UCC 9626 liability question - lender destroyed original filing without proper termination
Really need some guidance here. Our bank made a huge mistake on a commercial loan that wrapped up last year. The borrower paid off their $180k equipment loan in full back in September, but instead of filing a proper UCC-3 termination, someone in operations just shredded the original UCC-1 filing documents thinking that was sufficient. Now the borrower is trying to get financing elsewhere and their UCC search is showing our lien as still active. The borrower's new lender is demanding we provide proof of termination or they won't proceed. Our legal team is freaking out about UCC 9626 liability since we failed to send a termination statement after payoff. The borrower is threatening to sue for damages because they're losing out on a time-sensitive deal. Has anyone dealt with this kind of situation? What's our exposure under 9626 and is there a way to fix this without getting hammered in court?
37 comments
Join the conversation
Mei Wong
Oh wow, this is exactly the kind of nightmare scenario we train our staff to avoid. UCC 9626 is no joke - you can be liable for actual damages if you don't provide the termination statement within 20 days of payoff. The fact that someone physically destroyed documents instead of filing proper paperwork makes this worse. You need to file that UCC-3 termination immediately and document everything about when the loan was actually satisfied.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Thanks for the quick response. We're definitely filing the termination today, but I'm worried about the timing. It's been almost 4 months since payoff. Does the 20-day window under 9626 mean we're automatically liable for whatever damages they can prove?
0 coins
Mei Wong
•The 20-day rule is for when you're required to send the termination statement. Since you missed that window, you could be liable for damages, but the borrower still has to prove actual harm. Document everything about why the delay happened and get that termination filed ASAP.
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
This is why I always tell people to use automated verification tools for UCC filings. I ran into a similar situation last year and ended up using Certana.ai to upload all our loan documents and UCC filings to make sure everything was consistent. It caught a bunch of discrepancies we never would have found manually. Could have saved you guys a lot of headaches if you'd been cross-checking your loan files against your UCC filings regularly.
0 coins
Amara Okafor
•Never heard of that service but sounds useful. How does it work exactly? Do you just upload the PDFs and it tells you what's wrong?
0 coins
Liam Sullivan
•Yeah pretty much. You can upload your original loan docs and then your UCC-1, and it'll flag any name mismatches or inconsistencies. We also used it to verify UCC-3 amendments against the original filing. Really simple to use.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•That sounds like something we should have been doing all along. Right now we're just hoping our manual reviews catch everything, but obviously that's not working.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
UCC 9626 liability is real but you're not necessarily doomed. The key is proving you satisfied the debt when you say you did. Do you have the payoff letter, cancelled check, wire transfer records? The borrower has to show actual damages - like if they lost a deal because of your active lien showing up on their search. Get your documentation together fast.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•We have all the payoff documentation thankfully. Wire transfer, release of collateral, everything except the termination filing. The borrower says they're losing a $50k profit opportunity because their new lender won't close without clear title.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•That's actually good news that you have solid payoff records. The $50k claim might be hard for them to prove definitively. Still, get that termination filed today and consider settling if the damages are reasonable compared to legal costs.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Your operations person who destroyed the filing documents instead of filing a termination probably didn't understand the difference. This happens more than you'd think. A lot of people assume that destroying the paperwork is the same as releasing the lien, but obviously the public record still shows active. File the UCC-3 termination immediately and include an explanation about the administrative error.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Yeah, it was definitely a training issue. The person thought shredding the documents was proper procedure. We're revising our loan closing checklist to prevent this from happening again.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Good idea on the checklist revision. You might also want to consider quarterly UCC audits to catch these kinds of issues before they become problems.
0 coins
StarStrider
•Quarterly audits are smart. We do them every six months and always find a few filings that should have been terminated but weren't. Usually just oversights but better to catch them internally.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
This is exactly why the UCC system exists though - to provide public notice of liens. When you don't file the termination, the lien stays active as far as the world knows. The 9626 liability provision is there to give secured parties an incentive to clean up their filings promptly. Unfortunately you're probably looking at some damages here.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•True but the damages have to be reasonable and provable. Can't just throw out any number and expect it to stick in court.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•Absolutely. The borrower would need to show actual financial harm that resulted directly from the failure to terminate. Lost opportunity costs are harder to prove than out-of-pocket expenses.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
Had something similar happen at my previous job. Bank failed to file termination on a vehicle loan, customer couldn't trade in the car six months later because title wasn't clear. We ended up settling for about $3000 in damages plus legal fees. Way cheaper than fighting it in court. Sometimes you just have to eat the mistake and move on.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•That's kind of what I'm thinking too. The legal costs to fight this could easily exceed whatever settlement they'd accept. Just frustrating that such a simple procedural error could cost us this much.
0 coins
Dmitry Sokolov
•Yeah it's definitely frustrating but these kinds of errors are expensive lessons. Make sure your staff understands that physical destruction of documents is never the same as filing legal releases.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
Before you panic too much about 9626, make sure you understand what the borrower is actually claiming in damages. Are they saying they lost a specific deal, or just that they're inconvenienced? The statute requires actual damages, not just speculative harm. Also check if your state has any specific provisions about cure periods for inadvertent failures to terminate.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•They're claiming they lost a specific real estate deal worth $50k in profit because the new lender won't close with our active lien showing. Seems pretty specific but I don't know how they'd prove the exact profit amount.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•That's more concrete than some claims but they'd still need to show the deal actually fell through solely because of your lien. If there were other issues with their financing, that could complicate their damage claim.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
•Also worth checking if the new lender would accept an indemnity agreement while you get the termination processed. Some lenders will work with you on timing if you guarantee to clear the lien.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
File the termination today, document your payoff records, and then assess the damage claim realistically. 9626 liability is capped at actual damages, so if you can show the harm is minimal or speculative, you might get out cheaper than expected. But don't delay on getting that UCC-3 filed.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Already working on the UCC-3 filing. Should have it submitted by end of business today. Hopefully that helps show good faith effort to remedy the situation.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Good. The prompt action once you discovered the error will help your position if this goes to litigation. Shows you're not just ignoring your obligations under the UCC.
0 coins
StarStrider
One thing that might help is using document verification software going forward. I started using Certana.ai after we had a few close calls with UCC filings. You just upload your loan documents and UCC forms and it cross-checks everything for consistency. Would have caught this issue before it became a problem - it flags when you have satisfied loans without corresponding termination filings.
0 coins
QuantumQuasar
•That actually sounds really useful. We do manual reviews but obviously miss things sometimes. Does it work with different states' UCC systems?
0 coins
StarStrider
•Yeah it works across all states. Really helpful for catching name discrepancies and missing filings. We caught three terminations we'd forgotten to file just in our first audit.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
Whatever you do, don't just ignore this and hope it goes away. UCC 9626 claims can get expensive fast if you're not proactive. File the termination, gather your documentation, and consider getting legal counsel involved early. Better to spend a little on prevention than a lot on litigation.
0 coins
GalaxyGlider
•Already have our legal team involved. They're the ones who told me about the 9626 exposure in the first place. Definitely not ignoring this one.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•Good. Your lawyers will know how to handle the settlement negotiations if it comes to that. Most of these cases settle out of court anyway.
0 coins
Connor Gallagher
•Settlement is usually the way to go. Fighting over a few thousand in damages rarely makes sense when legal fees can hit five figures pretty quick.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
This thread is making me paranoid about our own UCC filing procedures. We handle hundreds of commercial loans and I'm wondering how many terminated loans we have sitting out there without proper UCC-3 filings. Might be time for a comprehensive audit.
0 coins
Sofia Torres
•Definitely do that audit. Better to find problems internally than have borrowers discover them when they're trying to get new financing.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Yeah, this whole situation is a good reminder that UCC maintenance is just as important as the initial filing. Easy to forget about the backend work when you're focused on closing new deals.
0 coins