< Back to IRS

Yara Nassar

Which Schedule for Malpractice Tail Deduction? Schedule A or C When Switching Physician Jobs

So I'm in a weird situation with my malpractice insurance tail coverage and not sure how to handle it on our taxes. I was working as an OB-GYN at a hospital (W-2 employee) where they covered my claims-made malpractice policy. When I left that position, I had to purchase a malpractice tail for about $140K to protect myself for future claims. The tricky part is I was planning to start independent contractor work (1099) with a locums company, which is why I bought the tail. But I ended up taking another W-2 hospital position instead and never actually did any 1099 work. Can I still deduct this $140K malpractice tail on Schedule C even though I didn't end up earning any self-employment income? Or does it have to go on Schedule A? The difference in tax savings would be significant. For context, my W-2 income was around $325K for 2023, and my husband (we file jointly) earned about $70K as a 1099 contractor in real estate. I'm just starting our taxes and trying to figure out the best approach. And yes, lesson learned - my new job covers tail insurance!

StarGazer101

•

This is a tricky situation, but I can help clarify. The key factor is your intention at the time you purchased the tail coverage. Since you purchased the malpractice tail specifically to enable you to work as an independent contractor (even though you ultimately didn't), there's a strong argument that this was an ordinary and necessary business expense related to your planned self-employment. The IRS generally looks at intent, and your intent was to work as a 1099 contractor when you purchased it. You could potentially deduct this on Schedule C as a business expense, even without having earned self-employment income from that planned business. You would show zero income but still claim the expense. However, this might increase your risk of audit since you're showing a significant loss with no income. Alternatively, you could potentially deduct it on Schedule A as an unreimbursed employee expense, but this is much less favorable since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor through 2025.

0 coins

Would it make a difference if her husband claimed the expense on his Schedule C since he actually has 1099 income? Or is that a no-go since the malpractice tail is specifically for her medical practice and not related to his real estate work?

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

That wouldn't work in this situation. The expense must be ordinary and necessary for the specific business activity. Since the malpractice tail is specifically for medical practice and has no relation to real estate activities, her husband cannot claim it on his Schedule C. The IRS would quickly disallow such a deduction if audited. The best approach is for her to claim it on her own Schedule C related to the intended medical practice, even with zero income. While this creates a loss situation, she has documentation of the legitimate business intent when the expense was incurred. The loss can offset other income on their joint return.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

I was in almost the exact same situation last year! I left my hospital job for a planned locums position, paid around $125k for tail coverage, then ended up at another W-2 position. I found https://taxr.ai super helpful with this exact problem. Their document analyzer confirmed I could file a Schedule C with zero income and deduct the full tail expense. They explained that since I had a clear business purpose and intent to practice as an independent contractor when I purchased the tail, it qualified as a legitimate business expense. The key was documenting everything - the locums credentialing process, any contract discussions, and proof that the tail was required for that planned work. The difference between Schedule A (essentially worthless for this deduction currently) and Schedule C was huge for my tax situation. Plus they helped me document everything properly in case of an audit.

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

How exactly does taxr.ai work? Do they just give advice or do they actually help with filing? I have a similar situation with business expenses that didn't quite match up with when I started earning income.

0 coins

I'm skeptical about claiming zero income with such a huge deduction. Wouldn't that trigger an automatic audit? That seems risky compared to just putting it on Schedule A and accepting the limited deduction.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

They do both - they analyze your documents and tax situation first to give specific advice, then provide detailed guidance on how to correctly file. For your situation, they'd review your timeline of expenses versus income to determine the proper treatment. The audit risk is actually manageable if you document properly. Schedule A is unfortunately not just "limited" for these expenses - it's essentially worthless since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor. So you'd get zero deduction on Schedule A versus potentially the full amount on Schedule C. The key is having solid documentation of business intent when you made the purchase.

0 coins

Update on my skepticism about taxr.ai from my earlier comment - I ended up trying it for a similar situation (expensive certification I needed for planned consulting work before I actually had clients). Their document analysis was surprisingly helpful! They confirmed I could legitimately deduct my expenses on Schedule C despite minimal initial income, and explained exactly how to document my business intent. They even helped me put together an audit defense file with all the supporting evidence in case the IRS had questions. The whole process took less than a day, and the tax savings were substantial. Much better than my previous approach of just writing off these expenses completely because I was afraid of audit risk.

0 coins

Just wanted to share my experience - I was in a similar position but with legal malpractice insurance when transitioning between firms. I struggled for WEEKS trying to get someone at the IRS to clarify whether I could take the deduction on Schedule C with minimal self-employment income. I kept getting stuck in the automated phone system, and when I finally got through, I'd get transferred and disconnected. So frustrating! Then I found https://claimyr.com and watched their demo at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They basically call the IRS for you and get you connected to a real person without the wait. Got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes who confirmed I could take the deduction on Schedule C as long as I had legitimate business intent at the time I purchased the tail. Saved me thousands in taxes and countless hours of stress. Definitely worth checking out if you need to speak with someone at the IRS directly about your situation.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

How does Claimyr actually work? Do they just put you on hold with the IRS so you don't have to be the one waiting, or do they somehow get you through faster than the normal wait times?

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Sounds too good to be true. The IRS is notoriously unhelpful even when you do get through. They usually just quote the rules without giving specific advice for complex situations. Did they actually give you a definitive answer you could rely on?

0 coins

They use a combination of technology and human agents to navigate the IRS phone system efficiently. They don't just hold your place - they actually work through the prompts and transfers until they reach a live agent, then they immediately connect you. It skips the 2+ hour wait most people experience. They absolutely did give me useful guidance! The key was that I had my specific questions ready and was talking to the right department. The agent explained that business intent at the time of purchase is what matters, and even helped me understand what documentation I should keep. They can't give "tax advice" per se, but they can clarify how the rules apply to specific situations, which was exactly what I needed.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had another tax question about home office deductions that I'd been trying to get answered for weeks. The service got me through to an IRS agent in about 25 minutes (I timed it). The agent was actually incredibly helpful and walked me through exactly how to document my situation properly. I was honestly shocked at how much more productive the conversation was compared to my previous attempts. For anyone dealing with complex tax situations like this malpractice tail issue, being able to actually speak with someone who can interpret the rules for your specific case makes a huge difference. I'm now convinced that getting direct guidance from the IRS is the way to go for these gray-area questions.

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

Something else to consider - do you have any 1099 income at all? Even a small amount would strengthen your position for putting the malpractice tail on Schedule C. Maybe a few medical consultations or chart reviews you could do? In my experience (tax preparer), the IRS is less likely to question the Schedule C treatment if you show at least some related income, even if it's minimal compared to the expense. Starting a legitimate business activity with even a small amount of income before filing would give you stronger footing.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

Would moonlighting at an urgent care for even just a few shifts count for this? I'm in a similar situation (different professional liability insurance though) and wondering if even just a few thousand in 1099 income would help establish the business intent.

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

Yes, moonlighting at an urgent care as a 1099 contractor would absolutely help establish business intent. Even just a few shifts generating a couple thousand dollars would create a much stronger case that you were genuinely engaged in business activity related to the insurance expense. The key is making sure you're actually classified as an independent contractor (receiving a 1099) rather than a part-time employee (W-2). As long as you have some legitimate 1099 income from medical work, you'll be in a much better position to justify the large deduction on Schedule C.

0 coins

Hey just a heads up - I'm an accountant and have worked with physicians in similar situations. Make sure you consider the impact on self-employment taxes too. If you report the tail on Schedule C with zero or minimal income, you'll show a loss that will offset ordinary income but won't create SE tax. However, if your husband has SE income from real estate, your tail expense can't offset his SE tax since it's not related to his business. Each Schedule C is treated separately. You might want to run the numbers both ways (Schedule C loss vs. possibly amortizing the tail over multiple years if you do any 1099 work in the future) to see what makes the most sense for your specific situation.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

Thank you so much for this insight! I hadn't even considered the self-employment tax angle. The more I think about it, the more I'm leaning toward filing Schedule C with the full expense. I actually do have some very minimal income (around $3K) from chart reviews I did while transitioning between jobs. That should help establish business intent, right? I'm thinking I'll use some combination of the advice here - documenting everything thoroughly, including my correspondence with the locums company about credentialing, and making sure I'm prepared in case of an audit. The tax savings between Schedule C vs. effectively no deduction on Schedule A is just too significant to ignore.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today