Why did unemployment rise 1938 - Washington ESD historical perspective on benefit changes
I'm doing research on unemployment trends and noticed that unemployment spiked again in 1938 after improving from the Great Depression. Does anyone know how this affected the early unemployment insurance programs? I'm curious because Washington ESD's system seems to have roots going back to this era, and I'm wondering if the 1938 recession influenced how our current UI benefits are structured. My grandfather always said the unemployment office changed a lot around that time but he never explained what happened.
62 comments


Yara Elias
The 1938 recession was called the 'Roosevelt Recession' and it happened when the federal government cut spending too quickly. Unemployment jumped from about 14% to over 19% that year. The Social Security Act of 1935 had just created the unemployment insurance system, so states like Washington were still figuring out how to run their programs.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•That makes sense! So Washington ESD was dealing with a brand new system when unemployment suddenly got worse again?
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Yeah, and the benefit amounts were tiny back then compared to now. I think the maximum weekly benefit in Washington was like $15 in 1938.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
This is actually really relevant to understanding how Washington ESD works today. The 1938 recession exposed problems with the early UI system - benefits were too low and didn't last long enough. That's when they started thinking about extending benefit periods during recessions, which is basically what we still do now with extended benefits.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Interesting! So the idea of extending benefits during economic downturns started that early?
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Exactly. The 1938 experience showed that the original 16-week benefit period wasn't enough during severe recessions. Washington and other states lobbied for federal extensions.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
Speaking of Washington ESD and getting benefits, has anyone else had trouble actually reaching them by phone lately? I've been trying to get through about my claim for weeks and keep getting disconnected. The historical stuff is interesting but I need help with my current claim!
0 coins
Yara Elias
•Oh man, the phone lines are terrible. I found this service called Claimyr that actually helped me get through to a Washington ESD agent. Check out claimyr.com - they have a demo video at https://youtu.be/7DieNd3C7zQ that explains how it works.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
•Really? How does that work exactly? I'm desperate at this point.
0 coins
Yara Elias
•It basically handles the calling for you and gets you connected to an actual person at Washington ESD. Way better than sitting on hold for hours just to get hung up on.
0 coins
Amina Diop
Back to the 1938 thing - the recession was caused by premature fiscal tightening. FDR's administration cut New Deal spending and raised taxes, which tanked the recovery. Industrial production fell 33% and unemployment shot back up. It was a policy mistake that modern economists study as an example of what not to do during a fragile recovery.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Wow, so it was basically self-inflicted? That's crazy.
0 coins
Oliver Weber
•Yeah and it lasted until 1939 when they started spending on defense buildup for WWII. The unemployment insurance system was still brand new so it was really tested by this crisis.
0 coins
Natasha Romanova
my grandfather worked for the state employment office in the 1930s and he said 1938 was absolute chaos. lines around the block, not enough staff, benefits running out. sounds familiar lol
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Some things never change I guess! Did he ever talk about how they handled the surge in claims?
0 coins
Natasha Romanova
•he said they basically hired anyone they could find and worked 12 hour days. also had to set up temporary offices in schools and churches because the regular offices were overwhelmed
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
The 1938 recession also led to changes in how unemployment benefits were funded. Before that, some states weren't building up adequate reserves during good times. After 1938, the federal government required states to maintain higher reserve funds.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•That makes sense - you need reserves for when unemployment spikes unexpectedly.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Right, and Washington has generally done a good job maintaining its trust fund compared to other states. That's why our benefits didn't get cut as much during the 2008 recession.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
This is all interesting history but can we talk about current Washington ESD issues? I'm stuck in adjudication and have been waiting 6 weeks for a decision. Anyone know how to actually get someone to look at my case?
0 coins
Yara Elias
•You should try that Claimyr service I mentioned earlier. They're really good at getting you connected to Washington ESD agents who can actually check your adjudication status. Way better than the automated system.
0 coins
NebulaNinja
•I'll look into it. At this point I'm willing to try anything.
0 coins
Paolo Moretti
•I just signed up for Claimyr after reading about it here. Fingers crossed it works better than calling myself!
0 coins
Oliver Weber
For what it's worth, the 1938 recession was relatively short - about 13 months. But it was sharp. GDP fell 3.3% and industrial production collapsed. The unemployment rate went from 14.3% in 1937 to 19% in 1938. It really shook confidence in the New Deal recovery.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•13 months doesn't sound short when you're living through it!
0 coins
Amina Diop
•True, but compared to the initial Great Depression which lasted years, it was relatively brief. The key lesson was that government support needed to continue until the recovery was really solid.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
Does anyone know if Washington's unemployment insurance law was different from other states in 1938? I'm writing a paper on this and trying to understand regional variations in the early UI system.
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Washington was actually one of the more generous states early on. We had higher benefit amounts and longer duration than many southern states. The basic structure was similar though - all states had to meet federal standards to get the tax offset.
0 coins
Javier Gomez
•Thanks! Do you know where I could find the specific benefit amounts for Washington in 1938?
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Try the Washington State Archives or the Washington ESD website. They might have historical documents from that period.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
honestly this historical stuff is cool but i just need to know why my weekly claim is saying i have an outstanding issue when i reported everything correctly. washington esd is so confusing
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•What kind of outstanding issue? Is it asking for verification of work search or something else?
0 coins
Emma Wilson
•it just says 'outstanding issue - no payment will be made' but doesn't say what the issue is. super helpful right?
0 coins
Yara Elias
•You really need to talk to an actual person at Washington ESD to find out what the issue is. That Claimyr service I keep mentioning is honestly your best bet for getting through to someone who can explain what's going on.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
The 1938 recession was also significant because it happened during peacetime, unlike the recovery from the Great Depression which eventually benefited from WWII spending. It showed that the economy could still be vulnerable to policy mistakes even after several years of recovery.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•That's a good point - it wasn't war that ended this recession, it was policy changes.
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Exactly. They reversed course on spending cuts and the economy started recovering again in 1939. It was a valuable lesson about the importance of fiscal policy.
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
I think the real lesson from 1938 is that unemployment insurance needs to be counter-cyclical - more generous during recessions, not less. Washington ESD generally follows this principle with extended benefits and emergency programs during downturns.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Makes sense. So our current system is influenced by lessons learned in 1938?
0 coins
Isabella Oliveira
•Absolutely. The basic framework of UI as economic stabilization dates back to experiences like the 1938 recession.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
wait so unemployment went UP in 1938 even though they had just created unemployment insurance? that seems backwards
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•Unemployment insurance doesn't prevent unemployment - it just provides income support when people lose their jobs. The 1938 recession was caused by economic policy mistakes, not problems with the UI system.
0 coins
Ravi Kapoor
•oh ok that makes more sense. i thought maybe the benefits made people not want to work or something
0 coins
Amina Diop
•That's a common misconception. UI benefits are typically much lower than wages, so they don't create much disincentive to work. The 1938 recession was definitely caused by fiscal policy, not unemployment benefits.
0 coins
Freya Larsen
This thread got me curious about Washington's unemployment history. Did you know our state was one of the first to implement the federal UI program in 1935? We started paying benefits in January 1938, just before the recession hit.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Wow, so Washington ESD was brand new when the 1938 recession happened. Talk about trial by fire!
0 coins
Freya Larsen
•Yeah, and somehow the system held up. Benefits were paid throughout the recession even though claims skyrocketed. Pretty impressive for a new program.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
Can we please get back to helping people with actual Washington ESD problems? All this history is fine but people have real issues with their claims right now.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•agreed! im trying to figure out how to appeal a disqualification and this historical discussion isnt helping
0 coins
Keisha Jackson
•For appeals, you need to file within 30 days of the disqualification notice. The appeal form should be on the Washington ESD website or you can call to request one.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•ive been trying to call for two weeks! thats why people are mentioning that claimyr thing - the phones are impossible
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
The 1938 recession actually led to some of the first studies of unemployment insurance effectiveness. Researchers found that UI benefits helped stabilize consumer spending during the downturn, which became important evidence for expanding the program later.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•So UI actually helped the economy recover faster?
0 coins
Chloe Taylor
•Yes, by maintaining some level of consumer demand. People spent their UI benefits on necessities, which kept money flowing in the economy.
0 coins
Diego Flores
ok this has been educational but im still confused about why unemployment rose so much in 1938 specifically. was it really just government spending cuts?
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Pretty much. The federal government cut spending by 6.5% in 1937 and raised taxes. It was classic austerity at the wrong time. The private sector wasn't strong enough to maintain growth without government support.
0 coins
Diego Flores
•makes sense. so if they hadnt cut spending, unemployment might not have risen?
0 coins
Amina Diop
•Most economists think the recession could have been avoided or at least been much milder without the premature fiscal tightening.
0 coins
Anastasia Ivanova
Well this thread definitely answered the original question! The 1938 unemployment spike was caused by policy mistakes, and it helped shape how we think about unemployment insurance today. Pretty cool how Washington ESD's history connects to major economic events.
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Thanks everyone for all the information! Really interesting to see how historical events shaped our current system.
0 coins
Yara Elias
•And hopefully some people got help with their current Washington ESD issues too. Remember that Claimyr service if you're having trouble getting through on the phone!
0 coins
Connor Byrne
•Definitely bookmarking that for future reference. Thanks again!
0 coins