< Back to UCC Document Community

Diego Vargas

UCC Article 9 attachment timing - when does security interest actually attach?

I'm dealing with a complex equipment financing situation and need clarity on UCC Article 9 attachment requirements. We have a borrower who signed our security agreement last month covering all manufacturing equipment, but the loan funds won't be disbursed until next week when they close on their facility purchase. The equipment is already on-site and operational. My question is about the exact moment of attachment under Article 9 - does it happen when they sign the security agreement, when we disburse the loan proceeds, or when they actually acquire rights in the collateral? I've seen conflicting interpretations and our UCC-1 filing is ready to go, but I want to make sure I understand the attachment timeline correctly before we proceed. The borrower has about $2.8M in equipment that needs to be properly secured, and I can't afford to miss the attachment window. Anyone dealt with similar timing issues where the security agreement, value, and debtor rights don't all align on the same date?

NeonNinja

•

The three-prong test for attachment is pretty straightforward - you need all three elements: (1) value given by secured party, (2) debtor has rights in collateral, and (3) security agreement that describes the collateral. Attachment doesn't happen until ALL three are satisfied. In your case, if the borrower already has rights in the equipment and you have a signed security agreement, attachment will occur when you disburse the loan funds (value). The timing matters for priority purposes, so make sure your UCC-1 is filed before attachment or immediately after.

0 coins

This is exactly right. I see this confusion all the time with equipment loans. The borrower signing the agreement isn't enough - you have to actually give value first. Once you disburse those funds, attachment is automatic if the other two prongs are met.

0 coins

Sean Murphy

•

Wait, so if they already own the equipment and signed the agreement, but we haven't funded yet, there's no security interest? That seems risky if something happens to the borrower before closing.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Correct - no attachment until value is given. That's why most lenders file their UCC-1 before closing to establish priority from the filing date, even though attachment happens later.

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

I had a similar situation last year with a manufacturing client. The key thing to remember is that attachment and perfection are separate concepts. You can file your UCC-1 before attachment occurs - this is actually recommended practice. Once you disburse the loan, attachment happens automatically and your security interest becomes perfected as of the filing date. Don't wait to file until after you fund the loan.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

That makes sense. So I should go ahead and file the UCC-1 now, then when we disburse next week, the security interest attaches and becomes perfected retroactively to the filing date?

0 coins

Zara Khan

•

Exactly. File now, fund later, and your priority date is the filing date. Just make sure your collateral description in the UCC-1 matches what's in your security agreement.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

You mentioned the borrower already has the equipment operational - make sure they actually have clear title or rights in it. I've seen deals where the borrower thought they owned equipment that was still subject to a lease or prior lien. You can't get a security interest in collateral the debtor doesn't have rights in, even with a perfect security agreement and funding.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Good point. We did a UCC search and lien investigation as part of due diligence. The equipment is owned free and clear, purchased with cash from their previous business sale.

0 coins

Nia Davis

•

Smart to verify ownership first. I've seen too many lenders skip this step and end up with worthless security interests because the borrower didn't actually own what they pledged.

0 coins

For a $2.8M equipment portfolio, you might want to consider using a document verification tool before filing. I recently started using Certana.ai's UCC checker - you can upload your security agreement and UCC-1 draft as PDFs and it instantly verifies that the debtor names, collateral descriptions, and other critical details match exactly. Caught a debtor name discrepancy in mine that would have caused major issues. Really helpful for avoiding those filing rejections that can mess up your priority date.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Interesting, I hadn't heard of that tool. How does it work exactly? We're always paranoid about typos in debtor names causing problems.

0 coins

You just upload your documents as PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically. Takes about 30 seconds and highlights any inconsistencies between your security agreement and UCC-1. Definitely worth it for high-value deals like yours.

0 coins

QuantumQueen

•

That sounds useful. Name mismatches are one of the most common reasons for filing rejections, and catching them before filing saves a lot of headaches.

0 coins

Aisha Rahman

•

Make sure you understand the difference between attachment and enforceability too. Under 9-203, attachment requires the three-prong test, but enforceability requires the security agreement to be authenticated (signed) or the collateral to be in your possession. Since you have a signed agreement, you're good on both fronts once you give value.

0 coins

Ethan Wilson

•

Good distinction. A lot of people confuse attachment with enforceability, but they're related but separate requirements under Article 9.

0 coins

Yuki Sato

•

Right, and possession works for some collateral types but obviously not practical for heavy manufacturing equipment.

0 coins

Carmen Flores

•

One more thing to consider - if there's any chance the borrower might file bankruptcy before you fund the loan, you could have preference issues. A security interest that attaches within 90 days of bankruptcy can be challenged as a preferential transfer. Not saying don't do the deal, just something to keep in mind for your risk assessment.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

The borrower seems financially stable and we've done extensive due diligence, but I'll flag this for our credit committee. Thanks for the heads up.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

The preference risk is real but manageable if you're giving new value and taking security contemporaneously. The bigger risk is usually delay between agreement and funding.

0 coins

Andre Dubois

•

Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and the attachment timing question comes up constantly. File your UCC-1 now while you're thinking about it. The worst thing that happens is you file and the deal falls through - you can always file a termination later. But if you wait and something goes wrong, you lose your priority position.

0 coins

CyberSamurai

•

Agreed. Better to over-file than under-file when it comes to UCC work. Terminations are cheap and easy.

0 coins

This is the practical approach. I always tell clients to file early and ask questions later.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Quick question - you mentioned the equipment is 'on-site and operational' - make sure it's not fixtures that need a fixture filing. Manufacturing equipment can sometimes be considered fixtures if it's permanently attached to the real estate. Might need to file in the real estate records too.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Good catch. Most of it is mobile equipment, but there are some permanently installed machines. I'll need to review which ones might qualify as fixtures.

0 coins

Luca Ferrari

•

Fixture filings are a whole different animal. You'll need to file in the real estate records where the property is located, not just the central filing office.

0 coins

Jamal Carter

•

Exactly. And the debtor name requirements can be different for fixture filings versus regular UCC-1s. Make sure you get the real estate record name exactly right.

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

Just went through something similar with a $3.2M packaging equipment deal. Filed UCC-1 two weeks before funding, and attachment happened smoothly when we wired the money. The key is making sure your security agreement has clear language about after-acquired property if they're planning to add more equipment later.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Our security agreement does include after-acquired property language for future equipment purchases. Did you run into any issues with the filing timing?

0 coins

Mei Liu

•

No issues at all. Filed early, funded on schedule, and everything attached perfectly. Used one of those document verification tools someone mentioned earlier and it caught a small formatting error in our collateral description.

0 coins

This thread is really helpful. I'm dealing with a similar attachment timing issue on a smaller deal. The three-prong test explanation clarified a lot for me. Going to file our UCC-1 today instead of waiting until closing next month.

0 coins

NeonNinja

•

Smart move. Early filing is almost always the right call for priority protection.

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

•

Same here. I was waiting to file until we had final loan documents, but this convinced me to file the UCC-1 now with our draft security agreement.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

One last consideration - make sure your loan agreement coordinates with the attachment timing. Some loan agreements have conditions precedent that could delay funding, which would delay attachment. Review the closing conditions to make sure there's nothing that could create a gap between when you expect to fund and when you actually can fund.

0 coins

Diego Vargas

•

Our loan agreement is pretty straightforward with standard conditions. The only major condition is the real estate closing, which is scheduled for the same day as our funding.

0 coins

AstroExplorer

•

Sounds like you're well-prepared. Just make sure both closings happen simultaneously or in the right order for your attachment timing.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today