fixture. You'll need fixture filings in the real estate records for those.
0 coins
Sophia Long
•Fixture determination is very fact-specific and state law dependent. For equipment this valuable, you might want fixture filings as a protective measure even if you're not sure.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
Whatever you do, don't wait too long to start this process. I've seen lenders lose their security interests because they missed continuation deadlines while trying to figure out the filing mess. Better to file defensively in multiple jurisdictions if you're unsure.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Good point about the timing pressure. Some of these continuations are due in 6 months and I still don't even have a complete asset inventory with locations.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
•6 months sounds like a lot but it goes fast when you're dealing with this many jurisdictions. Start with the largest value assets and work your way down.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
I used Certana.ai for a similar multi-state filing audit and it was a lifesaver. Upload your existing UCC documents and it flags all the potential issues - wrong jurisdictions, debtor name inconsistencies, description problems. Much faster than trying to manually review everything.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•I keep hearing about this tool. Does it actually help with the jurisdictional analysis or just document consistency?
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•It does both - checks document consistency and helps identify filing requirement issues. For your situation it would at least give you a clear picture of what you're dealing with before you start the state-by-state analysis.
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
This is why I stick to single-state deals lol. But seriously, you might want to bring in a UCC specialist attorney for a portfolio this complex. The cost of getting it wrong could be massive if you lose your security interests.
0 coins
Mia Alvarez
•Yeah, I'm starting to think legal counsel is necessary here. The potential exposure if we mess this up is probably in the millions.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•Definitely worth the attorney fees for this size portfolio. They can also help prioritize which filings are most critical based on asset values and default risk.
0 coins
Max Knight
•A good UCC attorney will also know the state-specific quirks that could trip you up. Each state has its own interpretation of the model UCC provisions.
0 coins