< Back to IRS

Evelyn Kim

Are there legal limits to how frequently tax plans can be changed during the year?

I've been trying to understand if there are any legal restrictions or requirements about how often the government can change tax plans. Specifically, I'm wondering if the changes have to happen in 2025 or if they could have been implemented earlier. I've spent hours searching online, but all I can find is endless articles about what might change next year and how it might affect different income groups. Nothing actually addresses how frequently tax laws can be modified according to existing regulations. Is there some kind of mandatory waiting period between tax code revisions? Or could Congress theoretically change the tax code multiple times in a single year if they wanted to? Really appreciate any insights since this information seems impossible to find among all the speculation about upcoming changes!

There's actually no legal limit to how frequently Congress can change the tax code. Tax legislation can be passed at any time through the normal legislative process - it just needs to pass both the House and Senate and be signed by the President (or override a veto). The reason you're seeing so much about 2025 is because the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 included many provisions that are set to expire at the end of 2025. These expiring provisions are creating a deadline that's driving much of the current discussion, but there's nothing preventing Congress from making changes before then. Congress has historically made major tax code overhauls every few years, with smaller changes happening more frequently. There's no mandated waiting period between changes - it's entirely a political process rather than one bound by specific timing requirements.

0 coins

So theoretically they could change it multiple times in a year if they wanted to? Wouldn't that create chaos for businesses and individuals trying to plan? Also, do these changes typically take effect immediately or is there usually some delay in implementation?

0 coins

Technically, yes, Congress could pass multiple tax bills in a single year - there's no legal restriction preventing it. This has happened before with targeted tax legislation addressing specific issues. Most major tax changes include implementation dates that give people time to adjust. Sometimes provisions are effective immediately upon signing, others might be retroactive to the beginning of the tax year, and still others might be phased in over several years. The implementation timeline is written into each piece of legislation, so there's no standard rule.

0 coins

After spending weeks trying to make sense of all the potential tax changes coming, I finally found something that actually helped me understand what was happening with my specific situation. I was especially confused about how the potential changes would impact my small business and investment income. I ended up using https://taxr.ai which analyzed my previous returns and showed me exactly which parts of my tax situation would be affected by the expiring provisions. It gave me personalized guidance based on my actual tax history rather than generic articles that didn't apply to my situation. It really helped me understand which changes I should be preparing for and which ones weren't relevant to my circumstances. Definitely worth checking out if you're trying to cut through all the noise about the 2025 changes.

0 coins

How does it work with things that might change? Like did it just tell you what would happen if current laws expire or does it somehow predict what Congress might do next?

0 coins

Does it actually give tax advice or just information? I'm skeptical about using AI for something as important as tax planning when the laws haven't even changed yet.

0 coins

It doesn't try to predict what Congress will do, but it clearly shows what happens if no action is taken and the current provisions expire. It gives you a side-by-side comparison of your tax situation under current law versus what would happen if everything reverts. It's not giving tax advice in the sense of telling you what decisions to make. It's more about giving you personalized information about which changes would impact you specifically. I found it really helpful to see exactly which parts of my return would be affected rather than trying to figure it out myself from generic articles.

0 coins

Just wanted to follow up about using taxr.ai that someone mentioned earlier. I was pretty confused about how the expiring provisions would affect my rental property income, so I decided to give it a try. It actually identified three specific deductions I've been taking that would be changed if the current laws expire. What I really appreciated was that it showed me the actual dollar impact instead of just vague warnings. Now I can actually plan with real numbers instead of guessing. It also flagged that my child tax credit situation would change significantly, which none of the general articles I read had mentioned would apply to my income level.

0 coins

If you're struggling to get accurate information about how the tax code changes might affect you, you're not alone. I spent over 3 HOURS on hold with the IRS trying to get clarification about how the potential changes would impact my retirement withdrawals. I finally tried https://claimyr.com after seeing it recommended in another thread. You can see how it works here: https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c. It got me connected to an actual IRS agent in about 20 minutes instead of the endless hold I was stuck in before. The agent was able to explain which parts of the potential changes would affect retirement distributions specifically and which were just general income tax changes. Saved me so much frustration and I actually got answers from an official source.

0 coins

Wait, how does this actually work? Does it just call the IRS for you or something? I don't understand how a website can get you through to the IRS faster.

0 coins

This sounds like a scam. No way some random service can magically get you through the IRS queue faster than everyone else. The IRS phone system doesn't work that way - everyone waits in the same queue.

0 coins

It essentially uses an automated system to stay on hold for you and then calls you when an actual human agent is on the line. So you don't have to personally sit through the hold music for hours. The service monitors the hold queue and navigates the IRS phone tree for you. It's not bypassing anything or getting special treatment - it's just handling the wait time so you don't have to. When a real IRS agent picks up, it connects you directly to them. I was skeptical too, but it actually worked exactly as described.

0 coins

I have to admit I was completely wrong about Claimyr. After dismissing it as a probable scam, I was desperate enough to try it when I needed to talk to someone at the IRS about how the potential 2025 changes would affect my foreign tax credits. Not only did it work, but I got through to a specialist in about 45 minutes (after previously wasting an entire afternoon on hold). The agent walked me through exactly which provisions affecting foreign income were set to expire and what the default would be if Congress doesn't act. The system called me when an agent was on the line, and the conversation was exactly what I needed. Definitely changed my mind about the service.

0 coins

To add some historical context to the original question: while there's no legal limit to how often tax laws can change, there are practical political limits. Major tax overhauls typically happen every 10-15 years (1986, 2001, 2017) with smaller adjustments in between. The reason you're seeing so much about 2025 is that many provisions of the 2017 TCJA were deliberately set to expire then to comply with budget reconciliation rules, which allowed the bill to pass with a simple majority. Without those constraints, many provisions would have been permanent. Congress could technically change tax laws monthly if they wanted, but the political reality is that businesses and individuals need some stability for planning purposes, so frequent major changes are generally avoided.

0 coins

Can you explain more about those budget reconciliation rules? I keep hearing that term but don't really understand why it makes tax laws temporary.

0 coins

Budget reconciliation is a special process that allows certain types of legislation to pass the Senate with a simple majority (51 votes) instead of the usual 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. However, bills passed this way must comply with various rules, including the "Byrd Rule." One key aspect of the Byrd Rule is that provisions cannot increase the deficit beyond the budget window (typically 10 years). To comply with this rule while still passing tax cuts, lawmakers often make tax cuts temporary so they formally "expire" at the end of the budget window, which makes the long-term deficit impact appear smaller on paper.

0 coins

Does anyone know if state tax laws have similar patterns? My state keeps changing their tax code almost yearly and it's driving me crazy trying to keep up with planning.

0 coins

State tax laws vary widely but they generally have even fewer restrictions on how often they can change. Many states actually have to adjust their tax codes in response to federal changes because they use federal AGI or taxable income as starting points for state calculations.

0 coins

This is such a helpful discussion! I've been confused about the same thing - seeing all these articles about 2025 changes but not understanding the actual mechanics of how tax laws can be modified. The explanation about budget reconciliation rules really clarifies why we're seeing this specific timeline. I had no idea that the 2017 tax cuts were designed to expire to comply with Senate procedures rather than because there was some legal requirement for how long tax laws can stay in effect. It's actually somewhat reassuring to know that while Congress *could* theoretically change tax laws constantly, the political reality creates more stability than the legal framework would suggest. I was worried we might see constant changes that would make financial planning impossible. Does anyone know if there are any proposals to change how this process works, or if we'll likely see the same pattern of temporary provisions in future tax legislation?

0 coins

Great question about future patterns! From what I understand, as long as the current Senate filibuster rules remain in place, we'll likely continue seeing this cycle of temporary tax provisions. There have been discussions about reforming budget reconciliation rules or eliminating the filibuster for tax legislation, but those are major procedural changes that would require significant political consensus. Some lawmakers have proposed making certain popular provisions (like the child tax credit expansions) permanent through regular legislation, but that would require bipartisan support to get 60 Senate votes. The temporary nature creates this recurring "fiscal cliff" situation every 10-15 years where Congress has to decide whether to extend, modify, or let provisions expire. It's definitely not ideal for long-term planning, but it seems like the political reality we're stuck with unless there are major changes to Senate rules.

0 coins

IRS AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today