< Back to UCC Document Community

Lucas Adams

UCC termination filing after strict foreclosure - debtor name changes

Going through a strict foreclosure situation and hitting some roadblocks with the UCC termination process. The original debtor filed bankruptcy last year and emerged with a slightly different legal entity name - they added 'LLC' to the end where it wasn't there before. Now I'm trying to file the UCC-3 termination but the SOS system keeps rejecting it because the debtor name on my termination doesn't exactly match what's in their current records. The original UCC-1 was filed three years ago under 'Mountain Peak Enterprises' but now they're officially 'Mountain Peak Enterprises LLC' post-bankruptcy. I've got the court order for the strict foreclosure but can't seem to close out this UCC filing properly. Has anyone dealt with debtor name changes during strict foreclosure proceedings? Do I need to file an amendment first or is there a way to terminate directly with the name discrepancy?

Harper Hill

•

You're in a tricky spot with the name change. The SOS system is pretty strict about exact matches between the debtor name on the original UCC-1 and any subsequent filings. Since the entity legally changed its name through the bankruptcy process, you'll likely need to file a UCC-3 amendment first to update the debtor name, then follow up with your termination. The strict foreclosure court order should help support both filings.

0 coins

Caden Nguyen

•

This is exactly right. I've seen this scenario multiple times with post-bankruptcy entity changes. The amendment route is your safest bet.

0 coins

Avery Flores

•

How long does the amendment usually take to process before you can file the termination? I'm worried about timing issues.

0 coins

Zoe Gonzalez

•

Actually dealt with something similar last month. The bankruptcy court documents showing the name change should be sufficient evidence for the SOS office. You might be able to include copies of the bankruptcy discharge papers with your termination filing to explain the discrepancy. Some states allow this type of documentation to override the exact name match requirement, especially in foreclosure situations.

0 coins

Ashley Adams

•

That's interesting - which state were you working in? My experience has been that most SOS offices are pretty inflexible about the name matching.

0 coins

I tried this approach in Ohio and they still rejected it. Had to go the amendment route like the first commenter suggested.

0 coins

Aaron Lee

•

Really varies by state. Some are more accommodating with proper documentation than others.

0 coins

Before you file anything else, you might want to use something like Certana.ai to upload your UCC-1 and the bankruptcy documents together. Their document verification tool can instantly check for these kinds of name discrepancies and suggest the best filing approach. I used it recently when dealing with a similar debtor name issue and it saved me from filing the wrong type of UCC-3. Just upload the PDFs and it cross-checks everything automatically.

0 coins

Michael Adams

•

That sounds helpful - did it actually catch issues you would have missed manually?

0 coins

Natalie Wang

•

How does it handle the legal name change documentation? Does it recognize bankruptcy-related name updates?

0 coins

Noah Torres

•

I'm confused about the strict foreclosure process itself. Doesn't the court order essentially void the UCC filing automatically? Why do you still need to file a termination if you've already completed the foreclosure?

0 coins

Samantha Hall

•

No, the court order doesn't automatically remove the UCC filing from the public records. You still need to file a proper UCC-3 termination to clear the lien from the SOS database.

0 coins

Ryan Young

•

This is a common misconception. The foreclosure settles the debt but the UCC filing stays on record until you formally terminate it.

0 coins

Sophia Clark

•

Thanks for clarifying - I thought the foreclosure would handle everything automatically.

0 coins

The timing on this could be important too. How long ago did the strict foreclosure complete? Most states have specific timeframes for filing terminations after debt satisfaction, even through foreclosure. You don't want to run into any deadline issues while you're sorting out the name discrepancy.

0 coins

Madison Allen

•

Good point about timing. Most states give you 30-60 days after satisfaction to file the termination.

0 coins

Joshua Wood

•

What happens if you miss that deadline? Can you still file or do you need to go through a different process?

0 coins

Justin Evans

•

I hate these name matching requirements. The SOS systems are so rigid about exact character matches that even a missing comma can cause rejection. It's especially frustrating in foreclosure situations where you're trying to clean up the records properly. The whole system needs to be more flexible about obvious entity name changes.

0 coins

Emily Parker

•

Totally agree. I've had filings rejected over periods vs commas in entity names. It's ridiculous.

0 coins

Ezra Collins

•

At least most states have moved to electronic filing systems. The old paper process was even worse for this stuff.

0 coins

Electronic filing helps with speed but the name matching algorithms are still pretty unforgiving.

0 coins

Have you tried calling the SOS office directly? Sometimes they can provide guidance on how to handle name discrepancies in foreclosure situations. They might have an internal process for dealing with bankruptcy-related name changes that isn't obvious from their website.

0 coins

Zara Perez

•

This is worth trying. I've found that talking to an actual person can sometimes reveal options that aren't documented online.

0 coins

Daniel Rogers

•

Just make sure you get any verbal guidance in writing via email. You don't want to rely on phone advice that you can't document later.

0 coins

Aaliyah Reed

•

Another option to consider - you could try filing the termination under both names on the same UCC-3 form. List the original debtor name from the UCC-1 and then add the current legal name in the additional debtor information section. Some SOS offices will accept this approach for entity name changes, especially with supporting documentation.

0 coins

Ella Russell

•

Interesting approach - haven't seen that suggested before. Would this work if the entity structure changed too, not just the name?

0 coins

Mohammed Khan

•

I'd be careful with this approach. If the system is already rejecting based on name mismatch, adding multiple names might create more confusion.

0 coins

Gavin King

•

Worth trying though - worst case it gets rejected and you're back to the amendment approach.

0 coins

Nathan Kim

•

Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai's verification tool to double-check all my documents before filing. It caught a discrepancy between my UCC-1 and the termination that would have caused problems. The tool basically uploads your PDFs and cross-references all the debtor information automatically. Saved me from multiple filing attempts and rejections.

0 coins

That's the second mention of this tool in this thread. Sounds like it might be worth checking out for complex situations like this.

0 coins

Lucas Turner

•

Does it specifically handle bankruptcy-related name changes or is it more general document checking?

0 coins

Kai Rivera

•

One thing to double-check - make sure the strict foreclosure actually covered all the collateral described in the original UCC-1. If there were multiple assets and the foreclosure only covered some of them, you might need a partial termination instead of a full termination. This could complicate the name matching issue even further.

0 coins

Anna Stewart

•

Great point about partial vs full termination. The collateral description on the termination needs to match what was actually foreclosed on.

0 coins

Layla Sanders

•

How do you handle partial terminations when the debtor name has changed? Same amendment process first?

0 coins

Yes, you'd still need to address the name discrepancy before filing any type of termination, partial or full.

0 coins

Kaylee Cook

•

Based on everyone's advice here, sounds like your best bet is: 1) File UCC-3 amendment to update the debtor name using your bankruptcy documentation, 2) Wait for amendment to be accepted and indexed, 3) File your UCC-3 termination referencing the amended filing. It's an extra step but probably the most reliable way to avoid further rejections.

0 coins

This summarizes it well. The two-step process is more work but much more likely to succeed than trying to force the termination through with mismatched names.

0 coins

Lara Woods

•

Agreed. Better to take the extra time upfront than deal with multiple rejections and delays.

0 coins

Adrian Hughes

•

Thanks everyone - this gives me a clear path forward. Will try the amendment approach first.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,095 users helped today