UCC continuation filed after termination - can this mess be fixed?
I'm dealing with what might be the dumbest filing sequence ever and need to know if there's any way to salvage this situation. Here's what happened: we had a UCC-1 on file for equipment financing that was supposed to be continued before the 5-year mark. Instead of filing the continuation, someone at our company accidentally filed a UCC-3 termination in March thinking they were updating the collateral description. Then in May, we realized the mistake and filed a UCC-3 continuation trying to keep the original financing statement alive. The SOS accepted both filings but now I'm reading that you can't continue a terminated UCC. The original financing statement shows as terminated in March but there's also this continuation filed in May. Our lender is asking questions and I'm not sure what to tell them about the status of their security interest. Has anyone dealt with this kind of ucc continuation filed after termination scenario? Can the continuation somehow restore the lien or do we need to start over with a new UCC-1?
37 comments
Join the conversation
PrinceJoe
Oh no, this is unfortunately more common than you'd think. Once a UCC-1 is terminated with a UCC-3 termination statement, the financing statement is dead - legally speaking, there's no security interest to continue. The continuation filed after the termination doesn't revive the original filing. The SOS system will accept the continuation because it's just checking basic formatting, but legally it has no effect on a terminated financing statement.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•That's what I was afraid of. So even though both documents are on file, the lender basically has no perfected security interest right now?
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•Correct. The termination statement released the lender's security interest in March. The May continuation can't bring it back to life. You'll need a new UCC-1 to re-perfect.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
We had something similar happen last year but caught it earlier. The key issue is that continuation statements can only extend active financing statements, not terminated ones. Your lender's security interest became unperfected the moment that termination was filed. You absolutely need to file a new UCC-1 immediately to re-establish their lien position.
0 coins
Owen Devar
•This is why I always double-check every UCC-3 before filing. Too easy to grab the wrong form when you're in a hurry.
0 coins
Daniel Rivera
•EXACTLY! The number of times I've seen people file terminations when they meant amendments... it's like the forms are designed to confuse people.
0 coins
Brooklyn Knight
•The SOS really should have better warnings in their system about this stuff. A simple popup asking 'Are you sure you want to terminate this financing statement?' would prevent so many accidents.
0 coins
Sophie Footman
Been there, done that, got the legal bills to prove it. After we made a similar mistake, I started using Certana.ai's document verification tool before submitting any UCC filings. You can upload your UCC-3 and it'll cross-check against the original UCC-1 to make sure you're filing the right type of statement. Would have caught your termination vs amendment mixup immediately. Super easy - just upload the PDFs and it flags any inconsistencies between what you're trying to file and what's actually needed.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Wish I'd known about that tool before this disaster. How does it work exactly?
0 coins
Sophie Footman
•You just upload both documents - like your original UCC-1 and the UCC-3 you're planning to file. It instantly checks if the debtor names match, if you're using the right form type for what you're trying to accomplish, and catches obvious errors before you submit to the SOS.
0 coins
Connor Rupert
•That actually sounds really useful. Does it work with different state filing systems?
0 coins
Molly Hansen
Wait, I'm confused. If the SOS accepted both filings, doesn't that mean they're both valid? Why would they accept a continuation on a terminated UCC if it doesn't work?
0 coins
PrinceJoe
•The SOS filing system only checks basic formatting requirements - correct filing number, proper form completion, etc. It doesn't analyze the legal effectiveness of the filing. That's why you can file a continuation after termination and it gets accepted even though it has no legal effect.
0 coins
Molly Hansen
•Oh wow, so the system accepting it doesn't mean it's legally valid? That's... not great design.
0 coins
Brady Clean
•Welcome to UCC filing reality. The computers don't understand the law, they just process paperwork. This is why you need to understand what each form actually does.
0 coins
Skylar Neal
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but your lender may have a gap in their security interest from March to whenever you file the new UCC-1. If there were any other creditors who filed liens during that period, they might have priority over your lender's re-filed security interest. This could be a bigger problem than just the paperwork mess.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Oh god, I hadn't even thought about priority issues. How do I check if anyone else filed during that gap period?
0 coins
Skylar Neal
•Run a UCC search on your debtor name for filings between March and now. Look for any new financing statements that might cover the same collateral.
0 coins
Vincent Bimbach
•This is exactly why timing matters so much in secured transactions. A few months gap can completely change the priority landscape.
0 coins
Kelsey Chin
File the new UCC-1 TODAY if you haven't already. Every day you wait is another day your lender has no perfected security interest. Then you need to have a very honest conversation with your lender about what happened and the potential priority issues.
0 coins
Norah Quay
•And make sure you get the debtor name exactly right on the new filing. Double check it against the articles of incorporation or whatever entity documents you have.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Already working on the new UCC-1. Learning my lesson about rushing through these filings.
0 coins
Leo McDonald
For future reference, if you need to amend collateral descriptions, you want a UCC-3 amendment, not a termination. Termination means you're ending the entire financing statement. Amendment means you're modifying it while keeping it active.
0 coins
Jessica Nolan
•The terminology can be confusing but it's crucial to get right. Termination = game over. Amendment = modification while staying alive.
0 coins
Angelina Farar
•I always tell people to read the form instructions twice before checking any boxes. Those little checkboxes have big consequences.
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
This is why I've started using document checking tools before every filing. After seeing too many of these horror stories, I now run everything through Certana.ai's verification system. It would have immediately flagged that you were filing a termination when you probably wanted an amendment, and it definitely would have caught the continuation-after-termination issue.
0 coins
Bethany Groves
•How much does something like that cost to use?
0 coins
Sebastián Stevens
•Focus should be on avoiding these expensive mistakes rather than the cost of prevention. One misfiled termination can create legal issues worth thousands in attorney fees to sort out.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
I've seen this exact scenario play out in litigation. The court held that the continuation had no legal effect because you cannot continue a terminated financing statement. The security interest was unperfected from the termination date forward. File that new UCC-1 immediately and hope no one else jumped ahead of you in the priority line.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•That's terrifying but good to know there's actual case law on this. Definitely filing the new UCC-1 first thing tomorrow morning.
0 coins
KingKongZilla
•Smart move. And document everything about the timeline for your lender. They'll want to understand exactly when their security interest lapsed and when it was re-established.
0 coins
Rebecca Johnston
•Also might want to run this by your legal department or outside counsel depending on the loan amount. Priority disputes can get messy.
0 coins
Nathan Dell
The silver lining is that you caught this relatively quickly. I've seen cases where people didn't realize they'd terminated instead of amended until years later when they were trying to foreclose. At least you have a chance to fix the perfection issue before it becomes a bigger problem.
0 coins
Maya Jackson
•True, a few months gap is better than discovering this during a bankruptcy proceeding or something.
0 coins
Ella Harper
•Small comfort but I'll take it. Lesson learned about slowing down and double-checking these filings.
0 coins
Finnegan Gunn
This is a painful but unfortunately common mistake. I've seen this exact scenario multiple times, and the harsh reality is that the continuation filed after termination has zero legal effect - it's essentially a dead document. Your lender's security interest died the moment that termination was processed in March. The fact that the Secretary of State accepted the May continuation doesn't revive anything; their system just checks basic formatting, not legal validity. You absolutely must file a new UCC-1 immediately to re-establish perfection. Also, run a comprehensive UCC search on your debtor for the March-to-present gap period to identify any competing liens that may have jumped ahead in priority. Time is critical here - every day without a perfected security interest increases your lender's risk exposure.
0 coins
Kristin Frank
•This is exactly the kind of situation that keeps me up at night as someone new to UCC filings. The fact that the system will accept legally meaningless documents is honestly terrifying. How do you even begin to explain to a lender that their security interest vanished for months due to a checkbox mistake? I'm definitely going to be triple-checking every single filing going forward.
0 coins