< Back to IRS

Romeo Quest

How are fund manager fees calculated - before or after tax calculations?

Hey guys, I have a couple quick questions about my investment account and how taxes work with the fees. First, I'm trying to figure out if I'm taxed on my entire gains for the year, or if I can subtract what my fund manager takes? My manager charges a 20% performance fee but doesn't charge any management fee. I'm guessing I can deduct their fee since they'll pay taxes on it as income when they receive it? Or does this money basically get taxed twice - once when I pay it and again when they receive it? Second question - when figuring out the performance fee itself, what's the standard practice? Do I calculate the realized gains first, then subtract the tax I'll owe before determining the manager's fee? Or do I just calculate their fee based on the total profit without considering taxes? My fund manager is basically letting me choose how we handle this, but I'd like to know if there's an industry standard I should follow for this type of arrangement. Thanks for any advice!

Val Rossi

•

You've got a couple of important tax questions here that many investors overlook until tax time. For your first question: Generally, investment management fees are considered miscellaneous itemized deductions, but the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act suspended these deductions from 2018 through 2025. So currently, you're typically taxed on the full realized gains before the manager's fee is deducted. Yes, this does effectively create a situation where the money is "taxed twice" - you pay tax on the full amount, and the manager pays income tax on their fee. For your second question: The standard practice is to calculate the performance fee based on the gross returns before tax considerations. Most hedge funds and investment managers calculate their performance fee on the pre-tax gains. This is because your tax situation is unique to you (tax bracket, state of residence, other deductions, etc.) and would be impractical for them to factor into their fee calculations. Remember that how these fees are structured should be clearly outlined in your investment management agreement. You might want to review that document to see if there are any specifics about how fees are calculated in your particular case.

0 coins

Eve Freeman

•

Thanks for the explanation. I thought the 2017 tax law eliminated the ability to deduct those fees, but wasn't 100% sure. Does it make sense to negotiate with my fund manager to have them take a slightly lower performance fee since I'm essentially paying tax on money I never receive?

0 coins

Val Rossi

•

You're right that the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act eliminated the deduction for investment management fees. That's why many investors are feeling the pinch. Negotiating a lower performance fee is absolutely a reasonable approach. Many sophisticated investors do exactly that, pointing out the tax inefficiency as leverage in their negotiations. You might suggest a structure that acknowledges the tax impact - perhaps a 16-17% fee instead of 20% to partially offset your tax burden on those amounts. Alternative structures could include a hurdle rate (where fees only apply to returns above a certain percentage) or a sliding scale based on performance.

0 coins

After dealing with similar tax headaches with my investment accounts, I started using taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) to help make sense of all this. I uploaded my investment statements and tax documents, and it highlighted exactly how my fund manager fees were impacting my tax liability. The tool actually showed me that my effective return was about 2.3% lower than I thought because of the tax inefficiency of the fee structure. What I found really helpful was that it showed me alternative fee structures that would be more tax-efficient based on my specific situation. It also helped me prepare documentation for discussions with my fund manager about restructuring our agreement. Might be worth checking out if you're trying to optimize this situation.

0 coins

Caden Turner

•

How easy was it to get your documents analyzed? My investment statements are usually pretty complicated with lots of transactions throughout the year. Does it handle complex portfolios well?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these kinds of services. Did it actually help you negotiate better terms with your manager, or did it just tell you what you already suspected? Also, how does it differ from just talking to a CPA?

0 coins

The document analysis was surprisingly straightforward. I just uploaded PDFs of my statements and it processed everything in about 10 minutes. It handles complex portfolios quite well - mine has over 200 transactions per year across multiple asset classes, and it categorized everything correctly. Yes, it absolutely helped with negotiations. It generated a detailed report showing exactly how the current fee structure was affecting my after-tax returns, with specific calculations I could show my fund manager. It's different from a CPA consultation because it's more specialized for investment fee structures specifically, and it provides visual modeling of different scenarios. My CPA actually recommended it because he said it would save him hours of specialized analysis that would cost me more than the service itself.

0 coins

I was really skeptical about using taxr.ai when I first heard about it, but I finally tried it last month when preparing for my annual review with my investment manager. I'm surprised to say it was actually incredibly helpful. The analysis showed me that my current fee arrangement was costing me an additional 3.1% in tax inefficiencies that I hadn't accounted for. It generated specific language I could use when discussing fee restructuring, and even provided four alternative models that would be more favorable from a tax perspective. My fund manager actually seemed impressed when I came prepared with such detailed analysis. We ended up negotiating a new structure with a lower performance fee (17% instead of 22%) plus a small management fee (0.25%), which the analysis showed would save me about $13,000 in taxes annually on my portfolio. Wasn't expecting such a concrete result.

0 coins

Harmony Love

•

If you're struggling to get clear answers from your fund manager about how fees and taxes work, you might want to try Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was in a similar situation last year and needed to speak directly with the IRS about how to properly report these fees on my tax return. After waiting on hold for hours across multiple days, I found this service that got me connected to an IRS agent in under 20 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with was able to clarify exactly how to handle the reporting of my fund's performance fees and confirmed that under current tax law, I couldn't deduct them as investment expenses. She also pointed me to some specific IRS publications that addressed alternative investment structures that might be more tax-efficient. Having that direct confirmation saved me from making a reporting mistake that could have triggered an audit.

0 coins

Rudy Cenizo

•

Wait, how does this actually work? Does it just call the IRS for you? Why would that be faster than calling them yourself?

0 coins

This sounds too good to be true. The IRS wait times are notorious. If this service actually worked, wouldn't everyone be using it? I've spent collectively days of my life on hold with the IRS and never found a way around it.

0 coins

Harmony Love

•

It doesn't just call for you - it uses a system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold in your place. When an agent finally picks up, it calls your phone and connects you directly to the agent. It works because they have technology that can stay on hold indefinitely while you go about your day. I was incredibly skeptical too! I've spent literally 4+ hours on hold with the IRS before giving up. The difference is they have systems designed specifically for navigating government phone systems. I don't know if "everyone" is using it, but after my experience, I've told all my friends who have tax questions. The service paid for itself in terms of the time I saved not being stuck on hold, and the peace of mind from getting definitive answers directly from the IRS.

0 coins

Well, I have to eat crow on this one. After expressing skepticism about Claimyr, I decided to try it last week when I needed clarification on reporting my hedge fund's K-1. I was fully prepared to waste my entire afternoon on hold with the IRS. The service connected me to an IRS representative in about 15 minutes while I was able to continue working. The agent walked me through exactly how to properly report my fund manager's performance fees on my return and clarified that certain offshore fund structures have different reporting requirements that actually might benefit my situation. The information I got directly from the IRS representative was much more specific to my situation than what my fund manager had told me (which was basically "consult your tax advisor"). Saved me hours of research and probably prevented me from making a costly reporting error. Consider me converted - I'll definitely use this again next time I have a specific tax question that needs an official answer.

0 coins

Natalie Khan

•

One thing to consider is whether your fund manager is charging the performance fee at the entity level or the investor level. If it's at the entity level (like in a partnership structure), those fees reduce the partnership's income before it flows to you on a K-1, which effectively means you're not taxed on those amounts. But if you're getting the full gain reported to you and then paying the manager separately, that's where you run into the double taxation issue. Worth checking how your specific arrangement is structured.

0 coins

Romeo Quest

•

Thanks for bringing this up! I just checked my documents and it looks like the performance fee is being charged at the investor level after the gains are calculated. So it sounds like I'm in that double taxation situation you mentioned. Is there any way to restructure this to be more tax efficient?

0 coins

Natalie Khan

•

You definitely have options to restructure this arrangement. The most common approach would be to request that your manager change to an entity-level fee structure, where the fee is taken before income is distributed to you. This typically requires the fund to be structured as a partnership. Another option is to discuss a different investment vehicle altogether, such as separately managed accounts (SMAs) which can sometimes offer more flexibility in how fees are structured. Many high net worth investors are moving toward SMAs for precisely this tax efficiency reason. In some cases, you might also explore having your fees paid from a different account rather than from the investment gains directly, which can have different tax implications depending on your overall situation.

0 coins

Daryl Bright

•

Just to add another perspective - I work in wealth management (not giving professional advice here), and one approach we've seen clients use successfully is establishing an LLC or other business entity that holds their investments. In some cases, this can allow investment management fees to be treated as business expenses rather than miscellaneous itemized deductions.

0 coins

Sienna Gomez

•

Interesting approach. Wouldn't the LLC need to have a legitimate business purpose beyond just holding investments though? I thought the IRS was pretty strict about structures created primarily for tax advantages.

0 coins

You're absolutely right to question this. The IRS does scrutinize structures created primarily for tax benefits. For an LLC holding investments to legitimately deduct management fees as business expenses, it typically needs to demonstrate active business activities - like operating as an investment company, having employees, conducting regular business meetings, maintaining business records, etc. Simply holding passive investments in an LLC without substantial business activities would likely be challenged by the IRS as lacking economic substance. The Tax Court has been pretty clear that investment holding entities need to show they're engaged in a trade or business beyond just passive investing. Most individual investors would find the compliance costs and complexity outweigh any potential tax benefits, unless they're managing very large portfolios or have other legitimate business reasons for the LLC structure.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today