Are gambling winnings taxed on gross or net amount? Tax implications for $0 sportsbook earnings with standard deduction
I've been trying to figure out the tax situation with sports betting and I'm confused about how it works with the standard deduction. Here's my situation: Throughout the year, I placed 24 different $5 bets on a sportsbook app. My total wagers came to $120, and I won back exactly $120. So technically, I broke even with a net of $0. But from what I'm reading, the IRS wants me to report the $120 in winnings as income, even though I spent $120 to get those winnings. If my tax rate is around 22%, that means I'd owe about $26 in taxes on money I didn't actually profit from. So even though I broke even on my bets, I'd end up $26 in the hole after taxes? That doesn't seem right. If this is actually how it works, does that mean someone taking the standard deduction should never gamble unless they can win enough to offset their tax rate? Like if my tax rate is 22%, I'd need to win at least 22% more than I bet just to break even after taxes? I just want to make sure I fully understand the tax implications before I continue with sports betting.
21 comments


Oliver Zimmermann
You're asking a great question about gambling winnings and taxes! For tax purposes, gambling winnings are indeed reported as income on your tax return (specifically on Schedule 1, Line 8). The tricky part is how losses are handled. If you itemize deductions, you can deduct gambling losses up to the amount of your winnings on Schedule A. However, if you take the standard deduction (which most people do), you cannot separately deduct those gambling losses. In your example, yes - you'd report the $120 of winnings as income, but without itemizing, you wouldn't get to deduct the $120 in wagers. This creates exactly the situation you described where you'd owe taxes on money you didn't actually profit from. For regular gamblers taking the standard deduction, this means you effectively need to win at a rate higher than your tax bracket percentage just to break even after taxes. Many recreational gamblers don't realize this tax impact until filing season.
0 coins
Natasha Volkova
•Wait, so if I win $2000 at a casino but lost $1800 trying to win that money, and I take the standard deduction, I'd have to pay taxes on the full $2000? That seems incredibly unfair. Is there any way around this?
0 coins
Oliver Zimmermann
•For most people taking the standard deduction, you're correct - you would need to report the full $2000 as income without being able to deduct the $1800 in losses. The tax code treats gambling winnings and losses asymmetrically when you don't itemize. If your gambling activity is substantial enough that your potential gambling loss deductions would exceed the standard deduction amount ($13,850 for single filers in 2024), then itemizing might make sense. However, remember that by itemizing, you'd lose the standard deduction, so the math needs to work in your favor.
0 coins
Javier Torres
Just wanted to share my experience - I had the exact same issue last year and found this website called https://taxr.ai that helped me figure out my gambling tax situation. Their system analyzed all my sports betting records and showed me exactly what I needed to report. What was eye-opening was that they showed me how to properly document everything in case of an audit. They explained that if I could prove my gambling was a "professional activity" rather than recreational, I might be able to deduct losses on Schedule C instead of Schedule A, which would work even with the standard deduction. Not saying everyone qualifies for this, but worth checking out.
0 coins
Emma Davis
•How does the system determine if gambling qualifies as a "professional activity"? I place bets almost every weekend during football season, but it's definitely not my main source of income. Could I still potentially qualify?
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•I'm skeptical about claiming gambling as a profession just to get tax benefits. Doesn't the IRS have pretty strict criteria for what constitutes professional gambling vs. recreational? Seems like a potential audit flag to me.
0 coins
Javier Torres
•The system doesn't make that determination for you - it helps you understand the factors the IRS considers when evaluating if someone is a professional gambler. These include whether you approach it in a businesslike manner, how much time you spend, your expertise, and if you genuinely intend to make a profit rather than just for entertainment. For your weekend football betting, it would depend on various factors. If you're methodically tracking results, using statistical analysis, maintaining separate gambling accounts/records, and treating it like a business operation rather than casual entertainment, you might have a case. But occasional weekend betting during football season alone probably wouldn't qualify.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
I was totally skeptical about the professional gambling angle mentioned above, but I decided to check out that https://taxr.ai site anyway. Surprisingly helpful! I uploaded my betting history from DraftKings and FanDuel, and they showed me that even as a recreational gambler, I needed to be more strategic about record-keeping. While I couldn't qualify as a professional gambler, they showed me how tracking my sessions properly could help me determine if itemizing might actually make sense for my situation. In my case, my mortgage interest plus gambling losses actually pushed me over the standard deduction threshold, so itemizing saved me about $800 in taxes. Worth checking out even if you're just a casual bettor.
0 coins
Malik Johnson
For people struggling to reach the IRS with gambling tax questions, I had success using https://claimyr.com to get through to a real person. I waited on hold for 3+ hours on my own trying to get clarification about reporting requirements for my sports betting, then found this service that got me a callback from the IRS in about 20 minutes. You can see how it works at https://youtu.be/_kiP6q8DX5c The agent confirmed that yes, you do have to report all gambling winnings even if you had matching or greater losses, and taking the standard deduction means you can't write off those losses. She also explained that W-2G forms are only issued for certain winning thresholds (like $600+ with odds of 300:1 or greater), but you're still required to report ALL gambling winnings regardless of whether you received a form.
0 coins
Isabella Ferreira
•How does this service actually work? Do they just keep calling the IRS for you until they get through? And is it really worth paying for when I could just keep calling myself?
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
•This sounds too good to be true. I've spent HOURS trying to talk to someone at the IRS before. Is this some kind of scam where they just take your money and tell you they couldn't get through?
0 coins
Malik Johnson
•They use a sophisticated calling system that navigates the IRS phone tree and holds your place in line. When they reach a real person, they conference you in directly with the IRS agent. It's all automated technology - they're not physically making calls for you. Is it worth paying for? Depends on how you value your time. If you've tried calling yourself and spent hours on hold like I did, the convenience might be worth it. I needed answers before filing and couldn't afford to keep waiting on hold for entire afternoons.
0 coins
CosmicCaptain
OK I need to eat my words about being skeptical of that Claimyr service. After posting my comment yesterday, I decided to try it since I had specific questions about reporting requirements for online poker winnings. It actually worked exactly as advertised - I got a call back from an IRS representative in about 25 minutes. The agent confirmed everything the previous commenter said about gambling taxes and standard deductions, but also explained that I should keep detailed records of all poker sessions with dates, locations (even if online), and win/loss amounts. These won't help me with taking the standard deduction, but they're essential if I ever get audited to prove I properly reported everything. Definitely worth the money just to get clear information directly from the IRS without spending half my day on hold.
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
There's a little-known way that some people handle this situation. If you have enough itemized deductions to get close to the standard deduction amount, the gambling losses might push you over the threshold where itemizing makes sense. For example, if you have $11,000 in mortgage interest, property taxes, and charitable donations, and then another $3,000 in gambling losses (matched by $3,000 in reported winnings), your total itemized deductions would be $14,000, which exceeds the $13,850 standard deduction for a single filer. However, if your gambling losses are your only significant potential itemized deduction, then you're probably better off with the standard deduction, and yes - you'll end up paying taxes on money you didn't actually profit from.
0 coins
Amina Toure
•Thanks for this explanation. I have about $9,000 in mortgage interest and property taxes, plus maybe $1,000 in charitable donations. With my $120 in gambling losses, I'm still well below the standard deduction threshold, so itemizing wouldn't help me. Looks like I'm stuck paying taxes on my gambling "winnings" even though I didn't actually profit. Seems like the tax code really discourages casual gambling if you're taking the standard deduction!
0 coins
Ravi Sharma
•You're exactly right in your situation. With about $10,000 in potential itemized deductions plus only $120 in gambling losses, the standard deduction is still your better option. The tax code does create this odd situation for casual gamblers. If you continue gambling, one strategy some people use is to concentrate their gambling into specific tax years. For example, if you know you'll have enough other deductions in a particular year to make itemizing worthwhile, that might be a year to do more gambling since you could deduct the losses. In years when you're definitely taking the standard deduction, you might choose to gamble less or not at all.
0 coins
Freya Thomsen
One thing nobody has mentioned is that if you gamble at a casino or racetracks, they'll issue you a W-2G for certain winnings (slot jackpots over $1200, etc). The IRS automatically gets these, so you HAVE to report that income. But for sports betting, especially through apps, you might not get any tax forms if you don't hit certain thresholds. Does that mean you don't have to report it? Technically no - all gambling winnings are legally required to be reported regardless of whether you receive a tax form. But realistically...well, you can draw your own conclusions about what people actually do.
0 coins
Omar Zaki
•Be careful suggesting people might not report all their gambling income. The major sports betting apps do report high-volume accounts to the IRS, and they're increasingly being required to track and report more customer activity. Plus, if you ever hit a big win that generates a W-2G, any audit could expand to look at all your gambling activity.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
This is a frustrating aspect of the tax code that catches many casual gamblers off guard. You're absolutely correct in your understanding - with the standard deduction, you'd report the $120 in winnings as income but couldn't deduct your $120 in losses, effectively creating a tax liability on money you didn't actually profit from. One thing to consider is keeping meticulous records of all your gambling activity, even small amounts. While it won't help with the standard deduction issue, having detailed documentation becomes crucial if you ever scale up your gambling or if your other potential itemized deductions change in future years. Also worth noting that some states have different rules for gambling income and losses, so you might face this issue at both federal and state levels. The math really does work against casual gamblers who take the standard deduction, which is why many tax professionals recommend either going big enough to justify itemizing or staying small enough that the tax impact is minimal.
0 coins
Sofia Gutierrez
•This is exactly why I've been hesitant to try sports betting even though my friends keep encouraging me to join them. The tax implications seem so unfavorable for casual players like me who would definitely be taking the standard deduction. Is there a minimum threshold where this starts to make sense? Like if I only bet $20-30 total for the whole year, would the tax impact be negligible enough that it's not worth worrying about, or should I just avoid gambling entirely until my financial situation changes and I might be itemizing deductions? I'm in the 12% tax bracket, so even small amounts could add up to real money over time if I'm not careful.
0 coins
Marina Hendrix
•@Sofia Gutierrez In your situation with the 12% tax bracket, even small gambling amounts can create a tax burden. If you won $30 in a year, you d'owe about $3.60 in federal taxes on those winnings "even" if you broke even overall. For very small amounts like $20-30 total bets per year, the actual tax impact might be minimal enough that some people don t'stress about it. However, you re'right to think carefully about this - if you enjoy it and start betting more over time, those tax obligations can add up quickly. One approach might be to set a strict annual limit that you re'comfortable paying taxes on like (deciding you re'okay with owing an extra $10-15 in taxes per year on gambling ,)and never exceed that amount. That way you can participate socially with your friends while keeping the financial impact predictable and small.
0 coins