UCC attachment perfection timing question - security interest valid?
Hi everyone, I'm dealing with a tricky situation regarding UCC attachment perfection and could really use some guidance. We extended a $450,000 credit line to a manufacturing company back in October, and I'm second-guessing whether we properly perfected our security interest in their equipment. Here's what happened: The loan agreement was signed on October 15th, but we didn't file our UCC-1 until November 3rd due to some back-and-forth on the collateral description. The debtor took possession of additional machinery worth about $180,000 on October 28th - right in that gap period. My concern is whether our security interest attached properly to that new equipment, given the timing. The original security agreement broadly covers 'all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired' but I'm worried about the perfection gap. The debtor's name on our UCC-1 matches their articles of incorporation exactly (we triple-checked that), and we filed in the correct state. Has anyone dealt with similar attachment perfection timing issues? I know attachment can occur before perfection, but I want to make sure we didn't miss anything critical that could affect our priority position. Any insights would be really helpful.
38 comments


Kayla Morgan
The timing you described should be fine for attachment purposes. As long as your security agreement properly covers 'equipment hereafter acquired' and the debtor had rights in the collateral when they took possession on October 28th, attachment occurred then - even though you didn't perfect until November 3rd. The key is that both value was given (your credit line) and the debtor had rights in the equipment.
0 coins
James Maki
•Wait, but what about that gap period? Couldn't another creditor have jumped in and perfected first between October 28th and November 3rd?
0 coins
Kayla Morgan
•That's exactly why the timing matters for priority, not attachment. Attachment happened when the debtor got the equipment, but priority is determined by perfection timing. Anyone who perfected during that gap could potentially have priority.
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
I had a similar issue last year with some construction equipment financing. The attachment part sounds solid based on what you described, but you're right to be concerned about that perfection gap. Did you run a UCC search during that period to see if any other liens were filed?
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•We didn't run a search during the gap - honestly didn't think about it at the time. Should I run one now to see what might have been filed in that window?
0 coins
Jasmine Hancock
•Definitely worth checking. Even if something was filed, it doesn't automatically mean you lose priority - depends on what type of financing and whether they properly perfected.
0 coins
Cole Roush
•This is making me nervous about my own filings. How long is too long between attachment and perfection?
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
I've been using Certana.ai's document verification tool for situations like this - you can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 to check for any inconsistencies in collateral descriptions or debtor names that might affect perfection. It caught a potential issue with my equipment financing last month where the debtor name format was slightly different between documents.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•That sounds useful. Did it help identify anything your manual review missed?
0 coins
Scarlett Forster
•Yeah, it flagged that our security agreement used 'ABC Manufacturing LLC' but the UCC-1 had 'ABC Manufacturing, LLC' with a comma. Small difference but could potentially cause problems down the line.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
Just to clarify the basics here - attachment requires three things: value given, debtor rights in collateral, and authenticated security agreement. Perfection is separate and usually happens through UCC filing. Your attachment likely occurred when the debtor took possession of that October 28th equipment, assuming your security agreement was already signed and the credit line established.
0 coins
Sayid Hassan
•So attachment and perfection are totally separate things? I thought they had to happen together.
0 coins
Arnav Bengali
•No, they're distinct concepts. Attachment creates the security interest, perfection gives you priority over other creditors. You can have attachment without perfection, but you need both for maximum protection.
0 coins
Rachel Tao
•This is why I always file UCC-1s BEFORE closing - eliminates any gap period worries.
0 coins
Derek Olson
UGH this filing system drives me crazy! Why can't it be more straightforward? I had a UCC-1 rejected three times last month because of tiny formatting issues, then had to worry about this exact same timing problem.
0 coins
Danielle Mays
•I feel your pain. The rejection notices are usually so vague too.
0 coins
Derek Olson
•Right? And then you're stuck wondering if your security interest is even valid while you're fixing their picky requirements.
0 coins
Roger Romero
Based on what you've described, I think you're probably fine. The 'hereafter acquired' language in your security agreement should cover that October 28th equipment. The real question is priority - but unless there's evidence of competing liens filed during your gap period, you should be in good shape.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•That's reassuring. I'll definitely run that UCC search to check for any competing filings in that timeframe.
0 coins
Anna Kerber
•Good plan. Also make sure your collateral description is broad enough to clearly cover that specific equipment.
0 coins
Niko Ramsey
I've seen this come up in loan workouts before. The attachment timing usually isn't the issue - it's whether anyone else perfected during the gap. Even if they did, you might still have priority depending on the type of transaction and when purchase money security interests were perfected.
0 coins
Cole Roush
•What's a purchase money security interest? Is that different from regular equipment financing?
0 coins
Niko Ramsey
•PMSI is when the creditor finances the debtor's acquisition of specific collateral. It can get special priority treatment if perfected within 20 days of the debtor taking possession.
0 coins
Seraphina Delan
•20 days? I thought it was 30 days for equipment.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
Have you considered using something like Certana.ai to double-check your documentation? I started using their UCC verification tool after a close call with a debtor name mismatch. You just upload your security agreement and UCC-1, and it flags any potential inconsistencies that could affect your perfection.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•Someone else mentioned that tool earlier. Might be worth trying to make sure everything aligns properly.
0 coins
Jabari-Jo
•It's pretty straightforward - saved me from a potential disaster when it caught that our collateral description was too narrow compared to what we thought we were securing.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
Quick question - when you say the debtor took possession on October 28th, was this equipment they purchased or leased? Because if it's leased equipment, you might have different attachment issues to consider.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•It was purchased equipment - they bought it from a dealer with our financing. Does that change anything?
0 coins
Kristin Frank
•Actually that might give you PMSI rights if you were the one financing the purchase. Did your loan proceeds go directly to pay the equipment dealer?
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•Yes, we paid the dealer directly. So that would be a purchase money security interest?
0 coins
Micah Trail
OK so if this was PMSI financing and you perfected within 20 days of the debtor taking possession, you'd have super-priority over other creditors even if they filed first. October 28th to November 3rd is only 6 days, so you should be golden.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•That's a huge relief! I didn't realize the PMSI timing rules would apply here.
0 coins
Micah Trail
•Yeah, PMSI gives you priority over earlier-filed general liens on the same collateral. Pretty powerful protection when done right.
0 coins
Nia Watson
•This thread has been super educational. I need to review all my equipment financing to see what qualifies as PMSI.
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
Sounds like you actually have a stronger position than you initially thought. The combination of proper attachment through your 'hereafter acquired' language plus PMSI protection for that specific equipment should give you solid priority. Just make sure your UCC-1 filing was accurate and complete.
0 coins
Saleem Vaziri
•Thanks everyone for the input. I feel much better about our position now. Going to run that UCC search and maybe try the Certana verification tool just to be thorough.
0 coins
Katherine Shultz
•Smart approach. Better to double-check everything than discover problems later during a workout or bankruptcy.
0 coins