Publication 523 (2023) Question: Can a Married Couple Claim the $250,000 Exclusion for Two Different Homes?
My wife and I have found ourselves in an interesting tax situation. We own two different homes and are planning to sell both of them within the next couple of years. We're trying to maximize our tax benefits by claiming the $250,000 exclusion for both properties. From what I've read in Publication 523 (2023), Selling Your Home, I understand we need to meet both the ownership and residence tests for each property. We've lived in both homes for more than 2 years out of the 5-year period before sale, so I think we're good there. What's confusing me are a couple of specific aspects: 1. Regarding the ownership test and the look-back rule: We're both on the deeds for both houses (joint ownership). If we file married filing separately, can one spouse claim the entire $250,000 exclusion for one house on their return, leaving the other spouse "clean" to use their exclusion on the second house? Or since both properties are jointly owned, would each spouse have to claim half the gain from each sale on their individual returns? 2. Filing status question: If we sell the first house in 2025 and file separately to claim the exclusion on one spouse's return, then sell the second house in 2027, would we need to file separately for 2026 too (when no house is sold)? Or could we file jointly in the years between sales without affecting our ability to claim the exclusion on the second home? Any insights would be greatly appreciated! We're trying to plan our sales and tax strategy for the next few years.
18 comments


Everett Tutum
This is a great question about Publication 523! The $250,000 exclusion ($500,000 if married filing jointly) is one of the best tax breaks available, but there are some important nuances when you have two homes. For your first question: When you file married filing separately, each spouse can only exclude up to $250,000 of gain from the sale of their main home. Since both homes are jointly owned, each spouse would typically report half the gain from each sale on their separate returns. You can't have one spouse claim 100% of the gain from one house while the other spouse claims nothing from that same sale - the IRS considers each spouse to own half of jointly titled property. For your second question: You don't have to file separately in years when you don't sell a home. The look-back rule examines whether you (or your spouse if filing jointly) have excluded gain from the sale of another home during the 2-year period ending on the date of the current sale. So you could sell House #1 in 2025 (filing separately), file jointly in 2026, and then file separately again in 2027 when selling House #2, as long as you're outside that 2-year window.
0 coins
Sunny Wang
•Wait, I'm confused about something here. I thought married couples get a $500k exclusion when they file jointly? So wouldn't it be better for them to just file jointly and claim $500k for each house if they qualify? Or is there some rule preventing that?
0 coins
Everett Tutum
•The married filing jointly $500,000 exclusion is definitely available, but the key issue here is the look-back rule. You can only exclude gain from selling a main home once every two years. So if they sold both homes within a 2-year period and filed jointly, they could only use the exclusion on one home. By filing separately, they're trying to have each spouse use their individual $250,000 exclusion on a different property. This strategy only works if each spouse hasn't excluded gain from another home sale in the 2 years before each sale, and if they're willing to accept the other tax disadvantages of filing separately.
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
After struggling with a similar situation last year, I found this amazing tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that really helped me understand Publication 523 and navigate selling multiple properties. I uploaded my previous returns and property documents, and it analyzed everything to show me the optimal filing strategy. What I appreciated about taxr.ai was that it laid out all my options with the tax implications of each - it showed me exactly how the look-back rule would apply in my situation and calculated the potential tax savings for different scenarios. It even created a timeline showing when I could sell each property to maximize my exclusions.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
•That sounds useful! Does taxr.ai work with complicated situations like rental properties that were converted to primary residences? My wife and I have a former rental we've been living in for 3 years now, plus our cabin that we're considering making our primary home next year.
0 coins
Melissa Lin
•Did you have to provide a lot of personal information? I'm always skeptical about uploading tax documents to online services. How secure is it?
0 coins
Hugh Intensity
•For rental properties converted to primary residences, yes! That's actually similar to my situation. The tool handles the partial exclusion calculations and shows you exactly what portion of your gain might be taxable based on the period it was used as a rental versus primary residence. It's really helpful for planning when to sell to maximize your exclusion. As for security concerns, I was hesitant too. They use bank-level encryption and don't store your documents after analysis. You can also redact sensitive information before uploading if you prefer. I just uploaded my previous Schedule E and property purchase/sale documents, and that was enough for the analysis.
0 coins
Effie Alexander
I just wanted to follow up about taxr.ai that I mentioned earlier. I decided to try it after all, and I'm actually really impressed with the results! I was planning to sell both properties this year but the analysis showed I'd save over $42,000 in taxes by selling my former rental now and waiting until next year for the cabin. The tool created this detailed timeline showing exactly when each property would qualify for maximum exclusion, and even factored in the depreciation recapture on my rental. It confirmed what others were saying about splitting the gains when filing separately, but also showed me some options I hadn't considered about timing the sales. Definitely worth checking out if you're dealing with multiple properties like this.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
If you're having trouble getting answers directly from the IRS about Publication 523 questions, I'd recommend trying Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I spent weeks trying to reach someone at the IRS about a similar situation with multiple properties and the $250,000 exclusion, but kept getting disconnected or waiting for hours. With Claimyr, I was connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes who answered all my questions about the look-back period and filing requirements. They have this smart system that navigates the IRS phone tree for you and holds your place in line - you can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. The agent I spoke with gave me specific guidance about my situation that I couldn't find anywhere online.
0 coins
Romeo Quest
•How exactly does this work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I don't understand how they can get through when nobody else can. Sounds too good to be true.
0 coins
Val Rossi
•Yeah right. I've been trying to reach the IRS for months about my audit. If this actually worked, everyone would be using it. The IRS is deliberately understaffed and there's no magic solution to get through.
0 coins
Lydia Santiago
•It's not as complicated as it might seem. They don't call the IRS for you - they use specialized technology to navigate the IRS phone system and secure your place in line. When an agent is about to be available, you get a call to connect directly with them. It's like having someone wait on hold for you, but with smart technology that knows when to press which buttons. They're able to get through because they've mapped out the optimal times to call and the most effective paths through the phone tree. It's not magic - just efficient technology combined with data about IRS call patterns. They've helped over 100,000 people connect with the IRS, so it's definitely legitimate.
0 coins
Val Rossi
I need to eat my words about Claimyr from my comment earlier. I was super skeptical, but I was desperate enough to try it after waiting on hold with the IRS for 3+ hours last week. I honestly couldn't believe it when I got a call back saying an IRS agent was on the line ready to talk to me. The agent walked me through exactly how the ownership test works for married couples with multiple homes and confirmed that we CAN file jointly in years between home sales without affecting the look-back period. She even emailed me the specific sections of Publication 523 that applied to my situation. I probably never would have gotten this information without finally connecting with a human at the IRS. So yeah, it actually works.
0 coins
Eve Freeman
Another option you might consider is a 1031 exchange for one of the properties instead of using the primary residence exclusion. If one of the homes has appreciated significantly more than $250k, you could potentially defer all that gain by reinvesting in another property. Obviously, this only makes sense if you're planning to buy another property anyway, but it's worth considering as part of your overall strategy. You'd need to work with a qualified intermediary, and there are strict timelines (45 days to identify replacement property, 180 days to close), but it could potentially save you more in taxes than the primary residence exclusion.
0 coins
Aria Khan
•That's an interesting idea I hadn't considered. Do both properties need to be investment/rental properties for a 1031 exchange to work? One of our homes has been purely a primary residence, while the other we rented out for about 18 months a few years back.
0 coins
Eve Freeman
•Yes, this is an important distinction - 1031 exchanges only work for investment or business properties, not primary residences. If the home you rented out for 18 months has since been your primary residence, you'd need to convert it back to a rental before attempting a 1031 exchange. For a mixed-use property (part rental, part primary residence), the exchange can get complicated. You might be able to do a partial 1031 exchange on the portion used for business/investment, but you'd need a tax professional to help structure this correctly. The primary residence exclusion is usually simpler for homes that have been your main home for 2+ years.
0 coins
Clarissa Flair
Has anyone dealt with the "unforeseen circumstances" exception to the 2-year rule? My understanding is that if you HAVE to sell both homes within 2 years due to health issues, job relocation, etc., you might qualify for a partial exclusion even if you don't meet the usual look-back requirements.
0 coins
Caden Turner
•I used this when I had to relocate for a job after only living in my house for 14 months. You get a prorated portion of the exclusion based on how long you lived there divided by 24 months. So in my case, I got 14/24 of the $250k exclusion (about $146k). But you need legitimate unforeseen circumstances - not just wanting to sell two houses close together.
0 coins