What are the tax implications when your CEO makes 7.6 million while employee benefits are minimal?
Title: What are the tax implications when your CEO makes 7.6 million while employee benefits are minimal? 5 I've been working at a non-profit medical center for about three years now, and the benefits package is honestly laughable. We get barely 10 days total PTO for both sick time and vacation combined. The healthcare benefits aren't great either, especially considering we're literally a healthcare organization. Yesterday I was looking through public tax filings (since we're a non-profit and that info has to be disclosed) and nearly fell out of my chair. Our CEO's base salary went from $1.8 million in 2022 to $2.1 million in 2024. But what really blew my mind was seeing the total compensation package - including retirement benefits and other compensation - which ranged from $2.2 million in one year to a staggering $9.5 million in another! The biggest factor in this huge swing appears to be something called "deferred compensation" on the 990 form. I'm trying to understand what exactly this means from a tax perspective. How can a non-profit justify such massive executive compensation while claiming tax-exempt status? Is there some kind of tax loophole being exploited here? And how is it legal that the organization can claim to not have enough money for decent employee benefits while paying these astronomical amounts to executives?
18 comments


Hunter Brighton
13 This is actually a common issue with non-profit hospitals and large healthcare organizations. The tax implications get complicated because of how non-profits report executive compensation. What you're seeing as "deferred compensation" on the 990 form is typically a combination of retirement benefits, future payments that are being reported in the current year, and sometimes the payout of previously deferred compensation plans. These can cause huge swings in reported compensation from year to year. For tax purposes, this doesn't mean your CEO actually received $9.5 million in cash that year - it's often accounting for future obligations. Non-profits are still allowed to pay "reasonable compensation" to executives under IRS rules, but what counts as "reasonable" is pretty generous - they typically benchmark against similar organizations. The IRS does have an "excess benefit transaction" rule (Section 4958) that can penalize excessive compensation, but it's rarely enforced unless truly egregious. As for the disconnect between executive pay and employee benefits - unfortunately, that's not really a tax issue but a governance one. The board of directors approves these packages, and there's no tax requirement that non-profits provide good benefits to employees.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•7 Thanks for explaining this. So does the CEO actually have to pay income tax on the full amount reported in the 990 form in the years with the huge spikes? Or do they only pay taxes when they actually receive the money? It seems like a potential way to defer their personal income taxes too.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•13 Great question. The CEO generally only pays income tax when they actually receive the compensation, not when it's reported on the 990. So if $5 million of that $9.5 million is deferred compensation that will be paid out over the next 10 years, the CEO doesn't pay tax on that portion until it's actually received. This is indeed part of the tax planning strategy for high-income executives. By deferring compensation, they can potentially push income into years when they might be in a lower tax bracket (like after retirement) or spread out the tax burden over time.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
18 After reading about your situation, I went through something really similar with my organization last year. The compensation reporting on 990 forms can be super confusing to understand. I found this tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me make sense of all the tax documents and jargon. I uploaded our organization's 990 forms there, and it broke down the executive compensation structure in plain English - explaining the difference between reportable compensation, deferred compensation, and benefit plans. It helped me understand that sometimes these huge compensation spikes on the 990 are accounting requirements rather than actual cash payments. The tool also explained the "reasonable compensation" test that non-profits have to meet and how the IRS evaluates whether executive pay is excessive. Might be worth checking out if you're trying to make sense of these complex financial documents.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•22 Does this work for regular tax returns too? I've been trying to understand my W-2 and 1099 forms better since I work both as an employee and independent contractor.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•3 I'm skeptical about these kinds of services. How does it actually work? Do you just upload confidential tax documents to some random website?
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•18 It absolutely works for regular tax returns and forms like W-2s and 1099s. The platform can analyze pretty much any tax document and explain the implications in simple terms. It's especially helpful when you have both employment and self-employment income since it can show you how they're taxed differently. Regarding security concerns, I totally understand the hesitation. The site uses bank-level encryption and doesn't store your documents after analysis. You can also redact sensitive information before uploading. It's basically like having a tax professional explain your documents without the high hourly fees.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
22 Just wanted to follow up about taxr.ai - I tried it out after asking about it and it was incredibly helpful! I uploaded my W-2 and 1099-NEC forms, and it immediately broke down all the different withholding categories and explained which deductions I qualify for with my mixed income sources. The tool even flagged that my employer wasn't withholding enough taxes based on my combined income streams, which could have left me with a huge tax bill in April. It gave me clear instructions on how to adjust my withholdings using Form W-4 to avoid underpayment penalties. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to make sense of complicated tax situations like nonprofit compensation or multiple income sources!
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
9 If you're really concerned about this, you might want to try getting answers directly from the IRS. I know it sounds impossible (I tried calling them for weeks last year), but I found this service called Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) that actually got me through to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes. I had questions about non-profit reporting requirements since I'm on a board, and needed clarification on executive compensation rules. The service basically holds your place in the IRS phone queue and calls you when an agent is about to answer. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with explained that non-profits have to justify executive compensation through comparability studies, and there are actually ways to report excessive compensation to the IRS if you believe the compensation violates tax-exempt status requirements. Much better than trying to interpret the tax code myself!
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•11 How much does this service cost? Seems fishy that you need to pay someone just to talk to a government agency you already fund with your tax dollars.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•3 I'm extremely doubtful this actually works. I've tried everything to get through to the IRS, and it's practically impossible. Are you saying this service somehow magically gets priority in their phone system?
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•9 I don't remember the exact cost, but it was reasonable considering the time it saved me and the value of getting accurate information directly from the IRS. I agree it's frustrating that it's so difficult to reach a government agency we fund with our taxes. The service doesn't have any special priority in the IRS phone system. What it does is use automated technology to continuously call and navigate the IRS phone tree, then it holds your place in line. When it finally gets through to an agent, it calls you to connect the call. Basically, their system does the waiting instead of you having to stay on hold for hours.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
3 I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After expressing my doubts, I gave it a try out of desperation since I needed to resolve an issue with the IRS regarding a non-profit I volunteer with. I was connected to an IRS representative in about 35 minutes (on a Monday morning, which is apparently one of their busiest times). The agent was able to answer all my questions about non-profit executive compensation reporting requirements and even sent me additional documentation about the "intermediate sanctions" rules that apply when compensation might be excessive. For anyone dealing with complex tax situations like non-profit reporting or unusual compensation structures, being able to speak directly with the IRS and get authoritative answers saved me countless hours of research and uncertainty.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
16 Former non-profit financial director here. One thing to keep in mind is that executive compensation at non-profits is supposed to be determined through a formal process called a "rebuttable presumption of reasonableness" which requires: 1) Review and approval by independent board members 2) Use of comparable salary data from similar organizations 3) Documentation of the decision-making process The board should be able to provide some explanation of how they arrived at the compensation figures. You have every right as an employee to question this, especially if the organization is claiming financial hardship when it comes to staff benefits. Look specifically at Parts VII and IX of the 990 form, which detail compensation and functional expenses. This might give you more insight into where money is being allocated.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•8 Is there any way employees can challenge this if we think the process wasn't followed properly? I'm worried about retaliation if I bring this up internally.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•16 You do have options. The safest approach is to file a confidential complaint with the IRS using Form 13909 (Tax-Exempt Organization Complaint Form). This allows you to report suspected excess compensation without identifying yourself. Another option is to contact your state's charity regulator or attorney general's office, as they often have oversight of non-profits as well. Many states allow anonymous reporting of concerns. If you're worried about workplace culture issues beyond just the compensation disparity, you might also consider reaching out to accreditation bodies in healthcare, as they often have standards regarding organizational ethics and governance.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
21 My wife works for a similarly sized non-profit hospital and we went through the shock of seeing the executive compensation last year. One thing to understand is that those huge spikes in certain years might be from vested benefits or one-time payments. For example, if they have a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) that vests after 5 years, the whole amount shows up on the 990 in that year, making it look like they got a massive payday. It's still a lot of money, but spread over the vesting period, it might be somewhat less shocking. Check if your organization posts their audited financial statements too - sometimes they have notes that explain unusual compensation arrangements better than the 990 does.
0 coins
Hunter Brighton
•5 That makes sense about the vesting. I'll definitely look into the financial statements to see if there's more detail. Do you know if there's a specific part of those statements I should focus on?
0 coins