< Back to IRS

Melina Haruko

Understanding Subpart F Income for International Tax Reporting

I'm trying to wrap my head around Subpart F income for my small business. We recently expanded operations to include a foreign subsidiary in Singapore, and I'm completely lost when it comes to reporting requirements. From what I understand, this income is taxable to US shareholders even if it's not distributed, but I'm confused about what exactly qualifies as Subpart F income for our situation. Our foreign entity primarily provides IT consulting services to Asian clients, but also holds some passive investments. My accountant mentioned something about the "de minimis rule" and "high-tax exception" but honestly I'm struggling to understand how these apply to our situation. Our Singapore subsidiary earned about $320,000 last year, with roughly $75,000 from passive investments. Do I need to report all of this as Subpart F income on my personal return as the majority shareholder? How do I calculate what portion is taxable immediately versus what can be deferred? Any real-world explanations would be incredibly helpful. Tax season is coming up fast and I'm getting anxious about getting this right.

Subpart F income can be tricky! I work with international business structures regularly, so I'll try to break this down in simpler terms. Subpart F was created to prevent US taxpayers from indefinitely deferring US tax by keeping income in foreign corporations. For your situation, you need to determine what portions of your Singapore subsidiary's income fall into Subpart F categories. The main categories that might apply to you are Foreign Personal Holding Company Income (FPHCI) - which includes your passive investments like interest, dividends, rents, and royalties - and Foreign Base Company Services Income (FBCSI) - which might include some of your IT consulting services if they're performed for related parties outside Singapore. The de minimis rule applies if Subpart F income is less than the lesser of 5% of gross income or $1 million. In your case, $75K passive income is about 23% of total income, so you don't qualify for this exception. The high-tax exception applies if the foreign income was subject to an effective tax rate greater than 90% of the US corporate rate (currently 21%). So if Singapore taxed that income at more than 18.9%, you might qualify.

0 coins

Melina Haruko

•

Thanks for explaining! For the consulting services, we're working with unrelated Asian companies, not with our US parent company. Does that mean the consulting income ($245K) isn't considered Subpart F income? And for the Singapore tax rate, they have a flat 17% corporate tax rate, so I'm guessing we don't qualify for the high-tax exception?

0 coins

Since your IT consulting services are provided to unrelated parties in Asia (third parties), this income would generally not fall under Foreign Base Company Services Income, so the $245K from consulting likely isn't Subpart F income. With Singapore's 17% corporate tax rate being below the 18.9% threshold needed for the high-tax exception, you're correct that you probably don't qualify for that exemption for the passive income portion. You'll likely need to include the $75K of passive investment income as Subpart F income on your personal return, assuming you're a US shareholder owning at least 10% of the foreign corporation.

0 coins

Reina Salazar

•

After struggling with similar international tax issues for my business, I found an incredibly helpful tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me navigate all this Subpart F confusion. It analyzed my foreign subsidiary documents and actually broke down exactly what portions of my income qualified as Subpart F. I was seriously considering hiring another specialized accountant before I tried it, but their software identified several exceptions I qualified for that I wouldn't have known about otherwise. The tool also helped me determine if I qualified for the high-tax exception by calculating the effective tax rates across different income categories.

0 coins

How does it handle different types of passive income? I have rental income from properties in Europe but also some dividend and interest income. Does it separate those or just lump everything into FPHCI?

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

I'm skeptical about software handling something as complex as international tax. Did you have to verify the results with an accountant anyway? And how does it handle the lookthrough rule under 954(c)(6) for payments between related CFCs?

0 coins

Reina Salazar

•

It actually breaks down each category of passive income separately - showing interest, dividends, rents, royalties, etc. - which was super helpful for me to understand exactly what was triggering Subpart F inclusion. The detailed categorization helped me restructure some of my European operations to minimize FPHCI. I did have my accountant review the results, but he was impressed with how comprehensive the analysis was. The software handles CFC-to-CFC payments under the lookthrough rule by identifying these transactions and applying the appropriate exclusions when they represent active income in the hands of the related CFC. It even flagged when certain payments might not qualify for the exception.

0 coins

Demi Lagos

•

I tried taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here, and I'm genuinely impressed. My situation involves multiple foreign entities in different jurisdictions, and I was constantly mixing up what qualified for exceptions and what didn't. The tool analyzed my corporate structure and gave me a clear breakdown of my Subpart F exposure for each entity. What was most valuable was the year-over-year comparison showing how changes in our operations affected our Subpart F income calculations. It identified that one of our entities qualified for the full-year exception since we established it mid-year, which my previous accountant had missed. Ended up saving us a significant amount on our return.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

For anyone dealing with Subpart F issues, I found that trying to get guidance directly from the IRS was nearly impossible. After spending HOURS on hold trying to get answers about the high-tax exception documentation requirements, I discovered Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent within 45 minutes instead of the usual endless hold times. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent I spoke with provided specific guidance on how to properly document and claim high-tax exceptions for different categories of Subpart F income, which was way more helpful than trying to interpret the regulations myself.

0 coins

Vera Visnjic

•

Wait, so this service actually gets you through to the IRS faster? How does that even work? The last time I called about international tax issues I was on hold for literally 3 hours before giving up.

0 coins

Jake Sinclair

•

Sounds too good to be true. I've tried every trick in the book to get through to the IRS, especially their international division. There's no way some service can magically cut through their queues when they're understaffed by thousands of employees.

0 coins

Mason Lopez

•

Yes, they use technology that continuously calls the IRS and navigates the phone tree for you. Once they reach a live agent, you get a call connecting you directly. It saved me from having to sit on hold for hours. It's absolutely legitimate - I was skeptical too. They don't "cut the line" but rather do the waiting for you. Think of it like having someone stand in a physical line on your behalf. The IRS is severely understaffed which is precisely why this service is so valuable. In my case, Claimyr got me through to an actual international tax specialist who answered my specific Subpart F documentation questions.

0 coins

Jake Sinclair

•

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After commenting here, I decided to try it for my Subpart F questions regarding a manufacturing operation in Mexico. My previous attempts to reach the IRS had been exercises in frustration - being on hold for hours only to be disconnected or transferred to someone who couldn't help with international issues. Using Claimyr, I got connected to a knowledgeable IRS representative in about 35 minutes without having to sit by my phone. The agent clarified exactly how the manufacturing exception applied to my specific situation and what documentation I needed to maintain. Completely changed my approach to handling these complex international tax matters.

0 coins

Don't forget about Form 5471! If you have a Controlled Foreign Corporation (which it sounds like you do), you'll need to file this form annually. The penalties for not filing are STEEP - $10,000 per form plus reductions in foreign tax credits. Make sure you're classifying your Singapore entity correctly and meeting all the reporting requirements.

0 coins

Melina Haruko

•

Oh man, another form I need to worry about? Is Form 5471 something I can handle myself or is this definitely something I should have my accountant prepare? And are there any specific schedules within Form 5471 that relate to Subpart F income reporting?

0 coins

I strongly recommend having your accountant prepare Form 5471. It's one of the most complex IRS forms with multiple schedules and detailed reporting requirements. Schedule I specifically reports Subpart F income and is where you'll need to break down those passive investment earnings. Schedule J tracks your E&P balances which affect future distributions. And don't forget Schedule P for tracking previously taxed earnings. Even experienced accountants sometimes struggle with this form, so it's definitely not something I'd suggest handling yourself, especially with the significant penalties for errors or omissions.

0 coins

Honorah King

•

Just want to add that the Section 962 election could be worth considering if you're an individual shareholder. It lets you be taxed as if you were a corporation on Subpart F inclusions, potentially giving you access to the lower corporate tax rates and foreign tax credits that might otherwise be limited. The downside is complexity and potential double taxation when you eventually distribute the earnings.

0 coins

Oliver Brown

•

Does making a 962 election make sense if most of the foreign income is already NOT Subpart F (like the consulting income mentioned)? Seems like it might create more complications than benefits in that case.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today