Can you efile superseded 1040s now or still need to paper file them?
I'm prepping some returns right now and just realized I might be able to save myself a huge headache. I remember reading somewhere that the IRS finally allowed e-filing superseded 1040s instead of just paper filing them like before. Is this actually true now? I've always had to paper file when a client needed to supersede rather than amend their return. I'm using UltraTax for my practice this year and I can't figure out if they've implemented this capability yet. Has anyone successfully e-filed a superseded 1040 through UltraTax or any other software? Also, what about state returns? If the federal return is superseded, do the states typically accept a superseded state return or do we still need to file amended state returns regardless? I've got a couple clients in different states and I'm trying to figure out the most efficient approach here.
33 comments


McKenzie Shade
Yes, you can now e-file superseded returns! This changed fairly recently and it's been a huge time-saver. The IRS now accepts electronically filed superseded Form 1040s as long as you're filing before the due date (including extensions). The key difference between superseding vs. amending is still the timing - a superseded return completely replaces the original return and is filed before the due date (including extensions), while an amended return is filed after the deadline using Form 1040-X. As for UltraTax specifically, they did implement this functionality in one of their updates. When you're preparing the return, you need to mark it as "superseding" in the return properties or filing information section. The exact location varies by software version, but it should be in the e-file section. For states, it varies by jurisdiction. Most states that accept e-filed returns will also accept e-filed superseded returns, but some still require paper amendments regardless. You'll need to check the specific requirements for each state your clients are in.
0 coins
Harmony Love
•Thanks for confirming! Do you know if there's any special indicator or form you need to include with the superseded return? I've heard some people mention you need to attach a statement explaining it's superseding a previous return. Also, any idea about the processing time compared to amended returns? Is it faster?
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•You don't need a special form, but you should include a statement with the superseded return that clearly identifies it as superseding a previously filed return. Include the date the original return was filed and a brief explanation of what changed. This helps prevent confusion at the IRS processing centers. Processing time is definitely faster with superseded returns compared to amended returns. Since a superseded return completely replaces the original in the IRS system, it's processed like a regular return (typically 2-3 weeks for e-filed returns) rather than going through the amendment review process which can take 16+ weeks currently.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
After dealing with amendment nightmares last tax season, I started using taxr.ai https://taxr.ai to help with my superseded returns this year and it's been incredible. I was having the same concerns about whether to supersede or amend for several complex returns. The tool analyzed all my clients' original return documents, compared them with the new information, and actually flagged several items I would have missed that needed correction. It automatically identified which returns qualified for superseding vs. amending based on filing deadlines. Saved me hours of cross-checking and reduced errors dramatically. What I found most helpful was how it organized all the changes in a clean side-by-side format that shows exactly what changed between the original and superseding return. Makes it super easy to explain to clients and document for my files.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
•Does it actually work with professional tax software like UltraTax though? I'm wondering if there are compatibility issues or if it's more for individual filers using consumer software.
0 coins
Daryl Bright
•I'm a bit skeptical - how does it handle different state requirements for superseded returns? That's always been the biggest headache for me since each state seems to have their own rules about this.
0 coins
Rudy Cenizo
•It works with all the major professional tax software platforms including UltraTax, Lacerte, Drake, and ProSeries. You can either upload PDFs of returns or connect it directly to your professional software through their integration. I use it alongside UltraTax with no issues at all. For state returns, it maintains a current database of each state's requirements for superseded returns. When you upload or connect a return, it automatically identifies which states allow e-filed superseded returns versus which require amendments, and gives you specific guidance for each state your client has filed in. It's updated constantly as state requirements change, which has been super helpful since some states changed their policies mid-season.
0 coins
Natalie Khan
Just wanted to update after trying taxr.ai - it actually works really well with my UltraTax setup! I was skeptical at first (I've tried so many "time-saving" tools that ended up being more work), but this one actually delivered. I had a client with a complex multi-state situation where we needed to supersede the federal return and deal with different requirements for each state. The tool instantly identified which states accepted superseded returns and which needed amendments. It even generated the explanatory statements I needed to include with each return. The comparison feature showing exactly what changed between original and superseded returns saved me at least an hour of work per client. My clients also appreciated the clear explanation of changes. Definitely keeping this in my toolkit going forward.
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
If you're having trouble getting through to the IRS to confirm how they're processing superseded e-filed returns, I highly recommend using Claimyr https://claimyr.com to get through to an agent quickly. I wasted hours on hold trying to get clarity on some superseded returns I filed that weren't processing correctly. I was skeptical but tried their service (you can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c) and got connected to an IRS agent in about 15 minutes instead of the 2+ hours I spent on previous attempts. The agent confirmed that my superseded returns were in the system but needed some additional processing, and was able to help resolve the issue while I was on the call. Really helpful for getting definitive answers directly from the IRS about how they're handling these newly e-filed superseded returns, especially for clients who are anxious about their refunds.
0 coins
Kirsuktow DarkBlade
•How does this actually work? Seems sketchy that they can somehow get you through the IRS phone system faster than doing it yourself.
0 coins
Abigail bergen
•Sounds like BS honestly. IRS wait times are the same for everyone. How could some service possibly get you through faster than just calling yourself? Wouldn't everyone use this if it actually worked?
0 coins
Sienna Gomez
•It's not sketchy at all - they use an automated system that continuously calls the IRS until it gets through, then connects you when a representative answers. You don't have to sit on hold yourself. They basically do the waiting for you and call you when they've reached an agent. The reason everyone doesn't use it is simply that most people don't know about it. The service was actually created by some tech folks who were frustrated with IRS hold times during the pandemic and built a solution. The IRS phone system is first-come-first-served, so there's nothing improper about it - they're just handling the calling and waiting part for you.
0 coins
Abigail bergen
I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After posting my skeptical comment, I was desperate to resolve an issue with a client's superseded return that wasn't being processed correctly, so I tried it anyway. The service actually works exactly as described. I got a call back in about 20 minutes telling me they had an IRS representative on the line. The agent was able to locate both the original and superseded return in their system and confirmed the superseded return was being processed correctly but was flagged for a quick review since it was significantly different from the original. This saved my client from filing an unnecessary amended return (which would have delayed things even more). Worth every penny for the time saved and the peace of mind getting a definitive answer directly from the IRS.
0 coins
Ahooker-Equator
Just to add some practical experience - I've e-filed about 15 superseded returns this season using UltraTax. Here's what I've learned: 1) You need to check the "Superseding Return" box in the e-file menu under the General tab 2) You MUST include a statement explaining it's a superseded return 3) Processing is MUCH faster than amendments (about 3 weeks vs 4+ months) 4) For states, it's a mixed bag - NY and CA accepted superseded e-filed returns, but NJ and PA required paper amendments Hope this helps anyone trying to figure out the actual practical steps in UltraTax specifically!
0 coins
Anderson Prospero
•For the statement you include, is there specific language the IRS wants? Or do you just write something simple like "This is a superseded return replacing the return filed on X date"?
0 coins
Ahooker-Equator
•I keep it simple but thorough. My standard statement is: "This return is being filed as a superseding return to replace the original return filed on [DATE]. This superseding return is being filed to correct [brief explanation of what changed - e.g., "previously unreported income" or "corrected Schedule C income and expenses"]." I've never had an issue with this format. Just make sure the statement is attached as "Form_Superseding_Statement" or something similarly clear so it's obvious to the processor what it is.
0 coins
Tyrone Hill
Has anyone had experience with superseded returns where the filing status changed? I have a client who filed single, but should have filed married filing jointly (newlywed who didn't realize). I know we can supersede before the deadline, but I'm concerned about changing the filing status completely rather than just correcting income or deductions.
0 coins
McKenzie Shade
•I actually handled this exact situation last month. Changed from single to MFJ through a superseded return using UltraTax. It processed normally without any issues. The IRS treats a superseded return as if it's the original return, so changing filing status is perfectly fine. Just make sure you include a clear statement that this superseding return changes the filing status from single to married filing jointly and explain that the taxpayer was recently married and filed incorrectly. The extra explanation helps prevent any confusion or potential flags.
0 coins
Diego Rojas
Great thread! I wanted to add some additional insights based on my experience this season. One thing that caught me off guard was that while the IRS accepts e-filed superseded returns, some banks and financial institutions are still getting confused by them when clients apply for loans or mortgages. I've had two clients this year where their lender's verification system flagged discrepancies between the "original" return (which was superseded) and the superseded return that actually counts. The lenders' automated systems were pulling data from both returns and getting confused about which one was valid. My recommendation is to provide clients with a clear cover letter explaining that they filed a superseded return, along with copies of both the superseded return and your explanatory statement. This has helped my clients avoid delays in their loan applications. Also, for anyone using Drake software - they added the superseded return functionality in their February update. The checkbox is under E-File Options > Special Situations.
0 coins
Diez Ellis
This is incredibly helpful information! I've been struggling with this exact issue for several clients this season. I'm also using UltraTax and had no idea they added the superseded return functionality - I've been paper filing everything out of habit. Quick question about the explanatory statement - do you attach it as a separate PDF or include it directly in the return? I want to make sure I'm doing this correctly before I start e-filing superseded returns. Also, has anyone run into issues with state returns where the federal was superseded but the state doesn't accept superseded returns? I'm wondering if there's a timing issue where the state processes the original state return before the federal superseded return is processed, creating a mismatch. Thanks everyone for sharing your experiences - this thread is going to save me so much time and headache!
0 coins
Luca Russo
•Great questions! For the explanatory statement, I attach it as a separate PDF in UltraTax. In the e-file section, there's an option to attach additional documents - I usually name it something like "Superseding_Statement_[ClientName]" so it's clear what it is. Regarding state returns with federal superseding - yes, this can definitely create timing issues! I've found it's best to hold off on filing the state return until the federal superseded return is accepted, especially in states that don't accept superseded returns themselves. If the state processes first and then sees a different federal AGI later, it can trigger correspondence or require you to amend the state return anyway. For states that don't accept superseded returns, I usually prepare the amended state return right after the federal superseded return is accepted, so the state sees the corrected federal information from the start. It's a bit more work but prevents bigger headaches down the road. One more tip - make sure to check the "Do Not File" box for any state returns until you confirm the federal superseded return went through successfully!
0 coins
Alberto Souchard
This has been such a helpful thread! I'm a newer practitioner and had been avoiding superseded returns entirely because I wasn't sure about the e-filing rules. After reading through everyone's experiences, I feel much more confident about implementing this in my practice. One question I haven't seen addressed - are there any specific types of changes or situations where you'd still recommend paper filing a superseded return instead of e-filing? I'm thinking about complex situations like NOL carrybacks, major business structure changes, or cases involving multiple years of corrections. Also, for those using the various tools mentioned (taxr.ai, Claimyr), do you find they're worth the cost for smaller practices? I only prepare about 200 returns per year, so I'm trying to weigh the investment against the time savings. Thanks again everyone - this community is invaluable for staying current on these kinds of practical issues that don't always make it into the official guidance clearly!
0 coins
Sofia Peña
•Welcome to the community! Great questions. For most situations, e-filing superseded returns works well, but I'd still recommend paper filing in a few specific cases: 1) Returns with significant NOL carrybacks or carryforwards - the IRS processing systems sometimes struggle with these electronically and manual review is often needed anyway 2) Cases involving identity theft or prior year fraud issues - paper filing with Form 14039 attached ensures everything gets routed to the right department 3) Very complex partnership or S-corp changes that affect multiple years - these often need human review regardless For smaller practices like yours, the tools can definitely be worth it if you're dealing with even 10-15 complex returns per season. The time savings on research and documentation often pays for itself, plus the reduced liability from catching errors you might miss. That said, start with the basics first - master the standard superseded return process in UltraTax before adding additional tools. One tip for your practice size - consider offering superseded return services as a premium add-on for existing clients who need corrections. Many practitioners still don't know about e-filing superseded returns, so it can be a differentiator that justifies higher fees while providing real value to clients who would otherwise wait months for amended return processing.
0 coins
Felicity Bud
This thread has been incredibly informative! As someone who's been preparing returns for over a decade, I have to admit I was hesitant to switch from paper filing superseded returns - old habits die hard. But after reading everyone's experiences, I finally made the jump this season and wow, what a difference! I've successfully e-filed 8 superseded returns through UltraTax so far, and the processing times have been night and day compared to paper filing. What used to take 8-12 weeks is now happening in 2-3 weeks. My clients are thrilled with the faster refunds. One thing I want to emphasize for anyone still on the fence - the key is really in that explanatory statement. I learned the hard way with my first e-filed superseded return when I didn't include enough detail. The IRS kicked it back for additional information. Now I always include: the original filing date, specific reason for superseding, and a brief summary of the major changes. Haven't had any issues since. Also, for those asking about software compatibility - I know ProSeries added this functionality last year, and TaxWise implemented it this season too. It's becoming pretty standard across professional software platforms now. The state return coordination is still tricky, but the federal e-filing capability alone has been a game changer for my practice. Definitely recommend making the switch if you haven't already!
0 coins
Lucas Bey
•Thanks for sharing your experience with the transition! Your point about the explanatory statement is so important. I'm curious - when the IRS kicked back your first superseded return for additional information, how long did that delay the processing? I'm wondering if it's better to be overly detailed from the start rather than risk any back-and-forth that could slow things down. Also, you mentioned TaxWise added this functionality this season - do you know if they have any specific formatting requirements for the explanatory statement, or is it pretty standardized across software platforms now? I have a colleague who uses TaxWise and has been asking about this. The processing time improvement you've seen really drives home why this is worth adopting. 2-3 weeks versus 8-12 weeks is huge for client satisfaction!
0 coins
Gabriel Graham
As someone who processes a high volume of returns, I can confirm that e-filing superseded returns has been a massive workflow improvement this season. I've handled about 45 superseded returns through e-filing so far, mostly using ProConnect Tax Online. One thing I haven't seen mentioned yet is the importance of client communication throughout this process. I've started sending clients a brief email when I file their superseded return explaining what happened and what to expect. This has dramatically reduced the number of panicked calls I get when clients see multiple returns in their IRS online account or get confused about which return is actually valid. My standard client communication includes: 1) Confirmation that the superseded return was filed and accepted, 2) Explanation that it completely replaces the original return, 3) Expected timeline for processing, and 4) A reminder to use the superseded return (not the original) for any loan applications or other financial needs. I also keep detailed notes in each client file about what changed between the original and superseded return. This has been invaluable when clients call months later asking about their return or when I need to reference the changes for next year's planning. The efficiency gains are real - I estimate I'm saving about 30-40 hours per tax season just from not having to deal with the paper filing process and delayed amendment processing. That time savings translates directly to being able to serve more clients or focus on higher-value services.
0 coins
Nathan Kim
•This is exactly the kind of systematic approach that makes a real difference in practice! Your client communication strategy is brilliant - I've been dealing with confused clients calling about seeing multiple returns in their IRS accounts, and a proactive email like you described would have saved me so many headaches. The 30-40 hour time savings per season is incredible. That really puts the efficiency gains into perspective - it's not just about faster processing for individual returns, it's about the cumulative impact on your entire practice workflow. I'm definitely going to implement your client communication template. Do you send that email right after the superseded return is accepted, or do you wait until you see it's actually processing in the system? I'm trying to figure out the best timing to give clients the most accurate information without having to send multiple follow-up emails. Also, your point about keeping detailed notes for next year's planning is spot on. I hadn't thought about how having that change history documented would be valuable for future tax planning conversations with clients. Thanks for sharing these practical insights!
0 coins
StarStrider
This has been an incredibly valuable thread - thank you to everyone who shared their experiences! I'm coming at this from a slightly different angle as someone who works at a mid-sized CPA firm where we handle a mix of individual and business returns. We've been piloting e-filed superseded returns on a smaller scale this season, and one thing that's come up is the coordination with business returns when there are flow-through entities involved. If we supersede a partner's individual return but the partnership return is already processed, we haven't run into any systemic issues, but our clients get nervous seeing what appears to be a mismatch in their records. Has anyone dealt with situations where you need to supersede both a business return (partnership, S-corp) AND the related individual returns? I'm wondering if there's a preferred sequence or if the IRS systems handle the cross-referencing automatically. Also, for those in larger practices - how are you handling the training and workflow changes to get all your preparers comfortable with this process? We've had some resistance from senior preparers who are very set in their ways about paper filing superseded returns. The time savings arguments are compelling, but change management is always a challenge in professional services. The client communication strategies mentioned by Gabriel Graham are definitely going into our standard procedures. That proactive approach could really help with client satisfaction and reduce our support call volume during busy season.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•Great question about flow-through entities! I've handled a few cases this season where we needed to supersede both partnership and individual returns. The IRS systems do handle the cross-referencing, but I've found it's best to supersede the business return first, then the individual returns. This prevents temporary mismatches that can trigger automated notices. For the change management piece - what worked for us was starting with our most tech-savvy preparers as "champions" who could help train others. We also created a simple one-page checklist for the superseded return process in UltraTax that covers all the key steps. Having that visual reference really helped the senior preparers who were hesitant about changing their workflow. One tip that's helped with staff buy-in: track the time savings on a few returns and share those numbers with the team. When our preparers saw we were saving 45+ minutes per superseded return (not having to print, mail, track paper filing), they became much more willing to learn the e-filing process. Sometimes you need concrete data to overcome the "we've always done it this way" mentality. The client communication templates are definitely worth implementing firm-wide. We've reduced our post-filing support calls by about 30% just by being proactive about explaining the superseded return process upfront.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I'm a solo practitioner who's been hesitant to make the switch from paper filing superseded returns, but reading everyone's experiences has convinced me it's time to modernize my process. One question I haven't seen addressed - for clients who are particularly anxious about their tax situation, how do you explain the difference between superseding and amending in a way that reassures them? I have several clients who get very nervous about any changes to their returns, and I want to make sure I'm communicating the benefits clearly. Also, I'm using TaxSlayer Pro and I'm not sure if they've implemented the superseded return e-filing capability yet. Has anyone had experience with TaxSlayer Pro for this, or should I consider switching software if I want to take advantage of e-filed superseded returns? The time savings everyone is reporting (30-40 hours per season) would be huge for my practice. Right now I probably spend 2-3 hours per superseded return between printing, mailing, tracking, and following up. If I could cut that down to 30 minutes of electronic processing, it would free up significant time for client advisory work. Thanks to everyone who's shared their practical experiences - this is exactly the kind of real-world guidance that makes all the difference!
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•For anxious clients, I find it helps to explain superseding as "replacing" rather than "changing" - it makes it sound less scary. I tell them: "Think of it like sending a corrected email before anyone reads the first one. The IRS will only look at the new, correct version and completely ignore the original." I also emphasize that superseding is actually BETTER than amending because it's faster and there's no lengthy review process. Regarding TaxSlayer Pro, I believe they added e-filing capability for superseded returns in their latest update, but you'd need to check with their support to confirm. Most major professional software platforms have implemented this by now given the IRS changes. The time savings are absolutely real - you're looking at the right numbers. What really sold me on making the switch was calculating that even if I only do 10 superseded returns per season, I'm saving 15-20 hours of administrative work. That's time I can spend on higher-value client services or just having better work-life balance during tax season. For a solo practitioner, that efficiency gain can be transformative for your practice!
0 coins
Dmitry Ivanov
I've been following this discussion with great interest as someone who's been preparing returns for about 8 years. Like many of you, I was slow to adopt e-filing for superseded returns, but this thread has really opened my eyes to what I've been missing. One thing I want to add that hasn't been mentioned yet - make sure to update your engagement letters and fee schedules to reflect the new superseded return capabilities. I've found that clients are willing to pay a premium for the faster processing times compared to amendments, especially when they need their corrected returns quickly for mortgage applications or other time-sensitive situations. I'm using Drake Tax and can confirm their superseded return functionality works great. The key thing in Drake is to make sure you check the "Superseding Return" box in the Electronic Filing menu AND attach your explanatory statement in the Client Documents section. I learned this the hard way when my first attempt was rejected for missing documentation. For those still on the fence about making the switch - start with one or two straightforward cases to get comfortable with the process. Once you see how much smoother it is compared to paper filing, you'll wonder why you waited so long. The client satisfaction alone is worth the learning curve!
0 coins
Riya Sharma
•Great point about updating engagement letters! I hadn't thought about that aspect but you're absolutely right - being able to offer faster processing is definitely a value-add that clients will pay for. I'm curious about how you structure the pricing difference between superseded returns and regular amendments? Also, thanks for the specific Drake instructions. I've been hesitant to try it in Drake because I wasn't sure about the exact steps, but your explanation makes it seem much more straightforward than I expected. The Client Documents section for the explanatory statement makes sense - I was wondering where that would go in their system. I think you're right about starting with simple cases first. I have a couple of straightforward income corrections coming up that would be perfect for testing this process before trying it on more complex situations.
0 coins