How to perfect a security interest UCC - missing steps causing lien problems
I'm dealing with what seems like a straightforward equipment financing situation but I think I missed something critical in perfecting the security interest. Filed the UCC-1 about 8 months ago for industrial machinery (laser cutting equipment, $180k value) but now the borrower is claiming our lien isn't properly perfected and they want to refinance with another lender. The original filing shows accepted status in our state portal, debtor name matches the LLC exactly as registered, and we described the collateral as 'industrial manufacturing equipment including laser cutting machinery.' But their new attorney is saying something about our perfection being incomplete? What am I missing here? I thought filing the UCC-1 with correct debtor name and collateral description was enough to perfect the security interest. Are there additional steps required that I'm not seeing? This is a pretty standard equipment loan so I'm confused why there would be perfection issues.
38 comments
Join the conversation
Yuki Yamamoto
The filing itself looks fine from what you described, but perfection can have multiple layers depending on the collateral type. For equipment that's permanently attached to real estate, you might need a fixture filing instead of or in addition to the regular UCC-1. Also, if any of that machinery was purchased with proceeds from the loan, you need to make sure your security agreement properly covers after-acquired property and proceeds. What does your security agreement say about the collateral description?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•The security agreement describes it as 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired.' The laser equipment is bolted to the concrete floor but it's not permanently integrated into the building structure - it can be moved if needed.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•That broader description in your security agreement is good. Since it's moveable equipment, regular UCC filing should be sufficient. The issue might be timing or maybe there's a gap between your security agreement date and UCC filing date?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
Wait, you said the filing was 8 months ago - what was the exact date of your security agreement and when did you fund the loan? There's a critical timing issue with perfection that could be the problem here. If there was any gap between when you gave value and when you filed, another creditor could have jumped in during that window.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Loan funded March 15th, security agreement signed March 12th, but UCC-1 wasn't filed until March 22nd. Is that 7-day gap a problem?
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•That's likely your issue right there. You have a 7-day window from the gap between funding and filing where you weren't perfected. Any creditor who filed during March 15-22 would have priority over you, even if you filed first overall.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Actually, that's not necessarily true. The UCC has a 20-day relation-back rule for purchase money security interests. If this was a PMSI for the equipment purchase, the filing within 20 days of the debtor receiving the collateral would relate back and give you priority.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
Before you panic, let me ask - was this loan specifically to purchase that laser equipment, or was it a general business loan secured by existing equipment? If it was a purchase money security interest (PMSI), you have different perfection rules and timing requirements that might actually protect you here.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Yes, the entire loan was specifically for purchasing that laser cutting equipment. The funds went directly to the equipment vendor.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•Perfect! That's a PMSI situation. As long as you filed within 20 days of the debtor taking possession of the equipment, your security interest should have priority over other creditors, even if they filed before you. When did the debtor actually receive the equipment?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Equipment was delivered and installed March 18th, so we filed 4 days after delivery. That should be within the 20-day window.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
I ran into a similar issue last year with equipment financing. The problem wasn't the UCC filing itself but document consistency. I had the debtor name slightly different between my security agreement, UCC-1, and the borrower's corporate registration. Even small variations can create perfection gaps that sharp attorneys will exploit. I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool after that nightmare. You upload your security agreement and UCC-1 as PDFs and it instantly cross-checks all the critical details - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, dates. Would have caught my name mismatch immediately instead of discovering it during a refinance dispute.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•That's interesting about the name variations. I thought I was careful but maybe there's something I missed. How detailed does that verification get?
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
•It's pretty thorough - compares exact spelling, punctuation, entity types between documents. Also flags potential issues with collateral descriptions and highlights any timing gaps. Saved me from another perfection disaster.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•I've heard good things about that tool. Better than manually comparing documents line by line, which is how I've been doing it and obviously missing things.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
Something doesn't add up here. If your UCC-1 shows accepted status and you have a proper PMSI filing timeline, their attorney should know your lien is valid. This sounds like they're fishing for technical defects to clear the way for their new financing. Have you actually seen their legal opinion or are you just hearing this secondhand?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•It's secondhand from the borrower so far. They said their new lender's attorney found 'perfection issues' but haven't provided specifics yet.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•Exactly what I suspected. They're probably hoping you'll panic and agree to a subordination or release without forcing them to prove their claim. Don't do anything until you see their actual legal analysis.
0 coins
Mei Liu
This is why I always double-check my filings immediately after submission. The state portal might show 'accepted' but there could still be issues with the indexing or searchability that affect perfection. Have you done a UCC search on your debtor recently to confirm your filing appears correctly?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•I haven't done a search since the original filing. Should I be checking that regularly?
0 coins
Mei Liu
•I do quarterly searches on all my UCC filings, especially for larger loans. Sometimes filings get corrupted in the system or the debtor name indexing gets messed up, which could affect your perfection status.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•That's a good practice. I've seen filings that were 'accepted' but didn't show up in searches due to system glitches. Usually gets fixed but you want to catch it early.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
UGH this is exactly the kind of BS that makes me hate dealing with UCC filings! You do everything right, follow all the rules, and then some attorney comes along claiming there are 'perfection issues' without even specifying what they think is wrong. The system is designed to create these ambiguities so lawyers can generate billable hours arguing about technical compliance.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
•I hear you on the frustration but in this case it sounds like the OP actually has a solid PMSI filing that should hold up. The attorney is probably just trying to create doubt.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
•Maybe, but I've been burned too many times by 'technical defects' that nobody could have predicted. The UCC system needs a complete overhaul.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
Quick question - did you file in the correct state? For equipment that moves around, sometimes there's confusion about where to file. LLC formation state vs. equipment location vs. debtor's principal place of business. That could be their angle.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Filed in the state where the LLC was formed, which is also where their business operates and where the equipment is located. Pretty straightforward on that front.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•Good, that eliminates the most common filing location mistakes. Sounds like you covered the basics correctly.
0 coins
NeonNova
I'm curious about the collateral description issue. You said you described it as 'industrial manufacturing equipment including laser cutting machinery' but your security agreement says 'all equipment, machinery, and fixtures now owned or hereafter acquired.' The UCC-1 description should be broader to match your security agreement. Specific equipment descriptions can create problems if the debtor acquires additional equipment.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Hmm, I was told to be specific about the collateral on the UCC-1 to avoid over-broad descriptions. Are you saying I should have used the same language as the security agreement?
0 coins
NeonNova
•Not necessarily the exact same language, but the UCC-1 description shouldn't be narrower than your security agreement. If your security agreement covers 'all equipment' but your UCC-1 only mentions specific laser equipment, you might not be perfected in other equipment.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•That's a good point about description scope. For a PMSI though, you typically want to be specific about the purchase money collateral to get PMSI priority. The broader description can create complications with purchase money status.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
Have you considered that this might not be about your perfection at all? If the borrower wants to refinance, they might be looking for any excuse to pressure you into accepting a payoff below the full balance. 'Perfection issues' sounds scarier than 'we want to pay you off early.' What's your current loan balance vs. equipment value?
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Current balance is about $145k and the equipment is probably worth $160-170k used. So there's decent equity for a refinance.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•Right, so they have plenty of equity to pay you off in full. This is definitely about them trying to create leverage in the payoff negotiation. Don't let them bluff you into a discount.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
One more thing to check - make sure your continuation filing deadline hasn't passed. UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years, and if you're getting close to that deadline without filing a continuation, that could be what they're calling a 'perfection issue.' Though at 8 months out, you should have plenty of time.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Yeah, 8 months ago so still have over 4 years before I need to worry about continuation. But good reminder to calendar that deadline.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•I actually had this happen - used Certana.ai to verify all my filing dates and it reminded me I had a continuation due in 6 months that I completely forgot about. Could have been a disaster if I missed it.
0 coins