< Back to IRS

GalacticGuardian

How to Calculate Cost Basis for Stock in Spin-Off Company (IBM/KD)

I need help figuring out the cost basis for stocks I got through a company spin-off. Here's my situation - I've owned IBM shares for years, and when they spun off part of their business to create Kyndryl (KD) at the end of 2021, I received 1 share of KD for every 5 IBM shares I owned. The problem is my shares have moved through several brokerages over the years, and most of the cost basis information is missing. They're currently at Fidelity, and I want to get everything updated correctly before I sell any shares. I found a document on the Kyndryl website that talks about determining cost basis using the stock prices of both companies on the distribution date and the 5:1 ratio - basically allocating about 96% of the original cost to IBM and 4% to KD. So if I'm understanding this right, if I originally bought 10 IBM shares at $120/share, I should adjust that to show IBM cost basis of $115.20/share (96%) and add a new entry showing I acquired 2 KD shares at $4.80/share (4%) on the same original purchase date. What's confusing me is that the limited cost basis info Fidelity shows for my IBM shares seems to match this calculation, but their cost basis for the KD shares is way higher than what I'm calculating (about 6 times higher!). Did they get incorrect information, or am I misunderstanding how to do this calculation? Any help would be appreciated!

This is a common issue with spin-offs! You're on the right track, but let me clarify a few things. When a spin-off occurs, you need to allocate the original cost basis between the parent company (IBM) and the spun-off company (KD) based on their relative fair market values immediately after the spin-off. The 96%/4% split you found on Kyndryl's website is their official allocation ratio, which is determined based on the companies' relative values right after the distribution. The key thing to understand is that you're not creating a new purchase - you're splitting your original cost basis. So if you paid $1,200 total for 10 IBM shares, after the spin-off you would allocate $1,152 (96%) to your 10 IBM shares and $48 (4%) to your 2 KD shares. The purchase date remains the same as your original IBM purchase. As for the discrepancy with Fidelity, this could be happening for a few reasons. Sometimes brokers use different valuation methods, especially if they didn't receive the official allocation information. They might be using the fair market value of KD on the distribution date as the cost basis instead of the allocated portion of your original IBM cost basis.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation - that helps a lot. So just to make sure I understand completely: if I originally purchased 10 IBM shares at $120 each ($1,200 total), then after the spin-off, my 10 IBM shares would have a total cost basis of $1,152 ($115.20 per share) and my 2 KD shares would have a total cost basis of $48 ($24 per share)? Would it be appropriate for me to contact Fidelity and ask them to correct the cost basis for the KD shares? And what documentation should I provide to support this request?

0 coins

Yes, that's exactly right! Your 10 IBM shares would have a new cost basis of $115.20 per share (totaling $1,152), and your 2 KD shares would have a cost basis of $24 per share (totaling $48). The purchase dates stay the same as when you originally bought the IBM shares. Definitely contact Fidelity to request a correction. I'd recommend providing them with: 1) Your original IBM purchase records showing date and price, 2) The official Kyndryl documentation showing the 96%/4% allocation ratio, and 3) Your calculations showing how you applied this ratio to your specific holdings. Most brokerages have a cost basis correction form you can submit online or by mail, along with these supporting documents.

0 coins

After struggling with the exact same issue last year, I found an amazing service called taxr.ai at https://taxr.ai that totally saved me from this headache. I was in a similar situation with some GE spin-offs that had moved between brokerages and had missing cost basis info. The tool analyzed my statements and transaction history, then calculated the proper cost basis allocation for all my spin-off shares. What impressed me was how it handled the multi-tier transactions that happened when shares moved between brokerages - something I couldn't figure out myself. For IBM/KD specifically, it correctly applied the 96%/4% allocation ratio but also accounted for some nuances in how fractional shares were handled that I would have missed. The reports it generated were accepted by my broker without any pushback.

0 coins

How does taxr.ai handle situations where you've purchased shares of the same company at different times? I've got IBM shares I bought in 2015, 2017, and 2019, and now I have these KD shares too. Does it figure out which KD shares came from which IBM purchase lot?

0 coins

I'm curious - how much documentation did you need to provide? My statements from my old brokerage are incomplete, which is part of my problem. Would taxr.ai still work with partial records?

0 coins

It handles multiple purchase lots beautifully. The system matches each KD share to the specific IBM purchase lot it came from, maintaining the correct acquisition dates for each. This is crucial for calculating correct long-term vs. short-term capital gains when you eventually sell. For documentation, I was surprised how little I needed. Even with some gaps in my records, the system could interpolate missing information based on transaction patterns and public stock price history. I had about 60% of my historical statements, and that was enough. They also have a method to reconstruct basis by working backward from your current holdings if your historical records are really limited.

0 coins

I just wanted to follow up about my experience with taxr.ai after trying it based on the recommendation here. It was seriously impressive! I uploaded what statements I had, which honestly wasn't much, and their system filled in the blanks. For my IBM/KD situation, not only did they correctly apply the allocation ratio, but they caught something I would have completely missed - apparently some of my IBM shares had been purchased through a dividend reinvestment plan which affects the cost basis calculation differently. The detailed report showed exactly which KD shares came from which IBM lots, making it crystal clear. Fidelity accepted the documentation without question and updated all my cost basis information. This was such a relief because I was planning to sell some shares this year and was worried about reporting incorrect information to the IRS.

0 coins

I had a similar issue calling the IRS to get clarification on a spin-off question, but could never get through until I found Claimyr. Their service at https://claimyr.com actually got me connected to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes when I'd been trying for weeks on my own. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c I was skeptical at first, but after the IRS agent confirmed my understanding of the cost basis allocation for a similar spin-off situation (mine was with Dow/DuPont), I was able to confidently update my records. The IRS agent even walked me through the correct way to report it on my tax forms, which was incredibly helpful. What surprised me most was how knowledgeable the IRS representative was once I actually got to speak with one. They explained that brokerages often struggle with spin-off cost basis calculations because they don't always receive the complete transaction history.

0 coins

How exactly does this service work? I've tried calling the IRS several times about my own stock basis questions and just get the dreaded "due to high call volume" message before being disconnected.

0 coins

I don't buy it. There's no way to "skip the line" with the IRS. They answer calls in the order received. This sounds like some kind of scam to get people's tax info or money.

0 coins

The service works by continuously calling the IRS and navigating the phone tree for you until a line opens up. When someone finally answers, you get an immediate callback connecting you directly to the IRS agent. It's not skipping the line - it's basically having technology do the tedious redial work for you. Regarding the skepticism, I totally understand. I felt the same way initially. But they don't actually have access to any of your tax information - they're just connecting the call. You speak directly with the IRS agent, and Claimyr isn't on the line during your conversation. It's similar to how delivery services work with restaurants - they're just facilitating the connection, not involving themselves in the actual interaction.

0 coins

I need to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I had a complicated question about a REIT spin-off that I couldn't get answered anywhere else. The service actually worked exactly as described. After months of failing to reach anyone at the IRS, I got a call back within 20 minutes connecting me to an actual IRS representative. The agent was able to confirm the proper allocation method for my spin-off basis question and even sent me documentation to support it. What I appreciated most was being able to get an official answer directly from the IRS rather than relying on forum advice or my own interpretation. For something as specific as spin-off cost basis calculations, having that authoritative guidance gives me confidence that my tax return will be correct.

0 coins

Have you checked if IBM or Kyndryl filed a Form 8937 with the IRS? Companies are required to file this form for corporate actions that affect basis, and it should have the official allocation ratio. I had a similar issue with a Pfizer spin-off and found their Form 8937 posted on their investor relations website. Sometimes these forms include detailed examples of how to calculate the allocation for specific share amounts. The form should also show the fair market values they used to determine the allocation percentages, which could help explain why Fidelity's numbers are different.

0 coins

I hadn't thought of looking for Form 8937 specifically! I'll search for that on both companies' investor relations sites. Would this form be something that I could also reference when contacting Fidelity to correct the cost basis? I still don't understand why Fidelity would have such different numbers though - we're talking about a 6x difference in the KD cost basis compared to what the 4% allocation would give me.

0 coins

Absolutely! Form 8937 is an official IRS document, so it carries a lot of weight when requesting cost basis corrections from brokerages. Fidelity should accept it as definitive proof of the correct allocation method. Regarding the 6x difference, there's a common mistake that happens with spin-offs. Sometimes brokerages mistakenly use the market value of the new shares on the distribution date as the cost basis, rather than allocating a portion of your original basis. For example, if KD was trading at around $30 when distributed, but your allocated cost basis should only be $5, that could explain the 6x difference. Another possibility is they're using a different allocation method - some brokers use closing prices on the day before distribution rather than the day after, which can lead to different ratios.

0 coins

For anyone dealing with spin-offs in the future, I highly recommend keeping a spreadsheet that tracks all your stock purchases with dates and prices. When spin-offs happen, immediately document the allocation ratios announced by the companies. I learned this the hard way after going through THREE different spin-offs with AT&T. Their Warner Media spinoff to Discovery was especially complicated with the reverse stock split component. Also, don't wait years to update your cost basis like I did! The longer you wait, the harder it is to find the documentation, especially if companies get acquired or change names after the spin-off.

0 coins

What software do you recommend for tracking this kind of stuff? I've been using an Excel spreadsheet but it's getting unwieldy with multiple accounts and dozens of positions.

0 coins

I've been using Portfolio Tracker by Quicken for the past few years and it handles corporate actions pretty well. It automatically updates for most spin-offs and stock splits, though you still need to verify the allocations are correct. For something more comprehensive, I'd actually recommend keeping both a simple spreadsheet for your own reference AND using your brokerage's portfolio tracking tools. Most major brokers like Fidelity, Schwab, and Vanguard have decent portfolio analysis features that can export transaction histories. The key is having multiple backup records. I learned this after my old broker (E*Trade) got acquired by Morgan Stanley and some of my historical data got lost in the transition. Having my own spreadsheet saved me from having to reconstruct years of transactions.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
43,533 users helped today