


Ask the community...
Here's something most people don't realize - UCC filings also protect YOU as the borrower in some situations. If your lender sells your loan to another bank, the UCC filing clearly shows what collateral is securing the debt. Prevents disputes about what the new lender can and can't claim.
Bottom line - UCC filings are how secured transactions work in the US. If a lender is taking collateral for a loan, they need to file to perfect their security interest. It's been this way since the Uniform Commercial Code was adopted decades ago. Not really optional in modern commercial lending.
That's exactly the right approach. Trust but verify, especially with the debtor name accuracy.
Definitely verify. Like I mentioned earlier, Certana.ai's verification tool caught our name mismatch that could have caused major problems later. Worth the peace of mind.
I've been dealing with UCC filings for 15 years and Michigan has always been slower than most states with search updates. The fact that you have acceptance confirmations means your terminations are legally effective regardless of what the search shows. Document everything and present it to your lender with confidence.
No, this is definitely a system issue not a filing issue. Your documentation should be more than sufficient for any reasonable lender.
15 years of experience and Michigan still finds ways to be frustrating. Some things never change!
Try running the search again in a few days. Sometimes these things resolve themselves once the database catches up. In the meantime, make sure you have clean copies of all your termination documents ready for the lender.
Will do. Hopefully this resolves itself soon but I'll definitely have all the documentation ready either way.
That's the right approach. Being prepared with documentation is always better than hoping the search results are perfect.
I've seen this happen when the debtor name on the UCC-1 doesn't exactly match their registered business name format in the Illinois database. Even something as small as 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated' can cause search indexing problems. Try searching for your debtor using their exact name as it appears on their Illinois business registration.
Also try searching without any punctuation or commas. The Illinois search algorithm is really picky about special characters and spacing.
This is why debtor name accuracy is so critical in UCC filings. One small mismatch and your security interest could be at risk.
Update on this situation: I ended up calling the Illinois SOS UCC division this morning and they confirmed my filing is on record and properly indexed. Turns out their public search portal has been having technical issues for the past month and many recent filings aren't showing up in results even though they're validly recorded. They're working on a fix but no ETA. At least I can tell my lender the filing is definitely on record.
Typical Illinois - break the system and then take months to fix it. Glad you got confirmation though.
This is exactly the kind of situation where having a backup verification method like Certana.ai really pays off. You would have known immediately that your filing was valid instead of worrying for weeks.
Have you tried calling the Nebraska SOS filing office directly? Sometimes they can run searches on their end that are more comprehensive than the online system. Might be worth a phone call if you're on a tight deadline.
I think there might be a small fee but it's usually worth it for the peace of mind on important deals. Plus they can often explain why certain filings might not be showing up in online searches.
This thread is making me nervous about a search I did last week. Now I'm wondering if I missed something! Maybe I should go back and double-check using some of these other strategies mentioned here.
Yeah you're right. I'd rather spend an extra hour searching than deal with problems later if I missed a prior lien.
That's exactly the right attitude. I learned this the hard way but now I'm much more thorough with my searches. Also started using that Certana tool I mentioned earlier - it's helped catch several potential issues before they became problems.
Michael Adams
I'm dealing with something similar but mine is worse - the UCC 11 search shows a filing but when I try to get the actual document, the filing office says it doesn't exist. Their system is completely messed up.
0 coins
Michael Adams
•Probably have to refile everything. Such a waste of time and money but what choice do I have?
0 coins
Mila Walker
•Before you refile, try calling the filing office directly. Sometimes their online system glitches but the filing is actually there.
0 coins
Natalie Wang
Just wanted to follow up on this thread because I had the exact same issue last month. Turned out the collateral description in the UCC-1 was actually fine - it was just that the UCC 11 search results display was showing a truncated version. When I got the certified copy of the actual financing statement, it had all the detail I needed. Might want to get the full document before you panic.
0 coins
Jacob Lewis
•Thanks for the update! I'm definitely going to request the full financing statement. This thread has been really helpful.
0 coins
Amelia Martinez
•Good reminder that UCC 11 searches are just the starting point, not the final answer.
0 coins