IRS

Can't reach IRS? Claimyr connects you to a live IRS agent in minutes.

Claimyr is a pay-as-you-go service. We do not charge a recurring subscription.



Fox KTVUABC 7CBSSan Francisco Chronicle

Using Claimyr will:

  • Connect you to a human agent at the IRS
  • Skip the long phone menu
  • Call the correct department
  • Redial until on hold
  • Forward a call to your phone with reduced hold time
  • Give you free callbacks if the IRS drops your call

If I could give 10 stars I would

If I could give 10 stars I would If I could give 10 stars I would Such an amazing service so needed during the times when EDD almost never picks up Claimyr gets me on the phone with EDD every time without fail faster. A much needed service without Claimyr I would have never received the payment I needed to support me during my postpartum recovery. Thank you so much Claimyr!


Really made a difference

Really made a difference, save me time and energy from going to a local office for making the call.


Worth not wasting your time calling for hours.

Was a bit nervous or untrusting at first, but my calls went thru. First time the wait was a bit long but their customer chat line on their page was helpful and put me at ease that I would receive my call. Today my call dropped because of EDD and Claimyr heard my concern on the same chat and another call was made within the hour.


An incredibly helpful service

An incredibly helpful service! Got me connected to a CA EDD agent without major hassle (outside of EDD's agents dropping calls – which Claimyr has free protection for). If you need to file a new claim and can't do it online, pay the $ to Claimyr to get the process started. Absolutely worth it!


Consistent,frustration free, quality Service.

Used this service a couple times now. Before I'd call 200 times in less than a weak frustrated as can be. But using claimyr with a couple hours of waiting i was on the line with an representative or on hold. Dropped a couple times but each reconnected not long after and was mission accomplished, thanks to Claimyr.


IT WORKS!! Not a scam!

I tried for weeks to get thru to EDD PFL program with no luck. I gave this a try thinking it may be a scam. OMG! It worked and They got thru within an hour and my claim is going to finally get paid!! I upgraded to the $60 call. Best $60 spent!

Read all of our Trustpilot reviews


Ask the community...

  • DO post questions about your issues.
  • DO answer questions and support each other.
  • DO post tips & tricks to help folks.
  • DO NOT post call problems here - there is a support tab at the top for that :)

Arjun Kurti

β€’

FYI your experience is pretty common with all the big tax prep chains now. They operate on a volume model and upsell like crazy. Almost all of them charge that refund transfer fee ($39-45 range) if you want your prep fees taken out of your refund instead of paying upfront. My sister is a CPA and says most of those places hire seasonal workers with minimal training. For complex situations like retirement accounts with early withdrawals and penalties, you're better off with an actual CPA firm or good tax software if you're comfortable doing it yourself.

0 coins

RaΓΊl Mora

β€’

I had the same EXACT experience with Jackson Hewitt this year. Walked in, got quoted one price, then by the end they had added like $89 in random fees. Left and did it myself with TaxAct.

0 coins

Arjun Kurti

β€’

It's unfortunately the standard business model now. They advertise one rate to get you in the door, then hit you with document fees, processing fees, e-file fees, and "protection" services. The refund transfer fee is particularly sneaky because they present it as a convenience rather than an extra charge. Tax preparation has become a massive upselling operation rather than a professional service. If you're comfortable with software, it's almost always cheaper and often more accurate. The big chains are mostly focused on volume and squeezing extra revenue from each customer.

0 coins

Aiden Chen

β€’

I had a similar experience with H&R Block this year - the nickel and diming has gotten completely out of hand. What really frustrated me was that they weren't upfront about all the fees from the beginning. The "audit protection" being an add-on now is particularly annoying since that used to be part of why you'd pay for professional help in the first place. The inconsistent advice about your retirement withdrawal is really concerning though. That's not just about fees - that's about getting accurate tax advice. If they can't agree on something with clear IRS guidelines, it makes you wonder what else they might be getting wrong. I ended up switching to a local CPA who charges a flat rate and actually explains what they're doing. Yes, it's more expensive upfront, but at least there are no surprise fees and I feel confident the advice is accurate. For anyone dealing with retirement account issues, it's probably worth paying a bit more for someone who actually knows what they're talking about.

0 coins

Ella Thompson

β€’

That's exactly what I'm realizing - the surprise fees are bad enough, but getting conflicting advice on something as important as retirement withdrawals is really concerning. I never thought about asking for a flat rate quote upfront, but that makes so much sense to avoid all the add-on charges. How did you find your local CPA? Did you just search online or get a referral? I'm starting to think paying more upfront for accurate advice might actually save money in the long run, especially if they catch deductions or avoid mistakes that these chain places might miss.

0 coins

Tate Jensen

β€’

I'm dealing with an 810 freeze right now and this thread has been incredibly helpful! Based on everyone's experiences, it seems like the Taxpayer Advocate Service at 877-777-4778 is definitely the consensus recommendation for hardship cases. What I'm gathering from all your stories: β€’ Call TAS at 7 AM sharp when they open to minimize wait times β€’ Use the specific phrase "economic burden" when explaining your situation β€’ Have Form 911 ready to submit, plus Form 433-F if they determine you qualify β€’ Document everything - dates, times, rep names, case numbers β€’ Be persistent but polite, and don't hesitate to ask for a supervisor if needed For anyone else in this situation, it sounds like the key is treating this as a systematic process rather than just hoping for the best. The fact that multiple people here got their freezes lifted in 2-4 weeks gives me hope that there's actually a clear path through this mess. Thanks everyone for sharing your real experiences - it's so much more helpful than the generic advice you find on most IRS help sites. Going to call TAS first thing Monday morning with all my documentation ready!

0 coins

Klaus Schmidt

β€’

This is such a great summary of everyone's advice! I'm actually bookmarking this thread because the collective wisdom here is amazing. As someone who's completely new to dealing with IRS issues, it's really reassuring to see that there's a proven process that multiple people have successfully used. One thing that really stands out to me is how important the timing seems to be - both in terms of calling at 7 AM and being persistent with follow-ups. It sounds like the IRS system is designed to wear people down, but if you stick to the process and use the right terminology, you can actually get results. I don't have an 810 freeze personally, but I'm definitely saving this information in case I ever need it. The step-by-step approach you've outlined based on everyone's experiences is so much clearer than anything I've seen on official IRS websites. Good luck with your call on Monday - hopefully you'll be able to add another success story to this thread soon!

0 coins

Camila Castillo

β€’

This thread has been incredibly valuable! As someone who just got hit with an 810 freeze two weeks ago, I'm feeling much more confident about tackling this after reading everyone's experiences. The consistent theme I'm seeing is that the Taxpayer Advocate Service (877-777-4778) is the key, especially when you mention "economic burden" specifically. I love that multiple people have confirmed the 7 AM call strategy works - definitely trying that tomorrow. One question for those who've been through this: when you submitted your hardship documentation, did TAS give you a specific timeline for when they'd review it, or was it more of a "we'll get back to you" situation? I'm trying to set realistic expectations for myself since I need my refund for a medical procedure scheduled next month. Also really appreciate everyone mentioning the importance of following up daily after submitting docs. Sometimes you need that reminder that being persistent isn't being annoying - it's advocating for yourself when you're in a legitimate hardship situation. Going to get my Forms 911 and 433-F ready tonight and call first thing in the morning. Fingers crossed I can add another success story to this thread in a few weeks! 🀞

0 coins

Elijah Knight

β€’

@Camila Castillo When I went through this process last year, TAS was pretty good about setting expectations upfront. After I submitted my Form 911 and documentation, they told me to expect initial review within 5-7 business days, and then they d'contact me with next steps. In my case, they called me back on day 6 to request additional documentation bank (statements ,)and then gave me another timeline of 10-14 days for final decision. The whole process took about 3 weeks total. Since you have a medical procedure scheduled, definitely mention that specifically when you call - medical expenses are considered high-priority hardship cases. I d'also suggest having your procedure documentation ready appointment (confirmation, cost estimates, etc. as) they may ask for it. One tip I learned the hard way: when they give you a timeline, mark your calendar and call back if you don t'hear from them by the deadline they set. My case worker told me this was actually helpful for her to prioritize my file. The squeaky wheel really does get the grease with the IRS! Good luck with your call tomorrow! πŸ’ͺ

0 coins

Evelyn Kim

β€’

When I filed my 1040-NR with a similar situation, I made sure to keep extensive documentation of my travels. Take screenshots of flight confirmations, keep hotel receipts, and maintain a spreadsheet with entry/exit dates for each country. The IRS seems to be paying more attention to these "nowhere" tax residents, and if you get flagged for review, having that documentation ready will save you a lot of trouble.

0 coins

Diego Fisher

β€’

What tax software did you use for this? I tried TurboTax but it kept assuming I was a tax resident somewhere and wouldn't let me proceed without entering a country for tax residency.

0 coins

Zoe Wang

β€’

I faced this exact same issue with tax software! Most consumer programs like TurboTax aren't designed for these edge cases. I ended up using FreeTaxUSA for my 1040-NR filing - it's more flexible and actually allows you to leave the tax residency field blank or enter custom text. For Schedule OI specifically, I wrote "None - Digital Nomad Status" in the tax residency field and attached Form 8275 (Disclosure Statement) explaining my situation in detail. The key is being completely transparent about your circumstances and providing documentation. Pro tip: If you do get questioned later, having a travel log with exact dates, flight records, and accommodation receipts makes everything much smoother. I use a simple spreadsheet that tracks country, entry date, exit date, and days spent - takes 2 minutes to update but could save hours of headache later!

0 coins

This is super helpful! I'm new to this whole digital nomad tax situation and had no idea about Form 8275. Quick question - when you say "None - Digital Nomad Status" did you put that exactly, or is there more official language I should use? Also, how detailed should the Form 8275 explanation be? I'm worried about oversharing but also don't want to be too vague and raise red flags.

0 coins

Is it worth it to prepay quarterly taxes for a Roth conversion? Penalty vs. investment returns

I recently converted my traditional IRA to Roth in February 2025 which added about $95k to my taxable income for this year. I've been thinking about making quarterly estimated tax payments, but I'm not sure if it's the right move. We're in the 35% tax bracket, and I'm looking at owing roughly $33k in additional federal taxes and $11k in state taxes. To make these quarterly payments, I'd need to sell some of my long-term investments and potentially pay capital gains tax on those sales. I'm wondering if it actually makes sense to just skip the quarterly payments and pay everything (plus the penalty) when I file next year. From what I understand, the underpayment penalty is around 8%. So if my investments earn more than 8% in the market, wouldn't I come out ahead by keeping that money invested instead of making quarterly payments? There's obviously some risk with this approach, but it also means I don't have to figure out how to make quarterly estimated payments, which I've never done before. Plus I wouldn't need to worry about calculating the exact amount owed. What am I missing here? Are there other penalties besides the 8% interest that I should be concerned about? My total estimated underpayment would be around $44k. Side note: I didn't have a 401k available to roll the pre-tax funds into, so I went ahead with the Roth conversion despite the tax hit. I'm comfortable with that decision since I have no idea what tax rates will be when I retire, and I like the security of knowing that money in my Roth won't be taxed again.

Mason Davis

β€’

Has anyone here actually tried the "pay the penalty later" approach? I'm wondering what the actual experience is like when filing. Is it complicated to calculate the correct penalty amount? Does it trigger any audit flags?

0 coins

Mason Davis

β€’

Thanks, that's helpful to know! Makes me feel better about potentially going this route. Did TurboTax flag anything or make you fill out any special forms for the penalty calculation?

0 coins

I can share my experience with this approach. I had a similar situation two years ago with a large stock option exercise. TurboTax automatically generated Form 2210 to calculate the underpayment penalty - you don't have to do the math yourself. It's pretty straightforward and didn't trigger any special scrutiny. The form just calculates the penalty quarter by quarter based on when you should have made payments versus what you actually paid through withholding. No audit flags or anything unusual. The penalty ended up being about 7.5% of my underpayment, and since my investments returned over 12% that year, it was definitely the right financial choice for me.

0 coins

Emma Thompson

β€’

This is a great question that many people face after large conversions! One additional consideration beyond what others have mentioned: if you're in the 35% tax bracket, you might want to check if you qualify for the 110% safe harbor rule (since your AGI is likely over $150k). If you can pay 110% of last year's total tax liability through withholding or estimated payments, you can completely avoid penalties regardless of how much you owe this year from the conversion. Another angle - since you mentioned needing to sell investments to make quarterly payments, have you considered increasing withholding from any W-2 income instead? The IRS treats withholding as if it was paid evenly throughout the year, even if you increase it heavily in Q4. This could let you avoid both the penalty and the need to liquidate investments with capital gains. The math on your approach could definitely work if your investments outperform the penalty rate, but the safe harbor route might give you the best of both worlds - keep your money invested AND avoid penalties entirely.

0 coins

This is really helpful advice! I hadn't thought about increasing W-2 withholding instead of making quarterly payments. That's a clever way to potentially qualify for safe harbor without having to liquidate investments. Do you know if there are any limits on how much you can increase withholding in the final quarter? I have a regular job with steady income, so this might be a much simpler solution than trying to figure out quarterly estimated payments. The timing aspect you mentioned (withholding treated as paid evenly throughout the year) could be a game-changer for my situation.

0 coins

Amara Torres

β€’

The same thing happened to me but with Spotify! Tax was like 14.2% and I was so confused. Turns out I had moved counties but my billing address was still using my old address which had higher local taxes. Check your billing address in your Apple account. Even if you updated your Apple ID info, sometimes the billing address for subscriptions updates separately.

0 coins

Alexander Zeus

β€’

That's a good point about the billing address potentially being different. I'll definitely check that. Did you just go into your Apple ID settings to update it, or is there somewhere else I need to look?

0 coins

Amara Nwosu

β€’

I work in tax compliance for a digital services company, and what you're experiencing is actually quite common. The 13.6% rate you're seeing is likely a combination of multiple tax layers that Apple has to collect based on your billing address. Here's what's probably happening: your base state sales tax, plus any county tax, city tax, and potentially a specific digital services tax. Many jurisdictions have added special taxes on streaming and digital subscriptions in recent years - some call them "amusement taxes" or "digital goods taxes." Chicago is notorious for this - they have a 9% amusement tax on top of regular Illinois sales tax. If you're in a high-tax area, 13.6% is unfortunately not unusual for digital subscriptions. The key thing to check is your billing address in your Apple account settings. Make sure it's current and accurate, because Apple calculates tax based on that address, not where you physically are when you use the service.

0 coins

Jamal Wilson

β€’

This is really helpful context! As someone new to understanding digital service taxes, I had no idea there were so many different layers that could stack up. The Chicago amusement tax example is eye-opening - 9% on top of regular sales tax would definitely explain why people are seeing such high rates. I'm curious though - do you know if there's any movement to standardize how digital services are taxed across different jurisdictions? It seems like the current patchwork system creates a lot of confusion for consumers who don't realize they might be paying vastly different rates depending on where they live. Also, is there typically any recourse if someone discovers they've been charged tax based on an incorrect address for months or years? Would companies like Apple provide refunds for the difference, or is the customer just out of luck?

0 coins

Prev1...587588589590591...5643Next