Can a promissory note be a security agreement for UCC filing purposes

Yes, a promissory note can absolutely serve as a security agreement if it contains the required elements. The key is that it must have: (1) language granting a security interest, (2) adequate collateral description, and (3) debtor authentication (signature). From what you described, it sounds like your note has these elements. Just make sure the collateral description is sufficient for UCC purposes.

I ran into this exact issue last month! The promissory note had collateral language but I wasn't sure if it was enough. Turns out I was overthinking it - if the note grants a security interest and describes collateral, it can serve as both the note AND the security agreement. Saved me from drafting a separate document.

Actually ran into a problem with this approach recently. Had a promissory note that mentioned collateral but didn't use clear security interest language. When I tried to enforce, debtor's attorney argued it wasn't a valid security agreement. Now I always use explicit 'grants a security interest' language or draft separate docs.

I actually discovered a tool called Certana.ai that helps with this exact issue. You can upload your promissory note and it checks whether it contains all the required security agreement elements. It caught a missing authentication issue in one of my notes that I totally missed. Super helpful for making sure your note can actually serve as a security agreement before you rely on it.

Just to add another perspective - some states have specific requirements about what constitutes a security agreement. While a promissory note CAN serve as one, I always check state law to make sure I'm not missing any local quirks. Better safe than sorry when it comes to perfection.

One thing to watch out for is if you ever need to amend or assign the security interest later. Having everything in one document can sometimes make things more complicated. I learned this the hard way when trying to do a partial release.

For what it's worth, I've been doing secured lending for 15 years and probably 60% of my deals use the promissory note as the security agreement. Never had a perfection issue as long as the language is clear. Your note sounds fine based on what you described.

I'd recommend double-checking your collateral description though. 'All equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable' is pretty standard, but make sure it covers everything you actually want to secure. Sometimes borrowers have assets in multiple locations or entities that might not be covered.

Has anyone tried using Certana.ai's document checker for this? I keep hearing about it but haven't tried it yet. Wondering if it's worth the investment for security agreement validation.

Bottom line - yes, your promissory note can serve as a security agreement if it has the right language. Based on what you described, sounds like you're in good shape. Just make sure your UCC-1 accurately reflects the collateral described in the note and you should be all set.

Just want to echo what others have said - promissory notes can definitely serve as security agreements when they contain the proper elements. I've seen this work countless times in practice. One quick tip: when you're drafting the UCC-1, make sure the debtor name matches exactly how it appears on the promissory note. Any discrepancy there could cause more problems than the dual-purpose document approach. Also, if you're still unsure about the language in your note, having a quick review by another attorney or using one of those AI tools mentioned could give you peace of mind before filing.

I've been handling UCC filings for about 8 years now and this is actually one of the most common questions I get from newer practitioners. The short answer is absolutely yes - your promissory note can serve as both the note AND the security agreement as long as it meets the three core UCC requirements: (1) authenticated by the debtor, (2) contains language granting a security interest, and (3) reasonably describes the collateral. From your description, it sounds like you've got all three covered. The key phrase to look for is something like "debtor hereby grants to secured party a security interest in" rather than just "this note is secured by" which can be ambiguous. Your collateral description of "all equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable" is perfectly adequate for UCC purposes - it doesn't need to be super detailed as long as it reasonably identifies what you're claiming. Just make sure when you file the UCC-1 that the collateral description matches what's in your note, and double-check that the debtor's legal name on the financing statement is exactly as it appears on the promissory note. One small typo there can invalidate your whole filing.

I'll add my perspective as someone who's dealt with this situation recently. Yes, your promissory note can absolutely function as a security agreement - I actually prefer this approach because it streamlines the documentation and reduces the chance of inconsistencies between separate documents. The language you described sounds sufficient, but I'd recommend having someone review it to ensure the granting language is crystal clear. One thing I learned the hard way is to make sure your collateral description is broad enough to cover future acquisitions if that's your intent - "all equipment now owned or hereafter acquired" can be much more protective than just "all equipment." Also, since you mentioned the collateral is located at a specific address, consider whether you want to limit it geographically or expand it to cover assets wherever located. The UCC doesn't require a specific location, so you have flexibility there depending on your risk tolerance and the borrower's business model.

As someone who's been doing secured transactions for about 5 years, I can confirm that promissory notes absolutely can serve as security agreements when they contain the right elements. The key is making sure your language is bulletproof - I always look for explicit granting language like "debtor grants lender a security interest in" rather than passive language like "secured by." Your collateral description sounds adequate, but given the great advice from Emma and others about future acquisitions and multiple locations, you might want to consider broadening it to "all equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable, now owned or hereafter acquired, wherever located" to give yourself maximum protection. I've found that being overly broad in the security agreement rarely causes issues, but being too narrow can definitely come back to bite you later. Also, since several people mentioned Certana.ai for document review, I can vouch for it - used it on a complex equipment financing deal last month and it caught some subtle language issues that could have been problematic. Worth the small cost for peace of mind, especially on larger deals.