< Back to UCC Document Community

Liam O'Sullivan

UCC filing complications with brokerage account collateral - need guidance

Running into some confusion with a UCC-1 filing where the collateral includes a brokerage account. The debtor has investment accounts at multiple firms and I'm not sure how specific I need to be in the collateral description. Should I list each individual brokerage account with account numbers, or can I use broader language like 'all investment accounts and securities held by debtor'? Also concerned about whether the UCC filing covers securities that get moved between accounts or if I need to track every transfer. The loan docs reference the brokerage account as collateral but I want to make sure the UCC-1 actually perfects our interest properly. Anyone dealt with similar investment account collateral situations?

Amara Okonkwo

•

Investment accounts can be tricky for UCC filings. Generally you want to be specific enough to identify the collateral but not so specific that you miss something. I usually describe it as 'all securities accounts, investment accounts, and securities held at [Brokerage Firm Name] and any successor or affiliated entities, including but not limited to account ending in [last 4 digits].' This gives you broader coverage while still being descriptive.

0 coins

That's helpful but what about when securities get transferred between different brokerages? Does the UCC lien follow the assets or do you need to file amendments?

0 coins

Amara Okonkwo

•

Good question - the lien should follow the identifiable proceeds, but you might want broader language in your original filing to cover transfers. Something like 'all securities accounts wherever maintained' could help with that coverage issue.

0 coins

I had a similar situation last month and the filing got rejected because my collateral description was too vague. The SOS wanted more specific identification of the brokerage accounts. Ended up having to refile with actual account numbers and brokerage firm names. Pain in the neck but that's what they required.

0 coins

Dylan Hughes

•

Which state was this? Some states are pickier than others about collateral descriptions for investment accounts.

0 coins

This was in Delaware. They seem to want pretty specific descriptions for financial accounts compared to other types of collateral.

0 coins

NightOwl42

•

Delaware can be tough on collateral descriptions. I've seen them reject filings for being too broad on investment accounts specifically.

0 coins

Actually ran into this exact issue a few weeks ago and ended up using Certana.ai's document verification tool. You can upload your security agreement and proposed UCC-1 and it'll flag any inconsistencies between how you described the brokerage account collateral in each document. Saved me from filing with a description that didn't match my loan docs. Really handy for catching those alignment issues before you submit.

0 coins

That sounds useful - did it help with the specific language for describing investment accounts or just the consistency check?

0 coins

Both actually. It flagged that my UCC description was more narrow than what was in the security agreement, so I could fix that before filing. Plus it caught that I had slightly different account numbers between documents.

0 coins

Dmitry Ivanov

•

How accurate is the checking? I've been burned by automated tools before that miss nuances in secured transaction language.

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Be careful with investment account collateral because you might need to consider whether you're dealing with certificated or uncertificated securities. The perfection rules can be different depending on how the securities are held. For securities accounts at brokerages, you usually need the UCC filing plus potentially other steps depending on the jurisdiction.

0 coins

Good point about certificated vs uncertificated. Most brokerage accounts these days are uncertificated though, right?

0 coins

Ava Thompson

•

Yeah most modern brokerage accounts hold uncertificated securities, but you still want to make sure your filing covers both just in case. Better to be over-inclusive in your collateral description.

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

ugh this is exactly why I hate dealing with investment account collateral. Every state seems to have different requirements and the brokerage firms all have their own weird account numbering systems. Last time I did one of these I had to call the SOS office three times to clarify what they wanted in the collateral description.

0 coins

Connor Murphy

•

Tell me about it! And then when you finally get it filed, the debtor changes brokerage firms and you have to figure out if you need to file an amendment or if your original description covers it.

0 coins

Zainab Ali

•

Exactly! That's why I try to use broader language now but then you risk getting rejected for being too vague. It's a no-win situation sometimes.

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

For what it's worth, I always include language about 'proceeds and products' of the securities accounts in my UCC filings. That way if dividends get paid out or securities get sold, you're still covered on the cash proceeds. Also helps with the transfer issue someone mentioned earlier.

0 coins

StarGazer101

•

That's smart. Do you use the standard proceeds language or something more specific for investment accounts?

0 coins

Yara Nassar

•

I usually add 'including all cash, securities, dividends, distributions, and other proceeds of any of the foregoing' after describing the accounts. Covers most scenarios.

0 coins

One thing to watch out for is if the brokerage account has a margin facility or other credit features. You might need to consider how that affects your collateral interest, especially if the brokerage firm has its own security interest in the account assets.

0 coins

Good point - the debtor does have margin capabilities on the account. Should I be concerned about priority issues with the brokerage firm's lien?

0 coins

Potentially yes. You'll want to review the margin agreement to see what security interest the brokerage firm claims. Might need to get a subordination agreement or modify your collateral description.

0 coins

Paolo Romano

•

This is getting complicated. Maybe worth consulting with someone who specializes in securities collateral before filing?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

I've been doing UCC filings for 15 years and investment accounts are definitely one of the trickier collateral types. My advice is to be as specific as possible while still maintaining broad coverage. List the specific brokerage firms and account numbers you know about, but also include catch-all language for future accounts or transfers.

0 coins

What's your experience with continuation filings on investment account collateral? Any special considerations there?

0 coins

Amina Diop

•

Not really different from other collateral types for continuations. Just make sure your continuation references the same collateral description as your original filing. The 5-year timeline is the same regardless of collateral type.

0 coins

Just want to add that I recently started using Certana.ai for these types of complex filings and it's been really helpful. You upload your documents and it checks for consistency issues between your security agreement and UCC filing. Caught several problems with my brokerage account collateral descriptions that could have caused issues later. Worth checking out if you're dealing with complicated collateral situations regularly.

0 coins

Javier Torres

•

How long does the checking process take? I usually need to get these filings done pretty quickly.

0 coins

Pretty fast - usually just a few minutes to upload the PDFs and get the analysis back. Much quicker than manually comparing documents line by line.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

Make sure you also consider whether you need to notify the brokerage firm about your security interest. Some states have notification requirements for certain types of collateral, and it might affect your priority position.

0 coins

QuantumLeap

•

Is that separate from the UCC filing requirement? I thought the UCC-1 was sufficient for perfection on investment accounts.

0 coins

Emma Wilson

•

UCC filing is usually sufficient but there can be additional steps depending on the type of securities and how they're held. Worth double-checking the specific requirements for your situation.

0 coins

Malik Johnson

•

This is why I stick to equipment collateral - much simpler than all these financial account rules!

0 coins

As a newcomer dealing with similar collateral issues, this thread has been incredibly helpful! One follow-up question - when you're describing investment accounts in the UCC-1, do you need to specify the types of securities held (stocks, bonds, ETFs, etc.) or is it sufficient to use general language like "all securities and investment property"? I'm worried about being too specific and missing something, but also don't want to be so broad that it gets rejected. Also wondering if anyone has experience with crypto assets held in these brokerage accounts - do those require special treatment in the collateral description?

0 coins

Ava Hernandez

•

Welcome to the community! For securities types, I typically use broader language like "all securities, investment property, and financial assets" rather than listing specific types. This covers stocks, bonds, ETFs, mutual funds, etc. without risking missing something new the debtor might acquire. Most filing offices accept this general approach for investment accounts. On crypto assets - that's a great question and honestly still evolving. If the brokerage account holds crypto ETFs or crypto-related securities, your general securities language should cover those. But if there are actual cryptocurrency tokens held in custody, you might want to add specific language like "digital assets and cryptocurrency" to be safe. Some practitioners are starting to include crypto-specific language given how common it's becoming. The key is balancing specificity with broad coverage - sounds like you're thinking about it the right way!

0 coins

Great thread - I'm dealing with a similar situation right now. One thing I learned the hard way is to check if your jurisdiction has any specific requirements for securities account collateral. In my state (Texas), they want you to include language about "investment property" specifically, not just "securities accounts." Also found out that some filing offices will reject descriptions that are too generic, while others reject ones that are too specific - it's like threading a needle! I ended up calling the SOS office directly and they gave me examples of collateral descriptions they typically accept for brokerage accounts. Might be worth a quick call to save yourself a rejection and refiling fee. The crypto question from @Carlos Mendoza is interesting too - I've been seeing more loan agreements that specifically mention digital assets lately.

0 coins

UCC Document Community AI

Expert Assistant
Secure

Powered by Claimyr AI

T
I
+
20,087 users helped today