Confused about 2025 SS benefit difference - $5,108 for new age 70 retirees vs. $4,994 for 2024 retirees?
I've been tracking Social Security max benefits as I approach retirement, and something's confusing me. According to my research, people turning 70 in 2025 and starting benefits this year can get a maximum of $5,108/month. But those who already started benefits at 70 in 2024 are only getting $4,994/month in 2025 after the COLA. This doesn't make sense to me. It's like the newer retirees are getting a better deal despite having the same birth year as those who claimed in 2024. Am I missing something about how the calculations work? Does SSA somehow give better COLAs to people who wait longer? My financial advisor couldn't explain it clearly and now I'm wondering if I should delay my application even though I'm already 70.
17 comments
Amara Oluwaseyi
The difference you're seeing is because of how SSA calculates initial benefits versus how they apply COLAs to existing benefits. When you start benefits in 2025, your Primary Insurance Amount (PIA) is calculated using the most recent wage indexing factors, which tend to increase year over year. Someone who started in 2024 had their initial benefit calculated with 2024 factors, and then just received the straight COLA for 2025. It's not that younger people get better COLAs - it's that your initial benefit calculation is based on current-year factors, while existing beneficiaries just get the standard COLA adjustment on their already-established benefit amount. This is completely normal and happens every year.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Oh that makes more sense! So it's not that they're getting preferential treatment, it's just two different calculation methods. But doesn't that mean I'd be better off waiting until January 2026 even though I'm already 70? Would my benefit amount be even higher with the 2026 wage indexing?
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
my mom ran into this same thing!!! she was so mad that her friend who retired a year later got more $$$. she called ss like 5 times and they kept giving her different answers. so frustrating!!!! the whole system is rigged i swear
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•I understand the frustration, but it's actually not rigged - it's just complicated. Each year's maximum benefit is calculated based on the current wage base and indexing factors. Once your benefit starts, you only get COLAs. That's why there's always a difference between new retirees and existing beneficiaries. Your mom's benefit was calculated correctly based on when she filed.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
This absolutely confused me too when I was researching SS benefits! The way I understand it (and I could be wrong), there are two different calculations happening: 1. For new retirees in 2025: They calculate your benefit from scratch using the 2025 wage base and indexing factors 2. For existing retirees: They just take your established benefit and add the COLA percentage What's weird is if you were born in the same year as someone who claimed last year, you might get more money by waiting until 2025 to file, even though you're both 70. The system doesn't make a lot of sense sometimes.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
•You've got it right. The difference between $4,994 and $5,108 stems from different calculation methods, not preferential treatment. The maximum benefit for someone retiring at age 70 in 2025 reflects the current wage base and indexing factors. However, someone who retired at 70 in 2024 gets their established benefit plus the 2025 COLA (3.2%). Importantly, once you reach 70, there's no benefit to waiting longer. Age 70 is the cap for delayed retirement credits. If you're 70 in 2025, you should apply now - waiting until 2026 won't increase your benefit except for any additional earnings that might replace lower earnings in your calculation.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
So does this mean if ur already collecting SS its gonna be less than someone who starts later even if u both waited till 70???
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•Yes, generally someone who starts benefits this year will get a higher amount than someone who started last year, even if they're the same age. This happens because the wage base (the maximum amount of earnings subject to Social Security tax) increases each year, and the calculation uses more recent indexing factors. It doesn't mean earlier retirees are being cheated - their benefits were correctly calculated based on the rules at the time they filed. It's just that the overall benefit formula tends to produce higher results each year as wages throughout the economy increase.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
I researched this extensively when planning my own retirement. The maximum benefit amount increases each year because it's based on the maximum taxable earnings from previous years, which increase annually. Here's what's happening: 1. Someone who turned 70 and claimed in 2024 had their benefit calculated using pre-2024 wage bases and indexing factors, then received a 3.2% COLA for 2025. 2. Someone turning 70 in 2025 has their benefit calculated using more recent (higher) wage bases up through 2024 or 2025, resulting in the higher $5,108 figure. This is normal and happens every year. There's nothing unfair happening - just the regular calculation method. And no, there's no advantage to waiting beyond age 70 to apply.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Thank you for this detailed explanation! I still find it odd that two people born in the same year get different amounts just because one waited a few more months to file. But I guess that's just how the system works. I'll go ahead and file now since I'm already 70 and there's no advantage to waiting longer.
0 coins
Dmitry Petrov
My cousin works for SSA and she says they get this question all the time. It drives her nuts because their own training doesn't explain it very well! The different max benefit amounts are because of the wage indexing thing the others mentioned, not because of COLAs being different. Its just how the math works out.
0 coins
Giovanni Rossi
Is anyone else having trouble even REACHING Social Security to ask these kinds of questions? I've been trying for weeks to get through to someone who actually understands these calculations. The phone lines are always jammed, I got disconnected twice after waiting over an hour, and my local office is booked solid for months!
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•I had the same problem until I found this service called Claimyr. They hold your place in line with SSA and call you back when an agent is available - saved me hours of waiting. Their site is claimyr.com and they have a video showing how it works here: https://youtu.be/Z-BRbJw3puU. I was skeptical but it actually worked and I got through to someone who could explain my benefit calculation in detail. Way better than getting disconnected after an hour on hold!
0 coins
Fatima Al-Maktoum
To clarify a key point that's causing confusion: Once you reach age 70, there is NO BENEFIT to waiting longer to apply. Age 70 is the maximum age for delayed retirement credits (DRCs). If you're already 70 in 2025, you should apply now. Waiting until 2026 will not increase your benefit amount through DRCs. The only thing that could potentially increase your benefit by waiting would be if you're still working and replacing a lower-earning year in your calculation with a higher-earning 2025 year. The difference between someone who turned 70 and applied in 2024 versus 2025 is due to the wage indexing in the initial calculation, not because of some advantage to waiting past 70.
0 coins
Liam McConnell
•Thank you for emphasizing this! I'll definitely apply now rather than waiting. My highest earnings years were already within my top 35, so working longer wouldn't help my calculation anyway. I appreciate everyone's help in understanding this confusing system!
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
wait so if I'm turning 66 this year should I wait till 70? will I get more $$$ that way? or should I just take it now? i'm so confused by all this!!!!
0 coins
Amara Oluwaseyi
•That's a different question from what the original poster asked, but generally: Yes, waiting until 70 will give you a significantly higher monthly benefit (approximately 32% more than at your full retirement age of 66). Whether that's the right choice depends on your health, financial situation, and other factors. But if you're trying to maximize your lifetime benefit and expect to live past roughly age 80, waiting is mathematically advantageous.
0 coins