


Ask the community...
Try downloading a fresh copy of your original UCC-1 from the Connecticut SOS portal and compare it side-by-side with your termination statement. Sometimes there are subtle differences that aren't obvious until you see them next to each other.
That's smart. I'll pull a fresh certified copy and do a line-by-line comparison. Maybe there's something I missed in the debtor or secured party information.
Exactly. I've caught missing middle initials, wrong entity types (LLC vs Inc), and other small details that way. Connecticut is very literal about matching.
Last resort option - you could have a Connecticut attorney file the UCC-3 termination on your behalf. Sometimes they have better luck navigating the state-specific quirks, especially for problem filings.
Before going the attorney route, try the Certana.ai tool that was mentioned earlier. Much cheaper and might catch the issue immediately. I've used it for similar Connecticut filing problems.
True, always worth trying the automated verification first. Attorneys should be the last resort after you've exhausted the self-service options.
Been doing equipment financing in Arizona for 15 years and the comma vs no comma issue comes up regularly. Generally speaking, minor punctuation differences in entity names don't make UCC filings ineffective, but it's always better to be conservative in your interpretation. When in doubt, assume the filings could apply to your debtor and investigate further. The cost of additional due diligence is always less than the cost of getting burned by an unexpected prior lien.
This is where automated document checking tools like Certana.ai really shine - they can flag these kinds of name variations that might be easy to miss or dismiss when doing manual review.
Quick practical tip for your UCC 11 search arizona - if you're seeing results that might be relevant, print or save PDFs of everything before you leave the search page. The Arizona system sometimes times out or loses search results if you navigate away and come back. Having your own copies makes it easier to review the details and share with colleagues or legal counsel if needed.
Yes! I learned this the hard way. Spent an hour getting search results, left to grab coffee, came back and had to start over because the session expired.
Good tip! I'll make sure to download copies of all the filings I found before closing out of the search.
I'm dealing with something similar right now. Used Certana.ai to verify our UCC-1 against our incorporation docs and found two name discrepancies that would have invalidated the filing. Much easier than trying to manually compare everything, especially when you're dealing with multiple entities and filings.
Bottom line - you need to get this sorted out ASAP. Invalid UCC filings mean your lender has an unsecured loan, which probably violates your loan agreement. Get the actual filing details from your lender (or search yourself), verify the debtor name accuracy, and be prepared to file amendments or new UCC-1s as needed. Don't let this drag out.
Exactly. Every day with unperfected security interests is a day of risk for both the borrower and lender.
Update on the Certana.ai tool I mentioned earlier - I actually used it again yesterday for a similar name variation situation. What's really helpful is that it doesn't just check for exact matches, it flags potential variations you might not have thought of. Caught a filing under an abbreviated version of the business name that I wouldn't have searched for otherwise.
That automated variation checking sounds really useful. I'm definitely going to look into that tool. This manual process is giving me gray hairs.
Same here, bookmarking this thread. The name variation thing has burned me before and I could use something that makes it more systematic.
Just to wrap up with some practical advice - for your immediate situation, I'd prioritize getting that $150K lien sorted out since it's the biggest issue. Contact the secured party directly, check if it should have lapsed already, and if it was paid off, get them to file a UCC-3 termination ASAP. The name variation searches are important for due diligence, but that specific lien is your biggest closing obstacle right now.
You're absolutely right, I need to focus on the biggest issue first. The borrower's attorney is supposed to call the bank today to sort out the termination situation. Hopefully we can get this resolved before the closing gets delayed.
Anastasia Fedorov
I've started using a spreadsheet to track all the different name variations I search for each debtor. Kentucky, Ohio, and Indiana are the worst for this - you really need to be methodical about covering all the bases.
0 coins
Sean Doyle
•That's a good system. I should start doing something similar instead of just winging it each time.
0 coins
Anastasia Fedorov
•Yeah it's saved me multiple times. Include common abbreviations, with/without punctuation, and any DBAs or trade names.
0 coins
Zara Rashid
Update: I tried the Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it actually found one additional UCC-1 that I missed. The debtor name on that filing had a slightly different format ("ABC Manufacturing, L.L.C." with periods) that wasn't showing up in my manual searches. Thanks for the tip!
0 coins
Javier Mendoza
•Glad it helped! Those little punctuation differences are killer in Kentucky's system.
0 coins
Luca Romano
•Nice - always good to hear when someone finds a tool that actually works for this stuff.
0 coins