< Back to IRS

Alicia Stern

Do I have to pay taxes on profit from selling house if I invest it into an RV park where I'll live?

I'm planning to sell my current house and use the proceeds to buy a piece of land and develop a small RV park where I'll also be living. From what I've heard, you don't have to pay taxes on profits from selling your primary residence if you use the money to purchase another home. But I'm not sure if my situation qualifies for this tax exemption. Would an RV park where I'll be residing count as a "home" for tax purposes? Or would it be considered a business investment? Maybe I'd get partial tax exemption - like not paying taxes on the portion used for my personal living space, but paying taxes on the part used for the commercial RV park development? I'm trying to figure out if I'd owe capital gains taxes on the full profit, partial profit, or none at all. Any insights would be helpful since I need to know what I'm getting into before I make this big change. Thanks!

Your situation is interesting! What you're referring to is the Section 121 exclusion, which lets you exclude up to $250,000 of capital gains ($500,000 for married couples filing jointly) from the sale of your primary residence if you've lived there for at least 2 of the last 5 years. The catch here is that this exclusion only applies when you're selling one primary residence and buying another primary residence. An RV park would likely be classified as a business investment, even if you're living on the property. The IRS would probably view this as two separate transactions: 1) selling your home and 2) investing in a business. The portion of the property that's genuinely your personal residence (your RV or a house on the property) might qualify for a partial exclusion, but the business portion (the RV park infrastructure) would likely be considered a capital investment, not a replacement residence. You might want to look into a 1031 exchange, which allows you to defer (not eliminate) capital gains taxes when selling an investment property and purchasing a similar investment property. But this wouldn't apply to your primary residence.

0 coins

Drake

•

Thanks for the explanation! Would it make a difference if I structured it differently? Like buying the land with a small house on it that would be my primary residence, and then later developing the RV park section as a separate project? Would that help with the capital gains exclusion?

0 coins

That's actually a smart approach to consider. If you purchase a property with an existing house that genuinely becomes your primary residence, that portion could potentially qualify for the Section 121 exclusion. The key is that you'd need to clearly separate the residential portion from the business investment. The timing and documentation would be important here. Ideally, you'd want to complete the purchase of your new primary residence within the timeframe that makes it clear this was a residence replacement, not just an investment. Then developing the RV park later as a separate project could help establish that distinction for tax purposes.

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

After running into a similar situation last year, I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) and it was incredibly helpful. I was selling my lakefront property and using part of the proceeds to buy a small marina where I'd also live in the apartment above the store. Their system analyzed my specific situation and clarified exactly what would qualify for the capital gains exclusion and what would be considered business investment. They even helped identify which improvements and expenses could be allocated to the residential portion versus the business portion. What I really liked was that they explained everything in plain English and gave me a document I could take to my tax preparer that laid everything out clearly. Saved me from potentially making a costly mistake with the IRS!

0 coins

How does this actually work? Do you just upload documents or do you have to talk to someone? I hate talking on the phone with strangers about my finances.

0 coins

Emily Sanjay

•

Did it actually save you money though? Like did you end up paying less in taxes than you would have without using it? Or is it just another service that charges for info you could find free elsewhere?

0 coins

Sarah Jones

•

You just upload your documents and their AI analyzes them - no awkward phone conversations required! It takes your documents, tax situation, and questions, then gives you personalized guidance based on your specific details. I found it much easier than trying to piece together information from random websites. It definitely saved me money. In my case, they showed me how to properly allocate expenses between the business and residential portions, which reduced my taxable gain by about $35,000. The guidance was specific to my situation, not just generic info you can find for free. They pointed out deductions I didn't know applied to my situation and helped me correctly structure the transaction.

0 coins

Emily Sanjay

•

Just wanted to follow up - I decided to try taxr.ai after all and I'm actually impressed. I was skeptical (sorry about that), but they showed me that I could classify about 30% of my property as primary residence, with documentation to support it if audited. This saved me nearly $22k in capital gains taxes! The analysis broke down exactly which expenses could be attributed to the residential portion vs the business investment. They even provided guidance on how to structure the purchase agreement to maximize my tax benefits. Way more specific than the generic "it depends" answers I was getting elsewhere.

0 coins

Jordan Walker

•

If you're planning this big of a tax move, you're probably going to want to talk to the IRS directly to get their official take. I tried calling them for clarification on a similar situation (converting my property to partial business use) and spent DAYS trying to get through. Then I found Claimyr (https://claimyr.com) and it was a game-changer. They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the hours I'd been wasting on hold. They have a demo video here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c that shows exactly how it works. Got official answers straight from the IRS about my specific situation, which gave me peace of mind that I wasn't missing anything important. For something as significant as what you're planning, getting official confirmation seems worth it.

0 coins

Natalie Adams

•

How does this work? Seems impossible to skip the IRS phone queue when millions of people are trying to call.

0 coins

Yeah right. Nobody gets through to the IRS that fast. This sounds like a scam to collect phone numbers or payment info. Has anyone actually verified this works?

0 coins

Jordan Walker

•

It uses a combination of automated technology and optimal calling strategies to navigate the IRS phone system more efficiently than a human can manually. It basically dials continuously using their system until it gets through, then connects you when an agent answers. It's not "skipping" the queue - it's just handling the waiting for you so you don't have to sit there with a phone to your ear for hours. I was skeptical too at first! But it worked exactly as advertised. The service only charges if they successfully connect you to an agent. I got connected in about 15 minutes when I had previously spent 3+ hours on hold and never got through. They don't collect any tax information - they just connect the call and then drop off.

0 coins

Ok I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting that skeptical comment, I decided to try it myself since I needed to ask about a missing tax refund anyway. It actually worked! Got connected to an IRS agent in about 20 minutes when I had previously wasted an entire afternoon on hold. The agent was able to confirm that for my situation (converting part of property to business use), I needed to file Form 8829 for the business portion of my home. For anyone with a complex tax situation like the original poster, getting direct confirmation from the IRS is really valuable. Saved me hours of frustration and gave me documentation of the call in case there are ever questions about whether I sought official guidance.

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

Have you considered a 1031 exchange? If you're creating an RV park that will generate income, you might be able to defer the capital gains taxes. You'd need to work with a qualified intermediary and follow specific timelines though. I did this when converting a residential property into a small hotel and it saved me a ton in immediate tax burden.

0 coins

But a 1031 exchange only works if you're selling an investment property, right? OP is selling their primary residence, so how would that work?

0 coins

Amara Torres

•

You're absolutely right about that limitation - 1031 exchanges only apply when both the property sold and the property purchased are held for business or investment purposes. Since OP is selling their primary residence, a 1031 exchange wouldn't be applicable for this particular situation. What might work better is to take advantage of the Section 121 exclusion on the residential portion and then properly structure the business investment part. Sometimes people convert their primary residence to a rental property for a period before selling, which might open up 1031 possibilities, but that's a whole different strategy with its own timeline requirements.

0 coins

Mason Kaczka

•

Has anyone mentioned property segregation? When I built my farm with living quarters, my accountant had me clearly document which parts of the property were for personal use vs business. We drew up actual boundary lines and kept separate receipts for improvements to each section. It wasn't a perfect solution but it helped substantiate what portion was my primary residence for tax purposes!

0 coins

Sophia Russo

•

This is actually really good advice. I did something similar when I converted my property to a bed and breakfast. Having clear documentation of what square footage was personal vs business use made a huge difference during tax time.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

This is a really complex situation that touches on several different tax concepts! Based on what you've described, you're dealing with both the Section 121 exclusion for primary residence sales and the classification of mixed-use properties. The key issue is that the IRS will likely view your RV park as a business investment rather than a replacement primary residence, even if you're living on the property. However, there are some strategies that might help: 1. **Separate the residential from business portions**: If you can clearly delineate what part of the property is your actual residence (whether that's an RV pad, a small house, or a manufactured home), that portion might qualify for the Section 121 exclusion. 2. **Timing matters**: You generally need to purchase your replacement residence within a reasonable timeframe to maintain the exclusion benefits. 3. **Documentation is crucial**: Keep detailed records of all expenses, improvements, and usage to support your position if audited. Given the complexity and potential tax implications (we're talking about significant capital gains here), I'd strongly recommend getting professional advice from a tax attorney or CPA who specializes in real estate transactions. They can help you structure the purchase and development in a way that maximizes your tax benefits while staying compliant with IRS regulations. This isn't a DIY situation - the stakes are too high to guess!

0 coins

Luca Esposito

•

This is really helpful advice! I'm actually in a similar situation - considering selling my primary residence to buy a small ranch where I'd run a glamping business. The point about separating residential from business portions makes a lot of sense. Do you happen to know if there's a minimum square footage or percentage that needs to be designated as "personal residence" to qualify for the Section 121 exclusion? I'm wondering if having just a small cabin on a large commercial property would still count, or if the IRS has specific thresholds they look for. Also, when you mention timing matters for the replacement residence - is there a specific deadline like the 45/180 day rules for 1031 exchanges, or is it more subjective?

0 coins

@dc11f34c4971 Great question about the thresholds! The IRS doesn't have specific square footage minimums for the Section 121 exclusion, but they do look at whether the space genuinely functions as your primary residence. The key test is whether you use it as your main home where you live, sleep, and conduct your daily personal activities. For timing, the Section 121 exclusion doesn't have the same strict deadlines as 1031 exchanges. You don't need to buy a replacement property at all to claim the exclusion - it's just about selling your primary residence that you've lived in for 2 of the last 5 years. The exclusion amount (up to $250k single/$500k married) applies regardless of what you do with the proceeds. However, if you're trying to argue that part of your new property qualifies as a replacement primary residence, you'd want to establish residency there fairly quickly to support that claim. The IRS looks at factors like where you receive mail, voter registration, driver's license address, etc. Your glamping situation sounds very similar to the original poster's RV park question. Just make sure whatever you designate as your personal residence is clearly separated from the business operation both physically and in your record-keeping!

0 coins

Miguel Ramos

•

Just want to add another perspective here - I went through something very similar when I sold my house to buy a working farm with a farmstand business. What really helped was consulting with a tax professional before making the purchase, not after. They helped me structure the transaction so that I clearly allocated the purchase price between the residential portion (my actual farmhouse) and the business portion (the farmstand, storage buildings, commercial kitchen, etc.). This required getting separate appraisals for each use, but it was worth it. The residential portion qualified for the Section 121 exclusion, saving me about $45,000 in capital gains taxes. The business portion was treated as a separate investment, which meant I did pay capital gains on that allocation, but it also meant I could depreciate those business assets going forward. One thing I learned is that you need to be very intentional about how you document everything from day one. The IRS will scrutinize mixed-use properties closely, so having clean records showing the legitimate business purpose versus personal residence use is essential. Don't try to get too creative with the allocations - they need to reflect the actual fair market values and intended use. The key is getting professional guidance before you buy, not trying to figure it out at tax time!

0 coins

Malik Jenkins

•

This is exactly the kind of real-world example that's so helpful! Getting separate appraisals for different portions of the property is brilliant - I never would have thought of that approach. It makes total sense though, since you need to justify the allocation with actual market values rather than just picking convenient percentages. The timing point about consulting before purchase (not after) is something I wish more people understood. By the time you're filing taxes, your options are pretty limited. But if you plan ahead, you can structure things to maximize your benefits legally. Quick question - when you got the separate appraisals, did you use the same appraiser for both portions or different specialists? I'm wondering if having one appraiser do both might be simpler for consistency, or if using different appraisers who specialize in residential vs commercial properties would give you stronger documentation. Also really appreciate you sharing the actual dollar amount you saved ($45k) - it helps put the value of proper planning into perspective!

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today