< Back to IRS

Yara Sabbagh

Clarification Needed on US Code 117(d)(5) Tax Exclusion for Graduate Tuition Waivers

I'm trying to understand the specifics of US tax code section 117(d)(5) regarding graduate tuition waivers. From what I gather, it states that graduate students who teach or conduct research at their nonprofit university can have their tuition waiver excluded from gross income for tax purposes. Is this interpretation correct? I'm particularly confused about whether there's a minimum teaching requirement - like do I need to teach a certain number of classes per semester to qualify for this exclusion? The code doesn't seem to mention any specific threshold. Also, I'm in a somewhat unique situation where I'm both a full-time graduate student AND I work full-time in the university's administration office, plus I teach one class per semester as an adjunct faculty member. Would this arrangement complicate how the 117(d)(5) exclusion applies to my tuition waiver? Would my full-time employee status affect this somehow? Any insights would be greatly appreciated! I'm trying to figure out my tax situation before the filing deadline.

You've got the basic interpretation right. Section 117(d)(5) of the Internal Revenue Code does allow for qualified tuition reductions (waivers) for graduate students who perform teaching or research activities at an educational institution to be excluded from gross income. The code doesn't specify a minimum number of teaching hours or classes required to qualify for this exclusion. What matters is that you're performing teaching or research activities as part of your graduate education. This is intentionally flexible to accommodate various university programs. Your situation is interesting because of your multiple roles. While the code doesn't explicitly address your specific circumstance, there could be some complications. The tuition waiver you receive as a graduate student/teaching assistant should be excludable under 117(d)(5), but any tuition benefits you receive specifically because of your full-time employment might fall under different rules (potentially Section 127 for educational assistance programs, which has a $5,250 annual exclusion limit). The key question is how your university structures and documents these benefits. Does your tuition waiver come from your status as a graduate student who teaches, or is it provided as an employee benefit?

0 coins

Paolo Rizzo

•

Thanks for the explanation! I have a similar situation but I only work part-time (20hrs/week) in addition to being a grad student and occasional TA. Does the same logic apply? Also, how would I know which section my tuition waiver falls under - is this something that would be reflected on my W-2 or some other document from the university?

0 coins

For your part-time situation, the same general principles apply. The key is how your university categorizes and documents the tuition benefit. You can typically determine which section your tuition waiver falls under by checking the documentation provided by your university. Many universities provide a statement or letter specifically addressing qualified tuition reductions. It generally wouldn't appear on your W-2, as properly excluded amounts shouldn't be reported as taxable wages. However, if you receive a 1098-T form, it may show the tuition waiver as a scholarship or grant. You could also check with your university's payroll or benefits department - they should be able to tell you specifically how your tuition benefit is classified for tax purposes.

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

After struggling with a similar situation last year, I discovered an amazing tool that saved me hours of research and confusion. I used https://taxr.ai to analyze my university stipend documents and tuition waiver statements to determine exactly how my waivers should be treated. The system automatically identified which tax code sections applied to my situation and spelled out what was excludable income versus what needed to be reported. They actually have experience with university tuition waivers and 117(d)(5) questions specifically. The tool analyzed my specific situation (I also had multiple roles at my university) and provided clear documentation I could rely on for tax filing. It even explained exactly what my university should have reported on my W-2 versus my 1098-T.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

How exactly does this work? Do you just upload your tax documents and it figures everything out? I'm in a PhD program and my university gives conflicting info about my fellowship vs. teaching stipend vs. tuition waiver. Would it help with that specific situation?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these kinds of services. Wouldn't a university tax office already know how to handle this? My school has tax workshops specifically for grad students. Did you find this gave you different advice than what your university provided?

0 coins

QuantumQuest

•

You upload your relevant documents (stipend letter, teaching appointment, tuition statement, etc.) and it uses AI to analyze them based on the tax code. It then gives you a detailed breakdown of how each component should be treated tax-wise. It's particularly helpful for complicated situations where multiple tax code sections might apply. The university tax workshops are helpful but often give general advice rather than addressing individual situations like yours with multiple sources of income and benefits. In my case, the university's general guidance wasn't wrong, but it didn't address my specific combination of fellowship, teaching, and research positions. The tool gave me more personalized analysis that the workshop couldn't provide given the number of students they were trying to help.

0 coins

Amina Sy

•

I just wanted to update everyone. I decided to try https://taxr.ai after reading about it here, and it was incredibly helpful for my PhD student tax situation. I uploaded my stipend letter, teaching contract, and tuition statement, and within minutes I had a detailed analysis explaining exactly how Section 117(d)(5) applied to my situation. What impressed me most was how it clearly distinguished between the portion of my tuition waiver that was tax-free under 117(d)(5) due to my teaching activities versus the fellowship portion that had different tax treatment. The report even cited the specific IRS rulings that applied to my case, which gave me confidence when filing. For anyone confused about graduate student tax situations (especially with multiple roles), it's definitely worth checking out. Saved me hours of stress and research!

0 coins

If you're still having trouble getting a clear answer about your 117(d)(5) situation, you might want to try getting an answer directly from the IRS. I was in a similar situation last year with confusion about my graduate tuition waiver and tax obligations. After weeks of trying to get through to the IRS phone lines without success, I found https://claimyr.com which got me connected to an actual IRS agent within 45 minutes instead of the hours or days I was spending on hold. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The IRS agent I spoke with provided official clarification on how 117(d)(5) applied to my specific teaching and employment situation. Having that direct guidance gave me peace of mind that I was filing correctly.

0 coins

How does this service actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? I'm confused because I thought everyone has to wait on hold with the IRS...nobody gets special treatment.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

This sounds like a scam honestly. Why would anyone pay for something they can do themselves for free? The IRS has to answer everyone's calls eventually. And even if you do get through, the IRS agents often give inconsistent answers to tax questions depending on who you talk to.

0 coins

They use an automated system that navigates the IRS phone tree and waits on hold for you. When an agent finally picks up, you get a call back so you can speak directly with them. It's not about special treatment - they're just handling the hold time so you don't have to. The value isn't just in saving time (though that's significant) - it's about actually getting through. During tax season, the IRS phone lines are so overwhelmed that many callers never get through at all after multiple attempts. And while you might get different answers from different agents occasionally, having direct IRS guidance on something like Section 117(d)(5) application is still better than guessing or relying solely on online forums.

0 coins

Emma Davis

•

I need to admit I was wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I decided to try it as a last resort because I was getting desperate for answers about my university tuition waiver situation. I couldn't believe it when I got a call back with an actual IRS agent on the line after trying unsuccessfully for weeks to get through on my own. The agent walked me through exactly how Section 117(d)(5) applied to my specific situation with teaching and research responsibilities. They confirmed that there's no minimum teaching requirement specified in the code, but they did explain how my full-time employment at the university might affect certain aspects of the exclusion. I'm not usually one to admit when I'm wrong, but this service actually delivered exactly what it promised. Saved me hours of frustration and gave me confidence that I'm filing correctly.

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

Something else to consider with your situation is that universities sometimes structure these benefits differently. At my university, graduate students who are also employees receive two separate benefits: 1) a tuition waiver from being a graduate teaching/research assistant that falls under 117(d)(5), and 2) a tuition benefit from being an employee that falls under Section 127. The key is to understand how YOUR university categorizes these benefits. Request documentation from both the graduate school and HR department explaining exactly how they're reporting your tuition benefit. This distinction matters because Section 127 has that $5,250 annual limit while 117(d)(5) doesn't. Also, check your 1098-T form carefully. Box 5 typically shows scholarships/grants (which can include waivers), but doesn't tell you which ones are taxable.

0 coins

Yara Sabbagh

•

That's really helpful - I hadn't considered that my benefits might be categorized under two different sections. I just checked my university portal and I do see two separate entries for tuition benefits, but they're labeled differently than what you described. One is called "Graduate Assistantship Tuition Award" and the other is "Employee Education Benefit." Would these likely correspond to the two different tax code sections you mentioned?

0 coins

GalaxyGlider

•

Yes, those labels strongly suggest the two different tax treatments! The "Graduate Assistantship Tuition Award" is almost certainly the 117(d)(5) qualified tuition reduction that's excludable from income without dollar limits since it's tied to your teaching/research activities as a graduate student. The "Employee Education Benefit" sounds exactly like the Section 127 educational assistance benefit that's provided to you as an employee rather than as a graduate student. This would be subject to the $5,250 annual exclusion limit, with any amount above that potentially being taxable.

0 coins

One thing nobody has mentioned yet is that Section 117(d)(5) has been on shaky ground in recent years. During the 2017 tax reform discussions, there was talk of eliminating this exclusion entirely, which would have made all graduate tuition waivers taxable income. While it survived that round, it's always possible future tax legislation could modify or remove this benefit. Make sure whatever documentation you rely on is current. The IRS Publication 970 (Tax Benefits for Education) gets updated annually and contains official guidance on these educational tax benefits. Always worth checking the most recent version!

0 coins

Thanks for bringing this up! Do you know if there are any current proposals that might affect this in the 2025 tax year? I'm starting a graduate program this fall and trying to plan my finances accordingly.

0 coins

Zainab Ismail

•

Just to add another perspective - I work in university payroll and see these situations frequently. The distinction everyone's discussing between 117(d)(5) and Section 127 benefits is crucial, but there's one more wrinkle to consider. If you're classified as more than a half-time employee (typically 20+ hours per week), some universities will automatically categorize ALL your tuition benefits under Section 127 rather than 117(d)(5), even if you're also teaching. This is because they view your primary relationship with the university as "employee" rather than "student." I'd strongly recommend getting written clarification from both your graduate school AND your HR department about how they're classifying your benefits. Don't assume that teaching one class automatically qualifies you for 117(d)(5) treatment if you're primarily employed in administration. The IRS looks at the substance of the relationship, not just the presence of teaching duties. Also, if your university is treating this inconsistently or you're getting conflicting information, document everything. You may need to make your own determination based on the facts and circumstances of your situation.

0 coins

Ravi Gupta

•

This is really eye-opening information! I had no idea that the 20+ hour employee classification could override the 117(d)(5) benefits entirely. As someone new to navigating graduate school finances and taxes, this is exactly the kind of nuance that's hard to find in general tax guides. Your point about getting written clarification from both departments is spot on - I'm realizing now that I shouldn't assume anything about how my benefits are being categorized. Do you have any advice on what specific questions I should ask HR and the graduate school to get the clearest picture? I want to make sure I'm asking the right questions to avoid any confusion or conflicting answers. Also, when you mention "substance of the relationship" - are there specific factors the IRS considers when making this determination, or is it more of a case-by-case evaluation?

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today