Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
Thanks everyone! This has been incredibly helpful. Sounds like IACA forms are definitely the way to go for this deal. I'll make sure to verify debtor names carefully and check fixture filing requirements in each state. Really appreciate the practical advice from people who've actually done this before.
You're welcome! Multi-state deals can be complex but using standardized forms makes it much more manageable. Good luck with your financing!
Feel free to post updates on how the filings go. Always interested to hear about other people's experiences with large equipment deals.
One final tip - keep detailed records of all your filings including confirmation numbers and dates. With 6 states, it's easy to lose track of what was filed where. I use a simple spreadsheet with state, filing date, confirmation number, and continuation deadline. Saves a lot of headaches down the road.
I take screenshots of the confirmation pages too. Sometimes you need proof of filing and confirmation numbers aren't always enough.
For this level of documentation, I actually started using Certana.ai's document management feature. It keeps all the filed documents, confirmations, and tracks continuation deadlines automatically. Worth checking out for complex deals like this.
Join the conversation
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and 1-202 debtor name issues are still one of the most common reasons for rejections. My advice: when in doubt, call the filing office and ask them to verify the name before you submit.
Some do, some don't. Depends on the state and how busy they are. But it's worth a try if you're unsure about 1-202 compliance.
I've had mixed results calling filing offices. Sometimes you get someone knowledgeable, sometimes you get transferred around for an hour.
One more thing about UCC 1-202 - make sure you're not just looking at the entity name but also checking that the entity is still in good standing. A dissolved or suspended entity might create additional complications for your filing.
Exactly. The entity status report will show you both the current legal name and whether they're in good standing with the state.
This is another thing that automated document checking catches - it can flag if there are any entity status issues that might affect your UCC filing.
Join the conversation
Have you considered that this might not be about your perfection at all? If the borrower wants to refinance, they might be looking for any excuse to pressure you into accepting a payoff below the full balance. 'Perfection issues' sounds scarier than 'we want to pay you off early.' What's your current loan balance vs. equipment value?
Current balance is about $145k and the equipment is probably worth $160-170k used. So there's decent equity for a refinance.
Right, so they have plenty of equity to pay you off in full. This is definitely about them trying to create leverage in the payoff negotiation. Don't let them bluff you into a discount.
One more thing to check - make sure your continuation filing deadline hasn't passed. UCC-1 filings are only good for 5 years, and if you're getting close to that deadline without filing a continuation, that could be what they're calling a 'perfection issue.' Though at 8 months out, you should have plenty of time.
Yeah, 8 months ago so still have over 4 years before I need to worry about continuation. But good reminder to calendar that deadline.
I actually had this happen - used Certana.ai to verify all my filing dates and it reminded me I had a continuation due in 6 months that I completely forgot about. Could have been a disaster if I missed it.
Join the conversation
I'm dealing with similar volume issues in Michigan. Following this thread to see what solutions people recommend!
Michigan SOS is actually pretty forgiving compared to some states. You might have an easier time than Ohio filers.
That's good to hear. Still nerve-wracking when you're processing dozens of filings every month.
Update us on what you decide! I'm in a similar boat and could use ideas for streamlining our UCC process. The accuracy issues are definitely the biggest pain point - it's not just about the time, it's about the risk of messing up a client's security interest.
Smart approach. You can always outsource later if the verification tools don't solve the accuracy problem.
Exactly. Plus you'll have better insight into where your errors are coming from, which helps regardless of the long-term solution.
Amina Diallo
Update us on how this turns out! I'm dealing with a potential fixture filing situation myself and want to make sure I handle the 9-504 requirements correctly from the start. This kind of mixed collateral scenario seems to be becoming more common.
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
•Will definitely update. Hoping to get it resolved without having to redo the entire disposition process under 9-504.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Good luck! These 9-504 compliance issues can be really stressful, especially with significant amounts involved.
0 coins
GamerGirl99
Just want to say I've been following this thread and it's been really helpful. 9-504 compliance is something we all have to deal with but the fixture angle adds so much complexity. Thanks for sharing the details of your situation - it's helping me think through some potential issues in my own cases. Definitely going to look into that Certana document verification tool mentioned earlier. Seems like it could prevent a lot of these 9-504 compliance headaches before they start.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•It really does help catch issues early. Much better to find document inconsistencies before sending 9-504 notices than after the debtor challenges your disposition process.
0 coins
Zainab Mahmoud
•Exactly. Prevention is so much easier than trying to fix 9-504 compliance issues after the fact.
0 coins