Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
This thread is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for all our UCC portfolio management. Upload your loan docs and UCC filings and it flags potential issues before they become problems. Caught three filings that were about to lapse that we hadn't calendared properly. Would have been a disaster if those had expired.
Does it handle the different state requirements? Some states have quirky rules about continuation timing.
It analyzes the documents based on standard UCC rules. For state-specific quirks you'd still want to double-check with local counsel, but it catches the basic deadline and consistency issues that cause most problems.
@Zara Shah - sorry to hear about this situation. Unfortunately once a UCC-1 lapses, your options are limited. You'll need to file a brand new UCC-1 immediately to re-establish your security interest, but as others mentioned, you'll lose your original priority date. The good news is that if your borrower is still making payments and hasn't filed bankruptcy, you're not in immediate danger. But definitely get that new filing done ASAP and run a UCC search to see if any other creditors have filed against your debtor since your lapse. Also might want to review your loan agreement to see if the lapse constitutes a default that gives you other remedies. Going forward, set up a robust tracking system - missing continuation deadlines is one of the most expensive mistakes in commercial lending.
This is really helpful advice @Mei Zhang. I'm new to commercial lending and had no idea UCC filings could just disappear like this. It seems like such a critical thing to track - are there any standard practices or software systems that most lenders use to avoid these kinds of lapses? The idea of losing millions in security interest over a missed deadline is terrifying.
Join the conversation
One more tip - if you're not 100% sure about the debtor name, you can always call the Washington Secretary of State UCC division. They're usually pretty helpful about confirming the correct legal name over the phone before you file. Better to spend a few minutes on a phone call than deal with rejection and refiling.
@Isabella Brown From my experience with Certana, it s'pretty comprehensive beyond just name matching. It checks collateral descriptions against state-specific requirements, flags potential issues with filing locations, and even does basic priority analysis by checking for existing filings. The debtor name verification is probably their strongest feature since that s'where most rejections happen, but the collateral description checking has saved me from several potential issues too. For someone new to UCC filings, it s'definitely worth the investment to avoid the learning curve mistakes we ve'all made!
@Zara Mirza That s'really comprehensive! I had no idea these verification tools had evolved to cover so much beyond just name matching. The priority analysis feature sounds particularly valuable - I imagine that could help identify potential conflicts before you even file. For those of us doing our first UCC filings, it sounds like investing in a tool like this upfront could save a lot of headaches and potential costly mistakes down the road. Thanks for sharing your experience with it!
For Washington state UCC-1 filings, I'd also recommend double-checking the debtor's current status in their Secretary of State database before filing. Sometimes LLCs get administratively dissolved or suspended for not filing annual reports, which can complicate your filing. If the entity shows as "not in good standing," you might want to have them cure that first. Also, regarding collateral descriptions for manufacturing equipment - Washington accepts fairly broad descriptions, but be specific enough that a third party could reasonably identify what's covered. "Manufacturing equipment located at [specific address]" is usually sufficient unless your security agreement requires more detail.
@Charlee Coleman Great questions! From what I ve'seen, Washington s'UCC system doesn t'automatically reject filings against entities not in good standing - they ll'process the filing. However, you could face serious enforceability issues later if you need to foreclose or collect. A dissolved LLC might not have legal capacity to grant valid security interests. As for collateral descriptions, all "machinery, equipment, and fixtures used in manufacturing operations would" probably be acceptable, but adding the specific location makes it much stronger. I always include the physical address where the equipment is located - it helps with identification and can be important if you need to repossess later.
@Sean O'Donnell That makes perfect sense about the enforceability risks with dissolved entities. I'm curious though - if you discover the LLC is not in good standing after you've already filed the UCC-1, what's the best course of action? Do you typically advise the borrower to cure their status immediately and then file an amendment, or is it better to terminate the original filing and start fresh once they're back in good standing? Also, for the collateral description with location - does the address need to match exactly what's in their Articles of Organization, or can you use the actual physical location where the equipment is housed if it's different?
Join the conversation
This thread was really helpful. I've been putting off a UCC filing because I was overwhelmed by all the different requirements I thought existed. Knowing the national form works everywhere makes this much simpler.
Same here. I was making it way more complicated than it needed to be.
If you're still feeling overwhelmed about the debtor name accuracy, that Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier really does take the guesswork out of it. Upload your documents and it tells you immediately if there are any mismatches. Makes the whole process less stressful.
Just to add another data point - I've been filing UCC-1s for about 8 years now across different states including Texas, and the national form has never caused me any issues. The standardization really did solve the old problem of having to track different state requirements. For your Texas filing with manufacturing equipment, you're definitely on the right track. One small tip: when you're describing the equipment in the collateral description, you can be fairly general (like "manufacturing equipment" or "all equipment") since it's tangible collateral, but being more specific can help avoid disputes later if you need to enforce your security interest.
That's really helpful advice about the collateral description! I was wondering whether to be super specific with model numbers or keep it more general. Since you mention it can help avoid disputes later - would you recommend including something like "all manufacturing equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" to catch future additions, or is that getting too broad?
Join the conversation
Update for anyone following this thread - ended up using two different search companies and cross-referencing with Certana.ai's verification tool. Found three filings that one company missed and one that both companies missed. The verification tool caught the discrepancies by comparing the search results against the actual state databases. Definitely worth the extra step for complex deals like this.
How much did the verification tool cost compared to just running duplicate searches?
Can't share company names publicly but the verification step was definitely cost-effective compared to the potential problems from missed filings. Worth it for peace of mind.
I've been burned by inadequate UCC searches too many times to count. One thing I always insist on now is getting a detailed search strategy upfront - which name variations they'll search, what date ranges they're covering, and whether they're checking both individual and corporate debtor indexes. Also learned to specifically ask them to search for any DBAs or trade names associated with the entity. The number of times filings are made under a company's "doing business as" name instead of their legal entity name is shocking. For your 6-state search, I'd also recommend asking each company how they handle cross-state entity relationships - some are better than others at identifying when a Delaware holding company has subsidiaries filing UCCs in other states.
This is really comprehensive advice, especially about the DBA searches. I've seen so many deals get complicated because filings were under trade names that nobody thought to check. The cross-state entity relationship point is huge too - I had a deal where the parent company in Delaware had filed a blanket lien that covered assets of subsidiaries in three other states, but it wasn't obvious from the subsidiary searches alone.
Nia Johnson
This has been such an educational thread! As someone who's been through the Ohio UCC filing process multiple times, I'd emphasize that while it seems daunting initially, the system really is designed to be straightforward once you understand the basics. One additional tip I'd offer is to keep copies of all your UCC-related documents in a dedicated file - not just the filed UCC-1, but also any amendments, continuations, or eventually the termination statement. I've found it helpful when dealing with multiple lenders or refinancing situations to have that complete paper trail readily available. Also, if you're working with a smaller regional bank that might not handle UCC filings as frequently as larger institutions, don't hesitate to suggest they use document verification tools like some folks mentioned here - it protects everyone involved and can prevent costly delays in your loan closing.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•This is excellent advice about keeping a complete file! I'm just starting to learn about UCC filings and hadn't thought about the importance of maintaining all those documents long-term. It makes total sense that having everything organized would be crucial for future financing or business changes. I really appreciate how everyone in this thread has shared their practical experiences - it's making what seemed like a scary legal process feel much more manageable. The tip about suggesting document verification tools to smaller banks is particularly helpful since we're likely going to work with a local lender for our equipment loan.
0 coins
Ana Erdoğan
As a newcomer to UCC filings, this entire thread has been incredibly valuable! I'm just getting started with understanding secured transactions for my business and was completely lost on the Ohio-specific requirements. Reading everyone's experiences has made it clear that while UCC filings seem complex on the surface, they're really just a standard part of equipment financing that lenders handle routinely. The key takeaways I'm getting are: make sure your business registration is current, pay close attention to exact name matching, let the bank handle the filing but review everything carefully, and keep good records of all the documents. I especially appreciate the practical tips about document verification tools and the importance of understanding what happens with termination statements down the road. It's reassuring to know that this is normal business procedure rather than something to be intimidated by. Thanks to everyone who shared their real-world experiences - it's so much more helpful than trying to navigate legal websites alone!
0 coins