UCC Document Community

Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Has anyone tried the Nevada business entity search as a workaround? Sometimes you can find UCC filing references in the business entity records, though it's not comprehensive.

0 coins

That's not reliable for UCC purposes though. Entity records and UCC filings are separate systems with different indexing.

0 coins

@Caden Turner is right - entity records won t'give you the complete picture for UCC due diligence. You really need the actual UCC search results to know what s'perfected and what priority issues you might face.

0 coins

I've been dealing with this same frustration across multiple states recently. One thing that's helped me is building relationships with local UCC search companies - they often have bulk rate agreements with state offices that individual practitioners can't get. In Nevada specifically, I found a search service that charges $3 per name search instead of the $5 direct rate. Not free, but it adds up when you're doing volume work. Also worth noting that some title companies still have legacy access to older search systems with different pricing structures if you're working on transactions that involve them anyway.

0 coins

This thread is a perfect example of why I always tell new attorneys to slow down and triple-check registered organization names. I learned this lesson the hard way when I had a client's entire credit facility delayed by two weeks because I used "Inc" instead of "Incorporated" on a UCC-1. The borrower was furious, the bank was questioning our competence, and I had to explain to partners why a simple filing mistake nearly killed a deal. Now I have a checklist: 1) Pull the exact charter from formation state, 2) Copy/paste the legal name directly (don't retype), 3) Have someone else verify before submitting. The Delaware comma situation you're dealing with is textbook - stick with the exact charter name and you'll be fine.

0 coins

That's a great checklist approach! I'm definitely going to implement something similar after this experience. The copy/paste tip is particularly smart - eliminates any chance of typos when transcribing names. Having another set of eyes review it before submission makes total sense too, especially with high-stakes deals like this one.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with similar Delaware LLC naming issues, I can confirm that the comma absolutely matters. I had a case last year where "Texas Energy Partners, LLC" vs "Texas Energy Partners LLC" caused a three-week delay because the filing was rejected twice. The frustrating part is that most clients don't understand why punctuation matters so much, but the UCC search logic is very literal. One tip I'd add to the great advice already given - if you're filing in multiple states for the same debtor, make sure you're consistent with the exact Delaware name across all jurisdictions. Some attorneys get sloppy and use variations between states, which can create search issues later. Also, keep a screenshot or printout of the Delaware database page showing the exact name as backup documentation in your file. It's saved me in disputes where clients later claimed I used the "wrong" name.

0 coins

This is such valuable practical advice! The screenshot documentation tip is brilliant - I never thought about keeping that kind of backup evidence in case there are disputes later. You're absolutely right about client confusion too. I spent way too much time yesterday trying to explain to my client why their business cards don't matter for UCC purposes. The consistency across multiple states point is something I hadn't considered either - that could definitely cause headaches down the road if searchers find different versions of the name in different jurisdictions.

0 coins

One more thing - if Kabbage continues to refuse fixing this, you might want to file a complaint with the CFPB. They take UCC filing errors seriously especially when they affect borrowers' ability to get other financing. Sometimes regulatory pressure works better than customer complaints.

0 coins

Let's hope it doesn't come to that but good to know the option exists.

0 coins

I've filed CFPB complaints before and they do get lender attention pretty quickly.

0 coins

This is exactly the kind of situation that makes me anxious about online lending platforms. The fact that they're dismissing a comma as "not their problem" when it's clearly affecting your ability to refinance is infuriating. I'd definitely follow the advice about escalating to their legal department and citing UCC Section 9-506. Document everything in writing and set firm deadlines for their response. If you're on a timeline with your refinancing, you might also want to loop in your new lender's attorney to put pressure on Kabbage - sometimes lender-to-lender communication gets better results than borrower complaints. Keep us posted on how this turns out, as I'm sure others will face similar issues with automated UCC filings.

0 coins

This is such a frustrating situation but your advice about getting the lenders to communicate directly is spot on. I've seen cases where business-to-business pressure works way better than individual borrower complaints. The automated filing systems these fintech companies use are clearly causing more problems than they solve - there's no human oversight to catch obvious errors like name discrepancies. Really hoping OP gets this resolved quickly before it derails their refinancing completely.

0 coins

Just file it with the exact debtor name from your original UCC-1 and move on. You're overthinking this. Florida SOS processes thousands of these terminations and the rule is simple - match the original filing exactly.

0 coins

Fair enough. Better to be cautious with loan compliance issues. But as long as you match the original UCC-1 exactly you shouldn't have any problems.

0 coins

Agree with being cautious on loan compliance. A rejected termination can create issues if your loan docs require proper UCC lien releases within specific timeframes.

0 coins

Thanks everyone for the clear guidance! This has been really helpful. I was definitely overthinking it - I'll use the exact debtor name from our original 2019 UCC-1 filing ("ABC Construction Services LLC" without the comma) on the UCC-3 termination form. I've pulled up our original filing confirmation to double-check both the debtor name and filing number before submitting. Really appreciate the community sharing their experiences with Florida's strict matching requirements - it's saved me from what could have been a costly rejection and potential compliance headache with our loan docs.

0 coins

Great to hear you got the clarity you needed! Florida's UCC system can definitely be intimidating with those strict matching rules, but once you know the process it becomes much more straightforward. Smart move double-checking both the debtor name and filing number from your original confirmation - that's exactly the kind of attention to detail that prevents rejections. Hope your termination goes through smoothly and you can get that lien released without any compliance issues!

0 coins

Update us when you figure out the correct name format! This thread will be helpful for others dealing with Brookvale Group or similar entity name variations.

0 coins

Will do. Planning to get a Certificate of Good Standing tomorrow to confirm the official name.

0 coins

Good plan. That should resolve any uncertainty about the correct debtor name format.

0 coins

I've dealt with similar debtor name verification headaches! One thing that's helped me is requesting a certified copy of the entity's current Articles of Organization directly from the Secretary of State - not just relying on online searches. The certified copy shows exactly how the name appears in their official records, including any punctuation. For your Brookvale situation, I'd bet the correct name is "Brookvale Group LLC" without the comma, based on what you're seeing in the charter. But that certified copy will give you bulletproof documentation for your lender's compliance file. Worth the $10-20 fee to avoid a $2.8M deal delay!

0 coins

That's excellent advice about the certified copy! I hadn't thought of that approach. The $10-20 fee is definitely worth it compared to potential filing delays or rejection costs. Do you know if most states provide certified copies online now, or do you typically have to request them by mail? With this tight closing timeline, I'm hoping to get documentation quickly.

0 coins

Prev1...9495969798...684Next