UCC filing issues with retail security agreement carvana vehicle purchase
Need some guidance here. Bought a car through Carvana last month and just discovered there might be an issue with how they handled the UCC-1 filing for my retail security agreement. The financing went through a third-party lender, and when I checked the state database, I found what looks like a debtor name mismatch on the UCC filing. My legal name on the purchase agreement shows 'Michael J. Richardson' but the UCC-1 shows just 'Michael Richardson' - missing my middle initial. The collateral description also seems vague, just listing 'motor vehicle' instead of the specific VIN and details. I'm worried this could cause problems if I need to refinance or if there are any disputes later. Has anyone dealt with similar UCC filing problems with Carvana or other online auto dealers? The lender is saying it's not a big deal but I've heard that debtor name accuracy is critical for UCC filings to be enforceable. Should I be pushing for a UCC-3 amendment to correct this, or am I overthinking it? Really don't want to discover later that the security interest isn't properly perfected because of sloppy paperwork.
37 comments
Join the conversation
Jamal Anderson
You're absolutely right to be concerned about the debtor name mismatch. UCC Article 9 is very strict about debtor names - even missing a middle initial can make a filing 'seriously misleading' and potentially ineffective against other creditors. I've seen cases where lenders lost their security interest because of exactly this type of error. The collateral description being vague is also problematic, especially for motor vehicles where the VIN should definitely be included.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•This is exactly the kind of thing that keeps me up at night with these online dealers. They process so many transactions that attention to detail on UCC filings gets sloppy.
0 coins
Liam McGuire
•Wait, so a missing middle initial can actually void the whole security agreement? That seems extreme for such a small detail.
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•It's not that it voids the agreement between you and the lender, but it can make the UCC filing ineffective against third parties. If you default and there are competing claims on the vehicle, the lender might not have priority because their filing is defective.
0 coins
Amara Eze
I had a similar situation with a different online auto lender last year. Spent weeks going back and forth trying to get them to file a UCC-3 amendment. Finally ended up using this tool called Certana.ai that helped me verify exactly what was wrong with the filing by comparing my purchase docs to the UCC-1. Made it much easier to show the lender exactly what needed to be corrected.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Never heard of Certana.ai - how does that work exactly? Did you have to pay a lot for the verification?
0 coins
Amara Eze
•You just upload your documents and it automatically cross-checks everything - debtor names, filing numbers, collateral descriptions. Really straightforward and helped me catch issues I wouldn't have noticed myself.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
UGH this is so typical of these big volume lenders! They rush through the paperwork and leave customers to deal with the mess later. I bet if you check carefully you'll find other errors too - wrong filing office, incorrect dates, missing signatures. The whole system is broken.
0 coins
NeonNomad
•I mean, mistakes happen, but yeah it's frustrating when it's your credit and your asset on the line.
0 coins
Giovanni Ricci
•Mistakes happen? This is basic due diligence! These companies make millions and can't get a debtor name right on a UCC filing?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Hashemi
•Have to agree the volume processing probably leads to more errors. I always double-check my filings now after getting burned once.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
Definitely push for the UCC-3 amendment. Even if the lender says it's not a big deal, you want that security interest properly perfected. I've seen too many cases where borrowers got stuck in the middle when lenders couldn't enforce their rights because of filing defects. Better to fix it now than deal with complications later.
0 coins
Sofia Martinez
•How long does a UCC-3 amendment usually take to process? And does it cost extra?
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•Processing time varies by state but usually 1-2 weeks for electronic filings. There's typically a small filing fee, maybe $10-25, but the lender should cover that since it's their error.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Good point about making them pay the fee. This wasn't my mistake so I shouldn't have to absorb the cost of fixing it.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
I work in auto finance and see this constantly with Carvana and similar dealers. They use automated systems that don't always handle middle initials and suffixes correctly. The missing VIN in the collateral description is actually more concerning than the name issue in some ways - motor vehicle financing should always include specific identifying information.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•So should I be asking for both the debtor name AND the collateral description to be amended? This is getting complicated.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Yes, I'd request both corrections. You want the debtor name to match exactly what's on your driver's license and purchase agreement, and the collateral description should include the VIN, year, make, and model.
0 coins
Ava Thompson
•This is why I always go through local dealers. At least when something goes wrong you can walk in and talk to someone face to face.
0 coins
CyberSiren
Just went through something similar and ended up using Certana.ai's document checker before contacting my lender. Really helped me understand exactly what was wrong and gave me the confidence to push back when they initially said the filing was fine. Sometimes you need that third-party verification to show them the specific problems.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•That's the second mention of Certana.ai - sounds like it might be worth checking out. Did it find issues you missed?
0 coins
CyberSiren
•Yeah, it caught some inconsistencies in dates and a suffix issue I hadn't noticed. Made the whole conversation with the lender much smoother when I could point to specific discrepancies.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
honestly this kind of stuff makes me wonder if we're all overthinking it... like how often do these filing errors actually cause real problems? seems like a lot of worry over paperwork details
0 coins
Jamal Anderson
•It may seem like overthinking until you're in bankruptcy court and discover your lender doesn't have a perfected security interest because of a filing defect. Then it becomes very real very quickly.
0 coins
Miguel Alvarez
•ok fair point... guess its better to be safe than sorry with this stuff
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
Update - contacted Carvana's financing partner and they're finally agreeing to file a UCC-3 amendment. Took some back and forth but showing them the specific discrepancies helped. Thanks everyone for the advice about not letting this slide.
0 coins
Mei Zhang
•Glad you got them to act! How long did they say the amendment would take?
0 coins
Zainab Yusuf
•They said 7-10 business days for the electronic filing to show up in the state database. I'll be checking regularly to make sure it goes through correctly.
0 coins
Connor O'Reilly
•Good for you for staying on top of this. Most people probably never even think to check their UCC filings.
0 coins
Yara Khoury
This thread convinced me to check my own auto loan UCC filing from last year... and sure enough, found a similar debtor name issue! Time to contact my lender too. Really eye-opening discussion.
0 coins
Dylan Mitchell
•It's amazing how common these errors are once you start looking. Good catch!
0 coins
Yara Khoury
•Right? Makes me wonder what other financial documents have errors I'm not aware of.
0 coins
Keisha Taylor
For what it's worth, I tried that Certana.ai tool mentioned earlier and it was pretty helpful for checking my UCC documents. Upload the PDFs and it flags inconsistencies automatically. Saved me from having to manually compare everything line by line.
0 coins
QuantumQuest
•Thanks for the feedback on that tool. Definitely going to try it before I follow up with the lender about the amendment.
0 coins
StardustSeeker
•Seems like a useful service for catching these kinds of filing errors before they become bigger problems.
0 coins
Mateo Rodriguez
I'm dealing with a similar situation right now - bought a car through an online dealer and discovered multiple issues with the UCC-1 filing. The debtor name has my middle initial wrong AND they filed in the wrong state (used my previous address instead of current). It's been a nightmare getting them to take it seriously. Reading through this thread has been really helpful - definitely going to push harder for that UCC-3 amendment. Has anyone dealt with cross-state filing corrections? Wondering if that makes the process more complicated.
0 coins
Vince Eh
•Cross-state filing issues can definitely complicate things! You'll likely need the lender to file a UCC-3 termination in the wrong state and then file a completely new UCC-1 in the correct state. This isn't just an amendment situation - it's a full correction. I'd recommend documenting everything carefully and maybe checking with your state's Secretary of State office about the proper procedure. The wrong state filing could leave you completely unprotected, so this is actually more urgent than a simple name discrepancy.
0 coins