Safe Harbor rule for quarterly tax payments after inheritance - do I really need to pay 110% of 2023 taxes when 80% was from one-time inheritance?
I'm retired and usually owe around $6500 in taxes annually on our joint return from investments and retirement income. Last October, I received an inheritance that resulted in an additional $24,000 in taxes for 2023. My understanding of Safe Harbor is that I don't need to file Form 2210 because we already paid more than 110% of our 2022 tax liability to the IRS before the end of 2023. The problem is my tax accountant is now telling me we need to pay estimated tax payments of $7200 per quarter in 2024 (our total 2023 tax burden was $30,500). This seems ridiculous - I can't believe I need to pay the IRS nearly $29,000 over the next 4 quarters just to get most of it back when I file my 2024 taxes in 2025. I'd be fine paying $2000 per quarter, which at $8000 would still exceed our normal annual tax burden going back to 2020. Please tell me I don't need to pay the government $29,000 in quarterly payments during 2024, just to get 75% of it refunded next year! I honestly don't even have that kind of cash on hand to make these payments. How can Safe Harbor work if a one-time event caused 80% of my tax liability?
20 comments


Aisha Hussain
The Safe Harbor rule can definitely be confusing when you have a one-time event like an inheritance. Here's what you need to understand: For federal estimated tax payments, you have several options to avoid penalties: 1. Pay 90% of your current year tax liability through withholding/estimates 2. Pay 100% of your prior year tax (110% if your AGI was over $150,000) 3. Use the annualized income installment method Your accountant is correctly stating that one way to absolutely avoid penalties is to pay 110% of your 2023 tax liability. However, they're missing that you likely qualify for a different approach that makes more sense in your situation. Since your normal tax situation is much lower ($6500) and the inheritance was a one-time event, you can simply estimate your actual 2024 tax and pay 90% of that amount through quarterly payments. If you expect to owe around $6500 for 2024, making quarterly payments of $2000 would more than cover this requirement. You might want to discuss using the annualized income installment method with your accountant, which accounts for when income is actually received during the year.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•Thank you so much for this explanation! So essentially, since I don't expect another inheritance in 2024, I should be fine paying quarterly estimates based on my "normal" income rather than last year's inflated number? That makes so much more sense. Does this approach still qualify as Safe Harbor protection? And what documentation would I need if the IRS questions the lower payments?
0 coins
Aisha Hussain
•Yes, you'd be following the "90% of current year tax" Safe Harbor provision, which is perfectly legitimate. As long as your estimates and any withholding total at least 90% of what you'll actually owe for 2024, you won't face penalties. If you're concerned about documentation, keep records of how you calculated your estimated 2024 tax liability. If you have consistent income patterns from previous "normal" years, those can help justify your calculations. If the IRS ever questions it, you can complete Form 2210 using the annualized income method to show your payments were appropriate based on your actual income during the year.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
I went through something very similar last year after selling some property and getting hit with a huge one-time capital gains tax. My accountant also told me I needed to pay these massive quarterly payments based on 110% of the previous year. I found an awesome solution using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that saved me from overpaying. Their tax strategy tool analyzed my situation and showed me exactly how the Safe Harbor rules applied to one-time events. They created a personalized quarterly payment plan that was legally sound but didn't require me to drastically overpay. The guidance was super clear and included documentation I could show my accountant to explain why the smaller payments were legitimate. They even provided a filled-out annualized income worksheet showing how my one-time event shouldn't affect future quarterly payments.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•How accurate was the analysis though? I'm in a similar situation (got a big bonus last year that was a one-time thing) and I'm nervous about underpaying and getting hit with penalties. Does the tool actually know for sure what the IRS will accept?
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•I'm skeptical about these online tools. Did you actually use the payment plan they suggested? And did you file your taxes yet to confirm you didn't get any penalties? My accountant insists we have to go with the 110% rule to be safe.
0 coins
GalacticGladiator
•The analysis was extremely accurate - they actually cite the specific IRS regulations that apply to your situation. They don't just make recommendations; they show you the exact rules that allow for the payment approach they suggest. I did use their payment plan, and I just filed my taxes last month with no penalties. The key is they don't tell you to underpay what you legally owe - they help you accurately calculate what you actually need to pay based on your specific situation, especially with one-time events. They provided me with the completed Form 2210 using the annualized income method that showed exactly why my payment schedule was compliant.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
I wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai that I was asking about earlier. I decided to try it despite my skepticism, and I'm honestly amazed at the results. The system identified that my accountant was being overly cautious by requiring me to pay 110% of last year's taxes in quarterly installments when my situation clearly qualified for the annualized income method. Their analysis showed I only needed to pay about 30% of what my accountant was recommending! What really impressed me was the detailed documentation they provided explaining exactly which tax regulations applied to my situation. I showed this to my accountant who initially pushed back but eventually agreed their approach was legitimate after reviewing the materials. I've already made my first quarterly payment following their recommended amount, and it's such a relief not having to liquidate investments just to make unnecessarily large tax payments. Wish I'd known about this sooner!
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
After dealing with the IRS for 15 years as a retiree, here's what I've learned: when you need to actually talk to someone at the IRS about complex situations like this, it's practically impossible to get through on their phone lines. I spent 6+ hours on hold trying to get clarification about quarterly payments after a one-time income event. That's when I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) - their service gets you connected to an actual IRS agent without the ridiculous wait times. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I used it to speak directly with an IRS representative about my Safe Harbor situation (similar to yours with a one-time inheritance). The agent confirmed I only needed to make estimated payments based on my expected current year tax, not the inflated previous year amount. Having that direct confirmation from the IRS gave me complete peace of mind.
0 coins
Andre Lefebvre
•How does this actually work? Sounds too good to be true. The IRS phone system is designed to be impossible to navigate.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
•Yeah right. I've tried EVERYTHING to get through to the IRS including calling at weird hours and using all their "shortcuts." Nothing works. You're telling me this service somehow magically gets around the same phone system everyone else is stuck in? I'll believe it when I see it.
0 coins
Carmen Ruiz
•The service works by using a combination of technology and call queuing systems. They essentially hold your place in line and call you back when they've reached an agent. It's not bypassing the system - they're using the same phone lines, but their system navigates the menus and waits on hold so you don't have to. It's not magic - it's just efficient use of technology to deal with the IRS phone systems. They can't create new openings or force the IRS to answer faster, but they handle all the waiting and navigation for you. When I used it, I got a call back in about 2 hours, and was connected directly to an agent without having to go through all the usual menu options again.
0 coins
Zoe Dimitriou
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it anyway because I was desperate to talk to someone at the IRS about my estimated tax payments situation. I've literally never gotten through to the IRS on my own after dozens of attempts, but Claimyr had me talking to an actual IRS agent within 2.5 hours. I didn't have to sit on hold - they called me when they reached an agent. The IRS representative confirmed exactly what others in this thread have said - I don't need to base my quarterly payments on last year's inflated amount if I can reasonably estimate this year's tax will be much lower. They explained I can use the annualized income method on Form 2210 if needed. For anyone struggling with estimated tax payment questions that require actually speaking to the IRS, this service is legitimately worth it. I'm still shocked it actually worked after years of IRS phone frustration.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
I dealt with this exact situation two years ago. Your accountant is going by the book, but there's a more nuanced approach. If your normal income is stable and predictable, you can make smaller quarterly payments based on your expected 2024 income. Then complete Form 2210 Schedule AI (Annualized Income) when you file next year. This form specifically addresses situations where income isn't evenly distributed throughout the year. The key is documenting your reasoning. Keep records showing your normal tax situation and why the inheritance was truly a one-time event. The IRS is actually reasonable about this when properly documented.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•Does this annualized method work for all types of one-time income? I received a large retirement account distribution last year that was mandatory but won't happen again. My accountant is also telling me I need to make huge quarterly payments.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Yes, the annualized income method works for pretty much any type of income that isn't evenly distributed throughout the year, including one-time retirement distributions. The Form 2210 Schedule AI lets you show which quarters had the unusual income. The key is that you're not trying to avoid paying taxes you owe - you're just avoiding making payments for taxes you don't expect to owe this year. If your retirement distribution was truly a one-time event and won't recur, the annualized method is perfect for your situation. Just make sure you can document that the distribution was indeed a one-time event if you're ever questioned.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
I think everyone's missing something important - if you normally owe $6500 in taxes, and you're retired, why aren't you having taxes withheld from your pension/retirement distributions? That would solve this whole quarterly payment issue. You could increase your withholding for a few months to cover your estimated tax liability for the year, then reduce it back to normal. Withholding is treated as happening evenly throughout the year even if it doesn't, which gives you more flexibility than quarterly payments.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
•That's actually a really interesting point I hadn't considered. We do have some taxes withheld from our pension, but not enough to cover everything since we also have investment income. I could definitely increase the withholding amount temporarily. Do you know if withholding is always treated as occurring evenly throughout the year, even if I increase it for just a few months? That could be a much simpler solution than dealing with quarterly payments!
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•Yes, that's one of the best "secrets" about tax withholding - the IRS treats withholding as if it occurred evenly throughout the year, even if you withhold it all in December! This is very different from estimated payments, which must be made quarterly. So you could increase your pension withholding for a few months to cover your entire expected 2024 tax liability, and the IRS will treat it as if you made timely payments throughout the year. This is completely legitimate and often the simplest solution for retirees. Just contact whoever administers your pension and ask them to temporarily increase your withholding rate. Much easier than dealing with quarterly payments and potentially having to file Form 2210.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
The withholding strategy mentioned by Mei Zhang is absolutely brilliant and often overlooked! I'm a retired tax preparer and this was one of my favorite solutions for clients in similar situations. Since you're already having some taxes withheld from your pension, you can simply contact your pension administrator and request a temporary increase in withholding to cover your expected 2024 tax liability (around $6,500 based on your normal income). You could even have them withhold the entire amount over just a few months if that works better for your cash flow. The beauty of this approach is that it completely eliminates the need for quarterly estimated payments AND provides automatic Safe Harbor protection. The IRS will treat that withholding as if it occurred evenly throughout the year, so you won't need to worry about Form 2210 or any penalty calculations. This is much simpler than trying to convince your accountant about annualized income methods or dealing with the complexity of estimated payments after a one-time inheritance. Just increase withholding temporarily, then reduce it back to normal once you've covered your expected tax liability for the year.
0 coins