UCC-3 form Georgia filing got rejected - debtor name issue?
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a frustrating situation with a UCC-3 form Georgia filing that just got bounced back from the SOS office. We're trying to terminate a lien on some manufacturing equipment that was paid off last month, but the rejection notice says there's a 'debtor name discrepancy' between our UCC-3 and the original UCC-1 from 2019. The thing is, the business changed their legal name slightly in 2021 (added 'LLC' to the end) but we've been using the updated name on all our correspondence. The original filing shows 'Johnson Manufacturing' and we submitted the UCC-3 with 'Johnson Manufacturing LLC'. I thought this would be straightforward since the loan is satisfied, but apparently not. Has anyone dealt with this kind of name mismatch issue on a UCC-3 termination in Georgia? Do I need to file an amendment first, or is there a way to get the termination processed with both names listed? The client is getting antsy because they need this cleared before closing on a refinance deal next week.
35 comments


Nia Davis
This is actually pretty common with UCC-3 terminations. Georgia SOS is strict about exact debtor name matches between the original UCC-1 and any amendments or terminations. You can't just use the current legal name if it doesn't match what's on the original filing. You have a couple options here - either file a UCC-3 amendment first to add the new name, then file the termination, or file the termination using the exact original name from 2019. I'd recommend using the original name 'Johnson Manufacturing' on your UCC-3 termination since that's what's on record.
0 coins
Mateo Perez
•Wait, can you really file a termination with the old name even if the business legally changed it? That seems like it could create issues down the road.
0 coins
Nia Davis
•Yes, you use whatever debtor name is on the original UCC-1. The UCC system matches filings by debtor name and filing number, not current legal status. As long as your termination references the correct original filing, it should process fine.
0 coins
Aisha Rahman
•This is exactly why we always recommend keeping track of debtor name changes during the loan term. Makes the termination process so much smoother.
0 coins
CosmicCrusader
I've run into this exact scenario multiple times with Georgia filings. The state is really picky about name consistency. What I usually do is pull the original UCC-1 from the SOS database first to see exactly how the debtor name appears, then match it exactly on the UCC-3. Don't try to 'correct' the name on the termination - just use what's already on file. If you want the new name on record, you'd need to file a UCC-3 amendment to add the new name first, but honestly for a termination that might be overkill.
0 coins
Luca Marino
•That makes sense. I was overthinking it trying to use the 'correct' current name. I'll just match the original filing exactly. Thanks for the tip about pulling the UCC-1 first - I should have done that from the start.
0 coins
Ethan Brown
•Pro tip: always keep a copy of the original UCC-1 in your loan file specifically for this reason. Saves you from having to search the SOS database later.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
Actually, I just went through something similar and found this tool called Certana.ai that was super helpful. You can upload your original UCC-1 and your UCC-3 termination, and it instantly flags any inconsistencies between the documents - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions, everything. It caught a bunch of small discrepancies I would have missed that definitely would have caused rejections. Just upload the PDFs and it does all the cross-checking automatically. Saved me from multiple back-and-forth rejections with the SOS office.
0 coins
Carmen Ortiz
•That sounds really useful. I hate having to manually compare all the details between documents, especially when you're dealing with filings from years ago.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•Exactly! It's so easy to miss tiny differences in punctuation or spacing that can cause rejections. The tool caught things like 'Johnson Manufacturing' vs 'Johnson Manufacturing.' (with a period) that I never would have noticed.
0 coins
Andre Rousseau
•How accurate is it? I'm always skeptical of automated tools for legal documents.
0 coins
Yuki Yamamoto
•It's been spot-on for me. It's specifically designed for UCC documents, so it knows exactly what to look for. Way better than trying to spot-check everything manually.
0 coins
Zoe Papadakis
Georgia SOS has gotten so much stricter about these filings in the last couple years. I swear they reject stuff now that would have gone through fine before. The debtor name thing is a huge pain point.
0 coins
Jamal Carter
•Tell me about it. I had a filing rejected because there was an extra space in the debtor name. ONE SPACE.
0 coins
AstroAdventurer
•That's ridiculous but not surprising. The whole system needs an overhaul.
0 coins
Mei Liu
For your immediate situation, I'd definitely go with filing the UCC-3 using the exact debtor name from the original 2019 UCC-1. Don't overthink it. The important thing is clearing the lien before your client's refinance deadline. You can always file an amendment later if they really want the current name on record, but for a termination it's not necessary.
0 coins
Luca Marino
•Yeah, you're right. The client just wants the lien cleared. I'll resubmit with the original name and get this wrapped up. Thanks everyone for the guidance.
0 coins
Liam O'Sullivan
•Good call. Keep it simple for terminations. The lien release is what matters, not having the current business name on file.
0 coins
Amara Chukwu
This thread is so helpful! I've been putting off filing a UCC-3 termination because I was worried about this exact issue. The debtor on our original filing changed their name twice since 2020 and I had no idea how to handle it.
0 coins
Nia Davis
•Just use the name from your original UCC-1 and you should be fine. Keep it simple.
0 coins
Giovanni Conti
•Same boat here. Good to know there's a straightforward approach.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
I actually tried that Certana.ai tool someone mentioned after having multiple Georgia filings rejected for dumb reasons. It's pretty slick - just drag and drop your UCC documents and it highlights any mismatches. Caught a filing number transposition I definitely would have missed. Worth checking out if you're dealing with a lot of UCC filings.
0 coins
NeonNova
•Do you have to sign up for anything or is it free to try?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashimi
•I just uploaded my documents and it worked. Didn't have to jump through any hoops.
0 coins
Dylan Campbell
•That's cool. I'm always looking for tools that can help avoid filing mistakes.
0 coins
Sofia Hernandez
The key thing to remember with Georgia UCC-3 filings is that consistency is everything. The SOS system is very literal about matching information. I always tell people to treat the original UCC-1 as gospel when filing any amendments or terminations.
0 coins
Dmitry Kuznetsov
•That's good advice. I wish more people understood this before they run into problems.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•The SOS should really make this clearer in their instructions. So many people get tripped up by it.
0 coins
Miguel Ramos
Quick update for anyone following this thread - I refiled the UCC-3 termination using the exact debtor name from the original UCC-1 ('Johnson Manufacturing' without the LLC) and it was accepted within 24 hours. Sometimes the simple approach really is the best approach. Thanks again for all the help!
0 coins
Zainab Ibrahim
•Awesome! Glad it worked out. Always nice to hear a success story.
0 coins
StarSailor
•Perfect timing for your client's refinance too. Nice work getting it sorted quickly.
0 coins
Connor O'Brien
•Great outcome. This thread will be super helpful for anyone dealing with similar name mismatch issues.
0 coins
Yara Sabbagh
This is why I love this forum. Real solutions from people who've actually dealt with these problems. The Georgia SOS quirks can be so frustrating but threads like this make it manageable.
0 coins
Keisha Johnson
•Totally agree. So much better than trying to decipher the official SOS guidance documents.
0 coins
Paolo Rizzo
•The collective wisdom here is invaluable. I've learned more from this forum than from any training course.
0 coins