Colorado UCC search showing weird results - am I missing something?
Been trying to run a Colorado UCC search on our borrower before we file our UCC-1 and getting some confusing results. The debtor name on their articles of incorporation is 'Mountain Peak Equipment Leasing LLC' but when I search that exact name in the Colorado SOS database, I'm getting partial matches for similar companies but not the exact entity. However, when I search just 'Mountain Peak Equipment' without the LLC part, it shows up fine. This seems backwards from what I expected - shouldn't the full legal name be the primary search result? We're about to file a $850K equipment financing UCC-1 and I'm paranoid about getting the debtor name wrong. Has anyone else run into Colorado's search function acting wonky like this? I've done UCC searches in other states and never had this issue where the complete legal name gives fewer results than a partial name.
30 comments
Join the conversation
Kiara Fisherman
Colorado's UCC search has always been a bit quirky with entity suffixes. The search algorithm treats LLC, Inc, Corp etc as separate search terms rather than part of the core business name. So when you search the full name with LLC it's looking for records that contain ALL those terms, but when you search without LLC it's doing a broader match on just the business name portion. This is actually pretty common - I always do my Colorado searches both ways just to be thorough.
0 coins
Liam Cortez
•Wait that doesn't make sense though. If the legal name includes LLC then that should be the exact match the system returns first, right? Why would a partial search give better results than the complete legal name?
0 coins
Kiara Fisherman
•It's counterintuitive but that's how Colorado's database works. Think of it like this - the search treats each word as a filter. More words = more filters = potentially fewer results. I learned this the hard way after a filing got rejected because I missed a variation in their system.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for all my UCC prep work. You can upload the debtor's articles of incorporation and your draft UCC-1 and it automatically flags any name inconsistencies before you file. Would have caught this Colorado search issue immediately. The tool cross-references the exact legal name from your charter documents against what you're putting on the UCC-1 form.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Interesting - so it actually compares the documents side by side? That would definitely help since I'm always second-guessing whether I have the debtor name exactly right.
0 coins
Savannah Vin
•Exactly. Just upload both PDFs and it highlights any discrepancies. Takes like 30 seconds and gives you confidence that your filing will go through clean. Much better than playing guessing games with search functions.
0 coins
Mason Stone
Colorado's system is notorious for this! I've been filing there for 8 years and always run multiple search variations. Try searching with different punctuation too - sometimes 'Mountain Peak Equipment, LLC' with the comma will give different results than without. Also try searching by any DBA names they might have registered. For $850K you definitely want to be absolutely certain.
0 coins
Makayla Shoemaker
•Good point about DBAs. Also worth checking if they have any previous UCC filings under slight name variations. Sometimes companies change their legal name slightly and old filings are still active under the previous version.
0 coins
Mason Stone
•Yes! And Colorado doesn't always link name changes well in their system so you could have multiple active profiles for the same entity under different name variations.
0 coins
Christian Bierman
UGH Colorado is the WORST for this stuff. Their search function is like 10 years behind other states. Half the time I get error messages or timeouts when trying to do basic searches. And don't even get me started on their continuation filing portal - it's a nightmare. Why can't they just modernize their system like everyone else?
0 coins
Emma Olsen
•Tell me about it. I spent 3 hours last week trying to file a simple UCC-3 termination and kept getting system errors. Finally had to call their office and they said the portal was 'experiencing issues' - no kidding!
0 coins
Lucas Lindsey
•At least you can call them. Some states barely have phone support anymore. But yeah Colorado's online system feels pretty dated compared to places like Delaware or Nevada.
0 coins
Sophie Duck
I always pull the actual articles of incorporation from Colorado's business database first, then use that exact name format for my UCC search. Sometimes the way they have it formatted in the business records is slightly different from what the client tells you. Could save you from a rejected filing.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•That's a smart approach. I should have started there instead of just trusting the name format from our loan documents.
0 coins
Austin Leonard
•Definitely do this. I've seen so many UCC-1s get rejected because the debtor name didn't match exactly what's in the Secretary of State records. Even small differences like 'Co.' vs 'Company' can cause problems.
0 coins
Anita George
Been there with Colorado searches. Another thing to try is searching by the registered agent name if you know it. Sometimes that will pull up all the entities they represent including your debtor. Won't help with the exact name formatting but at least confirms you're looking at the right company.
0 coins
Abigail Spencer
•Good tip. Also if you know their federal EIN number that can be another way to verify you have the right entity before filing.
0 coins
Anita George
•True, though not all states include EIN in their UCC database. Colorado might not display it in search results but it's worth checking.
0 coins
Logan Chiang
Had this exact same issue last month with a Colorado debtor. Turns out the search was splitting on the word 'Equipment' too. When I searched 'Mountain Peak' alone I got better results than the full name. Colorado's algorithm seems to have trouble with longer business names that include descriptive words like Equipment, Services, Solutions etc.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Wow that's really helpful context. So it might be treating 'Equipment' as another filter term like LLC. I'll try some shorter variations of the name and see what happens.
0 coins
Isla Fischer
•This is why I always do wildcard searches when possible. But Colorado doesn't support those in their UCC database unfortunately.
0 coins
Miles Hammonds
Before you file that UCC-1, double-check that Mountain Peak Equipment Leasing LLC is actually the exact legal name. Sometimes companies tell you one thing but their actual registered name is slightly different. I'd pull their current good standing certificate from Colorado just to be 100% sure.
0 coins
Ruby Blake
•This is critical advice. I've seen deals fall apart because the UCC filing was done under the wrong debtor name and the lien wasn't properly perfected.
0 coins
Micah Franklin
•Exactly. For an $850K deal you can't afford to guess. Get the official documentation that shows their exact registered name as of today.
0 coins
Ella Harper
I use Certana.ai for exactly this type of verification. Upload your borrower's articles and your UCC-1 draft and it instantly flags any name discrepancies. Saved me from several potential filing rejections by catching small differences I would have missed manually.
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•How accurate is that tool? Does it handle all the weird state-specific name formatting rules?
0 coins
Ella Harper
•It's been very reliable for me. Catches things like missing commas, wrong entity suffixes, extra spaces that could cause problems. Much more thorough than trying to manually compare documents.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
Update us on what you find when you check their actual registered name! I'm curious if Colorado's search is just being weird or if there's actually a name discrepancy. This kind of thing always makes me nervous until it's resolved.
0 coins
Jason Brewer
•Will do! Planning to pull their current certificate of good standing tomorrow morning and then run the search again with whatever name format they show.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•Smart move. Better to spend the extra time upfront than deal with a rejected filing and potential lien priority issues later.
0 coins