< Back to IRS

Amina Toure

My husband's boss wants to make him W-2 employee instead of 1099 contractor - can he still claim tools and mileage?

My husband is a woodworker who just started with a new company about 3 weeks ago. When he took the job, the understanding was that he'd be an independent contractor (1099). He uses all his own tools, sets his own schedule, pays for his own gas driving between job sites, and basically decides when and how much he wants to work. Today his boss asked him for his "number of dependents" which makes me think they're trying to put him on payroll as a regular employee (W-2) instead of keeping him as a 1099 contractor. If they switch him to W-2, he won't be able to deduct mileage (which is significant - he drives about 100 miles per day between sites), or write off his expensive tools and other business expenses on Schedule C like he normally would as a 1099 contractor. I'm trying to understand - what's the benefit to the company for making him W-2 instead of 1099? I see absolutely no advantage for my husband in this arrangement. He definitely would have negotiated a higher hourly rate if he'd known they wanted him as an employee rather than a contractor. We need to understand the pros and cons before he talks to his boss tomorrow. Is this a common bait and switch in construction, or am I missing something?

Oliver Weber

•

What you're describing is a common issue in construction. The IRS has specific criteria for determining if someone is an employee vs a contractor, and it sounds like your husband meets many of the contractor qualifications (own tools, schedule control, etc.). For the company, there are several benefits to having W-2 employees instead of 1099 contractors. First, they have more control over the work. Second, they avoid potential penalties if the IRS were to audit them and determine they've misclassified employees as contractors. Many companies have been hit with hefty fines for misclassification. For your husband, being a W-2 employee does come with some benefits: unemployment insurance, workers' compensation coverage, possibly health insurance or other benefits, and the employer pays half of his FICA taxes (Social Security and Medicare). As a 1099, he pays the full 15.3% self-employment tax himself. That said, the loss of business deductions is significant, especially in a tool and vehicle-heavy profession like carpentry. Your husband should definitely discuss this with the boss - there may be room to negotiate a higher wage to offset the lost deductions, or clarify the classification based on his working conditions.

0 coins

Amina Toure

•

Thank you for this detailed response. I didn't realize the company could face penalties for misclassification - that explains their motivation. Do you think it's worth calculating exactly how much we'd lose in deductions to negotiate a fair wage increase? His mileage alone would be about $15,000 in deductions for the year, plus several thousand in tool purchases and maintenance. Also, is there any middle ground? Could he possibly be both a W-2 for certain aspects but maintain some contractor status for the tools/vehicle?

0 coins

Oliver Weber

•

It's definitely worth calculating the financial impact. Add up all potential deductions (mileage at the current IRS rate, tool purchases, insurance, phone, etc.) and determine what that means in actual tax savings. Then factor in the employer covering half the FICA taxes (7.65% of wages) and any benefits they might offer. This gives you a clear number to negotiate with. As for a middle ground, it's generally an either/or situation - you're either an employee or contractor for a specific role. Having a split arrangement with the same company for the same work would likely raise red flags with the IRS. Some workers do maintain separate W-2 and 1099 positions, but these are distinct jobs with different companies or clearly different roles within the same company.

0 coins

FireflyDreams

•

After dealing with similar classification headaches as a skilled tradesperson, I discovered a service called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) that helped me sort through this exact situation. They analyzed my work arrangement and gave me a clear breakdown of whether I qualified as a contractor or employee according to IRS guidelines. The report they generated showed exactly which deductions I could take under each classification and calculated the financial difference. This was super helpful when negotiating with my client. They also explained how to document everything properly to avoid problems if I got audited. Saved me tons of stress trying to interpret tax rules myself.

0 coins

How accurate was their assessment? I'm in a similar situation but working in IT consulting, and I'm worried about getting incorrect advice since my field is different from trades.

0 coins

Did you actually have to talk to a person or was it all automated? I hate dealing with customer service people who just read from scripts and don't understand the complexity of contract work.

0 coins

FireflyDreams

•

Their assessment was spot-on. They use actual IRS guidelines and court cases to make determinations, not just generic advice. While my experience was in trades, the same worker classification rules apply across all industries including IT consulting. The key factors are control over your work, financial investment, and the business relationship, regardless of industry. It's primarily automated but in a sophisticated way - you upload relevant documents and answer specific questions about your work arrangement. No need to explain everything to a customer service rep. The system analyzes everything and provides detailed documentation you can actually use with clients or the IRS. Much better than generic advice from someone reading a script.

0 coins

Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai for my situation. It was incredibly helpful! The system analyzed my work contract and identified that I was clearly being misclassified as a contractor when I should have been an employee according to IRS standards. The report broke down exactly which factors of my work arrangement (like equipment usage, schedule control, and payment structure) aligned with employee vs contractor status. When I showed this to my client, they actually agreed to properly classify me as an employee AND increase my compensation to account for the benefits I was missing. I never would have had the confidence to push back without having that documentation. Definitely worth checking out if you're in a classification gray area.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

If your husband's boss is being difficult about this classification issue, you might want to try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was stuck in a similar situation where my employer misclassified me for years, and I needed to speak directly with someone at the IRS about my rights and tax implications. Regular IRS phone lines had me on hold for HOURS with no resolution. Claimyr got me connected to an actual IRS agent in under 15 minutes who walked me through the SS-8 form for determining worker classification. They have a video showing how it works: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent explained that worker misclassification is something they take seriously, and they outlined exactly what documentation I needed to provide to support my case.

0 coins

Wait, this sounds too good to be true. How does this service actually get you through to the IRS when their lines are always jammed? Do they have some special access or something?

0 coins

I'm very skeptical. The IRS is notorious for awful wait times. No way some random service can magically get you through. Sounds like a scam where they charge you and then you end up waiting anyway.

0 coins

Emma Anderson

•

They use technology that navigates the IRS phone system and waits on hold for you. When they reach an actual person, you get a call back and are connected directly to the IRS agent. No special access - they're just taking the waiting part off your plate. They can't change the IRS's internal processes or make them have more agents available, but they handle the frustrating part where you'd normally be listening to hold music for hours. You still talk to the same IRS representatives everyone else does, but without the wait. It's basically like having someone hold your place in a physical line.

0 coins

I need to eat my words from my previous comment. After my frustration boiled over with trying to reach the IRS about a contractor classification issue, I gave Claimyr a shot. I was absolutely convinced it would be a waste of money. I was shocked when I got a call back in about 20 minutes saying they had an IRS agent on the line. The agent helped me understand the difference between behavioral control, financial control, and relationship factors that determine worker status. For the first time in months, I got clear answers about my tax situation instead of just guessing or reading conflicting information online. The agent even emailed me relevant publications about construction industry classification. I hate admitting when I'm wrong, but this service actually delivered exactly what it promised.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

Another thing your husband should consider is liability insurance. As a 1099 contractor, he likely needs his own liability coverage for any damages or injuries he might cause. As a W-2 employee, he'd typically be covered under the company's insurance. Also, if he's been paying quarterly estimated taxes as a 1099, he wouldn't need to do that as a W-2 since taxes would be withheld from each paycheck. Might seem minor but it does simplify things.

0 coins

Ravi Kapoor

•

This is a really important point about liability that people often overlook. My brother-in-law is a contractor and was sued when a cabinet he installed fell and injured someone. His own insurance had to cover it, but if he'd been an employee, the company's insurance would have handled everything.

0 coins

CosmicVoyager

•

You're absolutely right about the liability risks. I've seen contractors face devastating financial consequences when something goes wrong on a job and they discover their insurance coverage had gaps. Company insurance policies typically have much higher coverage limits than individual policies. The other consideration is workplace injuries. As a W-2 employee, workers' comp would cover medical expenses and lost wages if your husband gets injured on the job. As a 1099, he'd need his own disability insurance policy, which can be expensive for high-risk trades like carpentry.

0 coins

Freya Nielsen

•

Has anyone mentioned the new tax rules for 1099 reporting? Starting with the 2025 filing season, the threshold for requiring 1099-NEC forms dropped significantly. So even small payments to contractors require reporting now. I'm wondering if that's part of the company's motivation - they're trying to simplify their reporting requirements by making more people W-2 employees.

0 coins

Omar Mahmoud

•

Yes! This has been causing chaos in my industry (graphic design). All of my small clients are suddenly panicking about paperwork. Some have even told me they're only working with LLCs now because they don't want to deal with 1099s for individuals anymore.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today