UCC filing for solar panels - collateral description nightmare
Hey everyone, I'm dealing with a massive headache on a UCC-1 filing for solar panels and need some guidance. We're financing a 250kW commercial solar installation for a manufacturing facility and I'm stuck on the collateral description. The debtor name is straightforward but the collateral schedule is where I'm hitting walls. These panels are being installed on the roof but they're not technically fixtures since they can be removed without damaging the building structure. However, they're also not exactly equipment in the traditional sense. I've seen some filings describe them as 'solar photovoltaic systems' while others go with 'renewable energy equipment' or even 'solar panel arrays and related components.' The SOS website doesn't give specific guidance on solar collateral and I'm worried about being too vague or too specific. The loan amount is substantial ($180k) so getting this wrong could void our security interest. Has anyone dealt with solar panel UCC filings recently? What collateral description language actually works?
37 comments
Join the conversation
Fatima Al-Qasimi
Solar panels are tricky because they straddle the line between equipment and fixtures. For rooftop installations that can be removed without damaging the building, I usually go with 'solar photovoltaic system including but not limited to solar panels, inverters, mounting systems, and related electrical components.' The key is being specific enough to identify the collateral but broad enough to cover all components. Make sure your debtor name matches exactly what's on the business registration too.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•This is helpful but I'm still confused about whether mounting systems count as fixtures. If they're bolted to the roof structure, doesn't that make them fixtures requiring a fixture filing?
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Good point - if the mounting system requires structural modification or can't be removed without damage, you might need both a regular UCC-1 and a fixture filing. It depends on your state's interpretation of fixture law.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
I just went through this exact situation last month! Spent weeks going back and forth with our legal dept on the collateral description. What finally worked was 'solar energy generation system and equipment including solar panels, inverters, racking systems, monitoring equipment and all related components whether characterized as equipment or fixtures.' We filed it as equipment but covered our bases with the fixture language.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•That's a really comprehensive description. Did you have any issues with the filing being accepted? Some states are picky about overly broad collateral descriptions.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•No issues at all. The SOS accepted it without questions. I think the key was being specific about what we were including rather than just saying 'all solar equipment' or something generic.
0 coins
Dmitry Volkov
•Wait, did you end up needing a fixture filing too or just the regular UCC-1? I'm dealing with ground-mount solar and trying to figure out if that's different from rooftop.
0 coins
StarSeeker
Honestly, I've been using Certana.ai for these complex collateral situations and it's been a game-changer. You can upload your loan docs and UCC draft and it cross-checks everything - debtor names, collateral descriptions, even flags potential issues with fixture vs equipment classifications. Caught a debtor name mismatch on my last solar filing that would have caused major problems. Just upload your PDFs and it does the verification automatically.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Never heard of Certana.ai before - is it specifically for UCC filings or general document review?
0 coins
StarSeeker
•It's designed for UCC document verification. Really helpful for catching those little inconsistencies that can kill a filing. Especially useful when you're dealing with complex collateral like solar installations where the description needs to be perfect.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
I'm probably overthinking this but wouldn't you also need to consider the electrical components? Like the inverters are definitely equipment but what about the wiring that connects to the building's electrical system? This stuff keeps me up at night honestly.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•You're not overthinking it. The wiring that becomes part of the building's electrical system could be considered fixtures. That's why broader descriptions that cover 'related electrical components' help capture everything.
0 coins
Ava Martinez
•OK that makes me feel better. I was worried I'd miss something critical and the whole security interest would be worthless.
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
SOLAR PANELS ARE THE WORST FOR UCC FILINGS!!! Every state seems to have different rules and the SOS websites are useless. I've had filings rejected for being too broad and rejected for being too narrow. There's no winning with these government systems.
0 coins
Sofia Ramirez
•I feel your pain but rejection usually comes down to debtor name issues more than collateral descriptions. Have you been checking the exact business name format?
0 coins
Miguel Ortiz
•Yeah the debtor name was perfect. It was literally the collateral description that got rejected as 'insufficient.' Then when I made it more specific they said it was 'overly restrictive.' Makes no sense.
0 coins
Zainab Omar
Just a thought but have you considered whether the solar panels qualify as manufactured goods under the UCC? If they're being installed as part of the building's energy infrastructure rather than standalone equipment, the classification might affect your collateral description approach.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Interesting point about manufactured goods. These are definitely manufactured but they're being installed for permanent use. Does that change the UCC-1 requirements?
0 coins
Zainab Omar
•Not the requirements per se, but it might influence how you describe them. Manufactured goods that become part of real estate might need fixture filing consideration.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
We do a lot of renewable energy financing and I always include serial numbers when possible. For solar installations I go with 'Solar photovoltaic energy system consisting of solar panels (with serial numbers attached as Schedule A), inverters, mounting hardware, electrical components, and monitoring systems.' The serial number schedule helps with identification and enforcement later.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•That's a great approach but what if you have 500+ panels? Listing all those serial numbers seems like overkill.
0 coins
Connor Murphy
•For large installations I just reference the serial number list as an attachment. Something like 'solar panels as identified in attached Schedule A.' Keeps the main filing clean but provides the detail.
0 coins
Yara Sayegh
•Do you actually attach Schedule A to the UCC-1 filing or keep it separate?
0 coins
NebulaNova
Been doing UCC filings for 15 years and solar is definitely one of the more challenging collateral types. The fixture vs equipment question is huge - if they're fixtures and you don't file properly, your security interest might not attach. I always recommend getting a legal opinion on fixture status for anything over $100k.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•At $180k this definitely warrants legal review. Do you have recommendations for attorneys who specialize in solar financing UCCs?
0 coins
NebulaNova
•Most commercial finance attorneys handle solar now but make sure they understand both UCC Article 9 and fixture filing requirements. The intersection is where problems happen.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
Quick question - are these panels going on the roof or ground mounted? Ground mount is usually easier because there's less fixture concern. Roof mount gets complicated with the attachment to real estate.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•These are roof mounted on a commercial building. The mounting system does penetrate the roof structure but the panels themselves could theoretically be removed.
0 coins
Keisha Williams
•Roof penetration definitely pushes toward fixture territory. You might want to consider both a UCC-1 and fixture filing to be safe.
0 coins
Fatima Al-Qasimi
•Agreed on the dual filing approach. Better to over-perfect than under-perfect when the loan amount is significant.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
I actually used Certana.ai on a similar solar deal and it flagged that my collateral description was too narrow. Saved me from a potential problem down the road. It's really handy for these complex equipment descriptions where you need to balance specificity with coverage.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•That's the second mention of Certana.ai - sounds like it might be worth checking out for this filing.
0 coins
Paolo Conti
•Yeah, especially for solar where the collateral description is so critical. Just upload your documents and it does the cross-checking automatically.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
One more consideration - make sure your continuation dates are set correctly. Solar installations often have 20+ year financing terms so you'll need multiple continuations. Plan ahead for the 5-year renewal cycle.
0 coins
Giovanni Colombo
•Good reminder about continuations. This is a 20-year term so we'll definitely need to stay on top of that 5-year cycle.
0 coins
Amina Diallo
•Set calendar reminders for 4.5 years out. UCC-3 continuations need to be filed before the 5-year expiration or you lose your security interest.
0 coins
Dylan Cooper
•Is there any way to file for longer than 5 years initially or are you stuck with the continuation cycle?
0 coins