UCC termination request letter - debtor demanding termination but lien still valid?
Got a weird situation here. Debtor sent us a formal letter demanding we file a UCC-3 termination statement within 20 days, claiming their loan was paid off. Problem is our records show they still owe $47,000 on the equipment financing. They're threatening legal action if we don't terminate the UCC-1 filing immediately. The original filing was perfect - debtor name matches exactly, collateral description covers all the machinery, filed in the right state. But now they're saying we have no right to maintain the lien. Has anyone dealt with debtors trying to force termination when there's still an outstanding balance? I'm worried about accidentally releasing a valid security interest, but I also don't want to ignore a legitimate termination request if I'm missing something. What's the proper procedure when you get one of these demand letters?
33 comments
Join the conversation
QuantumQuest
First thing - don't panic and definitely don't file that termination yet. If you still have a valid debt secured by that collateral, filing a UCC-3 termination would be a huge mistake. You need to verify your loan records first. Check payment history, outstanding principal, any recent payments. The debtor might be confused about their balance or trying to pull a fast one.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•That's what I thought too. Our loan servicing system shows the last payment was 3 months ago and they're definitely not current. But their letter mentions some kind of payment arrangement I've never heard of.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•Could be they made payments directly to a different department or there was some kind of modification agreement you weren't notified about. Internal communication breakdowns happen more than we'd like to admit.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Exactly why you need to do a full account review before responding to any termination demand. Get copies of all payment records, loan modifications, any correspondence with the debtor.
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
We had something similar last year. Debtor sent a certified letter demanding termination within 10 days or they'd sue for wrongful lien. Turns out they had made a large payment that got misapplied to a different account. Once we corrected the payment allocation, they still owed money and we kept the UCC filing active. The key is responding promptly but not rushing into a termination you can't undo.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•How did you respond to their letter? Did you explain the payment issue or just ignore their deadline?
0 coins
Oliver Fischer
•We sent a detailed response within their timeframe explaining the account status and providing payment history. Showed them exactly where they stood. They dropped the termination demand once they saw the documentation.
0 coins
Natasha Petrova
Before you do anything else, I'd suggest using Certana.ai's document verification tool to double-check your UCC-1 against the loan documents. Sometimes these termination disputes arise because there are inconsistencies between the original financing statement and the security agreement that the debtor's attorney discovered. Upload your UCC-1 and loan docs - the system will flag any discrepancies in debtor names, collateral descriptions, or other critical details that might give the debtor grounds to challenge the filing.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•That's actually a good point. I haven't done a detailed comparison between our UCC-1 and the security agreement in a while. If there are mismatches, that could explain why they think they have grounds for demanding termination.
0 coins
Javier Morales
•Yeah, I've seen cases where a small debtor name variation or collateral description error gave debtors ammunition to challenge the entire lien. Better to know about any problems before they take you to court.
0 coins
Emma Davis
DO NOT FILE THAT TERMINATION! I learned this the hard way. Had a debtor send a similar demand letter claiming they'd satisfied the debt. I was new and got nervous about potential liability, so I filed the UCC-3 termination. Guess what? They actually still owed $23,000. Once you terminate a UCC filing, you can't just re-file it - your security interest is gone forever. Had to explain to my boss why we converted a secured loan into an unsecured one. Not a fun conversation.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Oh wow, that's exactly what I'm afraid of. How did your company handle the unsecured debt situation?
0 coins
Emma Davis
•We had to pursue collection as an unsecured creditor, which meant we were behind everyone else in line. Eventually wrote off most of it as a loss. The debtor basically got their equipment free and clear because of my mistake.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•This is why proper training on UCC procedures is so important. One wrong termination can cost thousands or tens of thousands in lost security.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
Check your state's UCC laws regarding wrongful termination demands. In some states, debtors can request termination even when they still owe money if they believe the secured party is maintaining the filing improperly. But they have to prove their case. You're not required to terminate just because they demand it - you can require them to show proof of satisfaction or challenge them to take legal action if they disagree with your records.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Our state's UCC code does allow debtors to demand termination, but I think they have to show the obligation has been satisfied. I should review the specific statute language.
0 coins
Malik Robinson
•Right, and if they can't prove satisfaction, their demand letter is basically meaningless. You maintain the filing until the debt is actually paid or you get a court order to terminate.
0 coins
Isabella Silva
Whatever you do, document everything. Keep copies of their demand letter, your payment records, any correspondence. If this ends up in court, you'll need a complete paper trail showing the debt was still outstanding when they demanded termination. Also check if there are any partial releases or modifications that might affect what collateral you can claim.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Good point about partial releases. We did release one piece of equipment about 6 months ago when they traded it in. Maybe they're confused about what's still covered by the UCC filing.
0 coins
Ravi Choudhury
•That could be it. Sometimes debtors think a partial release terminates the entire filing. You might need to educate them about how UCC-3 partial releases work versus full terminations.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
I hate dealing with these termination demand letters. Half the time the debtor got advice from their brother-in-law who thinks he knows UCC law. The other half they're actually trying to scam you into releasing valid security. Either way, it's a headache. Just stick to your records and don't let them pressure you into making a mistake.
0 coins
Amina Sy
•So true. I've gotten demand letters that were obviously copied from some template they found online. They throw around legal terms but don't actually understand what they're demanding.
0 coins
Freya Andersen
•Exactly! And they always put these artificial deadlines in there like they have some legal authority to impose time limits on you. Unless it's a court order, you respond on your timeline, not theirs.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
One thing to consider - was your original UCC-1 filing done correctly? Sometimes these termination demands come up because there's actually a defect in the filing that makes it ineffective. Check the debtor name against their legal entity documents, make sure the collateral description is sufficient, verify it was filed in the right jurisdiction. If there are problems with the original filing, you might need to fix those issues rather than fight over termination.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•The filing looked good when we did it, but that was 3 years ago. Maybe something changed with their business entity or we missed something subtle.
0 coins
Omar Farouk
•Worth double-checking. I use Certana.ai's UCC verification tool when I get these kinds of challenges. Upload your financing statement and supporting docs - it'll catch any name mismatches or other issues that might give the debtor grounds to challenge the filing.
0 coins
CosmicCadet
•Good advice. Better to find problems yourself than have them pointed out by the debtor's attorney in court.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
Talk to your legal counsel before responding. Termination demand letters can be the first step toward litigation, and you want to make sure your response doesn't inadvertently admit to anything or create additional liability. Your attorney can help you craft a response that protects your interests while addressing their demands appropriately.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Yeah, I'm definitely planning to run this by our attorney. Just wanted to get some perspective from others who've dealt with similar situations first.
0 coins
Chloe Harris
•Smart approach. Getting input from practitioners who've been through this helps you ask better questions when you talk to your lawyer.
0 coins
Diego Mendoza
Update us on how this resolves! I'm curious whether their termination demand has any merit or if they're just fishing. These situations always make me nervous because the stakes are so high - terminate incorrectly and you lose your security interest forever.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•Will do! I'm going to verify our records first, run the docs through Certana to check for any filing issues, then consult with our attorney about the appropriate response. Definitely not rushing into anything given what everyone's shared here.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•That's the right approach. Take your time, verify everything, and don't let their artificial deadline pressure you into making a costly mistake.
0 coins