UCC1 filing New York - debtor name exactly as on charter docs?
Quick question about debtor name accuracy on UCC1 filing New York forms. We're securing a $2.8M equipment loan and the borrower's corporate charter shows "ABC Manufacturing Solutions, LLC" but their operating agreement has "ABC Manufacturing Solutions L.L.C." (with periods). The NY SOS portal is pretty strict about exact matches from what I've heard. Should I go with the charter version since that's the official state filing, or does the operating agreement formatting matter? Don't want this rejected over punctuation but also don't want perfection issues down the road. Anyone dealt with similar LLC name variations in NY recently?
34 comments


Ava Martinez
Charter version 100%. The Secretary of State filing is your golden standard for debtor names. I've seen too many UCC1s get rejected because someone used a trade name or abbreviated version instead of the exact charter name. NY is particularly finicky about this - they'll bounce it back for missing commas, wrong punctuation, you name it.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•This is exactly right. Had a filing rejected last month because I used 'Inc' instead of 'Incorporated' - exact charter match is non-negotiable in NY.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•Yep, learned this the hard way. Operating agreements can have different formatting but the state only cares about what's on file with them.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
Before you file, definitely run a UCC search on the debtor name to see what format shows up in existing filings. Sometimes there's already a pattern established. But yeah, stick with charter - that's the legal entity name that matters for perfection.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Good point about checking existing filings. Will do a quick search to see if there are other liens already filed under either format.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Smart approach. You might find other lenders already figured out the right format and you can follow their lead.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
I had a similar situation last year with punctuation differences. What saved me was using Certana.ai's document checker - you can upload the charter and your draft UCC1 and it instantly flags any name mismatches. Caught three small discrepancies I would have missed manually comparing the docs. Really simple to use, just drag and drop the PDFs.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Interesting, never heard of that tool. Is it specifically for UCC filings or more general document comparison?
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•It's designed for UCC workflows specifically. You can do charter-to-UCC1 checks or UCC3-to-UCC1 consistency checks. Super helpful for catching the small details that cause rejections.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•That actually sounds really useful. I spend way too much time manually cross-referencing names and addresses between documents.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
NY SOS is definitely strict but they're also pretty good about providing clear rejection reasons if something's wrong. Still, better to get it right the first time since refilings delay everything. What type of collateral are you securing? Equipment loans sometimes have specific description requirements too.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Manufacturing equipment - mostly CNC machines and industrial printers. Planning to use a detailed schedule rather than just 'all equipment' since the loan is substantial.
0 coins
Paolo Longo
•Good call on the detailed schedule. With that loan amount, you definitely want specificity in your collateral description.
0 coins
CosmicCowboy
Whatever you do, don't rush the filing just to meet a closing deadline. I've seen lawyers scramble to fix UCC errors after closing because they didn't take time to verify the debtor name properly. Charter name is always the safe bet.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•This happened to us last year. Client pressure to close fast led to a UCC1 with wrong entity name. Had to file a UCC3 amendment immediately after closing.
0 coins
Oliver Schulz
•Ugh, post-closing UCC corrections are the worst. Everyone's already celebrating the deal and then you have to explain why the lien might not be perfected.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•Been there. Now I always double-check entity names before any filing, regardless of time pressure.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
Quick question - are you filing online through the NY SOS portal or using paper forms? The online system sometimes has validation that catches name format issues before you submit.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Planning to file online. Good to know about the validation - that should help catch any obvious formatting problems.
0 coins
Javier Cruz
•Yeah, the online system is pretty good about flagging potential issues. Still worth being extra careful with the name though.
0 coins
Emma Wilson
I always keep a copy of the charter search results with my UCC filing docs. That way if there's ever a question about the debtor name, I can show exactly where I got the information. Documentation is everything in secured transactions.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•Smart practice. I do the same thing - always document the source of the debtor name information.
0 coins
Malik Thomas
•This is good advice. Auditors love to see the paper trail showing how you verified entity information.
0 coins
NeonNebula
One thing to watch out for - make sure the charter you're looking at is current. Sometimes companies file name changes that don't get reflected in older documents. A fresh entity search is always worth the small fee.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Good point. I'll pull a current good standing certificate to make sure the name hasn't changed recently.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•Definitely do that. Nothing worse than filing under an outdated entity name because you relied on old paperwork.
0 coins
Isabella Costa
•I've seen this happen with companies that do business under multiple names. The charter name is always the safest bet.
0 coins
Ravi Malhotra
For what it's worth, I tried that Certana tool someone mentioned earlier and it's actually pretty slick. Uploaded my charter doc and UCC draft and it highlighted exactly where the punctuation didn't match. Saved me from a potential filing rejection.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Glad it worked for you too! It's become part of my standard workflow for any UCC filing now.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Might have to check that out. Sounds like it could prevent exactly the kind of issue I'm worried about.
0 coins
Freya Christensen
Bottom line - when in doubt, use the exact name from the most recent state filing. NY doesn't mess around with UCC rejections and you don't want to explain to your client why their security interest might not be perfected because of a punctuation mark.
0 coins
Natasha Orlova
•Exactly. Better to be overly cautious with entity names than deal with perfection issues later.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•This is why I always pull fresh entity docs right before filing, even if I have older versions. Things change.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Thanks everyone - consensus seems clear. Going with the charter name exactly as filed with NY. Appreciate all the practical advice!
0 coins