Should I use my 401K as a bridge to delay Social Security until age 70?
Trying to decide the smartest path forward with my retirement finances. I'll hit my full retirement age (FRA) in September 2025, but I'm seriously considering delaying my Social Security benefits until I turn 70. The numbers show my monthly benefit would increase by about $1,350 if I wait those extra years. I have approximately $775,000 in my 401K that I could tap into as a bridge until 70. My thinking is that this approach would serve two purposes: 1) I'd get the higher SS benefit for life, and 2) drawing down my 401K now would reduce my required minimum distributions (RMDs) later, potentially keeping me in a lower tax bracket long-term. Once I hit 70, my Social Security would basically cover all my living expenses (house is paid off, no car payment, etc.), so I wouldn't need to withdraw much from retirement accounts. Does this strategy make financial sense? Any pitfalls I'm overlooking? Thanks for any insights!
40 comments


Gabriel Graham
This is actually a very sound financial strategy that many financial planners recommend. By delaying your Social Security until 70, you're essentially buying the best annuity on the market - guaranteed 8% annual increases from FRA to 70, plus cost of living adjustments. The math generally works in your favor if you live past your early 80s. Using your 401K as a bridge is smart for exactly the reasons you mentioned - it reduces future RMDs and can help manage your tax brackets in retirement. Just make sure you're being strategic about which accounts you withdraw from (traditional vs Roth if you have both). One thing to consider: make sure you're accounting for healthcare coverage during this period if you're retiring before Medicare eligibility at 65.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•Thanks! I'm already on Medicare (turned 65 last year), so healthcare is covered. One thing I'm still confused about - should I be converting some of my traditional 401K to Roth during these bridge years since my income will be lower? Or just take the straight withdrawals from the traditional 401K?
0 coins
Drake
I did exactly what you're planning. Retired at 66 (my FRA), used my 401k to bridge until 70, and now my SS check is $3,880/month instead of the $2,900 it would've been. Best financial decision I ever made. My RMDs are more manageable too, which helps with Medicare IRMAA surcharges. One suggestion - set up automatic monthly distributions from your 401k that roughly match what your SS would have been, helps with budgeting and makes the transition at 70 seamless.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
•but doesnt this strategy only work if you live a long time? im worried about delaying and then not living long enuf to break even. how do you calculate the break even point??
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
Sounds like a decent plan to me. Just make sure you're not leaving your spouse high and dry if something happens to you during those delay years. My buddy Jim did this and then passed away at 69, really messed up his wife's financial situation.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•This is such an important point that gets overlooked! The surviving spouse would only get the larger of the two benefits. So if the higher-earning spouse dies before claiming, the survivor might miss out on thousands. OP, if you're married, you should absolutely model both scenarios - what happens if you live a long time AND what happens if you die during the delay period. For some couples, it makes more sense for the higher earner to claim at FRA to lock in survivor benefits, while for others, delaying is still optimal even accounting for this risk.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
Why complicate things? Just take SS when you hit FRA and leave your 401k alone to keep growing. Thats what I did and Im doing FINE. All this fancy planning just gives you a headache lol
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•While simplicity has its merits, the financial difference can be substantial. By delaying SS from FRA to age 70, you get approximately 8% more benefit per year, which is guaranteed, inflation-adjusted income for life. Most 401k investments won't consistently deliver that kind of guaranteed return with zero risk. For someone with a $2,500 monthly benefit at FRA, waiting until 70 could mean an additional $800+ per month for life. Over a 20-year retirement, that's nearly $200,000 in additional benefits.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
THE SSA DOESN'T WANT YOU TO KNOW THIS!!! The whole "delay until 70" thing is actually just a way for them to avoid paying benefits to people who die between FRA and 70!!!! They KNOW a certain percentage of people will DIE before collecting A SINGLE DOLLAR if they delay!!! Think about it - why else would they offer such a "good deal"?? It's because they're BETTING ON YOUR DEATH!!!!!
0 coins
Drake
•That's not how Social Security works. The delayed retirement credits are actuarially neutral - meaning they're designed so that, on average, people receive the same total benefits regardless of when they claim. Some people who delay will die early and receive less, while others will live longer and receive more. SSA isn't "betting" on anything; they're providing options to manage longevity risk. The 8% per year increase was calculated by actuaries to be fair based on life expectancy tables. It's actually a very valuable option for those worried about outliving their savings.
0 coins
Sarah Jones
have u talked to a financhal advisor? my sister did something like this but her advisor told her to do roth conversions during the bridge years cuz her tax bracket was lower. might be worth paying someone for advice before u make big decishun
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•I've talked to a few people, but haven't hired a professional yet. The Roth conversion idea keeps coming up, so I should probably look into that more. Thanks for the suggestion!
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
I tried calling SSA to talk through my options like this and was on hold for TWO HOURS before I got disconnected. Then called back and waited another hour! Has anyone found a better way to actually reach a real person at Social Security? I need to discuss some specifics about my delayed retirement credits.
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•I had the same problem but found a service called Claimyr that got me through to an SSA agent in under 10 minutes. It basically navigates the phone system for you and calls you when an agent is on the line. Saved me hours of frustration. Their site is claimyr.com and they have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU I used it when I needed to sort out my delayed retirement credits calculation. Much easier than repeatedly calling and waiting on hold.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
One aspect of this strategy I haven't seen mentioned yet is the impact on your tax situation during the bridge years. When you're taking 401k distributions as your primary income source, you'll have more control over your taxable income than you would with SS benefits (which are partially taxable based on provisional income tests). This creates a unique opportunity to do Roth conversions during these years, potentially converting significant portions of your traditional 401k to Roth while staying in lower tax brackets. This could substantially reduce your RMDs later AND provide tax-free withdrawal options in the future. The combination of delayed SS + strategic Roth conversions during bridge years + reduced RMDs later can create a very tax-efficient retirement income strategy.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•That's really helpful! Do you know what tax bracket I should try to stay under when doing these Roth conversions? Is there a sweet spot?
0 coins
Sebastian Scott
My neighbor tried this exact strategy then the market crashed in his first bridge year and he panicked and took SS early anyway. Just something to consider - can you stomach a major market downturn while you're actively withdrawing from your 401k?
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
•This is why a proper retirement income strategy should include a cash buffer for market downturns. Ideally, you'd have 1-2 years of expenses in cash or very conservative investments so you can avoid selling equities during market drops. A good approach might be to segment the 401k into buckets: a conservative bucket for the first 1-2 years of bridge income, a moderately conservative bucket for years 3-4, and leaving the remainder invested for long-term growth.
0 coins
Drake
One more important point: run calculations on the tax implications of higher RMDs vs. higher SS benefits. While reducing RMDs is generally helpful, remember that 85% of SS benefits may become taxable if your other income (including RMDs) is high enough. In some cases, the tax advantage of reducing RMDs can be partially offset by increased taxation of your larger SS benefit. This doesn't usually negate the advantage of delaying, but it's something to model in your specific situation. A good tax-focused financial planner can run these projections for you and might identify some additional strategies to minimize lifetime tax burden.
0 coins
Alicia Stern
•Thanks for raising this point. I hadn't considered how the higher SS benefit might affect the tax calculation long-term. Sounds like I really should get some professional advice to model all these variables. Appreciate everyone's insights!
0 coins
NeonNebula
As someone who just went through this decision process myself, I can't stress enough how important it is to factor in your health and family longevity history. The break-even point for delaying SS until 70 is typically around age 82-83, but if you have health concerns or a family history of shorter lifespans, the math changes significantly. I ended up doing a hybrid approach - I delayed SS but also purchased a small immediate annuity to supplement my 401k withdrawals during the bridge years. This gave me some guaranteed income floor while still allowing me to capture most of the delayed retirement credits. Might be worth considering if you're worried about sequence of returns risk during your early retirement years. Also, definitely look into the Roth conversion opportunity during your bridge years - it's one of the best parts of this strategy that often gets overlooked!
0 coins
Carmen Diaz
As a newcomer to this community, I find this discussion incredibly valuable! I'm in a similar situation - approaching my FRA next year with about $650K in my 401K. Reading through everyone's experiences and advice has really opened my eyes to considerations I hadn't thought of. A few questions for the group: For those who've implemented this strategy, how did you handle the psychological aspect of not having that "guaranteed" SS income right away? I keep going back and forth between the logical math (which clearly favors delaying) and the emotional security of having SS payments start immediately. Also, I'm curious about the timing - is it better to retire exactly at FRA and start the bridge strategy immediately, or work a bit longer to build up the 401K cushion even more before making the leap? Thanks to everyone sharing their real-world experiences - it's so much more helpful than just reading generic financial advice online!
0 coins
Miguel Silva
•Welcome to the community! Your questions really hit home for me - I'm actually in almost the exact same boat as you, just a year ahead in the process. On the psychological aspect, I totally get that concern. What's been helping me is thinking of it this way: I'm not really "giving up" my Social Security - I'm just deferring it for a much better version later. I actually calculated my monthly 401K withdrawals to roughly match what my SS would be now, so it feels like I'm getting that "guaranteed" income, just from a different source. As for timing, I personally chose to retire right at FRA rather than working longer. My reasoning was that those extra work years would only add marginally to my 401K (since I'd be living off my salary anyway), but I'd miss out on years of actual retirement time. Plus, starting the bridge strategy immediately maximizes the delayed retirement credits. One thing that's really helped my peace of mind is having a solid cash cushion (about 18 months of expenses) separate from my 401K. That way if the market tanks, I'm not forced to sell investments at a loss during my first bridge year. Hope this helps, and good luck with your decision!
0 coins
Justin Evans
As someone new to this community, I'm finding this discussion incredibly helpful! I'm 64 and facing a similar decision in about 18 months. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen discussed much - how do you all handle the annual Social Security statements and benefit estimates during the bridge years? I know SSA sends updated estimates, but I'm wondering if there are any surprises people have encountered when they actually file at 70 versus what the estimates showed. Are the delayed retirement credit calculations typically accurate in the official statements? Also, for those who've gone through this, did you find it helpful to do a "trial run" of living off just 401K withdrawals for a few months before actually retiring? I'm thinking of testing out the budget during my last year of work to see how it feels psychologically and practically. Thanks for sharing all these real-world insights - it's exactly the kind of practical advice I was hoping to find here!
0 coins
Isabella Santos
•Great questions! I'm also new here but have been researching this strategy extensively. Regarding the SSA statements, I've read that the delayed retirement credit calculations are generally accurate, but there can be small discrepancies due to cost-of-living adjustments that get applied after the estimates are generated. Most people report the actual benefits being very close to projections. Your "trial run" idea is brilliant! I hadn't thought of that but it makes total sense. Testing the withdrawal strategy while still working would let you identify any budgeting issues or psychological hurdles before you're fully committed. Plus you could adjust your withdrawal amounts or investment allocation if needed. One thing I'm curious about from others - during these trial months, would you recommend practicing the Roth conversion strategy too, or wait until you're actually retired and in the lower tax bracket? I'm trying to map out the whole approach before taking the plunge. Thanks for bringing up these practical considerations - it's exactly the kind of detailed planning I need to think through!
0 coins
CosmicCruiser
As a newcomer to this community, I'm really impressed by the depth of discussion here! I'm 62 and still have a few years before my FRA, but I'm already trying to wrap my head around this strategy. One thing I'm wondering about that hasn't been mentioned - what happens if Congress changes Social Security rules during your bridge years? I keep hearing politicians talk about "fixing" Social Security, and I'm nervous that if I delay until 70, the rules might change in a way that affects my delayed retirement credits. Also, for those who have successfully implemented this strategy, how often do you review and potentially adjust your 401K withdrawal amounts during the bridge years? Do you stick to a fixed monthly amount, or do you adjust based on market performance, expenses, or other factors? I'm trying to build as complete a picture as possible before I get closer to decision time. Thanks for all the valuable insights everyone has shared!
0 coins
Lucas Kowalski
•Welcome to the community! Your concern about potential rule changes is completely understandable, but historically, Congress has been very reluctant to change benefits for people close to or in retirement. When Social Security reforms have happened, they typically include long phase-in periods (like the gradual increase in FRA that was implemented decades in advance). That said, it's always wise to stay informed. Most experts believe that any future changes would likely affect younger workers first, and delayed retirement credits are such a fundamental part of the system that eliminating them would be politically very difficult. Regarding withdrawal adjustments - I'm still in my first bridge year, but my advisor recommended starting with a fixed monthly amount based on conservative return assumptions, then reviewing quarterly. If the market performs well, you might reduce withdrawals slightly to preserve more capital. If it underperforms, you might need to adjust your spending or dip into your cash reserves. The key is having that flexibility built into your plan from the start. That's why the cash cushion so many people mentioned is crucial - it gives you options during volatile periods. Great questions - it shows you're thinking this through thoroughly!
0 coins
Elijah Brown
As a newcomer to this community, I want to thank everyone for such an informative discussion! I'm 63 and wrestling with this exact same decision. Reading through all these real-world experiences has been incredibly valuable. One aspect I'm curious about that I haven't seen addressed - how do you handle Required Beginning Date (RBD) considerations if you're still working past 70? I know RMDs typically start at 73, but I'm wondering if there are any special rules or strategies for people who implement this bridge approach and then maybe decide to do some part-time work after starting SS at 70. Also, I'm seeing a lot of mentions about working with financial advisors for this strategy. For those who hired professionals, did you find that most advisors were familiar with this approach, or did you need to shop around to find someone experienced with delayed SS/401k bridge strategies? The psychological aspects that others have mentioned really resonate with me too. It feels counterintuitive to delay guaranteed income, but the math seems pretty compelling. Thanks again for sharing all your insights - this community is exactly what I was hoping to find!
0 coins
Pedro Sawyer
•Welcome! Great question about RBDs and part-time work after 70. If you're working for an employer after 70 and participating in their 401(k), you can actually delay RMDs from that specific plan until you fully retire (the "still working exception"). However, this only applies to your current employer's plan - you'd still need to take RMDs from IRAs and previous employers' 401(k)s starting at 73. This could actually work in your favor with the bridge strategy - you could potentially continue working part-time after starting SS at 70, which would reduce how much you need to withdraw from retirement accounts and further optimize your tax situation. Regarding advisors, I had to shop around quite a bit. Many advisors I spoke with were familiar with the general concept of delaying SS, but fewer had deep experience with the specific tax optimization strategies during bridge years (like the Roth conversion opportunities). I'd recommend looking for fee-only advisors who specialize in retirement income planning and specifically asking about their experience with delayed SS strategies during initial consultations. One thing that helped me psychologically was reframing it: instead of "giving up" guaranteed income, I'm "upgrading" to a 32% larger guaranteed income that's also inflation-protected. When I think of it as trading up rather than delaying, it feels much more comfortable!
0 coins
Ali Anderson
As a newcomer to this community, I'm finding this discussion absolutely fascinating! I'm 65 and just hit my FRA last month, so this decision is very real and immediate for me. What struck me most about this thread is how many different angles there are to consider beyond just the basic math. The healthcare coverage piece, the spousal implications, the tax optimization opportunities - it's much more complex than I initially thought. I'm particularly intrigued by the Roth conversion strategy that several people mentioned during the bridge years. My 401k is about $650k, mostly traditional, and I hadn't considered that those lower-income bridge years might be the perfect time to convert chunks of it to Roth. One question for the group: for those who've done this, did you convert a set amount each year to stay within a specific tax bracket, or did you take a more aggressive approach and convert larger amounts while your overall income was low? Also, I'm curious about the logistics - when you delay SS, do you need to actively inform SSA, or do you simply not file at FRA? I want to make sure I don't accidentally miss any deadlines or requirements. Thanks for sharing all your experiences. This community is exactly what I needed to help think through this major decision!
0 coins
Jamal Brown
•Welcome to the community! Since you just hit FRA, you're in the perfect position to implement this strategy if it makes sense for your situation. Regarding SSA logistics - you don't need to actively inform them that you're delaying. Social Security benefits aren't automatic; you have to apply for them. So you simply don't file your application until you're ready to start receiving benefits (up until age 70). Just make sure you DO file before your 70th birthday to maximize those delayed retirement credits, as they stop accumulating after age 70. On the Roth conversion question, most people I've seen discuss this strategy aim to "fill up" lower tax brackets each year rather than converting massive amounts all at once. For example, if you're single and can stay in the 12% bracket by converting up to about $47k annually (2024 numbers), that might be your target. The key is modeling your specific situation - your 401k withdrawals plus any other income plus the Roth conversion amount. With $650k in traditional 401k, you have a great opportunity here. Even converting $40-50k per year during a 4-year bridge period could significantly reduce your future RMDs while staying in relatively low tax brackets. Definitely consider working with a fee-only advisor who specializes in retirement tax planning - the optimization opportunities during these bridge years can be substantial!
0 coins
Rajiv Kumar
As a newcomer to this community, I'm really grateful for all the detailed insights shared here! I'm 66 and approaching this decision myself with about $580k in my 401k. One thing I'm curious about that I haven't seen mentioned - how do you handle the emotional/psychological transition of going from earning a paycheck to living off retirement accounts? I know the math works, but I'm finding it harder than expected to mentally shift from "accumulation mode" to "distribution mode." Also, for those who've implemented this strategy, did you find it helpful to automate the 401k withdrawals, or do you prefer to manage them manually each month? I'm trying to figure out the most stress-free way to handle the logistics. The discussion about Roth conversions during bridge years has really caught my attention too. It seems like such a unique opportunity that you can't replicate once SS kicks in and pushes you into higher tax brackets. Thanks for creating such a welcoming and informative community!
0 coins
Nia Watson
•Welcome to the community! Your question about the emotional transition really resonates with me - I'm new here too and struggling with that exact same psychological hurdle. It's such a big mindset shift from "save every penny" to "it's okay to spend down these accounts." What's been helping me is reframing it as "strategic deployment of assets" rather than "spending down savings." You're not just burning through money - you're executing a calculated plan to optimize your lifetime income. The 401k withdrawals during bridge years aren't depleting your retirement security; they're actually enhancing it by allowing your SS benefit to grow by 8% per year. I've also found it helpful to think about the total picture: yes, your 401k balance will be lower, but your guaranteed monthly income from SS will be significantly higher for life. For me, knowing I'll have a larger inflation-adjusted payment forever actually feels more secure than having a bigger 401k balance that I'd have to manage and worry about market fluctuations. On the automation question, I'm leaning toward setting up automatic monthly withdrawals that match what my SS benefit would be now. That way it feels like getting a "paycheck" from retirement, and the transition to actual SS at 70 should be seamless. Thanks for asking these practical questions - it helps knowing others are working through the same concerns!
0 coins
Amara Okonkwo
As a newcomer to this community, I'm amazed by the depth of knowledge and real-world experience being shared here! I'm 64 and facing this exact decision in about a year when I hit my FRA. One thing that's really struck me from reading through all these responses is how this strategy seems to work best when you have multiple moving parts working together - the 401k bridge, the delayed SS credits, the Roth conversion opportunities, and careful tax planning. It's not just about delaying Social Security; it's about creating a comprehensive retirement income optimization plan. I'm particularly interested in what several people mentioned about having a cash cushion during the bridge years. For those who've implemented this, how much did you keep in cash versus keeping it invested? I'm torn between wanting to maximize growth and wanting the security of knowing I won't have to sell investments during a market downturn. Also, I noticed some discussion about spousal considerations. My spouse is 3 years younger than me and has a much smaller SS benefit projected. Should we be coordinating our claiming strategies, or can I make this decision independently? Thanks for such a welcoming and informative discussion - this community is exactly what I was hoping to find as I navigate these complex retirement decisions!
0 coins
Issac Nightingale
•Welcome to the community! You've really captured the essence of why this strategy can be so powerful - it's the synergy between all the different components that creates the real value. On the cash cushion question, most people I've seen discuss this aim for 1-2 years of expenses in cash or very conservative investments (CDs, money market, short-term bonds). The idea isn't to maximize returns on that portion, but to give yourself flexibility so you're never forced to sell equities during a downturn. Think of it as "sequence of returns insurance" rather than an investment. Regarding spousal coordination - this is absolutely something to plan together! With your spouse being 3 years younger, you have some interesting optimization opportunities. Generally, the higher-earning spouse delaying can maximize survivor benefits, but there are also strategies like "claim and invest" where one spouse claims early while the other delays, depending on your relative benefit amounts and overall financial situation. Given the complexity you've identified, this might be a perfect case for getting professional guidance. A fee-only advisor specializing in Social Security optimization could model different scenarios for both of you and help coordinate the timing to maximize your household's lifetime benefits. The fact that you're thinking about this comprehensively rather than just focusing on one piece shows you're approaching it the right way. These integrated strategies can be incredibly powerful when executed well!
0 coins
Norman Fraser
As a newcomer to this community, I'm incredibly impressed by the quality and depth of discussion here! I'm 63 and have been researching this exact strategy for months, but reading through everyone's real-world experiences has been more valuable than all the generic financial articles I've consumed. One aspect I haven't seen discussed much is how this strategy might interact with state taxes. I'm currently in a high-tax state but considering relocating to a no-tax state during my bridge years. Has anyone factored state tax implications into their decision? It seems like the combination of lower federal taxes during bridge years (from controlled 401k withdrawals) plus eliminating state taxes entirely could create even more optimization opportunities. Also, I'm curious about the practical mechanics of managing healthcare during these years. I know several people mentioned being on Medicare already, but for those who retired before 65, how did you handle the gap coverage? ACA marketplace plans can be expensive, and I'm wondering if that cost needs to be factored into the bridge year budget calculations. The psychological aspects many of you have discussed really resonate with me too. It's challenging to shift from "don't touch retirement accounts" to actively drawing them down, even when the math clearly supports it. Thanks for creating such a supportive environment for working through these complex decisions!
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Welcome to the community! Your question about state tax implications is really smart - that's an often overlooked piece of the optimization puzzle. Moving from a high-tax state to a no-tax state during bridge years could indeed amplify the benefits significantly. You'd have more control over your federal tax bracket through strategic 401k withdrawals and Roth conversions, while completely eliminating state income tax on those distributions. Just make sure you understand the residency requirements for your target state - some require you to be a resident for a full tax year before you get the benefit. On healthcare for pre-65 retirees, you're absolutely right that ACA marketplace plans can be expensive, but here's where the income control during bridge years can actually help. Since your income will be primarily from 401k withdrawals (which you control), you might be able to manage your Modified Adjusted Gross Income to qualify for premium tax credits on marketplace plans. It requires careful planning, but some people have successfully kept their reportable income low enough to get subsidized coverage. The psychological shift is definitely real! What helped me was creating a detailed month-by-month projection of my bridge years, showing exactly how the strategy plays out. Seeing the numbers laid out concretely - the 401k drawdown, the growing SS benefit, the tax savings - made it feel less like "spending my nest egg" and more like "executing a strategic plan." Great questions - you're clearly thinking about this comprehensively!
0 coins
Eva St. Cyr
As a newcomer to this community, I'm finding this discussion absolutely invaluable! I'm 64 and will hit my FRA in about 8 months, so this decision is becoming very real for me. I have around $720k in my 401k and have been going back and forth on this exact strategy. What really strikes me from reading through all these responses is how much the "human element" matters alongside the math. Yes, the 8% guaranteed growth from delaying SS is compelling, but the peace of mind factors - having that cash cushion, being prepared for market volatility, understanding the tax implications - seem just as important for actually sleeping well during those bridge years. I'm particularly curious about something I haven't seen mentioned: how do you handle the annual Social Security statements during the delay period? Do they continue to show updated projections with the delayed retirement credits, or do you need to calculate those increases yourself? I want to make sure I can track that my strategy is working as planned. Also, for those who've successfully navigated this, what was the biggest surprise or unexpected challenge you encountered during your bridge years? I'm trying to anticipate potential issues before I commit to this path. Thanks to everyone for sharing such detailed, real-world insights. This community is exactly what I needed to help finalize this major decision!
0 coins
William Rivera
•Welcome to the community! You're asking excellent questions that show you're thinking about this holistically, which is exactly the right approach. Regarding the Social Security statements during delay years - yes, SSA continues to send updated annual statements that reflect your delayed retirement credits! They'll show projections at different claiming ages (62, FRA, 70) and update the estimates based on your current earnings record. The delayed retirement credit calculations are typically very accurate in these statements. I found it reassuring during my bridge years to see those projections increase each year - it helped reinforce that the strategy was working as planned. As for unexpected challenges, the biggest surprise for me was actually positive: the Roth conversion opportunities during bridge years turned out to be even more valuable than I initially calculated. Being able to convert significant amounts while staying in the 12% tax bracket created tax savings that extended well beyond just the delayed SS benefits. The most challenging aspect was managing my emotions during the first market downturn in my bridge years. Even though I had that cash cushion everyone talks about, seeing my 401k balance drop while I was actively withdrawing from it was psychologically tough. Having a clear written plan and reminding myself of the long-term strategy helped get through that period. One practical tip: consider setting up automatic monthly transfers from your 401k that roughly match what your current SS benefit would be. It creates a "paycheck" feeling that makes the transition smoother psychologically. You're clearly well-prepared for this decision - trust the math and plan for the emotions!
0 coins
Ingrid Larsson
As a newcomer to this community, I'm really grateful for discovering this incredibly detailed discussion! I'm 65 and just reached my FRA two months ago, so I'm right in the thick of making this decision. Reading through everyone's real-world experiences has been more helpful than months of researching generic advice online. What's really resonating with me is how this isn't just a simple "delay Social Security" decision - it's a comprehensive retirement income optimization strategy that touches on tax planning, investment management, healthcare considerations, and even psychological preparedness. The interconnected nature of all these pieces is both exciting and a bit overwhelming. I'm particularly intrigued by the Roth conversion opportunity that so many have mentioned during the bridge years. With about $800k in traditional 401k assets, it seems like I might have a unique window to convert substantial amounts while controlling my tax bracket through strategic withdrawals. One question I haven't seen addressed: for those who've done significant Roth conversions during bridge years, did you find it better to spread them evenly across all four years, or concentrate them in the early years when you might have more flexibility? I'm trying to balance the tax optimization with maintaining enough traditional assets for ongoing withdrawals. Also, I'm curious about estate planning implications. Does this strategy affect how you think about leaving assets to heirs, given that you're drawing down 401k assets earlier but creating a larger SS survivor benefit? Thanks for such a welcoming and knowledgeable community - exactly what I needed as I navigate this major life transition!
0 coins