How to handle IRC 1341 credit when repaying income in a later tax year
So I ran into this weird situation with my brother-in-law's taxes, and I'm hoping someone can confirm I'm handling it right. Back in 2022, my brother-in-law left his engineering job, but the company kept depositing his salary for almost 2 months after he left (around $13,500 total). This was all reported on his 2022 W-2 and he paid taxes on it. Fast forward to 2023, the company's audit found the error and demanded repayment. He paid back the full amount in September 2023. I've been helping with his taxes, and after reading Publication 525, I think we need to use the IRC 1341 credit (Method 2) to get back about $3,200 in taxes. I filled out the worksheets and added the credit to his 2023 return. It's been 6 months since filing, and now the IRS is questioning the credit. They sent a letter asking for more documentation about the repayment. Has anyone successfully used the IRC 1341 credit before? What documentation did you provide? I'm worried we'll get stuck in audit limbo for years!
27 comments


Jordan Walker
You're definitely on the right track with IRC 1341! This is what's known as the "claim of right" provision, and it's exactly designed for situations where someone received income in one year, paid tax on it, and then had to pay it back in a later year. Method 2 (the tax credit method) is usually more beneficial than Method 1 (the deduction method) when the person was in a higher tax bracket in the year they received the money. You made the right choice there. For documentation, you'll need to provide: 1) Proof of the original payment (paystubs or bank statements from 2022), 2) Documentation showing why the money was paid in error, 3) Proof your brother-in-law repaid the amount (canceled check, bank statement, or receipt from employer), and 4) A written explanation connecting these documents to the IRC 1341 credit. Make sure you specifically reference IRC 1341 in your response to the IRS, not just Publication 525, as sometimes the examiners aren't familiar with this relatively uncommon credit.
0 coins
Emily Sanjay
•Thanks for the detailed response! I have the bank statements showing the deposits in 2022 and the withdrawal for repayment in 2023. Do I also need something from the employer confirming this was an error? The company just sent a generic letter requesting repayment, but it doesn't specifically say it was mistakenly paid after termination. Would that be enough? Also, when you mentioned Method 2 being better for higher brackets - he was in the 22% bracket both years. Does Method 2 still make more sense?
0 coins
Jordan Walker
•Yes, you should definitely get a more detailed letter from the employer that specifically states the payments were made in error after termination and that repayment was required. The more specific the documentation, the better. The generic repayment request might not be sufficient for the IRS to fully understand the situation. If he was in the 22% bracket both years, the difference between Methods 1 and 2 might be minimal, but Method 2 (the credit) is generally still better because it gives you back the exact amount of tax you paid on that income rather than just the value of a deduction in the current year. Also, a deduction might be subject to certain limitations, while the credit directly reduces your tax dollar-for-dollar.
0 coins
Natalie Adams
I had a similar situation last year and was completely overwhelmed until I found https://taxr.ai to help figure out my repayment issue. My employer overpaid me for 3 months after a payroll system glitch, and I had to repay almost $9,000. The IRS kept sending me confusing notices, and I couldn't figure out if I should be taking a deduction or claiming the IRC 1341 credit. I uploaded my W-2, repayment documentation, and the IRS notices to taxr.ai, and they analyzed everything and explained that the credit was definitely the right approach for my situation. They even generated a detailed explanation letter that I could send to the IRS explaining exactly how the credit was calculated. The IRS accepted it without further questions! Definitely worth checking out if you're still battling with the documentation requirements.
0 coins
Elijah O'Reilly
•Did you have to provide them with a lot of personal information? I'm looking for help with a similar issue (commission clawback) but I'm hesitant to share all my tax details with yet another online service. How secure was the process?
0 coins
Amara Torres
•Sounds interesting but how exactly does the tool determine which method is better? I thought that calculation required comparing tax liability between different years which seems complex for an automated system. Did they actually do the calculations or just give general advice?
0 coins
Natalie Adams
•They only needed the specific documents related to the repayment situation - not my entire tax return. I just uploaded the W-2 showing the original income, documentation of the repayment, and the IRS notice. Their system uses encryption and they have a clear privacy policy about not sharing your information. The tool actually performed both calculation methods side by side - it calculated what my tax savings would be using the deduction method versus the credit method. It showed me the exact tax difference between the two approaches based on my specific tax situation and explained why the credit method saved me about $600 more than just taking a deduction would have.
0 coins
Amara Torres
Just wanted to update everyone. After reading the suggestions here, I decided to try taxr.ai for my own repayment situation. I was skeptical at first since I've been burned by "tax help" services before, but this was actually really helpful. I had a commission clawback issue where I had to repay $22,000 in sales commissions from a previous year. The analysis confirmed I should use the IRC 1341 credit method and showed exactly how much I'd save compared to just taking a deduction. What really helped was the documentation package they prepared. It included a specific explanation of why IRC 1341 applied to my situation, the calculation worksheet showing how the credit amount was determined, and a template letter for responding to the IRS. My refund was processed without any additional questions from the IRS! Definitely saved me from what could have been years of back-and-forth with the IRS trying to explain this uncommon tax situation.
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
My accountant messed up my IRC 1341 calculation last year and I've been going back and forth with the IRS for MONTHS. After numerous failed attempts to reach someone at the IRS who actually understands this credit, I discovered https://claimyr.com and decided to give it a try. The service bypassed the ridiculous IRS hold times and got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes! You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was finally able to speak with someone in the right department who could review my documentation for the IRC 1341 credit. The agent confirmed exactly what additional documentation I needed to provide and gave me a direct fax number to send it to. After months of frustration, I finally got this resolved within a week after that call.
0 coins
Mason Kaczka
•How does this service actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? Couldn't you just keep calling yourself until you get through? Seems like you're paying for something you could do yourself with enough persistence.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
•Sorry, but this sounds like a scam. There's no way to "bypass" IRS wait times - everyone has to wait in the same queue. And there's definitely no "direct fax number" that gets priority treatment. I've worked with tax issues for years and I'm extremely skeptical about services claiming to have special access.
0 coins
Olivia Van-Cleve
•They don't just call for you - they have a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When they reach a human agent, they call you and connect you directly to the agent. It saved me hours of waiting and repeatedly calling. They absolutely don't claim to bypass the queue in the sense of cutting in line - they wait in the same queue everyone else does, but their system does the waiting instead of you having to sit there listening to the hold music. And regarding the fax number, I didn't mean it was some secret priority number - the IRS agent provided me with the direct fax for their department rather than the general IRS fax that might take longer to route to the right person.
0 coins
Sophia Russo
I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I was also dealing with an IRC 1341 issue from a retirement plan distribution I had to repay. The service actually worked exactly as described. Their system waited on hold with the IRS (2 hours and 17 minutes according to the tracker) and then called me once they reached an agent. I was connected to someone in the exam department who actually understood the claim of right doctrine and IRC 1341 credits. The agent reviewed my case while I was on the phone and confirmed my calculation was correct. They even noted in my file that the documentation I had already submitted was sufficient, which should prevent future notices. This saved me from potentially waiting months for a written response that might have just asked for more information. Sorry for being so dismissive initially - this service legitimately helped resolve my issue.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
My wife had to repay about $7,000 in bonuses that were incorrectly calculated by her company. After reading this thread, I realized we might have filed wrong. We just took a miscellaneous itemized deduction on Schedule A for 2023 (the repayment year). If I'm understanding correctly, we could have potentially gotten more back by using this IRC 1341 credit? Is it worth filing an amended return? The difference in tax brackets between the two years was pretty significant - she was in the 32% bracket when she received the bonus and only 24% when she repaid it.
0 coins
Jordan Walker
•Yes, you should definitely consider filing an amended return! Based on what you've described, the IRC 1341 credit would almost certainly give you a better result than the deduction you took. With that bracket difference (32% down to 24%), Method 2 (the credit method) would recover the full amount of tax you originally paid at the 32% rate. The deduction you took only gave you a benefit at your current 24% rate, so you're leaving money on the table. Also, miscellaneous itemized deductions are generally subject to the 2% AGI floor, which further reduces their value. The IRC 1341 credit isn't subject to these limitations.
0 coins
Evelyn Xu
•Thank you! That makes a lot of sense. I didn't realize we were potentially losing 8% of the tax benefit. Do you know if there's a time limit for filing the amended return to claim this credit? I'm guessing the typical 3-year rule applies? Also, is there a minimum amount that needs to be repaid before IRC 1341 applies? I vaguely remember reading something about a $3,000 threshold somewhere.
0 coins
Dominic Green
Can someone explain in simple terms how to actually calculate the IRC 1341 credit? My mom received Social Security benefits for my dad after he passed, but then had to repay them the following year when they determined she wasn't eligible. I'm trying to help her figure out if this credit applies and how to calculate it.
0 coins
Hannah Flores
•I helped my cousin with something similar! Here's a simple breakdown: Method 1: Take a deduction in the current year for the amount repaid. Method 2: Calculate the tax from the prior year WITHOUT the income you later repaid, then subtract that from what you actually paid that year. The difference becomes a credit on this year's return. Usually Method 2 gives you more money back, especially if you were in a higher tax bracket when you received the money. But you should calculate both ways and use whichever gives the better result. For Social Security specifically, I think repayments generally qualify for this treatment, but there might be special rules. Publication 525 has a whole section on Social Security repayments.
0 coins
Axel Bourke
I went through a similar situation with my husband's employer overpayment situation last year. One thing I learned that might help Emily - make sure you have the IRC 1341 credit calculation worksheet clearly documented and attached to your response to the IRS. We initially just referenced Publication 525 in our filing, but the IRS examiner wasn't familiar with the specific calculation method. When we resubmitted with the actual worksheet showing step-by-step how we calculated the credit amount (comparing the tax liability with and without the repaid income), they processed it much faster. Also, if your brother-in-law's employer has an HR department or payroll company, try to get a letter from them that specifically uses the words "overpayment" and "paid in error" rather than just "repayment requested." The IRS seems to want very clear language establishing that the original payment was incorrect, not just that money was requested back for other reasons. The 6-month timeline isn't unusual for this type of credit review, but having the right documentation should speed things up considerably.
0 coins
Julia Hall
•This is really helpful advice, especially about the specific language from the employer! I'm actually dealing with something similar right now - my company accidentally continued paying me vacation time after I returned from unpaid leave, and now they want it back. I've been trying to figure out if this qualifies for IRC 1341 treatment or if it's just a regular repayment situation. The distinction between "overpayment" and "repayment requested" makes a lot of sense. It sounds like the IRS really wants to see that the original payment was genuinely made in error, not just that circumstances changed later. Did you have any trouble getting your employer to provide that specific language, or were they pretty understanding about the tax implications? Also, when you mentioned the worksheet calculation - did you use the one from Publication 525 or is there a different form that works better for documentation purposes?
0 coins
Camila Jordan
I went through an IRC 1341 situation two years ago when my former employer kept paying me for three weeks after my resignation due to a payroll system error. The key documentation that satisfied the IRS was: 1. A detailed timeline showing exactly when I left the company vs. when payments continued 2. Written confirmation from HR that the payments were "made in error due to administrative oversight" (not just a generic repayment request) 3. The actual IRC 1341 calculation worksheet from Publication 525, filled out completely with both Method 1 and Method 2 calculations shown side-by-side 4. Bank statements showing both the original deposits and the repayment transaction The IRS initially questioned my credit too, but once I provided this package with a cover letter explicitly referencing "IRC Section 1341 - Claim of Right" and explaining that this was an involuntary repayment of income that was includible under a claim of right, they processed it within about 8 weeks. One tip: when responding to their letter, make sure to reference the specific IRC section number rather than just citing Publication 525. The examiners seem more familiar with the actual tax code reference. Good luck!
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
•This is exactly the kind of detailed documentation package I wish I had known about earlier! I'm just starting to deal with a similar situation where my consulting firm accidentally paid me twice for the same project milestone back in 2022, and I had to repay one of the payments in 2023. Your point about referencing the actual IRC Section 1341 instead of just Publication 525 is really valuable - I can see how that would help the examiner understand they're dealing with a specific tax code provision rather than just general guidance. Quick question about your timeline documentation - did you include anything showing when you actually discovered the error, or just focus on the dates of employment vs. payment? I'm wondering if the IRS cares about when the mistake was identified or just when it occurred and was corrected. Also, when you filled out both Method 1 and Method 2 calculations, did you submit both even though you only claimed the better result, or did you just show the calculation for the method you actually used? Thanks for sharing such specific details about what worked!
0 coins
Joshua Hellan
I've been following this thread with great interest since I'm dealing with a very similar IRC 1341 situation. My employer's payroll system had a glitch that resulted in duplicate direct deposits for about 6 weeks in early 2023, totaling around $18,000 in overpayments that I had to repay later that same year. What's been most helpful from reading everyone's experiences is understanding the importance of getting the right documentation language from the employer. I initially just had a generic "overpayment recovery" letter, but after reading the advice here, I went back to HR and specifically requested a letter stating the payments were "made in error due to payroll system malfunction" with explicit acknowledgment that I was not entitled to receive those duplicate payments. I'm still working through the IRC 1341 calculation worksheets, but it looks like Method 2 will save me significantly more than just taking a deduction since I was in the 32% bracket when I received the duplicate payments. The step-by-step documentation approach that several people have outlined here seems like the key to avoiding the lengthy back-and-forth with the IRS. Has anyone dealt specifically with same-year repayment situations? Most of the examples I'm seeing involve repaying income in a different tax year than when it was received, but in my case both the overpayment and repayment happened in 2023. I'm wondering if IRC 1341 still applies or if there's a different approach for same-year corrections.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
•For same-year repayment situations like yours, IRC 1341 typically doesn't apply since the whole point of the provision is to address the tax inequity that occurs when income is received in one year and repaid in a different year. When both the receipt and repayment happen in the same tax year, you can usually just net the amounts and report the correct income figure. However, there might be some complexity depending on exactly when during 2023 the overpayments occurred and when they were repaid. If the overpayments were included in W-2 wages that were already issued, you might need to work with your employer to issue a corrected W-2 showing the proper wage amount rather than trying to use IRC 1341. The duplicate payment situation you described sounds more like a payroll error that should be corrected at the W-2 level rather than through a claim of right repayment. I'd suggest checking with your employer's payroll department to see if they can issue a corrected W-2 for 2023 that reflects the proper wage amount after removing the duplicate payments. That would be much simpler than trying to navigate the IRC 1341 process. If for some reason the W-2 correction isn't possible, then you'd probably need to report the full W-2 amount as income and then take a deduction for the repayment, but IRC 1341 credit treatment likely wouldn't be available for same-year situations.
0 coins
Chad Winthrope
I've been dealing with a similar IRC 1341 situation for the past year, and I wanted to share what finally worked for me after multiple rounds with the IRS. Like many others here, I had an overpayment situation - my previous employer continued paying me for 6 weeks after I left due to a system error. The total was about $11,000 that I had to repay in the following tax year. The key breakthrough came when I stopped trying to explain the situation in my own words and instead used very specific tax terminology throughout all my documentation. Here's what finally got the IRS to accept my IRC 1341 credit: 1. Cover letter that opened with "This response concerns the IRC Section 1341 Claim of Right credit claimed on line 18a of Form 1040." 2. Employer letter that specifically stated the payments were "erroneously made under a claim of right" and that "taxpayer had no legal right to retain these payments." 3. Complete Publication 525 worksheets showing both Method 1 and Method 2 calculations, even though I only claimed Method 2. 4. A separate sheet showing the exact tax computation - what I paid in the original year WITH the income vs. what I would have paid WITHOUT it. The IRS processed my amended return within 10 weeks after I resubmitted with this language. I think the key was using their exact terminology rather than plain English descriptions of the situation. For anyone still struggling with this, the specific phrase "claim of right" seems to be what triggers recognition in their system that you're dealing with IRC 1341.
0 coins
Oliver Wagner
•This is incredibly helpful! The specific terminology approach makes so much sense - I've been struggling with getting the IRS to understand my situation, and I think I've been using too much plain language instead of the technical terms they're looking for. Your point about the employer letter using "erroneously made under a claim of right" is brilliant. I've been going back and forth with my company's HR department trying to get them to write a letter that clearly establishes the error, but they keep giving me generic language about "overpayment recovery." I'm going to show them your exact phrasing and see if they'll incorporate that specific terminology. The separate tax computation sheet is also something I hadn't thought of - showing the actual dollar difference between what was paid WITH the income versus WITHOUT it probably makes it much clearer to the examiner exactly how the credit amount was determined. One quick question: when you said you showed both Method 1 and Method 2 calculations even though you only claimed Method 2, did you include an explanation of why Method 2 was more beneficial? I'm wondering if that helps demonstrate that you properly considered both options rather than just picking one arbitrarily. Thanks for sharing such specific language that actually worked - this gives me a much clearer roadmap for resubmitting my documentation!
0 coins
Emma Wilson
I'm going through a similar IRC 1341 situation right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! My employer overpaid me by about $8,500 in 2023 due to an incorrect salary adjustment that wasn't caught until 2024. I had to repay the full amount in March 2024. After reading all the advice here, especially about using specific tax terminology, I'm preparing my documentation package. I've already gotten my employer to provide a letter stating the payments were "erroneously made under a claim of right" and that I "had no legal right to retain these payments." One question I have that I haven't seen addressed yet - when calculating the IRC 1341 credit using Method 2, do you use the tax tables from the original year when the income was received, or do you recalculate using current year rates? I want to make sure I'm doing the computation correctly before submitting everything to the IRS. Also, for anyone who successfully used this credit, how long did it typically take to receive the refund once the IRS accepted your documentation? I'm hoping to avoid the long processing delays I've been reading about with other types of amended returns. Thanks to everyone who has shared their experiences - it's given me much more confidence in handling this complex situation!
0 coins