< Back to IRS

Ryan Andre

How Rental Property Income on Schedule E Impacts MAGI Calculation

I'm trying to figure out how my rental property income affects my MAGI calculation and feeling a bit overwhelmed. Here's my situation: On my Schedule E, my rental property generates about $13,500 in gross income. After deducting expenses like mortgage interest ($4,200), property management fees ($1,350), property taxes ($1,800), insurance ($950), and miscellaneous repairs ($1,200), my net income comes to around $4,000. Then when I factor in depreciation of approximately $6,750, it brings my net rental income to negative $2,750. Since I don't have other passive income to offset this loss, I'm showing $0 for passive losses on line 25. What I'm confused about is exactly how this factors into my MAGI calculation. The rest of my income is pretty straightforward - I have W2 income from my job, some K1 income from a small business interest, and then this rental property situation. It's just the rental income part that has me confused about what number I should be using when calculating my MAGI. Can someone explain what figure from my Schedule E should be included in my MAGI calculation? Is it the $4,000 pre-depreciation amount, the -$2,750 after depreciation, or the $0 passive loss that's reported on line 25?

Lauren Zeb

•

The MAGI calculation can definitely be confusing when rental properties are involved! For your situation, here's what you need to know: When calculating your MAGI, you generally need to include your rental income BEFORE the depreciation deduction, but after your other ordinary and necessary expenses. So in your case, you would include the $4,000 figure (not the -$2,750 post-depreciation amount). This is because Modified Adjusted Gross Income typically adds back certain deductions to your AGI, and depreciation on rental properties is one of those add-backs for most MAGI calculations. The purpose is to get a more accurate picture of your actual income flow without the paper loss that depreciation represents. The $0 passive loss on line 25 is really about loss limitations, not your income calculation. Even though you can't use the passive loss this year (and carry it forward instead), the depreciation still reduced your AGI - it's just added back for MAGI purposes.

0 coins

Thanks for the explanation, but I'm still a bit confused. Does this mean the passive loss carryforward never affects MAGI in future years either? And does this same rule apply for all MAGI calculations like for ACA subsidies, IRMAA for Medicare, etc? Or does each program have different rules for what gets added back?

0 coins

Lauren Zeb

•

Passive loss carryforwards actually don't affect your MAGI until the year they're used to offset passive income or when you dispose of the property in a taxable transaction. At that point, they reduce your income but without the depreciation add-back. The definition of MAGI does vary somewhat depending on what it's being used for. For ACA subsidies, rental depreciation is indeed added back. For IRMAA calculations, the Social Security Administration uses a similar approach where certain deductions including depreciation are added back. However, there can be minor differences in what's included in MAGI depending on the specific program, so it's always worth double-checking the specific rules for your situation.

0 coins

After struggling with this exact same issue last year, I finally found a resource that helped me understand it. I used this tool called taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and uploaded my Schedule E forms. The system analyzed them and explained exactly how my rental income factored into my MAGI calculations. What was helpful is that it didn't just give me a number - it actually explained WHY certain items like depreciation get added back for MAGI while other expenses don't. The explanation matched what the previous commenter said about using the pre-depreciation amount, but it also showed me how the passive activity rules interact with various MAGI calculations for different programs. The analysis broke down which expenses are considered "paper losses" vs actual cash expenses, which really helped me understand the whole picture better.

0 coins

Anthony Young

•

That sounds useful, but does it handle more complex situations? I have 3 rental properties and one of them is partially a vacation home that I use myself part of the year. Would it understand the partial personal use complications?

0 coins

I'm skeptical of these tax tools. How does it know the different MAGI calculations for different purposes? Like MAGI for IRA contributions is different than MAGI for premium tax credits, etc. Does it actually distinguish between these?

0 coins

It handled my situation with two properties and different expense structures just fine. For vacation homes with partial personal use, it actually has a specific module that helps allocate expenses between personal and rental use based on days. It asks you about personal use days vs. rental days and calculates the proper allocation. The system is actually quite sophisticated regarding different MAGI calculations. You can select what you're calculating MAGI for - whether it's for IRA contribution limits, premium tax credits, IRMAA calculations, etc. - and it adjusts the formula accordingly. It clearly shows which deductions get added back for each specific purpose. For example, it shows that student loan interest is added back for some MAGI calculations but not others.

0 coins

I was really doubtful about using yet another tax tool, but I decided to try taxr.ai after seeing it mentioned here. I've been confused about my rental property MAGI calculations for years, especially since I have those passive loss carryforwards that never seem to get used. To my surprise, it actually clarified exactly how my Schedule E income factors into different MAGI calculations. For my ACA subsidy calculation, it confirmed I needed to use my net rental income BEFORE depreciation. But what was really helpful was seeing how my suspended passive losses would eventually affect my MAGI when I sell the property. The analysis even pointed out that I had been calculating my MAGI incorrectly for IRA contribution purposes for the past two years! Turns out I was adding back an adjustment that didn't need to be added for that specific MAGI calculation.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

If you're struggling with getting accurate information about your MAGI calculation, you might also be running into issues with getting answers from the IRS directly. I spent weeks trying to get through to someone who could answer my questions about passive income and MAGI. I eventually used Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) after finding them through this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 25 minutes when I had been trying unsuccessfully for days. The IRS agent confirmed what others have said here - that for most MAGI purposes, you include your net rental income before the depreciation deduction. She also explained how my suspended passive losses would eventually be treated when I either generate passive income or sell the property.

0 coins

How does this Claimyr thing actually work? Is it just scheduling a callback or something? I don't understand how they can get you through when the IRS lines are always busy.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

This sounds like BS honestly. I've called the IRS many times and there's no secret backdoor or way to skip the line. They're just understaffed and overworked. No way some service is getting people through in 25 minutes when the IRS themselves say wait times are hours long.

0 coins

Admin_Masters

•

It's not a callback system. Basically, they have technology that continuously calls the IRS and navigates through all the prompts until it gets in the queue, then it calls you and connects you when a real person answers. You just wait for their call rather than sitting on hold yourself. I was skeptical too, but it's not a backdoor or line-cutting system. They're just automating the tedious process of calling, getting disconnected, and calling again that most of us try manually. I was surprised it worked too, but after trying to get through for almost a week on my own, I was connected within 25 minutes after using them. The agent I spoke with was super helpful with my Schedule E and MAGI questions too.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

•

Well I'm eating my words now. After posting my skeptical comment yesterday, I decided to try Claimyr myself for an issue with my passive rental losses that had been bothering me. My previous attempts to reach the IRS had me on hold for over 2 hours before getting disconnected. Using the service, I got connected to an IRS representative in about 30 minutes. The agent confirmed that for MAGI calculation purposes, I needed to use my rental income after regular expenses but before depreciation. She also helped clarify how my suspended passive losses would be handled when I eventually sell my property. What was really valuable was getting confirmation about how the at-risk and passive activity loss limitations interact with MAGI calculations - something I couldn't find clear guidance on anywhere online.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

I think there's an important distinction that's getting missed in this conversation. The definition of MAGI actually varies depending on what you're using it for: - For ACA premium tax credits: You add back the excluded portion of foreign income, tax-exempt interest, and non-taxable Social Security benefits - For IRA contribution limits: You add back student loan interest, tuition deduction, foreign income exclusion, and a few others - For IRMAA Medicare determinations: The Social Security Administration uses yet another definition In all cases, you generally add back rental depreciation, but the other adjustments vary. That's why calculators that just say "calculate your MAGI" without specifying the purpose can be misleading.

0 coins

Do you know where I can find the official list of what gets added back for each type of MAGI calculation? The IRS publications I've read seem to be unclear or scattered across different documents.

0 coins

JacksonHarris

•

You're right that it's frustratingly scattered across different IRS publications. For ACA premium tax credits, look at Form 8962 instructions. For IRA contribution limits, Publication 590-A has the details. For IRMAA calculations, it's not even an IRS publication - you need to look at SSA documentation instead. The most comprehensive list I've found was actually on the IRS website under "Definition of Modified Adjusted Gross Income" but even that doesn't clearly differentiate between the different purposes. What I usually do is look at the specific form or worksheet for whatever I'm calculating and check what modifications it requires to AGI.

0 coins

Royal_GM_Mark

•

Has anyone had experience with how suspended passive losses affect your MAGI when you finally get to use them? I've been accumulating losses on my rental for 5 years and am thinking of selling soon.

0 coins

When you sell the property, those suspended passive losses become "unlocked" and can offset the gain from the sale. In the year you sell, those losses will reduce your AGI (and consequently your MAGI). It's one of the few times suspended passive losses directly impact your MAGI calculation. The interesting part is that when they're finally utilized, they're treated as ordinary losses - even the portion that was originally from depreciation. But remember that you'll likely face depreciation recapture taxes on the sale too, which is typically at a 25% rate for the accumulated depreciation you've taken over the years.

0 coins

As someone who's dealt with this exact same confusion, I can confirm what others have said about using the pre-depreciation rental income figure for MAGI calculations. In your case, that would be the $4,000. One thing that helped me understand this better is thinking about why MAGI exists in the first place - it's meant to capture your actual economic income flow for determining eligibility for various programs. Depreciation is a "paper loss" that doesn't represent actual cash leaving your pocket, so it gets added back. The passive loss limitation (showing $0 on line 25) is a separate issue from MAGI calculation. Those suspended losses are essentially being "stored" for future use when you either have passive income to offset or sell the property. For your situation with $4,000 net rental income before depreciation, that's what you'd include in your MAGI calculation for most purposes. Just remember that if you're calculating MAGI for different programs (ACA subsidies vs IRA contribution limits, etc.), there might be slight variations in what other items get added back to your AGI.

0 coins

This is really helpful clarification! I'm new to rental property ownership and was getting confused by all the different numbers on Schedule E. Your explanation about MAGI capturing "actual economic income flow" really makes it click for me. So just to make sure I understand correctly - even though my rental property might show a loss after depreciation on my tax return, for MAGI purposes I should still include the positive cash flow amount (before depreciation) because that represents real income I received? And those suspended passive losses are basically sitting in a "holding account" until I can use them later? This community has been incredibly helpful - I was getting overwhelmed trying to figure this out on my own!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today