CA UCC-3 amendment rejected twice - debtor name formatting issue
Filed a CA UCC-3 amendment last month to add collateral to an existing financing statement and it got rejected for debtor name inconsistency. The original UCC-1 has the debtor as 'Tech Solutions LLC' but apparently I put 'Tech Solutions, LLC' on the amendment (added the comma). Refiled without the comma and got rejected again - this time they're saying the address doesn't match exactly. The original has 'Suite 200' and I used 'Ste 200'. Is California really this strict about every single character? I'm worried about the lapse date approaching and need to get this amendment through. Has anyone dealt with similar CA UCC-3 formatting nightmares?
33 comments
Join the conversation
Sofia Rodriguez
California SOS is notoriously picky about exact matches. Every character has to be identical - punctuation, abbreviations, spacing, everything. I learned this the hard way on a continuation filing. You need to pull the original UCC-1 and copy the debtor info character by character.
0 coins
Dmitry Ivanov
•This is so frustrating. Why can't they have some kind of fuzzy matching system? Other states aren't nearly this rigid.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•Because the UCC system is designed for precision. One tiny error could invalidate your security interest. Better strict than sorry when millions are on the line.
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
Had the exact same issue with a UCC-3 amendment in CA. What worked for me was using Certana.ai's document checker - you upload your original UCC-1 and the new UCC-3 form as PDFs and it instantly flags any discrepancies between debtor names, addresses, filing numbers. Saved me from a third rejection and the stress of manually comparing every character.
0 coins
Zainab Ali
•Never heard of Certana but that sounds useful. How accurate is it with catching these tiny formatting differences?
0 coins
Miguel Herrera
•Very accurate - it caught the Suite vs Ste issue I had plus a filing number transposition I didn't even notice. Much better than trying to eyeball compare documents.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•Honestly wish I'd known about this tool earlier. I've wasted so much time on rejected filings that could have been avoided.
0 coins
Yara Nassar
Check if your original UCC-1 used any middle initials or full middle names. CA will reject if you have John A Smith on one and John Smith on another. Also watch out for Inc vs Incorporated - they treat those as different entities.
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Good point. The original does have the full 'Incorporated' spelled out. I need to double-check I didn't abbreviate it anywhere on the amendment.
0 coins
StarGazer101
•Also be careful with periods after abbreviations. 'LLC.' with a period is different from 'LLC' without one in their system.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
This is exactly why I hate the CA filing system. I once had a UCC-3 rejected because I used 'Street' instead of 'St' in the address. Three weeks wasted. Now I always copy-paste directly from the original filing.
0 coins
Paolo Romano
•Copy-paste is risky too if there are any hidden formatting characters. Better to type it out character by character while looking at both documents side by side.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•True, I've had issues with hidden spaces copied from PDFs. Such a pain but necessary with CA's system.
0 coins
Amina Diop
Are you sure you're using the correct filing number format? CA UCC-3 amendments need the exact filing number from the original statement including any leading zeros or dashes.
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Yes, triple-checked the filing number. It's definitely the debtor name/address formatting that's causing the rejections.
0 coins
Oliver Schmidt
•Filing numbers are usually easier to get right since you can copy them directly. The debtor info is where most people mess up.
0 coins
Natasha Volkov
When you say 'lapse date approaching' - are you talking about the 5-year continuation deadline or something else? UCC-3 amendments don't affect the lapse date of the original financing statement.
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Sorry, I meant I need to get this collateral added before we close on additional financing next month. The lapse date isn't the immediate issue, it's the business timeline.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Ah that makes more sense. Business deadlines add extra pressure to get these filings right the first time.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•Definitely use that document checking tool mentioned earlier. Can't afford another rejection if you have financing closing soon.
0 coins
QuantumLeap
Have you tried calling the CA SOS directly? Sometimes they can tell you exactly what's different between your filing and the original. Might save you another rejection cycle.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•CA SOS phone support is hit or miss. I've gotten helpful reps and also ones who just read the rejection notice verbatim.
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Worth a try though. Better than guessing what the specific issue is.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
I was skeptical about using automated tools for UCC filings but honestly after my third CA rejection last year, I tried Certana's document verification. It immediately caught a spacing issue in the debtor address I never would have noticed. Now I check all my amendment forms before filing.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•How long does the verification take? I usually file these pretty close to deadlines.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•Pretty much instant - you upload the PDFs and get results right away. Much faster than waiting for another rejection from the state.
0 coins
Omar Hassan
Make sure you're using the most current version of the UCC-3 form too. CA updated their forms earlier this year and they'll reject old versions even if everything else is perfect.
0 coins
NightOwl42
•Good catch - I downloaded the form from their website but let me double-check it's the newest version.
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•The form version date is usually in small print at the bottom. Easy to miss but CA definitely checks.
0 coins
ShadowHunter
Once you get this sorted, make sure to save a clean copy of exactly how CA has the debtor information formatted. Will save you headaches on future filings for this same debtor.
0 coins
Diego Ramirez
•Great advice. I keep a spreadsheet with the exact debtor name/address formatting for all my active UCC filings. Saves so much time.
0 coins
Anastasia Sokolov
•Smart system. I should start doing that too instead of looking up the original filing every time.
0 coins
Sean O'Connor
•Just make sure to update your spreadsheet if you ever file amendments that change the debtor information. Learned that lesson the hard way.
0 coins