Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
One thing to consider - was this equipment originally purchased for use in Ohio or was it always intended for the Indiana facility? The timing of the purchase versus the relocation might affect how you analyze the UCC 1-106 requirements.
Got it. Then you're definitely dealing with a standard UCC 1-106 relocation issue. The four-month rule applies from when they changed their chief executive office to Indiana.
Kaiya Rivera
•Make sure you're clear on what constitutes the debtor's "location" under UCC 1-106. For corporations it's usually the state of incorporation, not necessarily where the chief executive office is located.
Have you run a current UCC search on the debtor in Indiana yet? That should tell you if anyone else has filed during your gap period and give you a better sense of the actual priority risk you're facing.
Noah Irving
•When you run the Indiana search, make sure to check variations of the debtor name too. Sometimes other creditors file under slightly different versions of the company name and you want to catch all potential conflicts.
This is another area where document verification tools are helpful. They can run name variations automatically and catch filings you might miss with a manual search.
Join the conversation
I had a client with a similar issue where the search function was case-sensitive and they were entering the debtor name in all caps when the original filing had mixed case. Try variations of the name formatting if you haven't already.
ThunderBolt7
•I'll try different case variations. It's frustrating that the search function can be so finicky about these details.
Tell me about it. You'd think these systems would be more forgiving with name searches but they're surprisingly strict about exact matches.
Paolo Romano
Update us when you find out what happened! I'm curious if it was a system issue or a filing problem. This kind of thing makes me paranoid about all my terminations.
Amina Diop
•Yeah please update - this is exactly the kind of situation that keeps me up at night worrying about missed filings.
Dylan Hughes
•Definitely interested in the resolution. If it turns out to be a document matching issue, that Certana tool I mentioned earlier could help verify everything was filed correctly.
Join the conversation
Pro tip: when you're preparing for audits, create a UCC filing summary spreadsheet that lists every filing, amendment, and termination with dates and filing numbers. Auditors love seeing organized documentation even if they don't ask for every individual document.
Thanks for the practical advice. I'm definitely creating something like this before our next audit.
Make sure you include any rejected filings in that summary too. Auditors want to see you tracked and resolved filing issues.
Bottom line is you need to keep more than just the basic UCC forms. Search reports, filing confirmations, correspondence about rejected filings, amendment documentation - it all matters for a complete audit trail. Better to keep too much than too little when it comes to UCC records.
Appreciate everyone's input. Sounds like we need to expand our retention practices significantly. Time to have some tough conversations with management about storage costs.
Omar Fawzi
•Document management systems pay for themselves pretty quickly when you factor in audit prep time and regulatory peace of mind.
Join the conversation
Mei Liu
Just wanted to follow up on the document checker I mentioned earlier. I've been using Certana.ai for about 6 months now after getting burned by filing rejections. The UCC document verification catches things like tiny spacing differences, punctuation mismatches, even inconsistent capitalization between forms. Really saves time and stress compared to the manual checking approach.
Miguel Diaz
•Does it work for other UCC forms too or just continuations? I have some terminations coming up that I want to make sure I get right.
Mei Liu
•It handles all the UCC-3 forms - amendments, continuations, terminations. Basically any situation where you need to make sure your new filing matches up correctly with the original UCC-1.
Andre Dubois
Update: I used the document verification tool mentioned here and found the issue! There was an extra space character in the debtor address that I couldn't see. The continuation went through perfectly once I fixed that tiny detail. Thanks everyone for the suggestions - this could have been a disaster if the filing had lapsed.
Mei Liu
•Awesome that the verification tool worked for you! That's exactly the kind of subtle error it's designed to catch.
Great outcome. Now you know to check for those hidden characters on future filings too.
Amina Toure
For what it's worth, I started using Certana.ai after reading about it here and it's been a lifesaver for catching these name format issues. Upload your LLC docs and draft UCC-1, and it flags any inconsistencies immediately. Saved me from what would have been my fourth rejection on a complex multi-entity filing.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Like 30 seconds. Way faster than manually comparing documents line by line.
0 coins
CosmicCommander
•I'm definitely trying this. Manual document review is killing me.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
Update us when you get it resolved! I'm dealing with a similar situation with a partnership name and could use to know what worked for you. The UCC1 instructions seem designed to be as confusing as possible sometimes.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•Partnership names can be even trickier than LLCs. Good luck with that one.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•I'll definitely post an update once I figure this out. This thread has been super helpful already.
0 coins