


Ask the community...
I'm in tax preparation and deal with RMD issues constantly. Here's what I advise my clients: include Form 5329 with your tax return EVEN IF you already submitted one separately. It ensures your return is complete and consistent. TurboTax is generating that form correctly based on the information you entered. The notation of the missed RMD amount to the side of line 54 with a "0" on line 54 is exactly how you request a penalty waiver. When the IRS receives your e-filed return with this form, they'll have proper documentation of your waiver request. Remember that the 25% penalty for missed RMDs is substantial, so documenting your reasonable cause explanation thoroughly and consistently is crucial. Payment processing delays beyond your control generally qualify for penalty relief.
Thank you for the professional insight! Just to be clear - the fact that I'm essentially submitting the same form twice (once in January by mail and once now with my e-filed return) won't create any issues or confusion with the IRS?
No, submitting the form twice won't create issues. It's actually beneficial as it ensures your request is properly documented. The IRS systems will recognize both submissions are for the same taxpayer and tax year. When they process your return, they'll have the complete picture - both your standalone request and the form with your full tax filing. This redundancy works in your favor by creating multiple records of your waiver request.
Just throwing this out there - I made the mistake of NOT including Form 5329 with my tax return in a similar situation (had already mailed it separately). Ended up getting a confusing notice from the IRS 6 months later suggesting I hadn't requested the waiver at all! Had to call and explain everything all over again. Better to include all relevant forms with your tax return, even if redundant. Makes your return complete and consistent. TurboTax is actually doing you a favor by generating it correctly!
One thing nobody mentioned yet - you might want to look into contributing to a spousal IRA for your wife even though she doesn't have income. Since you're the earning spouse, you can make contributions to an IRA for a non-working spouse which gives you additional tax advantages. Worth considering as part of your new married tax strategy!
That sounds interesting but I've never heard of a spousal IRA. How does that work exactly? Does it come with the same tax benefits as a regular IRA?
A spousal IRA works just like a regular IRA - same contribution limits, same tax benefits. The difference is that normally you need earned income to contribute to an IRA, but the spousal IRA is an exception that allows a working spouse to contribute to an IRA for a non-working spouse. For 2024, you could contribute up to $7,000 to a spousal IRA for your wife ($8,000 if she's 50 or older). This gives you an additional tax deduction if you choose a Traditional IRA, or tax-free growth if you choose a Roth IRA. You'll need to file jointly to use this benefit, and your earned income must be at least equal to the total contributions you make to both your IRA and her spousal IRA.
Just got married last December myself and learned the hard way - make sure you run the numbers both ways (joint vs separate) before filing. Everyone told me joint was automatically better, but because of my student loan income-based repayment plan, filing separately actually saved me money despite paying more in taxes!
This is a really good point. Do you use any specific tax software that made it easy to compare the two options?
I work at a tax prep office (not a professional, just admin) and see this ALL THE TIME. Here's what our preparers tell clients: 1) File first! This is the #1 advice 2) If you have a custody agreement, review it carefully - sometimes there are alternating years for tax claims that people forget about 3) If you get rejected, don't panic. Paper file with all your proof of residency 4) The person who claimed your child illegally will eventually get audited and have to pay back all credits plus penalties 5) If this happens repeatedly, it could be identity theft so get those IP PINs ASAP The biggest mistake people make is waiting too long to deal with it. Don't put off paper filing if you get rejected!
Thanks so much for this! One question - my daughter lives with me 100% of the time, but her dad keeps claiming he's "entitled" to claim her some years because he pays child support. Is that true? The custody agreement doesn't mention taxes at all.
Child support payments do NOT give someone the right to claim a child as a dependent. The IRS has very specific tests for who can claim a child, and the main one is where the child lived for more than half the year (the residency test). If your daughter lives with you 100% of the time, you are the qualifying parent. Your ex might be thinking of the "dependent exemption release" (Form 8332) where the custodial parent can voluntarily release their claim to the non-custodial parent. But this is completely voluntary - you don't have to do this unless it's specified in your custody agreement. No custody agreement means you, as the parent with 100% physical custody, have the right to claim your child.
Just an FYI - I learned this the hard way - if someone fraudulently claims your child, your refund will be delayed EVEN if you paper file correctly. My ex claimed our kids when it wasn't his year, and it took 11 MONTHS to get my refund last time. That's why preventative measures like the IP PIN are so important. Also consider updating your custody agreement to specifically address who claims the kids on taxes in which years. My lawyer said this can help with IRS disputes.
Did they end up penalizing your ex for filing incorrectly? I'm wondering if there are any consequences for the person who's been claiming my kid.
Yes, they did eventually! The IRS sent him a notice disallowing the child tax credit and earned income credit he'd claimed. He had to pay back all of that money plus interest and a 20% accuracy-related penalty. It took about 14 months from when I filed my paper return with documentation, but the IRS did resolve it in my favor. I also found out he'd been doing this for 3 years, so they went back and audited his previous returns too. Expensive lesson for him!
One thing nobody's mentioned is state taxes and fees. In California, LLCs pay a minimum $800 annual tax regardless of profit, which would wipe out any federal tax benefits for a small side hustle. But in Wyoming or Delaware, the fees are minimal. Also consider liability protection. LLC protects your personal assets if someone sues your business. Graphic design might seem low risk, but if you accidentally use copyrighted material or a client claims your design caused them financial harm, that protection matters.
Thanks for bringing up state considerations! I'm in Michigan, so I'll have to look into what the fees are here. Do you know if the liability protection is significantly different between sole prop with good insurance vs an LLC?
Michigan is actually pretty reasonable - filing fee is around $50-75 and annual statement fee is just $25. Much better than California! Insurance and LLCs protect you differently. Insurance covers specific claims up to policy limits, while an LLC creates a legal separation between business and personal assets. Even with good insurance, as a sole prop, someone could still come after your personal assets if they win a judgment exceeding your coverage limits. The LLC creates a legal barrier they'd have to overcome (though not impossible). For graphic design, professional liability insurance is probably more immediately important than an LLC, but having both gives the strongest protection. Many designers start with good insurance, then form an LLC once profits justify the additional paperwork.
Just remember the QBI deduction (Qualified Business Income) works for sole props and LLCs alike - you get up to 20% deduction on your business income regardless. So that big tax benefit applies either way!
PixelPrincess
Don't forget about state taxes too! This is something a lot of people overlook when moving abroad. Some states like California and Virginia are notorious for trying to claim you're still a resident even after you've moved abroad. Before you leave, make sure you establish residency in a tax-friendly state or take clear steps to terminate your residency in your current state. This might include: - Selling property - Canceling state licenses/registrations - Closing state bank accounts - Getting a driver's license in your new location - Changing voter registration I paid double taxes for a year because I didn't properly handle my New York residency termination before moving to Dubai.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
β’What if I plan to keep my house in my home state and rent it out while I'm gone? Does that mean I'll always be considered a resident there for tax purposes?
0 coins
PixelPrincess
β’Keeping a house doesn't automatically make you a resident, but it does create a connection to the state that tax authorities might use to argue you've maintained your residency. If you rent out your house, you'll need to report that rental income to your state, but that doesn't necessarily make you a full resident. To strengthen your case for non-residency, make sure you have documentation showing you've established a genuine home in Dubai, like a long-term lease or utility bills in your name. Also keep records of your physical presence (entry/exit stamps, flight records) to demonstrate you're genuinely living abroad. Some states have specific requirements about maximum days you can spend there annually without triggering residency.
0 coins
Chloe Martin
Has anyone here dealt with retirement accounts when moving to Dubai? I have a 401k and Roth IRA and I'm not sure if I should leave them alone, roll them over, or what? Also confused about whether I can still contribute while living abroad.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
β’You can generally keep your retirement accounts as they are when moving abroad. For contributions, it gets tricky - you need US taxable income to contribute to an IRA, so if all your income is excluded via the Foreign Earned Income Exclusion, you might not be eligible to contribute. For 401k contributions, it depends on your employer - if you're working for a US company abroad, you may still be able to contribute, but if you're working for a foreign employer, you typically can't.
0 coins
Diego FernΓ‘ndez
β’I'm in Dubai now and found that keeping my retirement accounts in the US was the easiest approach. Just make sure your financial institution doesn't have issues with foreign addresses - some do!
0 coins