< Back to IRS

Marina Hendrix

Can someone explain the actual difference between a monetized installment sale and a Deferred Sales Trust? Tax guy giving me conflicting info

So I've been looking into different ways to defer taxes on a property sale I'm planning for later this year. I met with this tax attorney who's promoting something called a Deferred Sales Trust (DST). When I asked him about how it compares to a monetized installment sale, he just flat out told me "the DST is a monetized installment sale." That seemed... oversimplified? I've been doing some research, and it feels like there are actual differences between these two strategies, but I'm getting confused by the conflicting information. The property I'm selling will likely net around $1.8 million in profit, so I'm trying to understand all my options to minimize the tax hit. Does anyone here have experience with either of these tax deferral strategies? Are they actually the same thing like this attorney claims, or are there important differences I should know about? I'm definitely not tax-savvy enough to sort this out on my own and would really appreciate some clarity before making any decisions.

Justin Trejo

•

These are absolutely not the same thing, though they're often confused (and sometimes deliberately conflated by promoters). A monetized installment sale is a specific strategy where you sell property to a buyer on an installment basis, then get a separate loan for most of the proceeds. This lets you receive cash now while technically deferring tax recognition under IRC Section 453. The key element is that the loan and sale are separate transactions. A Deferred Sales Trust is a more complex arrangement where you sell your appreciated property to a trust in exchange for an installment note. The trust then sells the property to the final buyer and invests the proceeds. You get payments over time from the trust according to the note terms. The IRS has specifically targeted monetized installment sales with Notice 2022-21, indicating they may consider these "listed transactions" (potentially abusive). The DST isn't specifically addressed in that notice, but has its own scrutiny concerns. Both strategies aim to defer taxes, but they have different structures, risk profiles, and potential IRS treatment. I'd recommend getting a second opinion from a tax professional who doesn't have a financial interest in selling you either solution.

0 coins

Alana Willis

•

Thanks for the explanation! I've been researching this too. For the monetized installment sale, is there a limit to how much you can borrow against the installment sale without triggering immediate tax? And for the DST, who controls the trust? Is it the promoter or can you have some say in how the proceeds are invested?

0 coins

Justin Trejo

•

For a monetized installment sale, borrowing against the installment receivable can be tricky. The IRS considers borrowing more than 50% of the sale price as evidence the transactions might be linked, which could disqualify the installment treatment entirely. Some promoters try to work around this with careful structuring, but that's where the IRS scrutiny is focused. With a DST, the trust is typically controlled by a third-party trustee selected by the promoter company. You generally have input on investment strategy, but limited direct control - because if you had too much control, the IRS could argue it's a sham transaction and that you never actually "sold" the property to the trust. This arm's length relationship is part of what makes the strategy potentially viable, but also adds risk if the trustee makes poor investment decisions.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

After spending weeks in tax hell trying to understand these complex structures, I found taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai) incredibly helpful for analyzing these complicated tax arrangements. I uploaded some DST marketing materials and the IRS notices about monetized installment sales, and it actually explained the differences in plain English. The biggest insight I got was that monetized installment sales are much more likely to trigger IRS scrutiny since Notice 2022-21 specifically targeted them. The system analyzed the technical differences between the two strategies and flagged several red flags my "advisor" never mentioned. Worth checking it out if you're getting conflicting info like I was.

0 coins

Sara Unger

•

Does taxr.ai actually give you definitive answers on whether these strategies are legit or not? I'm in a similar situation but skeptical of any online service claiming to break down complex tax shelters.

0 coins

How many documents can you upload? I have about 50 pages of DST marketing materials, plus some analysis from my CPA who's skeptical. Would be nice to get an unbiased breakdown instead of just people trying to sell me something.

0 coins

Tyler Murphy

•

It doesn't give a black and white "this is legal" or "this is illegal" answer, but it offers a detailed analysis comparing what the promoters claim against actual tax regulations and court cases. It won't make the decision for you, but it gives you the tools to understand whether a strategy is high-risk or likely to work as advertised. You can upload quite a lot - I put in about 30 pages of materials plus the IRS notices and some private letter rulings I found. The platform compared the specific language and highlighted inconsistencies. The best part was getting straight talk without someone trying to sell me something.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up about taxr.ai since I ended up trying it. Glad I did because it saved me from potentially making a huge mistake! I uploaded all my DST promotional materials and my potential deal structure, and the analysis revealed several misrepresentations the promoter had made. The system pulled up actual tax court cases involving similar structures and showed how the IRS has challenged them. What was eye-opening was seeing the specific language from IRC 453 compared side-by-side with my proposed arrangement. The platform highlighted exactly where the promoter's claims diverged from actual tax law. My favorite feature was the risk assessment that explained in plain English which aspects of the deal structure were most likely to trigger IRS scrutiny. Based on this analysis, I'm meeting with a different tax advisor next week to explore more established tax deferral strategies. Would have been a costly mistake to just trust the promoter!

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

Dealing with these complex tax structures is stressful enough, but trying to get answers from the IRS is nearly impossible these days. After waiting on hold for 3+ hours multiple times trying to get clarification about monetized installment sales, I finally tried Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). They got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the 4+ hour wait I was experiencing. The IRS agent obviously couldn't give "approval" for either strategy, but was able to direct me to specific IRS notices and regulations about installment sales that were super helpful. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c - basically they navigate the phone tree and wait on hold for you, then call when an agent is ready to talk.

0 coins

Leslie Parker

•

How does this actually work? Do they just call the IRS for you? Couldn't you just use speaker phone and do other things while waiting?

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

I'm calling BS on this. Nobody gets useful information from IRS phone agents about complex tax shelters. They're just reading from scripts and tell you to consult a tax professional for anything complicated. Seems like a waste of money for something you could do yourself.

0 coins

Freya Ross

•

They have a system that holds your place in the IRS queue and then calls you when an agent is available to talk. I tried the speakerphone approach before, but the problem is that the IRS disconnects calls randomly after long waits, and you have to start all over. Plus, I was wasting entire mornings just waiting. You're right that IRS agents won't approve tax strategies or give specific advice on structures like DSTs. However, they were able to confirm which notices apply to monetized installment sales (like Notice 2022-21) and clarify some basic requirements of valid installment sales under Section 453. That information alone was valuable in helping me understand the risks. They also directed me to specific resources on the IRS website that I wouldn't have found on my own.

0 coins

Sergio Neal

•

I need to eat my words from my previous comment. After my tax attorney went radio silent for two weeks, I got desperate and tried Claimyr. Not only did I connect with an IRS agent in about 15 minutes, but I lucked out and got someone in the high-value transaction division who actually knew about these structures. She couldn't give specific advice on my situation, but confirmed that monetized installment sales are currently under heavy scrutiny as "listed transactions" and directed me to several resources I hadn't seen before. She also explained how the IRS views "step transaction" doctrine, which applies to both strategies. After that call, I was able to ask my tax attorney much more pointed questions which revealed he hadn't been considering the most recent IRS guidance. Definitely worth the service fee to get actual information instead of just promotional materials from people trying to sell these arrangements.

0 coins

I went down this rabbit hole last year when selling my business. Here's what my accountant (who doesn't sell either product) told me: monetized installment sales are specifically what the IRS targeted with Notice 2022-21, while DSTs are technically different but still high-risk. The key difference is that in a monetized installment sale, you're selling directly to the end buyer but getting a separate loan from a lender. In a DST, you're selling to a trust that then sells to the end buyer. The DST adds an extra layer that might avoid the specific issues in the IRS notice, but creates its own potential problems. He ultimately advised me against both and suggested a 1031 exchange into rental properties combined with opportunity zone investments for the portion that couldn't be exchanged. Ended up being less risky and actually gives me ongoing income.

0 coins

Juan Moreno

•

But don't you lose flexibility with a 1031? I want to invest the proceeds in my new business venture, not just more real estate. Did your accountant discuss that limitation?

0 coins

That's absolutely correct - 1031 exchanges definitely lock you into real estate investments, which was fine for my situation since I wanted passive income. For business investments, it wouldn't work. For investing in a new business venture, you might want to look into Qualified Small Business Stock (Section 1202) if you're setting up a C-Corp, or potentially an installment sale with a longer genuine payment period (without the monetization aspect that triggers IRS concerns). Both have limitations but might be less risky than DSTs or monetized installment sales. The right strategy really depends on your specific goals and risk tolerance.

0 coins

Amy Fleming

•

Has anyone actually used either of these structures successfully? All I see online are promoters selling them or people warning against them, but never anybody who's actually done it and can speak to their experience several years later (after potential IRS audits).

0 coins

Alice Pierce

•

I know someone who did a DST about 6 years ago. They're still getting payments from the trust and haven't been audited...yet. But they're constantly worried about it, especially with the increased IRS funding. Not sure the stress is worth it honestly.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today