


Ask the community...
I've used H&R Block for the past 3 years. First year was $225, second year $350, and this year they charged me $525 for basically the identical situation each time. When I asked about the increase, they just said "rates have gone up" with no actual justification. I'm definitely looking elsewhere next year! Their convenience isn't worth the premium anymore.
What alternatives are you considering? I'm in the same boat and wondering if the online versions of TurboTax/H&R Block are actually decent for self-employed folks?
I'm looking at both online and local options. For online, I've heard good things about FreeTaxUSA which is much cheaper than TurboTax or H&R Block's online versions for self-employed filing. But I'm also getting quotes from some local CPAs in my area. Found a few that specialize in small business/self-employed clients with flat-rate packages around $300-350. The online versions of TurboTax and H&R Block are decent for self-employed taxes if your situation is relatively straightforward. The main difference I've found is that a good human preparer will ask probing questions about your specific business that might uncover deductions the software won't automatically prompt you for.
Just walked out of H&R Block myself because they wanted $795 for my taxes!! I'm self employed too, but just a simple Etsy shop. Ended up using TaxAct online for $110 total for federal and state. Took me about 2.5 hours but TOTALLY worth saving almost $700!
Was it hard to figure out all the Schedule C stuff yourself? I'm afraid I'll mess something up and get audited if I don't use a professional.
I totally understand that fear! I felt the same way my first time doing it myself. But honestly, TaxAct (and most tax software) walks you through the Schedule C step by step with pretty clear explanations. They ask you questions in plain English rather than tax jargon, and there are help tooltips for almost everything. The audit risk for small self-employed businesses is actually pretty low unless you're claiming unusual deductions or have major inconsistencies. As long as you keep good records and are honest about your income and expenses, you should be fine. Plus, you can always have a professional review your return before filing if you want that extra peace of mind - many charge $100-200 just for a review, which is still way less than full preparation. The money you save can easily pay for professional help if you do run into issues later!
Has anyone considered putting an addendum in their modification to explicitly state that you want to keep the old tax treatment? My attorney suggested adding language like: "Both parties agree that this modification does not expressly state that the repeal of the alimony deduction under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act applies to this modification, and therefore the original tax treatment of alimony payments as deductible by the payor and includible in the income of the recipient shall continue." Would that be helpful or create more problems?
That's actually excellent language to include in a modification! It directly addresses the requirements in the tax code and makes it clear to both parties (and the IRS) that you intend to maintain the pre-2019 tax treatment. Including this kind of explicit statement can prevent misunderstandings between ex-spouses about tax reporting responsibilities, which often leads to problems when one party reports inconsistently with the other. It also provides clear documentation if either party is audited. I'd definitely recommend including language like this in any modification to a pre-2019 divorce agreement.
This is such a helpful thread! I'm dealing with a similar situation where my 2017 divorce agreement was modified in 2024, and like the original poster, our modification is silent on tax treatment. Reading through everyone's experiences, it sounds like I should be able to continue deducting my alimony payments since there's no explicit language in the modification adopting the new tax rules. But I'm curious - has anyone here actually been through a tax season filing this way and had any issues with the IRS? Also, @Rudy Cenizo, that addendum language your attorney suggested is brilliant. I wish I had thought of that before we finalized our modification. For anyone else reading this who hasn't modified yet, definitely consider adding that protective language! One question for the group - if I continue taking the deduction based on the silence in my modification, should I attach any documentation to my tax return explaining the situation, or just file normally and keep the divorce documents in case of questions later?
$172 is definitely above the threshold you need to report. I work at a bank (not tax advice) and we send 1099-INTs to both customers AND the IRS for anything over $10. The IRS computer systems automatically match these documents against tax returns, so they'll know this income wasn't reported. Here's what typically happens: The IRS will eventually (6-9 months later) send you a CP2000 notice saying they found unreported income. They'll calculate the additional tax, add interest from the original due date, and possibly a small penalty. Then you'll have to respond and pay the amount. It's much simpler to just amend now before that happens. Plus it looks better if you correct the mistake voluntarily rather than waiting for them to find it.
Based on the $76k income and California residency, what would the tax on $172 interest even be? Like $50 max?
You absolutely should amend your return for the $172 interest income. I went through something similar last year and learned the hard way that the IRS automated matching system is very thorough. Here's the reality: Your bank already sent a 1099-INT to the IRS showing that $172 in interest income. When the IRS runs their matching program (usually 6-12 months after filing season), they'll compare what you reported against all the 1099s they received. The discrepancy will trigger an automated notice. At your income level ($76k), you're probably in the 22% federal bracket, so we're talking about maybe $38 in additional federal tax, plus California state tax (probably around 6-8% depending on your exact bracket). So total additional tax would likely be under $60. The key benefit of amending voluntarily is that you avoid the failure-to-report penalty and minimize interest charges. If you wait for the IRS to find it, you'll pay interest calculated from the original due date plus potential penalties. Form 1040-X isn't too complicated for a straightforward addition like this. Just report the additional interest income and pay the difference. Much better to handle it proactively than deal with IRS notices later.
Pro tip: If you're waiting for an amended return and need that money ASAP, call the Taxpayer Advocate Service at 877-777-4778. If you can demonstrate financial hardship (like potential eviction, utilities being shut off, can't afford medications), they can expedite your case. I was waiting on a $4,500 amended refund for over 4 months and was about to miss a mortgage payment. Called the TAS, explained my situation, and they pushed my amendment through in 3 weeks. You'll need documentation of the hardship, but it's literally their job to help when the normal IRS processes are causing financial difficulties. Worth a shot if you're really struggling while waiting!
That's really helpful info! My situation isn't quite at hardship level yet, but good to know there's an option if things get tight. Did they require a lot of documentation when you contacted them?
I'm in a very similar situation - filed an amended return 11 weeks ago to add my son's SSN for the child tax credit after finding his social security card during a move. Also used H&R Block and everything should be straightforward. Reading through all these responses is both reassuring and concerning. It's good to know that 20-30 weeks is more realistic than the 16 weeks the IRS claims, but that's still a long time to wait for money you're legally entitled to. The advice about waiting until week 20 before contacting them makes sense, and I'm glad to hear that adding a dependent's SSN is low-risk for audit. I've been checking that tracking tool obsessively and it's frustrating how it just sits on "Processing" with no real updates. Thanks to everyone sharing their experiences and solutions - it helps to know I'm not alone in this waiting game. Going to bookmark some of these resources in case I need them down the road!
Zara Rashid
Has anyone had problems with the foreign tax credit affecting other parts of your return? Last year I claimed about $200 in foreign tax credit from my Betterment account, and it somehow messed up my qualified business income deduction calculation. TurboTax kept giving me an error about "modified taxable income" being affected.
0 coins
Luca Romano
ā¢I had something similar happen! I think it's because the foreign tax credit reduces your tax liability, which can cascade into affecting other calculations like the QBI deduction. I ended up having to redo that section of my return after adding the foreign tax credit.
0 coins
Aisha Abdullah
I had this exact same issue with my Schwab account last year! The Box 6-d confusion is super common because most investment platforms don't make the country information easily accessible on their standard 1099-DIV forms. One thing that helped me was logging into my Schwab account and looking for "Tax Center" or "Tax Documents" section - they often have more detailed breakdowns there that show which specific countries withheld taxes. For your $127 amount, you're definitely under the $300 threshold for the simplified foreign tax credit, so you might not even need to specify each country. If you can't find the detailed breakdown and don't want to spend time on hold with Betterment, you could also just proceed with the simplified credit option in TurboTax. The IRS allows this for smaller amounts and it's much less complicated than filing Form 1116. Just make sure to select that you're claiming the credit for taxes under $300 when TurboTax asks.
0 coins