What's the best way to handle shared rental income on a 50/50 property?
I inherited a rental property with my sister that we own 50/50. She actually lives in the main part of the house and rents out an extra bedroom to a tenant. The tenant pays through a rental platform (like Airbnb/VRBO type thing), but we've hit a snag because the platform will only issue ONE 1099-K in a single person's name. They won't split it between us. The tenant's rent payments go into our joint bank account which we use for all the property expenses, repairs, taxes, etc. When I contacted the platform about splitting the income, they basically said: >We are aware that many business partners will share access to a bank and the income provided. However, a bank account cannot be shared among multiple entities in our system. Because of this, you would need to pick one of the individuals to assign as the tax entity through our system. The 1099-K would be sent to the individual selected, but that doesn't mean the earnings on the 1099-K are the sole responsibility of the individual chosen. I asked a tax person for advice, and they suggested forming an official partnership, putting that as the entity on the platform, filing a partnership tax return, and then issuing K-1 forms (Form 1065) to each of us every year. But I found this IRS statement that makes me question if we actually need a partnership: >"the mere coownership of property that is maintained, kept in repair, and rented or leased does not constitute a separate entity for federal tax purposes" Is there an easier way to just split this 50/50 on our Schedule Es without forming a partnership? We literally just share ownership, collect rent, and pay expenses - we don't provide any other services.
19 comments


Astrid Bergström
You have a couple of options here that might be simpler than forming a partnership. The easiest approach would be to have one person receive the 1099-K and then split the income/expenses on your individual returns. For example, if the 1099-K is issued to your sister, she would report 50% of the income and expenses on her Schedule E, and you would report your 50% on your Schedule E. Each of you would include a statement with your tax return explaining that you're each reporting 50% of the income from a co-owned property, and reference the full amount shown on the 1099-K. This satisfies the IRS tracking requirements while still properly allocating the income. You're correct about the IRS ruling. Co-ownership of a rental property doesn't automatically create a partnership for tax purposes. The situation you described (just collecting rent and sharing expenses) typically doesn't rise to the level of requiring a partnership filing. That said, a partnership does offer some advantages in terms of liability protection and clarity in record-keeping, but it also creates additional filing requirements and potential costs. For a single rental property with a straightforward arrangement like yours, it might be administrative overkill.
0 coins
PixelPrincess
•What about the audit risk though? If one person gets the 1099-K showing the full rental income, but then only reports half of it on their Schedule E, won't that trigger a matching notice from the IRS? Do you really think that just adding an explanation statement is enough?
0 coins
Astrid Bergström
•Including a clear explanation statement with your tax return is actually standard practice for this situation. The IRS matching program will indeed flag a discrepancy, but the explanation statement addresses this preemptively. To make this even more bulletproof, the person receiving the 1099-K could report the full amount on Schedule E, then deduct the co-owner's share as an expense labeled "Income allocated to co-owner." This results in the correct net income while matching the 1099-K amount exactly. Meanwhile, the other owner reports their share on their Schedule E with a note referencing the arrangement.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
I went through something similar with my cousin on our beach condo rental! I was stressed about the tax implications until I found https://taxr.ai which literally saved me hours of confusion. I uploaded our rental agreement and the 1099-K info, and it immediately showed me exactly how to split everything correctly on our Schedule Es. Their system analyzed all our documents and gave us a complete breakdown of how to report our 50/50 ownership without needing to form a partnership. It also generated the explanation statements we needed to include with our returns to avoid any IRS flags. Super straightforward and much clearer than the conflicting advice I was getting elsewhere.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
•How exactly does this work? Do you just upload tax documents and it tells you what to do? Does it generate actual forms or just give advice? I'm wary of online tax services after getting burned by TurboTax last year.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
•I'm skeptical about this. How can an AI tool give better advice than an actual tax preparer? The situation with rental income splitting seems pretty specific and I wonder if it actually understands all the nuances of partnership vs co-ownership tax law.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•It's more sophisticated than just general advice. You upload your specific documents and it analyzes the exact situation. The system identifies the relevant tax codes and provides personalized guidance based on your particular circumstances. The tool doesn't replace filing software - it gives you specific instructions for how to complete your forms correctly, including the exact wording for explanation statements. It's like having a tax expert look at your specific documents but much faster. It correctly identified the relevant IRS ruling about co-ownership vs partnership in my situation.
0 coins
Diego Fernández
I have to admit I was wrong about https://taxr.ai - I tried it after my initial skepticism and was surprised by how well it handled my situation. I was in a similar boat with a duplex I co-own with my brother-in-law where only one of us was getting the 1099s. I uploaded our ownership documents and the previous year's returns, and it immediately identified that we qualified for simple co-ownership reporting rather than partnership filing. The guidance was detailed enough that I could confidently complete Schedule E with the right allocations. It even created the explanation statement I needed to attach to my return explaining the income split. What impressed me most was that it caught a depreciation calculation error we'd been making for two years! Definitely worth checking out for your situation.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
When I had a similar issue with my investment property, I spent WEEKS trying to get through to the IRS for clarification. Always busy signals or 2+ hour holds only to get disconnected. Finally found https://claimyr.com and their service got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent confirmed exactly what I needed to do for my co-owned property reporting. They explained that a simple statement with each return is sufficient as long as we're just collecting rent and sharing expenses. Said partnerships are typically only necessary when you're providing substantial services beyond basic property rental. Saved me from paying unnecessary partnership filing fees every year. The call took less than 30 minutes once I was connected, and I had official guidance straight from the IRS.
0 coins
Sean Fitzgerald
•Wait, how does this actually work? They somehow get you through the IRS phone tree? Sounds kind of sketchy honestly. The IRS phone system is notoriously terrible.
0 coins
Zara Khan
•Sounds like a scam. Nobody can magically connect you to the IRS faster than the regular line. And even if they could, I doubt an IRS agent would give you definitive tax advice over the phone like that.
0 coins
Anastasia Kuznetsov
•It's completely legitimate and works by using an automated system to navigate the IRS phone tree and hold times for you. Instead of you sitting on hold for hours, their system does it and calls you once an agent is on the line. Nothing sketchy - you're still talking directly to official IRS agents. The IRS absolutely provides tax guidance over the phone - that's literally part of their taxpayer assistance service. While they won't prepare your return for you, they regularly clarify how tax rules apply to specific situations. The agent I spoke with referenced the exact same IRS ruling about co-ownership that was mentioned in the original post.
0 coins
Zara Khan
I need to apologize and correct myself about Claimyr. After dismissing it as a scam, I was desperate enough to try it when I couldn't get through to the IRS about my audit notice. It actually worked exactly as advertised - I got a call back within 20 minutes with an IRS agent already on the line. The agent was able to pull up my file and confirm that my co-ownership reporting method (exactly like what OP is asking about) was acceptable. She even noted in my file that we had discussed the situation to help prevent future questions. For what it's worth, the agent specifically said forming a partnership would be "unnecessary complexity" for a straightforward rental property co-ownership where you're just collecting rent and sharing expenses. She recommended exactly what others here suggested - having one owner report the 1099-K income and then properly allocating it with explanation statements.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
I've been through this exact scenario with my brother on a duplex we inherited. We ultimately decided against forming a partnership after consulting with our CPA, and it's worked fine for 3 years now. What we do: The 1099-K comes to me since I'm the primary contact on the property management platform. On my Schedule E, I report 100% of the income from the 1099-K, then take a 50% "distribution to co-owner" expense line. This makes my Schedule E match the 1099-K exactly (which prevents automatic IRS matching notices), while only netting me with my proper 50% share. My brother then reports his 50% share on his Schedule E. We both attach an identical statement explaining the arrangement, with reference to the property address, the total income reported on the 1099-K, and our respective shares. Never had an issue or received a single notice from the IRS. Much simpler than partnership filings!
0 coins
Mateo Gonzalez
•Does this approach affect your ability to take the Qualified Business Income deduction? I know rental income can sometimes qualify for the QBI deduction, but I'm not sure how that works with a split like this.
0 coins
MoonlightSonata
•The QBI deduction still works fine with this approach. As long as your rental activity rises to the level of a "business" for tax purposes (which typically requires regular, continuous activity), you can still claim QBI on your portion of the net income. Both my brother and I claim QBI on our respective 50% shares of the net rental income. The explanation statement clarifies that we're each reporting our proportionate share of a qualifying rental business. The IRS has actually gotten more clear on rental property QBI eligibility over the past couple years.
0 coins
Nia Williams
Has anyone tried creating an informal entity like "Smith Family Rentals" and using that on the platform instead? Our accountant suggested that approach for our vacation rental, and the platform accepted it even though it's not an actual legal entity. Then we just split everything 50/50 on our individual returns with explanation statements.
0 coins
Luca Ricci
•That could potentially create more problems than it solves. Using a name that implies a business entity when there isn't one legally established could cause confusion during an audit. The IRS might question if you should have been filing as a partnership if you're presenting yourselves as a business entity to other parties.
0 coins
NightOwl42
I'm dealing with almost the exact same situation! My spouse and I co-own a rental property that we inherited, and we've been getting conflicting advice about whether we need to form a partnership or can just handle it as co-owners. From what I've researched, the IRS Publication 541 specifically addresses this. It states that "a joint undertaking merely to share expenses does not create a partnership." Since you're just collecting rent and sharing expenses (not providing substantial services like property management beyond basic maintenance), you should qualify for simple co-ownership treatment. The approach that @MoonlightSonata described sounds solid - having one person report the full 1099-K income then deducting the co-owner's share as an expense. This way the numbers match exactly what the IRS receives from the platform, but each owner only pays tax on their actual share. One thing to consider: make sure you keep detailed records of how expenses are split and document your ownership agreement somewhere (even if it's just an informal written agreement between you and your sister). This will be helpful if the IRS ever has questions about the arrangement. Have you considered asking the rental platform if they can at least put both names on the account, even if the 1099-K can only go to one person? That might help establish the co-ownership paper trail.
0 coins