


Ask the community...
The comments about brokers reporting is spot on. Fidelity flagged several of my trades as wash sales when they technically weren't. Their system seems to just automatically flag any loss followed by a purchase within 30 days regardless of other factors. When I called them about it, they said "we report what our system flags, it's up to you and your tax advisor to make adjustments on your return if needed" which wasn't helpful at all.
Yeah this gets even more complicated if you have multiple accounts across different brokers. The IRS wash sale rule applies across ALL your accounts (even retirement accounts!) but brokers only look at activity within their own platform.
This is a great discussion! Just wanted to add something I learned from my CPA last year - even though your same-day buy/sell scenario doesn't trigger a wash sale, you should definitely document the timeline clearly in your records. The key detail is that you bought ALL 200 shares first, then sold 100 at a loss. If you had done multiple separate buy orders throughout the day mixed with sell orders, the wash sale analysis could get more complex. The IRS looks at each "lot" of shares and when they were acquired versus when they were sold. Also, since you're holding the remaining 100 shares, just be extra careful about any future NVDA purchases in the next 30 days. Even buying just 1 share could trigger the wash sale rule on your previous $500 loss. I made that mistake once and had to adjust my cost basis calculations later.
This thread has been incredibly helpful! I went through a similar situation last year when I was laid off in March. The severance withholding looked scary at first - they took out about 28% total - but I ended up getting a substantial refund because my total annual income was lower due to unemployment. One thing I'd add that hasn't been mentioned much is to keep detailed records of any professional certifications or courses you took during your unemployment period. I took some online courses to upskill while job hunting, and my tax preparer said some of those expenses could potentially be deductible as job search costs. Also, if you moved for your new job in March, some of those moving expenses might be deductible depending on your situation. The key thing everyone's highlighted is accurate - it's all about your total annual income, not individual payments. Since you were unemployed for 8 weeks in what would normally be peak earning months, you'll likely see that overwithholding come back to you. Best of luck with tax season - from everything shared here, it sounds like you're in for a pleasant surprise rather than owing more!
This is such valuable additional information! I hadn't even considered that professional development courses during unemployment could potentially be deductible. I actually did take a few online certification courses while I was job hunting - spent probably around $800 total on various skills training. That could definitely help offset some of the tax impact. I didn't move for my new job, but it's good to know that's another potential deduction for people in similar situations. It seems like there are quite a few ways to potentially reduce your tax liability when you've been through a layoff situation that I never would have thought of. The consistent message from everyone who's been through this is really encouraging - that the overwithholding on severance combined with lower annual income from unemployment periods typically works out in your favor. I was genuinely stressed about this whole tax situation, but reading all these real experiences has made me feel so much better about what to expect. Thanks for adding another positive data point to the discussion!
I'm in a very similar situation - got laid off in February and received a severance package with what felt like excessive tax withholding. Reading through everyone's experiences here has been incredibly reassuring! One thing I wanted to add that might be helpful is to make sure you understand exactly what was included in your severance calculation. My package included not just the base severance but also prorated bonus, unused sick time, and even a small amount for my company phone reimbursement. Each component might be subject to different withholding rules, though they all end up as regular income on your W-2. I've been using a simple tracking sheet to monitor my total income and withholdings for the year, similar to what Carmen mentioned. With 8 weeks of unemployment, your annual income will definitely be lower than normal, which should work in your favor when everything gets reconciled. The consensus here from people who've actually been through this is spot on - that 22% supplemental withholding rate is typically higher than your actual tax liability, especially with reduced annual income from unemployment. Based on all these experiences, you're probably looking at a nice refund rather than owing more. Hang in there!
This is such a helpful breakdown of all the different components that can be included in severance packages! I hadn't really thought about how things like prorated bonuses or phone reimbursements might be handled differently for withholding purposes, even though they all end up as regular income ultimately. The tracking sheet approach you and Carmen mentioned sounds really smart - I'm definitely going to set something like that up to get a clearer picture of my total tax situation for the year. With all the moving pieces (severance, unemployment benefits, new job income), it'll be good to see everything in one place. It's so reassuring to see the consistent pattern from everyone who's been through similar situations - that the overwithholding typically works out in your favor when you've had periods of unemployment. I was really worried about getting hit with a surprise tax bill, but reading all these real experiences has completely changed my perspective. Thanks for sharing your situation and adding to the collective wisdom here!
Just to add some clarity for everyone here - the $1,500 threshold that Alexander mentioned is specifically for when you're REQUIRED to file Schedule B. However, you can still choose to file it even if your interest is under $1,500 if you want to itemize your interest sources for your own records. For Natalie's original question: Yes, include ALL three amounts you mentioned - the $12 savings interest, $45 money market interest, and $200 CD interest. That totals $257, which you'd report on your main tax form. Since it's under $1,500, you technically don't need Schedule B unless you have foreign accounts or want the detailed breakdown for your records. One tip: Keep all your 1099-INT forms together when you file. Even though the amounts seem small, they all add up and the IRS will have copies of these forms, so you want to make sure your reported total matches what they have on file.
Thank you Eloise, that breakdown is super helpful! I'm actually in a similar situation as Natalie - this is my first year dealing with multiple interest sources and I was getting overwhelmed by all the different forms and thresholds. Your explanation makes it clear that I just need to add everything up and report the total. I had been overthinking whether different types of accounts needed to be reported differently. Really appreciate you taking the time to walk through the math too - seeing that $12 + $45 + $200 = $257 example makes it click for me!
Great thread everyone! I'm also dealing with Schedule B for the first time and had a related question - what about interest from municipal bonds? I have some tax-free municipal bonds that earned about $85 this year. Do I need to report this anywhere on Schedule B or my tax return? I know it's supposed to be tax-free but I'm not sure if it still needs to be reported somewhere for informational purposes. Also, does anyone know if interest from Treasury bills (T-bills) gets reported the same way as regular bank interest? I have a few that matured this year and want to make sure I'm categorizing everything correctly.
I went through this exact same situation with my cabinet-making business last year! I purchased a 16x32 portable workshop building and was able to successfully claim the full amount under Section 179. The key documentation that saved me was keeping all the manufacturer specifications that clearly stated the building was designed to be "relocatable" and "non-permanent." I also took photos showing how it sits on concrete blocks rather than a poured foundation. My tax preparer initially wasn't sure about the classification, but after reviewing the manufacturer's documentation and IRS Publication 946, we determined it qualified as personal property since it could be moved without substantial damage to the structure. One tip - make sure you get a clear invoice that describes it as a "portable" or "relocatable" building rather than just a generic "building" description. This helped establish the intent and design purpose when I filed my return. The $28,000 deduction made a huge difference for my business cash flow that year instead of spreading it out over decades of depreciation!
This is really helpful! I'm in a similar situation and wondering - did you have to provide any additional documentation to the IRS beyond the manufacturer specs and photos? Also, how long did it take for your return to be processed? I'm worried about potential delays or audits when claiming such a large Section 179 deduction.
For anyone still following this thread, I want to share my recent experience since it directly relates to the original question about portable woodworking buildings and Section 179. I just completed my 2024 tax filing after purchasing a 14x36 portable workshop building last spring. After reading through all the helpful advice in this thread, I was able to successfully claim the full $31,500 cost under Section 179. Here's what made the difference in my case: 1. The manufacturer's spec sheet clearly labeled it as "portable" and "relocatable" 2. I documented that it sits on adjustable jack stands, not a permanent foundation 3. All utility connections (electrical panel, compressed air lines) are designed to be easily disconnected 4. I kept the transport/delivery photos showing it being moved by truck My return was processed normally with no additional questions or delays. The immediate deduction was a game-changer for my small furniture-making business cash flow compared to depreciating it over 30+ years. One thing I learned is that the IRS doesn't have a specific "portable building" category - they evaluate each case based on the permanence factors others have mentioned. Having clear documentation that supports the "personal property" classification rather than "real property" is crucial. Hope this helps others in similar situations!
Thanks for sharing your successful experience, Mateo! This is exactly the kind of real-world example I was hoping to find. I'm curious about one detail - when you mention the transport/delivery photos, did you specifically request those from the delivery company, or did they provide them automatically? I'm planning my purchase soon and want to make sure I have all the right documentation from day one. Also, did your accountant have any concerns about the size of the Section 179 deduction relative to your total business income?
Zoe Papadopoulos
Great question! I went through something similar last year with a deck replacement on my rental property. The key factor that helped me was understanding that since your gutters are adding something that wasn't there before (rather than replacing existing gutters), it's definitely a capital improvement. However, at $1,650, you're well within the de minimis safe harbor threshold of $2,500 for taxpayers without applicable financial statements. This means you can deduct the full amount in the year you placed the gutters in service, as long as you make the proper election on your tax return. Make sure to keep detailed records - the invoice, any permits if required, and photos showing the property didn't have gutters before. I'd also recommend getting a separate invoice just for the gutters if any other work was done at the same time, since the IRS looks at whether improvements are part of a larger project. The election statement is crucial - don't forget to attach it to your return stating you're making the de minimis safe harbor election under Treasury Regulation 1.263(a)-1(f). Without this election, you'd have to depreciate the improvement over 27.5 years instead of deducting it immediately.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
ā¢This is really helpful! I'm new to rental property ownership and just inherited a duplex from my grandmother. I'm trying to understand all these tax rules. When you mention "placed in service" - does that mean when the gutters were installed, or when I first started renting out the property? The installation was done in March but I won't have tenants until next month. Also, do I need to prorate anything if the property has both rental and personal use portions, or does the de minimis safe harbor apply to the full amount regardless?
0 coins
Giovanni Martello
ā¢@b0685d7bf605 Great explanation on the de minimis safe harbor! @500faee064fc For your questions - "placed in service" refers to when the gutters were actually installed and ready for use (March in your case), not when you get tenants. The improvement is considered placed in service when it's completed and available for its intended purpose. Regarding personal vs rental use - if the duplex is mixed use, you'll need to allocate the gutter expense based on the percentage used for rental purposes. The de minimis safe harbor applies to each separate unit of property, so if 50% of the building is rental use, you'd apply the safe harbor to $825 (50% of $1,650) and treat the other $825 as personal expense (not deductible). However, if you're converting the entire property to rental use, then the full amount would qualify for the de minimis treatment once you start offering it for rent. The key is determining your intended use of each portion of the property.
0 coins
Dylan Baskin
This is exactly the kind of question that trips up so many rental property owners! You're definitely dealing with a capital improvement since you're adding gutters where none existed before - this adds value and functionality to the property. The good news is that at $1,650, you should be able to take advantage of the de minimis safe harbor. Since you likely don't have audited financial statements as an individual landlord, you can deduct improvements up to $2,500 per item in the year they're placed in service. A few important things to keep in mind: - Make sure to attach the election statement to your tax return (Treasury Reg 1.263(a)-1(f)) - Keep excellent documentation - invoice, photos showing no gutters existed before, permits if any - Report it on Schedule E, typically under repairs and maintenance or clearly labeled as "de minimis safe harbor election" Since this is your first major update since 2019, you're in a good position. Just make sure the gutter installation was invoiced separately from any other work to avoid the IRS grouping it with other improvements that might push you over the threshold. The alternative would be depreciating it over 27.5 years, which would only give you about $60 per year in deductions - definitely not as beneficial as the immediate deduction!
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
ā¢This is such a comprehensive breakdown, thank you @335d28e0e704! I'm curious about one aspect - you mentioned keeping photos showing no gutters existed before. Should these photos be dated in some way to prove when they were taken? I'm thinking about situations where someone might take "before" photos after the fact for documentation purposes. Also, for the election statement attachment, is there a specific IRS form for this or do we just write our own statement? I want to make sure I get the language exactly right so there are no issues if I ever get audited.
0 coins