< Back to IRS

Mei Chen

Can I defer receiving my paycheck until January 2024 to reduce this year's taxable income?

I currently work full-time for Company X, but I've just received an offer for a part-time position at Company Y. I'm trying to be strategic about my income for tax purposes and wondering if it's legal to work for Company Y during October-December 2023 but not actually receive payment until January 2024. Here's why I want to keep my 2023 taxable income lower: 1. My income-driven repayment plan for student loans recalculates in September 2024 based on my 2023 taxes, and I'd like to keep those payments manageable (though I'll likely switch plans by 2025 since I probably won't have enough remaining for PSLF anyway) 2. I'm hoping to qualify for some of those Inflation Reduction Act rebates, but I'll lose eligibility if I go over 150% of my county's median income 3. I just bought a house and want to maximize those non-refundable energy efficiency tax credits next year by shifting more tax burden to 2024 4. After working at Company Y for about 3 months, I'll have a better idea of my regular hours and can plan appropriate withholding (I'm in the 24% federal and 9% state brackets) Company Y is fine with officially starting my employment on 1/1/24 for their payroll purposes. We have a great relationship - I've done about $45,000 worth of contract work for them over the years, so I completely trust them to pay me as agreed in January. I just want to make sure we're not doing anything illegal or committing any kind of tax fraud. Any advice from the tax pros here? Are there any issues with this approach?

CosmicCadet

•

This is a common question around year-end! What you're describing is basically timing income recognition, and there are some important things to consider here. For W-2 employees, income is generally taxable when it's received OR when it's made available to you. This is called "constructive receipt" in tax terms. If you genuinely defer the right to receive payment until January 2024, and the employer doesn't make the money available to you in 2023, then the income would indeed be reported on your 2024 taxes. However, you need to be careful. If you've earned the money in 2023 and could receive it then but are simply choosing not to take possession until 2024, the IRS could argue you had constructive receipt in 2023. The key is that there must be legitimate restrictions preventing you from accessing the money in 2023. My suggestion is to have a formal written agreement with Company Y stating your employment officially begins January 1, 2024, even though you're training or working in a transitional capacity in 2023. This makes the arrangement clearer and more defensible.

0 coins

Liam O'Connor

•

Thanks for the explanation, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm actually doing work in 2023 (not just training), won't the IRS see that as earned income for 2023 regardless of when I get paid? And what would count as "legitimate restrictions" in this case?

0 coins

CosmicCadet

•

The IRS focuses on when you have the legal right to receive payment rather than when you do the work. For W-2 employees, this typically aligns with your employer's regular pay schedule. If your formal employment agreement with Company Y states that your employment begins January 1, 2024, and the company's obligation to pay you doesn't arise until then, this can serve as a legitimate restriction. Many employers have policies that payment for services can only be made after someone is officially an employee in their payroll system. If Company Y doesn't officially add you to payroll until January 2024, this could be considered a legitimate business reason for the payment delay.

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

I struggled with something similar last year and found the tax implications really confusing until I discovered taxr.ai (https://taxr.ai). It's this smart tool that analyzes specific tax scenarios like income shifting between years and tells you exactly what the IRS rules say about your situation. My case was similar - I was trying to shift some consulting income between tax years to manage my ACA subsidies. I uploaded my employment offer and details about the work arrangement, and the system quickly identified the "constructive receipt" issue that could have gotten me in trouble. It showed me exactly how to structure my arrangement to be compliant while still achieving my tax goals. The best part was getting a clear explanation of how the IRS would view my specific situation rather than just general advice. Seems like it could help with your situation too since you're dealing with multiple factors (student loans, IRA rebates, and tax credits).

0 coins

Does it actually work with complicated tax situations? I have a similar income-shifting question but also have stock options and rental property income. Can it handle all that complexity or is it more for basic scenarios?

0 coins

I'm skeptical about these tax tools... especially since you're trying to dance around IRS rules. How does taxr.ai protect you if you get audited? Do they provide any guarantee or is it just "here's our opinion, good luck"?

0 coins

Amara Adeyemi

•

It handles complex situations really well - that's actually where it shines. I had W-2 income, 1099 income, and capital gains from stock sales, and it analyzed how shifting income between years would affect everything including my tax brackets. It's designed specifically for complex tax planning scenarios rather than basic filing. For audit protection, they don't guarantee you won't get audited, but they provide clear documentation explaining how your situation aligns with tax law. They cite specific tax code sections and relevant case law that you can use to support your position if questioned. It's more robust than just an "opinion" - it's backed by legal research their tax attorneys have compiled.

0 coins

I was super skeptical about taxr.ai mentioned earlier but decided to try it because my situation was similar - trying to time income for ACA subsidy purposes. I was genuinely surprised at how thorough it was. The system identified that I needed a formal written agreement specifying I wouldn't have the right to demand payment until January. It showed me exactly what language to include to avoid the "constructive receipt" issue. What really impressed me was that it found a tax court case (Martin v. Commissioner) with facts similar to mine where the taxpayer won because they had proper documentation. Having that case reference made me much more confident in my approach. My income was successfully recognized in the year I wanted, which saved me about $4,200 in healthcare premiums. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to time income between tax years.

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

If you're stressed about talking to the IRS directly about this (which honestly would be the safest route), I'd recommend using Claimyr (https://claimyr.com). I was in a similar situation last year with income timing questions and needed clarification straight from the IRS. After weeks of calling and never getting through, I tried Claimyr and was talking to an actual IRS agent within 15 minutes. You can see how it works in this video: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent was able to review my specific situation and confirm that as long as I had a formal agreement establishing when I had legal right to the money, I could recognize the income in the following year. That official confirmation gave me so much peace of mind compared to just guessing or relying on internet advice.

0 coins

NebulaKnight

•

Wait, how does this actually work? I thought it was impossible to get through to the IRS. Are they just repeatedly calling for you or something? What info do you have to provide to them?

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

This sounds like BS honestly. I've tried everything to get through to the IRS and nothing works. If this service actually worked, everyone would be using it. Plus, IRS agents aren't supposed to give binding tax advice on complex situations like this anyway.

0 coins

Dylan Wright

•

It uses a technology that navigates the IRS phone system and holds your place in line. When they reach a real person, you get a call connecting you directly with the agent. It's not magic - just automated persistence that most of us don't have time for. You don't provide Claimyr with any personal tax information. They just get you connected to the IRS, and then you speak directly with the agent about your situation. It's completely private. Think of it like having a robot assistant dial for you and wait on hold instead of you having to do it yourself.

0 coins

Sofia Ramirez

•

I owe everyone here an apology. After calling the IRS unsuccessfully for THREE DAYS about my income deferral question, I broke down and tried that Claimyr service someone mentioned. I was connected to an IRS representative in about 20 minutes. The agent explained that as long as I have no legal right to demand payment in 2023 (meaning a formal agreement stating payment won't be available until 2024), the income would be taxable in 2024. She also warned me that if the IRS believes I'm artificially deferring income I could access, they might challenge it. Having a legitimate business purpose for the structure is important. Honestly, having that official clarification directly from the IRS was worth every penny. Saved me hours of frustration and gave me actual confidence in my tax planning instead of just hoping I was interpreting things correctly.

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

I did exactly what you're considering last year. Make sure everything is clearly documented in writing with your employer. I'd suggest having: 1. An official offer letter showing Jan 1, 2024 as your start date 2. A separate document outlining any training or transition work in 2023 3. Clear payment terms stating when you'll be eligible to receive compensation My accountant said the most important thing is that you genuinely cannot access the money in 2023 - it's not just you choosing not to take it. If the company would pay you in 2023 if you asked, that's constructive receipt and the income belongs in 2023 regardless of when you physically receive it.

0 coins

Mei Chen

•

This is super helpful, thank you! Did you have any issues with the IRS questioning this arrangement after you filed? And did you structure the 2023 work as "training" specifically, or just as work with a delayed payment date?

0 coins

Dmitry Popov

•

No issues with the IRS at all. My accountant said it's pretty common, especially with year-end bonuses and similar situations. I structured it as "pre-employment consulting" with a specific payment date of January 15, 2024 written into the agreement. The key was that the contract explicitly stated I had no right to demand payment before that date - this avoided the constructive receipt issue. We also made sure the company's accounting team didn't accrue the expense in 2023, keeping everything consistent.

0 coins

Ava Rodriguez

•

Don't forget about state tax implications! Depending on your state, they might have different rules about when income is considered "received" for tax purposes. I tried something similar in California and they were much stricter about the constructive receipt doctrine than the IRS was. They determined that since I had provided the services in 2023, I should have reported the income then, even though I didn't get paid until 2024. Always check your state tax rules too!

0 coins

Miguel Ortiz

•

Good point about state taxes. I live in Washington state with no income tax but work remotely for a New York company. Would NY state tax rules apply in this case or does it depend on where I physically perform the work?

0 coins

Emma Thompson

•

Be very careful with this strategy - while it can work legally, the IRS scrutinizes income deferral arrangements closely. The key test is whether you have "constructive receipt" of the income in 2023. For your arrangement to pass IRS scrutiny, you need: 1. A formal written agreement stating your employment begins January 1, 2024 2. Clear documentation that you have NO legal right to demand payment in 2023 3. The employer's payroll system should not even have you as an employee until 2024 However, there's a potential red flag in your situation: you mention doing actual work for Company Y in October-December 2023. If the IRS views this as earned compensation that you're artificially deferring, they could challenge the arrangement. The safer approach would be to structure any 2023 activities as unpaid training or onboarding rather than compensable work. Also consider: - Document legitimate business reasons for the January start date (not just tax avoidance) - Ensure Company Y doesn't accrue the expense in 2023 on their books - Keep records of all agreements and communications Given the complexity and your multiple tax goals (student loans, IRA rebates, energy credits), I'd strongly recommend getting professional tax advice before proceeding. The potential savings need to be weighed against audit risk and penalties if the IRS disagrees with your position.

0 coins

Mei Zhang

•

This is excellent advice, especially the point about structuring 2023 activities as unpaid training rather than compensable work. I'm curious though - if Company Y has historically paid me as a 1099 contractor, would transitioning to W-2 employee status in January 2024 actually strengthen the argument that any work in 2023 is just preparation/training for the new role? It seems like there would be a clearer distinction between my past contractor relationship and my future employee relationship.

0 coins

Ana Rusula

•

That's actually a really smart observation! The transition from 1099 contractor to W-2 employee does create a cleaner distinction and could strengthen your position. Since you've been a contractor historically, any work you do in late 2023 could reasonably be characterized as orientation or skills transfer to prepare for your new W-2 role rather than compensable services. The IRS tends to look more favorably on arrangements that have legitimate business substance rather than pure tax motivation. A contractor-to-employee transition with a formal start date gives you that business rationale. Just make sure to document this transition clearly - perhaps have Company Y issue a final 1099 for your 2023 contractor work (if any) and then start fresh with W-2 status in January. One additional consideration: since you have this established contractor relationship, Company Y might even prefer this approach for their own accounting purposes. It keeps their 2023 books clean and allows them to budget your W-2 compensation as a 2024 expense. The key is still ensuring you have no legal right to W-2 compensation until January 1, 2024, but the contractor-to-employee transition definitely adds legitimacy to the arrangement.

0 coins

This is a really well-thought-out tax strategy! I've seen similar arrangements work successfully, but there are a few additional considerations that might help strengthen your position: Since you mentioned Company Y is "fine with officially starting employment on 1/1/24 for payroll purposes," I'd recommend getting this in writing as part of a formal offer letter. The documentation should explicitly state that your W-2 employment begins January 1, 2024, and that you have no entitlement to compensation before that date. One thing that caught my attention is your mention of the 24% federal tax bracket. With your strategic income deferral, make sure you're not accidentally pushing yourself into a higher bracket in 2024 when the deferred income hits. You might want to run some projections to ensure the overall tax impact across both years still achieves your goals. Also, regarding the Inflation Reduction Act rebates - double-check the income limits and timing requirements. Some of these programs have specific rules about when income is measured, and you want to make sure your deferral strategy actually helps you qualify. The student loan payment recalculation based on 2023 taxes is probably where you'll see the most immediate benefit from this approach. Just remember that when those payments do go up in 2025 (based on your higher 2024 income), you'll want to be prepared for that adjustment. Overall, with proper documentation and legitimate business reasons for the January start date, this approach should work. The key is making sure everything is structured correctly from the beginning rather than trying to fix it later.

0 coins

Great point about checking the bracket implications for 2024! I hadn't fully considered how bunching income into one year might affect my overall tax situation. One question about the IRA rebates - do you know if they typically look at AGI or modified AGI for the income limits? I'm wondering if maxing out my 401k contributions in 2024 could help offset some of the higher income from the deferred payments. Also, you mentioned getting the January start date in writing as part of an offer letter. Should this be a separate document from any agreement about transitional work in 2023, or can it all be in one comprehensive employment agreement? I want to make sure I'm not creating any contradictions that could hurt my position if questioned later.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today