Ask the community...
- DO post questions about your issues.
- DO answer questions and support each other.
- DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
- DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)
Join the conversation
Join the conversation
UPDATE: Thanks everyone for the advice. I contacted our bank this morning and they confirmed that the sale proceeds will fully satisfy the remaining debt balance. They're preparing a UCC-3 termination statement for us to review and file once the proceeds are officially applied to the loan. Should be resolved within the next week.
This thread was super helpful for understanding the proceeds perfection rules. I had no idea about the 20-day automatic period or the importance of having 'proceeds' in the original collateral description.
Definitely learned a lot here too. Going to double-check our UCC-1 filings to make sure the collateral descriptions are comprehensive enough to cover proceeds from any future sales.
This is a great example of why communication with your lender is so critical in UCC Article 9 sales. I've seen too many situations where businesses try to handle the filing requirements on their own and end up creating problems. The fact that your bank is asking for a termination actually suggests they're being proactive about cleaning up the filing once the transaction is complete. Just make sure you get written confirmation that the proceeds will fully satisfy the debt before filing anything - and keep copies of all the paperwork for your records. The $95K sale proceeds against a $180K original loan suggests there might be other collateral or payments involved, so definitely verify the final payoff amount includes all interest and fees.
This is excellent advice about getting written confirmation on the final payoff amount. I'm new to UCC filings and didn't realize how many variables could affect the final debt calculation - interest, fees, escrow holds, etc. The gap between the $180K original loan and $95K sale proceeds definitely suggests there might be additional payments or other collateral involved. Better to ask too many questions upfront than deal with complications later!
Join the conversation
The commercially reasonable standard is really about process, not just outcome. Document your efforts to research market value, consider different disposal methods, and justify your chosen approach. Courts look at whether you acted in good faith and followed reasonable commercial practices.
Exactly. The UCC doesn't require you to get the absolute highest price, just that you conduct the sale in a commercially reasonable manner. Process matters more than outcome.
But you still want to maximize recovery for the debtor's sake and to minimize any deficiency claim. Good process usually leads to better outcomes anyway.
Thanks everyone for the advice. I feel much more confident about proceeding now. I'll send the notices via certified mail, document everything, and go through the equipment auction house. Hopefully the borrower will be reasonable once they see we're following proper procedures.
One last thought - if the borrower is already threatening legal action, you might want to give your attorney a heads up about the disposition process. Better to have them involved early than scrambling later.
Absolutely agree with involving your attorney early. I learned that lesson the hard way on my first disposition case. Even if you follow everything perfectly, borrowers' attorneys can find creative ways to challenge the process. Having counsel review your notices and disposition plan before you execute can save you a lot of headaches down the road. Better to spend a few thousand on prevention than tens of thousands on litigation defense.
Join the conversation
Update: Finally got through to someone at LoanPal who admitted they've had 'system issues' with their UCC processing. They're supposedly filing all the backed-up terminations this week. Will believe it when I see it on the Delaware SOS website. Thanks everyone for the advice - filing complaints definitely helped escalate this.
System issues for 3 months? That's convenient. At least you got an admission that there's a problem.
Check the Delaware SOS website daily. Sometimes they say they filed but there are errors that cause rejections.
I went through something similar with LoanPal last year - took 5 months to get our UCC-3 termination after paying off a $240K equipment loan. What finally worked was sending a demand letter through an attorney threatening to file for damages due to their breach of the loan agreement's 30-day termination clause. Cost us $1,500 in legal fees but we got the termination within a week of them receiving the letter. Also document everything - keep records of every call, email, and delay because if this impacts your refinancing or business operations, you may have grounds for consequential damages. The "system issues" excuse is BS - they just have terrible internal processes and no accountability.
Join the conversation
Update on my situation - we ended up consulting with a local real estate attorney who confirmed we needed fixture filings due to the permanent nature of the installation. Filed in the county recorder's office where the property is located. Used Certana.ai one more time to verify our final documents before submission - caught a typo in the legal description that could have caused problems. Everything went smoothly and the lender is satisfied with the perfection. Thanks everyone for the guidance!
Smart move getting local legal advice. Fixture filing rules can be very state-specific.
Thanks for the update. This thread will help others dealing with similar equipment financing situations.
This is a great discussion thread - really helpful for someone new to fixture filings! I'm working on a similar situation with medical equipment being installed in a leased clinic space. The equipment will be bolted down and hardwired, but it's specialized and could theoretically be moved to another location. From what I'm reading here, it sounds like the "intention of the parties" factor is key - if we intend for the equipment to be removable at lease end, does that weigh against it being considered a fixture? Also, does anyone know if there are different rules for medical equipment versus manufacturing equipment when it comes to fixture determinations?
The medical equipment context is really important here! I've seen cases where MRI machines and CT scanners were considered personal property despite being permanently installed because they were clearly intended to serve the medical practice, not enhance the real estate. Your lease language will be crucial - if it specifically states that medical equipment remains tenant property and must be removed at lease end, that's strong evidence against fixture classification. Also consider whether the equipment increases the property value for general use or only for medical purposes. Equipment that only benefits specialized users tends to stay personal property. The dual filing approach is definitely smart for medical equipment financing.
This is such valuable insight about medical equipment! I'm curious - when you mention that MRI machines stayed personal property despite permanent installation, was that because of specific lease language or court decisions? For my situation with the packaging equipment mentioned in the original post, it sounds like medical equipment might actually have better arguments for avoiding fixture classification than manufacturing equipment. The specialized nature and limited utility to other users seems like a strong factor. Has anyone seen cases where the lender's intended use of the collateral (like requiring removal for resale) influenced the fixture determination? I'm wondering if documenting the equipment's resale market and portability could help support personal property classification.
Andre Moreau
Pro tip for anyone doing SBA loans: ask your bank if they have a dedicated SBA UCC specialist. The good SBA lenders usually have someone who only handles the secured transaction paperwork for SBA deals. Makes the whole process much smoother.
0 coins
NeonNebula
•Great suggestion. I'm going to ask about that when we meet with them tomorrow.
0 coins
Zoe Christodoulou
•This is excellent advice. The SBA specialists know all the quirks and requirements that trip up regular commercial lenders.
0 coins
Mia Green
Just went through this exact situation 6 months ago with our SBA 7(a) loan. The key thing that saved us was demanding to see the actual UCC-1 draft before they filed it. Our bank kept saying "we'll handle everything" but when I finally saw their draft, the collateral description was completely wrong - they had generic language like "all equipment" instead of the specific item-by-item breakdown SBA requires. Once we caught that, we provided a detailed equipment schedule with serial numbers, model numbers, and purchase dates for everything over $1,000. The filing went through clean after that. Don't let them rush the UCC filing - better to delay a few days and get it right than deal with rejections and amendments later.
0 coins
Adrian Hughes
•This is exactly the kind of proactive approach I wish I'd taken from the start. The "we'll handle everything" line from banks sounds reassuring but clearly isn't always reliable for SBA UCCs. Did you have any pushback from the bank when you asked to review the draft filing beforehand?
0 coins
CyberNinja
•Actually had quite a bit of pushback initially - they acted like I was questioning their expertise. But when I explained that I'd heard about SBA UCC rejections causing major closing delays, they became more cooperative. I think the key was framing it as "wanting to avoid any potential issues" rather than "I don't trust you." Once they saw I was serious about the timeline, they were willing to show me the draft. Definitely worth standing firm on this - it's your deal and your closing at risk.
0 coins