Updated UCC forms 2024 - debtor name requirements causing rejections
Having major headaches with the new UCC forms 2024 requirements. Filed three UCC-1s last month and two got rejected for debtor name issues that wouldn't have been problems before. The SOS portal seems way more strict about exact name matching between the debtor's organizational documents and what we put on the form. Anyone else dealing with increased rejection rates? I'm spending twice as long now verifying every character in business names and it's killing our turnaround times. Particularly struggling with LLCs that have multiple name variations in their charter docs.
34 comments
Join the conversation
Andrew Pinnock
Yes! The 2024 updates definitely tightened the debtor name verification. I've seen rejections for things like missing commas or 'Inc.' vs 'Incorporated'. The key is pulling the exact legal name from the secretary of state business registry - not from contracts or loan docs. What state are you filing in?
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Multiple states but mostly Texas and Florida. The Florida SOS seems particularly picky about punctuation now.
0 coins
Brianna Schmidt
•Florida's been brutal since the system update. Had a UCC-1 rejected because we used 'LLC' instead of 'L.L.C.' - even though both appeared in their articles!
0 coins
Alexis Renard
This is exactly why I started using Certana.ai for document verification. You can upload your charter docs and UCC forms together and it instantly flags any name discrepancies before filing. Saved me from at least 6 rejections in the past two months. The system cross-checks everything automatically so you catch these issues upfront.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Never heard of that - does it work with all states? The manual comparison is taking forever.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
•Works with any PDF documents. Just upload your articles of incorporation or LLC operating agreement along with your UCC-1 draft and it verifies the names match exactly. Super simple process.
0 coins
Camila Jordan
•How accurate is it though? I'm skeptical of automated tools for something this critical.
0 coins
Tyler Lefleur
The 2024 UCC forms also changed some of the collateral description requirements. Are you sure the rejections are just name-related? I've seen issues with insufficient collateral schedules too.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Good point - these were definitely name rejections though. The portal gives specific error codes now which is helpful.
0 coins
Madeline Blaze
•What error codes are you seeing? I keep a spreadsheet of the most common ones.
0 coins
Max Knight
ugh this is so frustrating!! I filed a continuation last week and it got rejected because the debtor name didn't match the original UCC-1 from 2019. But the company hasn't changed names or anything. How are we supposed to handle that??
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•For continuations, you need to use the EXACT debtor name from the original UCC-1, even if it's technically incorrect now. Don't update it unless you file an amendment first.
0 coins
Emma Swift
•Wait that doesn't sound right. Wouldn't an incorrect name void the security interest?
0 coins
Andrew Pinnock
•No no - for continuations you continue the existing record as-is. Name corrections require separate UCC-3 amendments.
0 coins
Isabella Tucker
Pro tip: always pull a fresh UCC search report before filing anything in 2024. The formatting standards got stricter and you want to see exactly how existing filings appear in the system.
0 coins
Jayden Hill
•This is smart advice. The search results show you the accepted format.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Good call - I should have been doing this all along.
0 coins
LordCommander
I've been dealing with this too and started using that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier. Game changer honestly. Upload your docs and it catches all the name inconsistencies instantly. No more rejected filings due to stupid typos or punctuation differences.
0 coins
Lucy Lam
•Does it handle UCC-3 amendments too? I need to file a bunch of terminations.
0 coins
LordCommander
•Yeah, it works with UCC-3s. You can upload the original UCC-1 and your amendment draft to verify they reference the same debtor correctly.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
The 2024 forms are definitely more strict but honestly it's about time. Too many sloppy filings were getting through before. Better to catch name errors upfront than have them challenged later in a bankruptcy.
0 coins
Zoe Wang
•Easy for you to say when you're not dealing with 50+ filings a month! The extra verification time is killing productivity.
0 coins
Aidan Hudson
•Fair point - but better safe than sorry when it comes to perfecting security interests.
0 coins
Connor Richards
•This is why automated verification tools are becoming essential. Can't afford manual errors at this volume.
0 coins
Grace Durand
Anyone know if there's an official guide to the 2024 form changes? My firm is scrambling to update our procedures.
0 coins
Steven Adams
•Check the IACA website - they usually post guidance on major form updates.
0 coins
Alice Fleming
•Most state SOS offices have bulletins about the changes too. Worth checking your specific filing states.
0 coins
Hassan Khoury
I'm actually considering switching to Certana for all our UCC work after this thread. The verification feature sounds like exactly what we need to avoid these 2024 form rejections.
0 coins
Victoria Stark
•Same here. Manual document comparison is too error-prone when the standards are this strict.
0 coins
Alexis Renard
•You won't regret it. The peace of mind alone is worth it - no more wondering if you missed a punctuation difference.
0 coins
Benjamin Kim
Bottom line - the 2024 UCC forms require perfect debtor name accuracy. No room for approximations anymore. Either invest in better verification processes or expect more rejections. The filing offices aren't going to get more lenient.
0 coins
Ella Lewis
•Exactly what I needed to hear. Time to upgrade our QC process.
0 coins
Samantha Howard
•Harsh but true. The days of sloppy UCC filings are over.
0 coins
Megan D'Acosta
•At least the rejection notices are clearer now. Used to be a guessing game figuring out what went wrong.
0 coins